Background

Cancers are presumed to be “multivariate, multifactorial diseases that occur when a composite and prolonged process involving genetic and environmental factors interact in a multistage sequence” [1]. Disparities in childhood cancer incidence are as a result of differences to exposure to certain risk factors [2]. The rarity and heterogeneity of pediatric cancers make it difficult to assess risk factors associated with the development of cancer in this group [3,4,5]. This also determines the quantity and quality of evidence for etiological factors linked to pediatric cancers. Evidence on the risk factors associated with pediatric cancers is scarce [2]. Evidence with reference to causal associations of childhood cancer has been considered to be accumulating slowly in the context of pediatric cancer epidemiology [3]. The weight of evidence on the risk factors can be known, suggestive, or limited [6].

The rarity of childhood cancers has led to the poor understanding of childhood cancer etiology [7]. Accumulation of case control studies and genomic advancement technology has led to a better understanding of the factors associated with childhood cancers. Epidemiologists have suggested that prenatal and perinatal exposures may be contributing factors in pediatric cancer pathogenesis as most children present with cancer in the first years of life [7]. Factors that have been consistently associated with pediatric cancers include birth weight, parental, birth defects, and common genetic variation [3].

Environmental risk factors have been linked to pediatric cancers; however, there are only few and it is difficult to distinguish those that are causally associated from those due to bias using observational epidemiology [3]. Moreover, infectious agents like human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) have been shown to play a crucial role in cancer development [8].

In most low- to medium-income countries (LMICs), priorities for health have paid attention to the treatment and prevention of communicable diseases, maternal, and infant mortality due to the high disease burden of such conditions and cost-effective interventions [9, 10]. As the disease burden shifts from communicable to non-communicable diseases, most of these LMICs find themselves over burdened with changing health care priorities and needs [9]. In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), it is of major importance to pay particular attention to risk factors associated with pediatric cancer, given the high levels of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. This will not only aid in disease prediction and prevention, but also cut down on health-related costs as a result of poor health outcomes. This scoping review aimed to assess the evidence on risk factors associated with pediatric cancers in SSA.

Methods

Design

A scoping review study was chosen as the appropriate method to map the evidence on the risk factors associated with pediatric cancers in SSA. The Arksey and O’Malley framework for conducting scoping reviews was used to guide the review, and the steps were listed a priori in the published research protocol [11]. The research protocol outlined the reasoning or rationale and planned methods for mapping the evidence on the distribution of pediatric cancer in SSA, and the current review is based on the stated sub-research question that aimed to map evidence on the risk factors associated with pediatric cancers. The study used an amended PEO (Population, Exposure, and Outcome) framework to determine the eligibility of the research question. Only published literature was included in the review, and we aimed to include studies conducted using quantitative methods as we focused on numerical/statically derived evidence from the studies. Since this study utilized a secondary synthesis of data, which is already in the public domain, ethical approvals and consent to participate were not necessary.

Search strategy

The literature search was conceptualized and developed under the supervision and guidance of an epidemiologist and a senior lecturer with the School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. We searched articles published in PubMed, Academic search complete and Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition. We also conducted a manual search on an academic search engine, Google Scholar. The search was carried out in December 2018 (Table 1), and another search was conducted in February 2022 to include newly published articles. We used the following keywords/search terms (“children,” “pediatric,” “childhood,” “cancer,” “pediatric cancers,” “childhood cancers,” “risk factors,” and sub-Saharan African country names and truncated terms such as “east-Africa” or “west-Africa” were also used to ensure that articles indexed using SSA country-specific names or regional terms were retrieved. The keywords were modified or changed according to the database setup. Medical Subject Headings (MeSh) were included in the search. To separate keywords during the database search, Boolean terms (AND, OR) were used. There was no language or date restrictions in the search. We anticipated to retrieve articles written in other languages besides English and had planned to utilize the services of a translator. However, all articles retrieved were written in English. Reference sections of eligible studies were reviewed to identify additional relevant articles.

Table 1 Database search terms

Study selection

The database search, which initially focused on the titles of the articles, was initially conducted by the first reviewer. The reviewer adhered to the inclusion and exclusion criteria during this process. Potentially relevant articles were obtained in full texts. These articles were exported to EndNote library version X8.2 [12] and duplicates removed. Two independent reviewers then conducted abstracts and full article screening. Disputes arising between the two reviewers were resolved by involving a third reviewer.

Studies were included if they met the following eligibility criteria:

Eligibility criteria

  • Quantitative primary studies focused on all types of pediatric cancers.

  • Studies reporting evidence of pediatric cancer in the SSA region.

