Background

The c-jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) is an evolutionarily conserved sub-group of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) that participates in survival signaling, apoptosis and pain [13]. The JNK family is encoded by three genes: jnk1, jnk2 and jnk3. Recent studies have demonstrated that JNK1 and JNK2 activation play important roles in the development and maintenance of chronic pain [4]; JNK3 has different functions from JNK1 and JNK2 and has been reported to participate in apoptosis in the brain. JNK activation is mediated by the dual phosphorylation on Thr and Tyr by two MAPK kinases (MKK4/7), and several transcriptional factors can be regulated by JNK activation [5]. JNK1/2 was shown to be activated in the spinal cord at 6 h after intra-plantar injection of complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) [6] and at day 3 after spinal nerve ligation (SNL) [7]. Moreover, intrathecal injection of JNK inhibitor SP600125 decreased pain behavior in animals with inflammatory pain, neuropathic pain and skin cancer pain [810].

Cancer-induced bone pain (CIBP) is a severe problem for patients with end-stage cancer. The preferential metastasis of cancer cells to bone disrupts the process of bone remodeling and results in lesions that cause significant pain [11]. The model of bone cancer induced by intramedullary inoculation with tumor cells has been the most frequently encountered type of cancer-induced pain in cancer patients with bone metastasis [12]. Several animal models of CIBP have been developed recently, and these models contributed to our understanding of CIBP [1315]. A widely used model of CIBP is induced by intra-tibial inoculation with Walker 256 rat mammary gland carcinoma cells [1618]. Rats inoculated with carcinoma cells developed mechanical allodynia from day 5 as indicated by decreased paw withdrawal thresholds for the ipsilateral hind paw. Although basic research on the mechanisms of bone cancer pain has been developed in recent years, the mechanisms of CIBP remain unclear. Previous studies have indicated the important roles of MAPK, including the roles of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK) and p38 in chronic pain [19, 20]; however, the specific roles of JNK activation of bone cancer pain in the spinal cord remain unclear.

In this study, we found that JNK was activated at different time points in the spinal cord after intra-tibial inoculation with carcinoma cells; increased pJNK levels were co-expressed with NeuN (a neuron marker) and GFAP (Glial fibrillary acidic protein, a specific astrocyte marker) but not CD11b (microglia marker); a single intrathecal injection of JNK inhibitor SP600125 by lumbar puncture attenuated CIBP on day 12. These results suggested that JNK activation in the spinal cord participated in the development of CIBP.

Results

Sustained activation of pJNK1/2 in the spinal cord after intra-tibial inoculation with carcinoma cells

pJNK1 and pJNK2 protein levels were detected on the ipsilateral side of L4-L5 spinal cord. We examined the expression of pJNK1/2 in either CIBP (Figure 1A) or a PBS control group (Figure 1B) at different time points after surgery. pJNK1/2 (46 kD, 52 kD) and GAPDH (36 kD) were detected in the same membrane. The levels of pJNK1/2 were not changed compared to the naïve group on day 5, day 12 or day 16 (Figure 1B, D) after the injection of PBS as a sham control. Compared to naïve rats, the pJNK1/2 protein levels were increased on the ipsilateral side of the spinal cord on day 12 and day 16 after intra-tibial inoculation with carcinoma cells (Figure 1C).

Figure 1
figure 1

Time course of pJNK upregulation on the ipsilateral side of L4-L5 spinal cord after intra-tibial inoculation with carcinoma cells. (A-B) Representative Western blots of pJNK1/2 and GAPDH from one membrane. (C-D) Density of pJNK1/2 levels on the ipsilateral side of L4-L5 spinal cord. pJNK1/2 levels were normalized against GAPDH levels and expressed as fold increase, compared with naïve. (* p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01, one-way ANOVA, Mean ± SEM n = 4)

The number of pJNK positive cells was also increased by single-stained immunofluorescence on day 12 and day 16 after inoculation with carcinoma cells (Figure 2A-D). We then determined the cellular localization of pJNK1/2 in naïve and model animals (Figure 2E-M). Double immunofluorescence results showed that a small number of pJNK1/2-IR cells were double labeled with NeuN, CD11b and GFAP, indicating that pJNK1/2 was expressed in neurons, microglia and astrocytes in naïve rats (Figure 2E, H, K). A significant increase in the number of pJNK1/2-IR neurons and astrocytes was found on day 12 and day 16 in ipsilateral spinal cord after intra-tibial inoculation with carcinoma cells as compared to the naïve condition, but the number of pJNK1/2-IR microglia was not changed at any time point after intra-tibial inoculation with carcinoma cells (Figure 2N).

