Background

COVID-19, the newly discovered coronavirus disease first diagnosed in China in 2019, has become pandemic throughout the world in a relatively short period of time. It has affected almost all aspects of human life worldwide. Many protocols have been established to minimize the number of infected people, yet this virus has already spread to all five continents, affecting all communities regardless of borders, nationalities, or climate conditions [1, 2]. Up to May 31, 2020, the number of people who were officially reported to have been infected by COVID-19 around the globe was more than 5,934,936 victims, out of which 367,166 deaths have been reported [3]. It seems that the actual numbers might be much higher than the above figures.

Fever, cough, and fatigue have been reported as the major clinical symptoms of the infection following a median incubation period of 3 days, with a great number of infected patients also showing impairment in smell (anosmia) and taste (ageusia) as vital clinical findings in early diagnosis of COVID-19 infection [4]. COVID-19 has similar transmission pathways, but not identical, to those of other SARS-CoV infections, being mainly through the respiratory system [5, 6]. Many considerations regarding possible hazardous activities or workplaces have been raised based on both our experience from previous SARS-CoV infections and our observation of the transmission pattern of the SARS-CoV-2 itself in such a short time following its appearance. Among them, the potential transmission of the virus through dental procedures and in dental settings has attracted much attention leading to either mandatory or voluntary suspension of routine dental care [7, 8].

The concern about dental practice coronavirus transmission has been widely recognized around the world. Recently, The New York Times noted that dentistry was the most at-risk profession for nCoV-19 compared to other various occupations [9]. Based on the nature of the dental procedures, and the proximity of the dental team with patients, the disease could readily spread from infected patients to the dental team, and vice versa, and subsequently to other patients, if appropriate protective infection control measurements are not undertaken [10, 11].

Dental teams, led by the dentist, are very familiar with universal personal protective equipment and other cross infection control measures and risk assessment. While these issues have become prominent during the pandemic, there has been uncertainty regarding the most appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and way of working. Each country of the world has been required to develop policies to counter COVID-19 rapidly and has interpreted medical and scientific evidence and advice from the WHO in very different ways. Similarly, the guidelines written for COVID-19 and advice published for the safe and effective practice of dentistry have shown much variation around the world and also within countries. Perhaps this is due to the lack of evidence-based research on the efficiency of the proposed guidelines. It is well known that developing an effective vaccine that implements widespread immunization takes time; therefore, it is critical to find new practical methods in our daily dental practice so that we can offer much-needed care for patients with oral health issues. The long term consequences of this pandemic are currently unknown, but they will undoubtedly result in a ‘new normal’ for the provision of dental care.

Many suggestions and protocols have been issued for the re-opening of or reorientation of dental clinics over a short period. However, many of the protocols have been produced posthaste (for understandable reasons) with a focus on the ideal rather than a realistic point of view [12,13,14]. This systematic review focuses on the risk of the transmission of the COVID-19 during dental treatment and provides pathways and protective protocols to minimize it, bearing in mind the long-term necessity of actions and realistic, practical measures.

