Introduction

Among eating disorders (ED), resistance to treatment is equivalent to chronicity, that is, it is a permanent aspect of the disease despite having performed different kinds of evidence-based therapies [1].

At present, the criteria for severe and enduring ED (SE-ED) are not sufficiently clearly defined. Current criteria are based on the duration of the disorder, together with unsuccessful previous attempts at conventional treatment. Nowadays, when conventional treatment fails over a period of between 7 and 10 years, the disease is considered to be chronic, and a different therapeutic approach is recommended to increase the chances of successful treatment [2, 3]. Even so, there is no consensus on the number of failed treatment attempts needed before reaching a diagnosis of treatment resistance. There is also no consensus as to whether patients who have not received treatment or those who have received it but have intermediate results should be included in the category of SE-ED [3, 4]. In bulimia nervosa (BN) SE-ED should be considered when there is no response to either evidence-based psychotherapy or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) treatment. Regarding anorexia nervosa (AN), resistance to treatment should be suspected when there is a repeated failure to maintain 85% of the ideal weight after multiple psychotherapeutic and intensive feedback treatment attempts in specialized programs, both on an outpatient basis and in hospitalization [5]. On the other hand, severity is described by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) in terms of body mass index (BMI), although clinical symptoms, functional disability and need for supervision are also included [6].

Currently, the evidence on treatment options for SE-ED is very limited. Although improvement in nutritional status is very important, the main focus should be related to quality of life and social adaptation and to a lesser degree on the significant reduction of ED symptoms. This is because overly demanding treatment goals can promote endurance and with detrimental effects, including increased risk of suicide [1, 2, 7]. Long-term poor nutritional status and disordered eating behavior impair cognitive structure and functions. Because of this, patients with SE-ED may benefit from innovative new treatment options, such as deep brain stimulations designed to change the factors that maintain the disorder [8].

Despite all this, at present there are few studies that evaluate the results of SE-ED treatment, despite the fact that there are studies in which it has been calculated that approximately 20% of patients with AN and 10% of patients with BN suffer a chronification [9,10,11]. Furthermore, in the few studies where the results have been compared in patients with SE-ED vs patients with non SE-ED, a worse prognosis has been reported in patients with SE-ED. Specifically SE-ED patients present a greater number of complications and higher mortality [12].

The objective of our study is to evaluate the characteristics, as well as the treatment outcomes (mental and physical) for the patients treated in our unit with a diagnosis of SE-ED.

Methods

A descriptive observational study was carried out in which patients with a diagnosis of SE-ED and treated in the Endocrinology and Nutrition service of the Virgen del Rocío University Hospital between 2014 and 2019 were included. We operationalized SE-ED as a disorder lasting 7 or more years [2, 3, 7] despite conventional treatment in specialized programs (outpatient, inpatient and day hospital). All patients included gave their consent to participate in this study.

Endocrinology follow-up was performed on an outpatient basis, and patients could be admitted to the hospital during their evolution. During hospitalization, patients were cared for jointly by the Endocrinology Unit and the Mental Health Unit. The criteria for admission to the Endocrinology ward were: failure of outpatient treatment; weight loss greater than 25% compared to the previous one in less than 6 months or 10% in one month; a heart rate < 50 bpm or blood pressure < 90/60 (80/50 in children) and / or associated symptoms; a potassium < 3 mEq/L or Na < 130 mg / dL, and / or changes in the electrocardiogram; the presence of severe hypoproteinemia and-/- or edema in the lower limbs; and/or the presence of persistent hypoglycemia and/or hypertransaminasemia. When the reason for admission is due to a mental illness, patients are admitted to the Mental Health hospital floor with nutritional support from us.

Regarding Mental Health Unit follow-up, it could be performed on an outpatient and/or day patient basis. After hospitalization, all patient treatments were performed on a day patient basis, followed by outpatient treatment if there was evolutionary improvement.

The variables collected are listed in Table 1.

Table 1 List of variables collected

Statistical analysis was carried out using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS®) 25 version for Windows (IBM Corporation, New York, USA). The descriptive analysis was carried out by obtaining the median and the quartiles of the quantitative variables (expressed as P50(P25-P75)) and the frequency for the qualitative variables (expressed as n(%)), both in the total sample and in AN and BN subgroups. For the inferential analysis between the two subgroups, a Chi-square test was performed for qualitative variables and the median test for independent samples for quantitative variables. P-values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Patients’ characteristics

A total of 67 patients were contacted to take part in the study and 67(100%) accepted to be included. 64 (95.5%) were women. Regarding the distribution of ED type, 45 (67.2%) were diagnosed with AN and 22 (32.8%) with BN.

The proportion of patients that underwent each form of treatment (outpatient, day patient and inpatient) in their clinical evolution is represented in Table 2. 39 (58.2%) patients underwent hospitalization, 30(66.7%) in the AN group and 9 (40.9%) in the BN group.

Table 2 Basis treatment performed in patients with severe and enduring eating disorders in an Endocrinology and Nutrition unit during 2014 and 2019

The follow-up in both consultations was higher than 80% if all patients who had some kind of follow-up, whether regular or irregular, are taken into account. The results regarding the median time of follow-up in consultations were 9 (6–14) years in the total sample, 11 (7–14.5) years in the group with AN and 7.5(5.75–13.25) years in the BN group.