Figure 2
figure 2

Intra-tibial inoculation of carcinoma cells induced persistent JNK activation on the ipsilateral side of L4-L5 spinal cord. (A-C) Time course of pJNK activation in ipsilateral side of L4-L5 spinal cord. (D) Quantitative measurement of pJNK-IR cells in the superficial dorsal horn (laminas I- III). (E-M) Double immunofluorescence of pJNK (green) with NeuN (red, E-G), CD11b (H-J) and GFAP (red, K-M) respectively. (N) Statistic analysis of pJNK1/2-IR cells co-expressed with NeuN, CD11b and GFAP. Scale bars: 50 μm. (G’, J’, M’) High magnification image of G, J and M. Scale bars: 50 μm. (** p < 0.01 vs Naive, one-way ANOVA, mean ± SEM, n = 4)

Analgesic effects of intrathecal JNK inhibitor SP600125

The CIBP rats displayed significant decreases in mechanical thresholds on day 5, day 12 and day 16 after intra-tibial inoculation with carcinoma cells as compared to naïve rats or sham control rats injected with intra-tibial PBS (Figure 3A). We sought to assess whether the activation of JNK contributed to the mechanical allodynia induced by intra-tibial inoculation with carcinoma cells. A single intrathecal injection of SP600125, which respectively inhibited JNK phosphorylation, induced an increase in paw withdrawal thresholds at 1 h; this effect lasted for 6 h (Figure 3B). Furthermore, the CIBP rats received a repeated daily intrathecal injection of SP600125 from day 10 to 14 after intra-tibial inoculation with carcinoma cells. After 3 intrathecal injections of SP600125, the analgesic effect of SP600125 was observed to last for 12 h, while there was no analgesic effect of SP600125 on 12 h after a single injection (Figure 3C). After 5 daily intrathecal injections of SP600125, the analgesic effect of SP600125 was observed to last for 24 h (Figure 3D). Intrathecal injection of 30% DMSO had no effect on mechanical allodynia at any time point throughout the experiment.

Figure 3
figure 3

The analgesic effect of JNK inhibitor SP600125 on the nociceptive response to mechanical stimulations. (A) The paw withdrawal thresholds of ipsilateral side were significiantly decreased from day 5 until day 16. (B) The effect was tested immediately after a single intrathecal injection of SP600125 on day 12 after intra-tibial inoculation with carcinoma cells. (C) The accumulative (therapeutic) effect was tested 12 h after intrathecal injection of SP600125 on days 10, 12 and 14 after the intra-tibial inoculation of carcinoma cells. (D) The accumulative (therapeutic) effect was tested 24 h after intrathecal injection of SP600125 on day 10 and 14 after the intra-tibial inoculation of carcinoma cells. (* p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01, compared to control, one-way ANOVA, Mean ± SEM n = 8)

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated JNK activation in neurons and astrocytes of the spinal cord after intra-tibial inoculation with carcinoma cells. A single intrathecal injection of JNK inhibitor SP600125 could attenuate bone cancer-induced mechanical allodynia. Interestingly, the repeated injection of SP600125 showed an accumulative analgesic effect. For example, the analgesic effect of SP600125 lasted up to 12 h after the previous injection when administered as repeated injections over 3 days and for 24 h when administered as repeated injections over 5 days.

Primary tumors including breast and prostate tumors have a particular propensity for metastasis to bone. Metastatic bone disease, especially bone pain, has a significant impact on the quality of life in patients with cancer. Despite the currently available therapies, CIBP is difficult to relieve and often associated with significant side effects [2124]. Advances in treatment of CIBP require new insights into the mechanisms that initiate and maintain this type of serious pain. The animal model we used in this study was an established model of CIBP that was suitable for studying the clinical problem of CIBP. Analysis of bone destruction by radiographic scoring and the behavioral measurement of pain using the von Frey hair test indicated that intra-tibial inoculation with Walker 256 mammary gland carcinoma cells in the induced bone pain model caused severe and progressive pain [16, 17]. In this study, the mechanical allodynia was observed on day 5, day 12 and day 16 after intra-tibial inoculation with carcinoma cells, but injection with PBS had no effect on paw-withdrawal thresholds. Clohisy found that no pain was observed when the malignancy was grown in soft tissue [22]. Thus, our results indicate that at the level of peripheral tissue, the tumor-induced bone destruction and the presence of tumor cells contributed to pain.