Method

In this systematic review of the literature, we searched Pubmed, ISI, and SCOPUS electronic databases using MESH terms and the following keywords: (“Covid-19” OR “Covid19” OR “Corona” OR “Coronavirus” OR “SARS-CoV-2”) AND (“Dentistry” OR “Dental”). All articles from the 01.01.2020 until 10.05.2020 that satisfied our selection criteria of being recommendations or guidelines for dental practice during the COVID-19 pandemic were retrieved. Articles were excluded if they were not found to be relevant, produced before the COVID-19 pandemic, or opinion-based without any supporting evidence. Some clinical organizations for example; The World Health Organization (WHO), The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), The National Health Service (NHS), The American Dental Association (ADA) and, American Dental Hygienists’ Association (AHDA) had also published recommendations and guidelines through their websites. Therefore, we also undertook a Google search for these sources and used the English, German, and Farsi languages. We outlined the competency criteria using a PICO model as follows: Population: All articles and/or guidelines for dental practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. Intervention: Knowing and applying the special precautions and therapeutic considerations in dentistry. Comparison: Despite the fact that due to the novelty of COVID-19, it is difficult to compare the effectiveness and applicability of the proposed precautions and interventions, but the comparisons have been made based on country, and organization of the article and guidelines. Outcome: the application and effectiveness of the intervention for reducing risks of transmission. Figure 1 shows a flow chart of the literature screening method used. These were reviewed by two authors independently, who have experience in infection control in dentistry and medical study methodology. Articles were critically appraised and data extracted to compile a summary clinical protocol for dental practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. The extracted statements of recommendation, both from the published articles and the clinical organization’s publications, were divided into grouped items. We also added to this grouping by including the views of ten dentists with more than 5 years of clinical work experience in addition to the views of the two authors who had undertaken the data extraction. These additional dentists were selected conveniently based on clinical experience from Iran.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Systematic review flow chart

Full size image

Main results

To the date this paper was drafted, 38 articles were found, of which 9 satisfied our inclusion criteria. The key feature of the nine included studies are summarized in (Table 1). We noted that some researchers preferred to publish their work rapidly and in alternative ways of using peer-reviewed journals.

Table 1 An overview of the guidelines provided for Coronavirus 2019 in dentistry by articles
Full size table

As all the nine studies were proposed in a general consensus, any elective non-emergency dental care for patients with suspected or known COVID-19 should be postponed for at least 2 weeks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Only urgent treatment of dental diseases can be performed during the COVID-19 outbreak taking into consideration pharmacological management as the first line and contagion-reduced minimally invasive emergency treatment as the secondary and final management.

Furthermore, some of the guidelines provided by specific clinical organizations were reviewed. Since these protocols were very long, they were summarized, and the key elements were extracted from these published guidelines. The recommendations and guidelines identified are shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Guidelines that should be adopted in a dental setting during COVID-19 [3, 23,24,25,26,27,28,29]
Full size table

According to the recommended guidelines during COVID-19, the protective measures that should be undertaken in a dental setting can be categorized into three phases: 1) prior to dental treatment, 2) during the dental procedure, and 3) after dental treatment.

Pre-dental treatment

Before entering a dental office

Patient triage, identification of possible suspects, delay of non-urgent dental care, management of dental appointments, and active screening of dental staff are among the protective protocols that should be considered prior to the patient entering the dental office.

At the dental office

Active screening of patients, management of social distancing in the dental office, offering sanitation measures to the patients, use of facemasks by everyone entering the dental office, patient education, use of PPE by the dental team, and management of dental operatory room are among the procedures required to be carried out in dental offices.

During dental treatment

Maintaining hand hygiene, offering a preoperative antimicrobial mouth rinse to patients, using rubber dams, high-volume saliva ejectors, and extraoral dental radiographs, using 4-handed dentistry, avoiding aerosol-generating procedures, one-visit treatment, and environmental cleaning and disinfection procedures should be implemented during dental procedures.

Post dental treatment

Cleaning and disinfecting reusable facial protective equipment, as well as management of laundry and medical waste following routine procedures should be considered after dental treatment.

A large number of articles were identified considering the short duration of the search period. Due to the rapid development of the COVID-19 pandemic and the short publication timeframe, some published articles have subsequently been retracted or rejected and replaced with newer information. The publication of unreliable papers has several negative consequences that can increase the chance of incorrect treatment for patients [30]. In this study, an attempt was made to use more valid and practical articles and protocols.

