Background

Mycoplasma bovis (M. bovis) is an important pathogen causing severe pneumonia, mastitis, and arthritis in the world. Especially, pneumonia caused by M. bovis has high morbidity and mortality. It is becoming one of the most widely recognized pathogens in the world[1, 2]. The pathogen is highly contagious and can spread rapidly throughout the herd. M. bovis can not only cause pneumonia, mastitis, arthritis, and otitis but also induce postpartum infection of the uterus with a mortality rate of 80%[3]. Since there are no effective vaccines and drugs to prevent and cure the disease caused by the pathogen, the incidence of the disease is on the rise[4, 5].

With the completion of whole-genome sequencing of M. bovis, a variety of highly repeatable molecular typing methods have been developed for molecular epidemiology and population structure research, including arbitrarily primed PCR (AP-PCR), random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)[6], amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP)[7], pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)[8], insertion sequence (IS)[9], variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR)[10, 11], multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat (MLVA)[10] and multi-locus sequence typing (MLST)[5]. Although AP-PCR, RAPD, AFLP, and PFGE methods can obtain a large amount of genetic information, they are subjective in the analysis of DNA fragments and require special equipment[5], so it is difficult to establish a standardized method.

MLST is a rapidly developing molecular biology analysis method with high resolution in recent years. It is suitable for both molecular epidemiological studies and molecular advancement studies. The MLST method compares the nucleic acid sequences of the core fragments of several housekeeping genes and then compares the diversity of the alleles of the strains. Different strains correspond to different sequence types (ST)[4]. Through the STs of M. bovis pathogens can be used to understand the genetic diversity, population structure, and evolutionary trend, which will be beneficial to the control of M. bovis and the development of vaccines, as well as providing a theoretical basis for the prevention and control of M. bovis[4]. MLST is a typing technique based on seven housekeeping genes of M. bovis to study the genetic diversity, population structure, and evolutionary trend of M. bovis, including alcohol dehydrogenase-1 (adh-1), glutamate tRNA ligase (gltX), glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gpsA), DNA gyrase subunit B (gyrB), phosphate acetyltransferase-2 (pta-2), thymidine kinase (tdk) and transketolase (tkt)[12]. The MLST data were used to populate a newly created and publicly available database (www.pubmlst.org/mbovis) intended to serve as a tool for epidemiologic studies and further investigating the population structure of M. bovis [5]. MLST is a powerful, scalable, and highly standardized method that makes it easy to clearly distinguish housekeeping genes among different strains[13].

Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region is one of the most important raising regions for cow and beef cattle in China[14]. The feeding level of bovine is currently ranked second in China. In 2009, our team isolated M. bovis for the first time from the lung of cows in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. From 2009 to 2018, a total of 65 strains of M. bovis were obtained from samples of lung, synovial fluid, nasal swab, and milk in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. However, there is no related study on the molecular epidemiology and population structure of M. bovis in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. In this study, The MLST method was used to classify 65 isolates from different cities of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region from 2009 to 2018, aiming to investigate the population structure of M. bovis[2, 5] and to explore the evolutionary relationship of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region isolates with Chinese isolates and global isolates, which will lay a foundation for further prevention and control of M. bovis in the world.

Results

Strains identification

Sixty-seven isolates were identified as M. bovis by PCR amplification using 16S rRNA and uvrC primers and sequencing of amplified products.

MLST analysis of M. bovis isolates

.

A total of 3 STs were identified among the 67 strains of M. bovis. Among the 65 isolates from Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, 37 isolates belonged to ST10 and 28 isolates belonged to ST134. The HB0801 and PG45 isolates belonged to ST10 and ST17, respectively (Table 1).

Table 1 M. bovis strains used in this study and their STs

According to Table 1, ST10 and ST134 strains could be isolated from samples of clinical mastitis (n = 9), arthritis (n = 22), and pneumonia (n = 34). The main clinical symptoms of calves were arthritis and pneumonia. The clinical symptoms of dairy cattle were mainly mastitis and pneumonia, while beef cattle were mainly pneumonia and arthritis.

The NX001 strain isolated from Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region for the first time in 2009 was ST134, and the NX002 strain isolated in 2010 was ST10. Since then, the ST10 and ST134 have been isolated from different lesions of bovine in different cities in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region.

Phylogenetic analysis

The phylogenetic tree constructed from the concatenated sequences of the seven target genes revealed two distinct lineages (Fig. 1). The ST173 and ST17 were in the same lineage. The other STs were in the other lineage including ST10, ST26, ST32, ST43, ST172, and the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region isolates of ST134.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Phylogenetic tree constructed using maximum likelihood and Kimura 2-parameter model based on concatenated MLST sequence data

Discussion

Molecular epidemiological studies are of great significance to reveal the population structure, genetic diversity, and prevalence of Mycoplasma spp [4, 15], which facilitates the formulation of effective prevention and control measures, including the development of vaccines and diagnostic methods[4, 16]. MLST studies performed on 44 strains from nine Chinese provinces from 2008 to 2014 showed that ST10, ST32, and ST43 were found in Hubei province (n= 25) and that ST10 was also found in Anhui (n = 1), Fujian (n = 2), Hunan (n = 1), Henan (n = 8), Inner Mongolia (n = 1), Jiangxi (n = 3), Guangzhou (n = 2), and Shandong (n = 1) province [4]. However, there are no reports about the MLST study of M. bovis in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. Therefore, this study is the first report on the molecular epidemiology of M. bovis from 2009 to 2018 in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region.