  • Studies presenting evidence on the factors that are associated with the risk of pediatric cancers among children younger than 15 years, including studies with comparisons between exposed children and unexposed children (cohort and case-control studies).

  • Articles presenting evidence on cancers among children aged below 15 years.

Exclusion criteria

Studies reporting evidence on cancers among people aged 15 years and above were excluded. Studies presenting evidence conducted outside of SSA, as well as those presenting the approach of qualitative data were excluded.

Charting data

Data was extracted using an electronic data extraction tool from Google forms. The following study characteristics and elements were extracted: author and year of publication, study title, study aim, study design, study population, sex, geographical setting, summary of findings/outcomes, country, and study limitations. Outcomes analyzed included type of risk factor and type of cancer.

Summary and collating

After charting the data, a descriptive overview of the studies was presented in a narrative format. An account of the number of studies, research methods used, sex, types, and risk associated with pediatric cancers and outcomes was described in this narrative. The analysis was mainly based on mapping the country and disease-specific outcomes emerging from the studies.

Results

The electronic search strategy identified 7391 references (Fig. 1), which were screened for titles. In addition, there were 22 articles retrieved by hand search and through database articles, references search. A total of 7347 articles were not selected during the database search stage because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Two duplicates were removed, leaving 64 articles which were screened for abstracts [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74]. A total of 25 articles were removed at the abstract screening stage because they formed part of the exclusion criteria (i.e., those conducted outside of SSA, those with no relevant outcomes for the study, those not in the specified age group, and those which are not primary studies). The researchers further screened 39 full-text articles and excluded 24 articles for the following reasons: 22 had no relevant outcomes for the current study and 2 were not available for full article screening. Therefore, 15 articles met our inclusion criteria.

Fig. 1
figure 1

PRISMA flow diagram

Overview of studies

This review included 15 studies that highlight risk factors for pediatric cancers [14, 27,28,29, 36, 53,54,55,56,57,58,59, 61, 73, 75]. Overall, there was limited evidence on the risk factors associated with pediatric cancers in SSA. A substantially small portion of SSA countries gave evidence on the risk factors associated with pediatric cancer (n=6). Evidence from the retrieved studies suggests that most childhood cancers in the SSA region are infection induced (n=12) [14, 27, 28, 36, 53, 55, 57,58,59, 61, 73, 75]. The type of cancer mostly reported is Burkitt Lymphoma and is diagnosed mostly the tropical region of SSA. Some studies did not provide a more comprehensive way of childhood cancer classification, making it difficult to discern which cancer was associated with a certain risk factor. The study designs employed were retrospective cohort (n= 9) and case-control studies (n= 6). The types of risk factors reported in the studies were not the same and for better ascertainment, we loosely divided the type of risk factors into three types: infection induced, genetic, and demographic risk factors. A more detailed summary of the included studies is described in Table 2.

Table 2 Characteristics of included studies

Infection induced

There seemed to be an increased rate of childhood malignancies due to infections. Infection with HIV, hepatitis B, human herpes virus, EBV, and malaria were mainly associated with an increased risk of cancer in children. HIV (n=6) [14, 55, 58, 59, 61, 76] and EBV (n=5) [28, 36, 57, 59, 75] were the most reported infection induced risk factors in children with cancer.

Infection with HIV was associated with an increased risk of pediatric cancer, particularly in SSA. In a study from Zambia conducted two decades ago, HIV was casually related with the risk of getting Kaposi sarcoma in children [55]. This was also the case in studies from Malawi that were an increased incidence in Kaposi sarcoma was noted over time. The HIV seroprevalence was 93% for children with Kaposi sarcoma, 4% for those with Burkitt lymphoma, 31% for other non-Hodgkin lymphomas, 7% for Hodgkin disease, and 5% for other cancers [61]. In the second study, 10% were seropositive for HIV and HIV infection was strongly associated with Kaposi sarcoma and positively associated with non-Burkitt, non-Hodgkin lymphoma [58]. A similar trend was also observed in Uganda for pediatric Kaposi sarcoma [53, 59] and Burkitt lymphoma [59]. In Tanzania infection with human herpes virus (HHV8) and HIV reflected an indirect effect or direct effect on the development of Kaposi sarcoma lesions [14]. In a recent study from four countries Botswana, Malawi, Tanzania, and Uganda, it was observed that late ART initiation and severe immunosuppression led to a higher risk of cancer among children living with HIV [73]. Kaposi sarcoma in particular had a high incidence among children living with HIV [73].