Possible risk of transmission of COVID-19 in dentistry

While it may be difficult to identify the particular mechanism of infection for individual patients, we are aware of the common routes of transmission. Droplet transmission and transmission through fomites (objects or materials which are likely to carry infection) are the main modes of transmission by the respiratory system in intrapersonal contact and especially during sneezing, dry coughing, or even talking [31]. Eye exposure has also been reported as a route of transmission for the virus, with infectivity even higher than that of SARS [32]. We also know that COVID-19 is present in saliva, but transmission through this route has not been conclusively confirmed [33]. Considering the main path of transmission of the COVID-19 disease, dental procedures that lead to the spray of saliva particles into the air (which means almost all dental procedures) could heighten the possibility of contamination [22]. Much effort has been made in the literature to define droplets and aerosols and to distinguish between their ability to carry the COVID-19 virus. Knowing which dental procedures produce aerosols that could carry the virus is important to help define the level of risk that these procedures create. This then helps to define what Personal protective equipment (PPE) is appropriate. As a result, both kinds of particles, or better to say, anything that comes out of the patient should be considered hazardous [34,35,36]. Given the fact that the majority of dental instruments are made from metal and polymers, the COVID-19 could adhere and persist on these surfaces for several days. Consequently, they could present a risk of virus transmission if they are not adequately decontaminated [31, 37]. Fundamentally, COVID-19 in dentistry may be transmitted through air, droplets, and contact [20, 38]. Not only could the professionals act as transmitters, but also, they could become infected during human-to-human transmission, through non-invasive salivary secretions like a patient’s cough or sneeze, or treatment procedures, such as using a high-speed handpiece or ultrasonic instruments which release aerosols which may contain saliva or blood bacteria and viruses into the environment. Therefore, using appropriate protective wearing is critical, given the fact that the spreading of saliva and dental fluids has the potential of virus transmission because of the close distance between patients and professionals [19, 39].

Special precautions in dental procedure

PPE and hand hygiene should be given very serious attention in a dental clinic at all times, even when no patient is present [19, 40]. Regular hand hygiene could be regarded as a critical element in any controlling protocol to reduce the outbreak of infection [40]. Due to the fact that dentists have close contact with the patients and their hands are exposed to the mouth fluids and aerosols, using an antiseptic solution before treatment of each patient is of the utmost importance. Although broad types of antiseptic solutions are available, the ethanolic solutions (above 70% concentration) are suitable for this process because of the non-toxic entity, while ethanolic solutions are useful in hand hygiene; using soap and water is also effective [38]. Using masks with pores of less than 50 μm is necessary for dental professionals [39, 41, 42]. On the other hand, these particles could be transmitted through the eyes; therefore, using appropriate goggles or face shields could decrease the risk of the infections [23].

As the aerosols spread from the mouth, suggesting to patients, they use an antiseptic oxidative mouth rinse would be protective prior to and after treatment. Currently, ADA and CDC only recommend peroxide to eradicate the virus. Moreover, public health authorities have advised 0.2% chlorhexidine mouth-wash (CHX), 1% povidone-iodine (P.I.), 1.5% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), or 0.05% hypochlorous acid (HOCl). CHX is weak in terms of virucidal, and the other three (P.I., H2O2, HOCl) all have excellent virucidal properties but are weak in substantivity, because saliva flow can potentially replace the virus. Clinically, the most acceptable in terms of virucidal and taste is 1.5% hydrogen peroxide [38, 43, 44].

Discussion

The results of a study on 2537 patients showed that the nCoV-19 pandemic led to a decrease in the emergency dental treatment in Beijing, China, this is because the patients were reluctant to have dental treatment because of the potential risk of infection by going outside [45]. Oral hygiene and preventive practices have always been very important, but now, in the current condition, they are more critical than ever. Higher levels of oral hygiene could decrease the need for a person to attend a dental clinic for urgent matters; and at the same time, could significantly help the person to remove the virus from the body in the early contamination phase in day to day life [46] and also to reduce the bacterial load in the mouth and the risk of bacterial superinfection especially in patients who are prone to altered biofilms due to diabetes, high blood pressure or cardiovascular disease [47].