Among the multiple mechanisms of chronic pain, the role of MAPK activation included ERK, p38, and JNK in central sensitization has been investigated in recent years [20, 25]. For example, JNK has been found to be activated in spinal astrocytes but not in neurons or microglia after spinal nerve ligation (SNL) and inflammation [6, 26]. In our study, after intra-tibial inoculation with carcinoma cells, increased levels of pJNK were found not only in astrocytes but also in neurons in the spinal cord on day 12 and day 16. Although the mechanical thresholds were decreased on day 5 after intra-tibial inoculation with carcinoma cells, the pJNK levels were not changed compared to the naïve group at the early stage (< 5 D). Interestingly, the results were clearly different from those observed for inflammatory pain or neuropathic pain. Several studies have found that JNK1 in spinal astrocytes was required in inflammatory pain and neuropathic pain condition. Besides, CFA-induced inflammatory pain was attenuated in mice lacking JNK1 but not JNK2 [6, 7]. In our results both pJNK1 and pJNK2 were increased in spinal cord, and inhibition of JNK by SP600125 attenuated the mechanical allodynia in bone cancer induced pain model. The selective JNK1 inhibitor and JNK2 inhibitor are needed to find the possible difference in the roles of JNK1 and JNK2 in further study. The differences between CIBP, inflammatory pain and neuropathic pain have been mentioned in a previous study that indicated that CIBP results in a unique pain state [27].

Several reasons account for the increased pJNK level, including the variation in levels of proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6. It has been well accepted that after nerve injury, levels of proinflammatory cytokines increased in the spinal cord and became the primary activators of the JNK pathway [4, 28, 29]. Several studies have found the up-regulation of TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 in the spinal cord in the CIBP model [30, 31]. Thus, after intra-tibial inoculation with carcinoma cells, it is probable that the increased release of proinflammatory cytokines induced JNK activation in the spinal cord. It is well known that NMDA receptors participate in the development of morphine tolerance and chronic pain [32]. Guo et al. has found that a noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 not only decreased the expression of NR2B but also reduced the level of JNK activation in the spinal cord. This suggested that the spinal JNK activation in the context of morphine dependence in rats was N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor dependent [33]. The activation of NMDA receptors in the spinal cord of CIBP model animals has been reported in many studies [3436]; thus, we suppose that the JNK activation in the spinal cord after intra-tibial inoculation with carcinoma cells may be induced by increased expression of NMDA receptors.

Previous studies have demonstrated that intrathecal injection of the JNK inhibitor SP600125 induced significant decreases in nociceptive behavior in inflammatory pain and neuropathic pain [6, 7]. In our study, we also found that the JNK inhibitor SP600125 reversed CIBP. It remains to be investigated how JNK inhibition in the spinal cord regulates pain. It was reported that transcription factors such as c-jun, Elk-1, p53 and ATF-2 were shown to be regulated by JNK activation, which subsequently induced gene expression that contributed to pain sensitization [7, 37].

Conclusions

In summary, our results demonstrated that intra-tibial inoculation with carcinoma cells induced obvious pain behavior in rats and caused JNK phosphorylation in the neurons and astrocytes of the spinal cord. Furthermore, the inhibition of JNK by SP600125 attenuated mechanical allodynia, providing a new method to control CIBP.

Methods

Animals

Adult female Wistar rats weighing 160–200 g were used in all experiments. All animals were kept under controlled conditions (a temperature-controlled room (22 ± 0.5°C), a 12:12 h light cycle (07:00–19:00 h light), and with unrestricted free access to food and water). All animal experiments followed the guidelines of the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) [38]. Efforts were made to reduce the number of animals used in the experiment.