Two case-control studies from Kenya and Malawi reported on the Joint pathogenesis of EBV and malaria in Burkitt Lymphoma [28, 57]. Burkitt lymphoma rates were observed to be 3.5 times (using log- linear model) higher in areas with intense malaria transmission as compared to regions with no malaria transmission [36]. Infection with malaria was positively linked to the oncogenesis of Burkitt lymphoma (odds ratio = 3.47, 95% confidence interval = 1.30–9.30) [36]. In another study from Uganda, 91% of endemic Burkitt lymphoma cases tested positive for EBV [75], reflecting a positive association between Burkitt lymphoma and EBV. Hepatitis B was associated with an increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in a retrospective study conducted in South Africa [27]. An observed decrease in the incidence of the latter was observed after vaccination for hepatitis B [27].

Demographic

The mean age at diagnosis varied depending on the type of cancer and this was the trend seen in most of the articles reviewed [14, 27, 54, 56, 57]. The mean age at diagnosis for hepatoblastoma was 2.16 and was not diagnosed in children over 4 years. In the same study, hepatocellular carcinoma was common in older patients (mean age 10.48 years) [27].

In patients with Burkitt lymphoma, the mean age at diagnosis ranged from 5 to 7.6 years [54, 56, 57]. In a study from Kenya, it was noted that the Burkitt lymphoma incidence decreased with age [56] and in Tanzania the mean age at diagnosis varied between male and female patients (6.8 and 7.6 years, respectively) [54]. Retinoblastoma and nephroblastoma had a mean age diagnosis of 0–4 years [56], and pediatric Kaposi sarcoma was diagnosed at 0–5 years [14].

This review highlighted the varying levels of disease predominance or, in some cases, causative agents for a particular cancer among female or male patients [27]. For example, there was a higher predominance of male children with Burkitt lymphoma and Kaposi sarcoma in some of the included studies [29, 55]. Overall, there was a high percentage of males diagnosed with childhood cancer in comparison to females.

Pediatric cancer incidence and risk factors seemed to also vary by ethnicity or race. Of the children diagnosed with hepatic cellular carcinoma in South Africa, 94% were black [27]. Among the different tribes in the western Kenya region, the Luo tribe had the highest incidence of Burkitt lymphoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and Kaposi sarcoma [56]. In northern Tanzania the crude incidence varied by region (3.0 in Mwanza and 6.8 in Mara) indicating variations in ethnicity [54]. In a study by Mwanda et al., they suggested that the observed demographic and geographic Burkitt lymphoma rate variations could be due to environmental factors [29]. Disease distribution was consistent with intermediate risk to Burkitt lymphoma level [29], and in another study by Makata et al., a large number of tumors were found concentrated around Lake Victoria and decreased in occurrence as one moved to semi-arid and highland areas [56]. Lymphomas were significant in humid and hot areas where malaria is hyperendemic [56].

Discussion

Children in SSA diagnosed with cancer have documented risk factors marked by sex, ethnic, and age disparities, and these variations have been long observed [3]. We classified the latter as demographic factors. Although there was no consistent evidence to prove that they contribute to the causality of cancer in children, the trend was that certain cancers where predominant or occurred at a certain age, ethnicity, and sex. The age at onset varies for various cancers, and the latency periods of different cancers also vary [6]. Most of the malignancies seemed to peak at a young age, but the reason was unknown or obscure. Malignancies like nephroblastoma, neuroblastoma, and brain tumors’ peak in infancy and acute lymphoblastic leukemia peaks at 2–4 years [3, 6]. It is thought that they may be related to prenatal exposures and those that occur in adolescents like renal carcinoma may be linked to hormonal changes that occur in the body [6]. There was no data on the risk associated with parental age at conception; however, in studies from HICs, there has been disparities in the role of parental age at conception. Whilst some authors reported an increase in the risk of pediatric cancer with increased maternal age [77,78,79], others concluded that younger maternal age increased the risk of pediatric cancer [7, 80, 81].

There was an overall male predominance for a majority of the pediatric cancers in the reviewed articles [14, 29, 54,55,56,57,58,59, 75, 76]. This trend was also observed from the incidence rates/million for international classification of childhood cancer categories by sex [82]. The incidence differences that exist between males and females are linked to various exposures that differ by sex. Moreover, it is important to note that hormonal effects and genetic disparities between boys and girls exist [83]. High incidence among males is observed in cancers like non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, Hodgkin’s disease, and acute lymphoblastic lymphoma [83]. A higher incidence exist among females for thyroid carcinoma and malignant melanoma [83].