Figure 1 shows the median age (years) of the patients at the onset of symptoms, at the beginning of follow-up by the Endocrinology and Nutrition Unit and at present, both in the total sample and in the subgroups of patients with AN and BN. Regarding the total sample, the median ages were 17, 32 and 42.5 years old, respectively.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Median age of patients with chronic eating disorders seen between 2014 and 2019 at the onset of symptoms, at the beginning of follow-up, and at present

Health outcomes

Table 3 shows the results obtained when studying the physical and mental complications that arose throughout the follow-up of the patients, as well as the need for admission to the Endocrinology and Nutrition floor and BMIs obtained. The results are shown both for the total sample and for the subgroups of AN and BN.

Table 3 Minimum and current BMI, as well as percentage of BMI recovered and complications arising during the follow-up of patients with severe and enduring eating disorders in an Endocrinology and Nutrition unit during 2014 and 2019

The minimum BMI was 16.2 (14.6–18.7)kg/m2, with significant differences between patients with AN and BN (15.75 (14–16.4) vs. 19.4 (16.9–22, 8), p = 0.000). The current BMI was 19 (17.1–20.8) kg/m2, with significant differences between the subgroups of AN and BN (17.8 (16.5–19.7) vs. 22.3 (19–25.3), p = 0.04). Despite this, no significant differences were found when comparing the percentage of recovered BMI in both groups (14.6 (7.6–25.2)% vs. 10, 4 (2.5–26.7)%, p = 0.640).

49 patients (73.1%) presented with mental comorbidity, 9(13.4%) presented with a history of attempted autolysis, and 10 (14.9%) presented with abusive consumption of toxic substances. Significant differences were found between both subgroups in terms of the proportion of osteoporosis (48.9% vs. 22.7%, p = 0.04) and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (31.1% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.014). The median number of admissions per person was 1 (0–2) and the median days of each admission was 13.5 (9.7–19.7). 1 (1.5%) patient died during follow-up.

Discussion

Our study is characterized by evaluating the health results obtained in patients with ED, focusing exclusively on those who have become chronic. At present, the published studies in which these patients are referred to are usually studies of years of follow-up in which the predisposing factors for greater chronicity or mortality are evaluated, in some of them comparing results between acute and chronic patients [13,14,15]. This may be due to the lack of established criteria on the definition of chronicity in these disorders, which makes the study of these patients, and therefore the improvement in their care, difficult.

As all patients presenting with SE-ED were included in the study, the data are representative of our population of people presenting with this group of diseases. The data obtained regarding the sex of the patients accords with those recorded in the medical literature, with female:male ratios described as ranging from 6:1 to 10:1 [16]. Regarding the type of eating disorder, in our sample AN prevailed over BN, according to current scientific evidence reported about SE-ED [7].

Regarding these patients’ follow-up, there are no studies evaluating their follow-up rates or abandonment of consultations rates, but given their characteristics we believe that the results obtained are very positive, with more than 80% of follow-up in both consultations, most on a regular basis. On the other hand, when analyzing the follow-up time data, it should also be taken into account that some patients were previously cared for in another centre, either by going to a private centre or because they lived in another healthcare area.

A particularly interesting variable in our study is age. As can be seen, there is a 15-year difference between the median age at the onset of symptoms and the median age at the beginning of follow-up. This seems to condition their chronification, since patients acquire deeply ingrained behaviors for a long time, which makes it difficult to change behaviors with conventional treatments, especially if we take into account that when the follow-up begins, patients present as adults, a circumstance that signals the need for a different approach to that recommended in most studies, which are based on results in adolescent patients [17]. These results also highlight the importance of raising the diagnosis of ED in patients with a typical behaviour of this group of diseases despite not being in adolescence.

The study on complications that arose during follow-up yields several data points to take into account. The first of these is the high proportion of mental comorbidity obtained, close to 75%, a result that is expected given the relationship between ED and personality disorder, mood disorders, obsessive–compulsive disorder and anxiety disorders [18]. There were also high proportions of both a history of suicide behavior disorder and of substance use disorder, both previously described in the scientific literature in relation to the impulsivity that characterizes patients with ED, especially in patients with BN [19]. Furthermore, the consumption of toxins is higher than that estimated in the general population in Spain (5.1%) [20]. On the other hand, among the physical complications, both osteoporosis and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism stand out, both because of their high proportion (40.3% and 22.4% in patients with a median age of 42 years) and because statistically significant differences have been established between the subgroups of AN and BN. This is logical since both are complications related to malnutrition [21] and patients with AN showed significantly lower BMIs than patients with BN. For this same reason, the data obtained regarding Endocrinology admissions makes sense, since such admissions occur when the reason is malnutrition and not decompensation of its mental comorbidity, in which a higher median income was found in the subgroup of AN. Finally, the fact that only one patient has died in this follow-up period is a relatively very positive finding, since a standardized mortality rate of 1.93 has been described in patients with BN and a mortality rate of 4 to 20% in AN, with chronicity being a described risk factor [22].

The limitations of our study are its observational and retrospective nature, the small sample size, and the fact that it was performed in a single centre. The main implications of our study are those mentioned on the age of our patients, as well as the high percentage of physical and mental comorbidities with which they presented. The fact that such a high percentage of patients presented with such comorbidities emphasizes the importance of closely monitoring them, with attention to the prevention and treatment of complications.

Conclusions

Our sample of patients with SE-ED reveals a high rate of physical complications and mental comorbidity. In the current study, it was found that patients with AN have higher rates of osteoporosis and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism than patients with BN, as well as a lower BMI. Furthermore, our SE-ED patients begin treatment after years of illness, which may condition the prognosis and makes it necessary to search for an early diagnosis, in addition to agreeing on chronicity criteria and raising the need for different therapeutic approaches in these patients.