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the closure of dental offices around the world. Some countries are currently re-opening or planning to re-open dental services. There are many protocols that need to be considered and integrated into a comprehensive and concise protocol (Tables 1 & 2). Smart appointment systems and generally avoiding crowding in dental clinics are vital [48]. Adequate time should be given between appointments so that appropriate decontamination procedures can be carried out [48].

Specific therapeutic considerations in dentistry

Considering the time needed to develop a vaccine and the high possibility of SaRS-CoV-2 outbreak being around for a long time to come, throughout the world, there is an urge to define more distinct guidelines in order to reduce the risk of dental emergencies and at the same time offer urgent care to those patients in need. Suggestions have been made to preserve a high level of oral hygiene in patients in order to diminish the risk of any emergencies; including washing teeth at least twice a day, daily flossing, and using a 1% povidone-iodine mouth-wash 3 to 4 times a day [49].

Endodontics and restorative dentistry

If emergency treatment is necessary, the ADA COVID-19 Dental Emergency document [42] recommends that chemomechanical caries removal and hand instrumentation should be prioritized over rotary systems. In the case of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis, reducing pain with a pulpotomy and pulpectomy or vital pulp therapy is recommended over conventional root canal therapies whenever possible [19, 50, 51].

Periodontics

For periodontal treatments, priority should be given to manual scaling and polishing instead of ultrasonic techniques.

Oral and maxillofacial surgery

In the case of tooth extraction, the use of high-volume saliva ejectors is crucial, preferably when the patient is in a supine position. If a suture is required, using absorbable material is advocated [37]. For the patients suffering extreme toothache and extensive caries, extraction of the pathogenic teeth could be considered instead of a restorative treatment as this could reduce the time of treatment and subsequently decrease the risk of infection [50, 51].

In the case of third molar abscesses or pericoronitis, antibiotic therapy (Azithromycin 500 mg P.O. per day for 3 to 5 days), a mouth-wash 3 times a day, as well as applying a chlorhexidine gel twice a day has been recommended over the infected area [49].

Prosthodontics

For prosthodontic treatments, enhanced disinfection techniques of prosthetic materials and impressions are highly emphasized to minimize the risk of cross-contamination to prosthodontic laboratories. To avoid gag stimulation, salivary suction is recommended.

In the case of a cemented crown becoming loose, using a temporary cement that can be easily found in a drug store has been recommended to relieve the discomfort and, at the same time, inhibit the closure of the interocclusal and mesiodistal space.

Application of an over-the-counter soft removable liner in the case of a removable prosthesis causing discomfort can temporarily let the patient preserve function and esthetics.

Oral and maxillofacial radiology

For diagnosis purposes, using extraoral radiographic such as Dental Panoramic Radiographs (DPRs) or Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) are endorsed over the intraoral radiographs [19, 50].

As reducing face-to-face appointments is necessary to reduce the risk of infection, the Teledentistry provides an opportunity for many patients to access uninterrupted clinical and supportive care and the chance to triage increasingly critical conditions needing face-to-face clinic visits. Furthermore, Teledentistry allows for the continuing clinical training of dental practitioners [52,53,54]. The COVID-19 pandemic may cause a permanent transformation in dentistry with the advancement of Teledentistry [29]. In fact, the visual nature of dental procedures makes telemedicine practical in the dentistry field [55].

Conclusion

This review focused on the methods, protocols, and recent reports regarding the nCoV-19 infection and the transmission process, which could occur during routine dental treatment and surgeries. While the currently available evidence has not demonstrated a clear and direct relationship between dental treatment or surgery and the possibility of the transmission of COVID-19, there is clearly the potential for transmission. This could result due to contaminated dental fluids, saliva, or aerosol spread during close human-to-human contact during dental treatment or by contact with contaminated instruments or surfaces. Therefore, following the previous literature, following the protective protocols in the COVID-19 crisis is of utmost importance in a dental setting. Although many articles have been published in journals during the Coronavirus 2019 crisis without appropriate methods and accurate judgment, careful and comprehensive research is recommended.