At present, there are seven STs in M. bovis in China including ST10, ST26, ST32, ST43, ST134, ST172, and ST173[4]. ST10 is widely prevalent in all provinces reported in China, including Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region (n = 37, 56.9%) where are no MLST reports. After the ST10 strain was first isolated in 2010 in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, the ST10 of M. bovis could be isolated and identified every year. And it has been widely diffused in different cities in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. Interestingly, the ST10 strains have been reported that were widely distributed in American, Australia, and Israel[4]. Previously, the international spread of contagious bovine pleuropneumonia was shown to be linked to the movement of cattle[4, 17, 18]. So, it is a similar transfer probably that through international movement of cattle and domestic movement of cattle caused the widespread distribution of the M. bovis ST10 in China and even in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. The reason for the widespread prevalence of ST10 strain in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region may be that the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region government strongly supports the construction of large-scale cattle breeding parks. For their expansion, intensive cattle farms had to purchase cattle from different provinces of China and different countries in the world, but M. bovis was ignored, which led to the widespread presence of exogenous M. bovis in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. It is speculated that the prevalence of M. bovis ST10 in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region began in 2010.

In 2009, our lab isolated M. bovis from the lung tissue of cows for the first time, which was ST134. From 2009 to 2018, ST134 (n = 28, 43.1%) was isolated and identified from different cities of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. However, it has not been identified in other provinces in China. Therefore, it confirmed that ST134 strains were closely related strains with the same origin in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China, and has been widely distributed in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region for many years.

To evaluate the evolutionary relationship of M. bovis between isolates from Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region and isolates from other provinces in China, a phylogenetic tree was constructed based on concatenated sequences. The evolutionary analysis showed that all ST10 strains were in the same lineage as ST26, ST32, ST43, ST172, including Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region ST134 strains. However, the ST173 strains were in the same lineage as the ST17 strain. The study results indicate that the M. bovis strains with STs different from ST173 and ST17 were closely related strains with the same origin.

Conclusions

This study revealed the genetic diversity of M. bovis from 2009 to 2018 in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region and provides epidemiological information. ST10 strains were widely prevalent in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region as well as all provinces of China that have been reported, and ST134 strains were also widely distributed in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region.

These results may help further our understanding of the evolution of M. bovis and provide information that may be useful for the development of novel vaccines.

Methods

Strains

The detailed information of sixty-seven strains of M. bovis was listed in Table 1, including the host, isolation site, geographical location, and the number of strains. Sixty-five strains came from different farms and were isolated from nasal swab, or milk, or joint fluid, or lung of M. bovis-infected cattle in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region from 2009 to 2018. HB0801 strain was isolated from the lungs of beef cattle in Hubei Province in 2008 when M. bovis was first reported in China[19]. PG45 strain (ATCC 25,523) was donated by Professor Aizhen Guo of Huazhong Agricultural University of China.

Cultivation and identification of M. bovis.

The M. bovis strains were cultured in PPLO broth(BD DifcoTM, US California)[4, 20]. M. bovis genomic DNA was extracted using a bacterial DNA extraction kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China)[21]. The16S rRNA gene[22] and uvrC gene[23] were amplificated using two pairs of primers (Table 2). The PCR reaction mixture was 50 µL (5 µL 10 × PCR buffer, 4 µL dNTP mixture, 0.25 µL rTaq, 2 µL primers, 1 µL DNA, 37.75µL ddH2O). The reaction mixture was incubated at 95 ℃ for 2 min, 35 cycles of 95 ℃ for 30 s, 50 ℃ for 20 s and 72 ℃ for 2 min, then a final incubation at 72 ℃ for 8 min[22, 23].

Table 2 Primers used for identification and amplification of MLST loci of M. bovis

Multi-locus sequence typing

The genes of 67 isolates of M. bovis were amplified by PCR using MLST scheme (adh-1, gltX, gpsA, gyrB, pta-2, tdk and tkt)[4, 5] (Table 2). The PCR reaction mixture was 50 µL (5 µL 10 × PCR buffer, 4 µL dNTP mixture, 0.25 µL rTaq, 2 µL primers, 1 µL DNA, 37.75µL ddH2O). The reaction mixture was incubated at 95 ℃ for 2 min, 35 cycles of 95 ℃ for 30 s, 55 ℃ for 30 s and 72 ℃ for 1 min, then a final incubation at 72 ℃ for 5 min[5]. The PCR amplification products were sent to Shanghai Bioengineering Co., Ltd for sequencing. The assembly sequences were aligned by the http://pubmlst.org/mbovis/ database to obtain the allele number and STs.

Phylogenetic analysis

Seven gene sequences of 65 strains of M. bovis in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region and the strains of different STs in China and PG45 reference strains were concatenated. A phylogenetic tree was constructed from concatenated sequences. The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Kimura 2-parameter model[3] of MEGA 10.0. Initial tree(s) for the heuristic search was obtained automatically by applying Neighbor-Join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the Maximum Composite Likelihood (MCL) approach and then selecting the topology with superior log likelihood value[3].