In SSA, it was clear to see that some cancers vary by ethnicity or race, this is marked by the differing cancer rates in different geographic areas like Kenya and Tanzania. In high-income countries, the incidence of most types of cancer is lower in Black, Hispanic, and Asian children as compared to white children and the disparities are quiet dramatic [82]. With the exception of one article [27], there was not much data from the reviewed articles for us to determine the racial trends in the SSA region. Hepatocellular carcinoma was found to be more predominant in the black childhood population in South Africa. There is ethnic variability in the pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma as hepatitis C virus was implicated as the cause of HCC among White and Black individuals whereas hepatitis B was the cause among the Asians in the US community [84]. In Africa, there is a wide variation among the population with respect to genes and environments [3]. It therefore follows that human cancer patterns vary and are diverse. The degree to which racial or ethnic factors are attributable to genetic versus environmental differences has not been determined [3].

Environmental exposures play a major role in the cause of childhood cancers. In this review, infectious agents or biological carcinogens were found to increase the risk or cause cancer in children. Infections are the causes of commonly diagnosed cancers in Africa, for example cervix, liver and bladder cancers and Kaposi sarcoma [85]. Infection with hepatitis B is a known cause of hepatocellular carcinoma [86]. HIV has also been long known to increase the risk of cancer like Kaposi sarcoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and these cancers are known as AIDS defining cancers [87, 88]. An increased risk in Kaposi sarcoma has been observed in HIV-positive individuals infected with human herpes virus-8 and is acquired horizontally from mothers [87].

Infection with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in children in Africa occurs soon after birth and intense infection with malaria is an important cofactor in the pathogenesis of Burkitt lymphoma [87]. Malarial holo-endemicity has been associated with the geographical distribution of Burkitt lymphoma [89, 90]. EBV is said to be detectable in 95% of childhood endemic Burkitt lymphoma cases [87]. A cure or vaccination proves the cause to a disease. In the current review, some articles mentioned causes to the abovementioned malignancies. An example is the decrease in the incidence of HCC after vaccinating for hepatitis B in South African children [27] and a decrease in the incidence of Burkitt lymphoma in some parts of Africa was attributed to the introduction of antimalarial programs [90].

Strengths and limitations of the study

Overall, we were able to summarize what is known and gaps on the risk factors associated with pediatric cancers. Thorough and comprehensive literature search was carried out, and to minimize bias, there was no language and date restriction. Complete and transparent presentation of the results was ensured through the employment of the PRISMA flow diagram.

In this review, most articles used two main study designs: retrospective and case-control studies. According to Linet et al., an ideal case-control study is one that is nested within a cohort (prospective or retrospective), in which all cases are ascertained, but a randomly selected sample of the cohort is used for controls [6]. Since pediatric cancers are rare, it is justified economically that retrospective studies were employed although most cases are a subject to selection bias.

Caution should however be taken when analyzing or interpreting this data as some studies did not provide a more comprehensive way of childhood cancer classification, making it difficult to discern which cancer was associated with a certain risk factor. It was also difficult to group some risk factors into a certain typology as there was an overlap between environmental factors and demographic factors for example in studies by Makata et al. [56] and Mwanda et al. [29].

Although the methodology was followed with accuracy, the search results might be subject to bias as some studies might have been excluded due to the inclusion or exclusion of certain search terms. There was a deviation from the published protocol as the study did not report on the main research question that sought to find the types of evidence and concepts behind estimating the distribution of pediatric cancers in SSA. This study did not also address the trends in pediatric cancer in relation to HIV in SSA.

Implications for research and practice

Current evidence on what has been done will create baseline knowledge on what to focus on; however, knowledge on its own is not sufficient to bring change in cancer management in the SSA region. Some cancers were diagnosed at a young age, and further research needs to be conducted on susceptible immunity and the role of prenatal factors at a young age leading to exposure. Furthermore, there is need for more current studies, coupled with the collection of biological samples as compared to records review. This will ensure the measurement of known and unknown cancer risk factors, monitoring their gradual development and assessing the effectiveness of prevention and treatment interventions.

The use of standardized methods in the measuring of exposures should be well thought of. This is important in the reproducibility of measurements over time, data validity, and accuracy of exposure measurements. The other advantage of using standardized methods for measuring exposure is that adequate quality control, and data collection protocols can be incorporated.

Conclusion

The review aimed to map evidence on the risk factors associated with pediatric cancers in SSA. Based on the weight of evidence obtained and taking into consideration the general rarity of these cancers with the exception of exposure to infections, there seemed to be limited evidence. The limited evidence on the risk factors of these malignancies in the SSA hampers efforts to set priorities for childhood cancer control. Formulation of effective preventative (where possible) measures and treatment regimens will need proper assessment of risk factors.