Surgical procedures

Walker 256 rat mammary gland carcinoma cells were used in the experiment. Suspensions of 1 × 108/ml tumor cells in PBS were prepared as previously described [13, 16, 17, 39]. After the animals were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (i.p. 50 mg/kg), 4 × 105 cells in 4 μl 0.01MPBS were injected into the right tibias of female Wistar rats. Briefly, the Walker 256 carcinoma cells were obtained from an ascetic tumor-bearing rat, washed with PBS 3 times, and then diluted to 1 × 108/ml during the last wash. Bilateral superficial incisions were made in the skin overlying the patella after disinfection with 70% v/v ethanol in order to expose the tibia head with minimal damage. After Walker 256 carcinoma cells were prepared, 4 μl cells followed by 4 μl of absorbable gelatin sponge dissolved in saline were slowly injected into the right tibia cavity of each rat using a 10-μl microinjection syringe. The syringe was left in place for an additional 2 min to prevent the carcinoma cells from leaking out along the injection track. The injection site was closed using bone wax while the syringe was removed to prevent tumor cells overflow. The sham group rats were treated in the same way and injected with 4 μl PBS instead of tumor cells.

Intrathecal drugs

The JNK inhibitor SP600125 (1,9-Pyrazoloanthrone) was purchased from Calbiochem (San Diego, California, USA). SP600125 stock solution was prepared in DMSO at a concentration 20 μg/μl and stored at -20°C until use. The concentration used for the study was 1 μg/μl, which was freshly prepared with a final DMSO concentration of 30%. Ten μg were used in the experiment, and the control group was treated with the same amount of DMSO. The dose of drug used in the experiment was chosen based on the previous research [7, 8]. Rats were anesthetized with 2% isoflurane. After the lumbar region was shaved and sterilized with 75% ethanol, animals were given a lumbar puncture at the L5-6 interspace using a 0.5-inch, 30-gauge needle. Then the drug was delivered to the CSF through the needle [40]. SP600125 was given once on day 12; for testing the addictive effect of SP600125, the drug was given daily from day 10 to day 14 after carcinoma cell inoculation.

Western blot

The spinal cord segments were removed and immediately placed in liquid nitrogen to freeze quickly. The ipsilateral L4-L5 segments were quickly removed and homogenized in an SDS sample buffer (25 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 1 mM each, PMSF, NaF, NaVO3, 1 μg/ml each, leupeptin, pepstatin, aprotinin), followed by centrifugation at 12000 g for 20 min. The protein concentration of the supernatant was determined by BCA Protein Assay Kit (Pierce, Rockford, USA). Thirty μg protein was boiled for 3 min at 100°C with an appropriate volume of 5× SDS-PAGE sample loading buffer (250 mM Tris–HCl, pH 6.8, 5% 2-mercaptoethanol, 10% SDS, 0.5% Bromophenol Blue, 50% glycerol). Samples were loaded into each lane of a 10% SDS-PAGE gel. The membrane was blocked by 5% bovine serum albumin in TBS-T (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.6, 140 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20) at 4°C overnight. Primary and secondary antibodies were also diluted in blocking solution at room temperature for 3 h. Blots were developed in ECL (Pierce, Rockford, US) solution for 3 min and exposed onto Kodak X-OMAT AR Film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, US) for 3 min. The antibodies used were rabbit anti-phosphorylation SAPK/JNK (Thr183/Tyr185) antibody (1:1000, Cell signaling Technology, Massachusetts, US), HRP-anti-rabbit antibody(1:1000, Santa Cruz, California, US)and mouse HRP-anti-GAPDH (1:5000, Santa Cruz, California, US), which was used as a loading control in all Western blots. Densitometry analysis of pJNK1/2 bands and GAPDH bands were performed using Syngene software (GeneGnome, Syngene, Maryland, US). The same size square was drawn around each band to measure the density and subtract the background near that band. pJNK1/2 levels were normalized against GAPDH levels and expressed as fold increase, compared to the naive condition.

Immunofluorescence

Four rats from each group were used in the experiment. The L4–L5 spinal segments were removed, post-fixed, frozen and cut on a freezing microtome (Leica 2000, Germany) at 30-μm thickness. The sections were washed three times and blocked with 4% donkey serum in 0.3% Triton X-100 for 1 h at 37°C and then incubated with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight and with secondary antibodies at room temperature for 1 h. The primary antibodies used were rabbit anti-phosphorylation SAPK/JNK (Thr183/Tyr185) (1:400, Cell signaling Technology, Massachusetts, US), mouse anti-NeuN (neuronal marker, 1:1000, Chemicon, California, US), mouse anti-GFAP (astrocyte marker, 1:1000, Sigma-Aldrich, Missouri, US) and mouse anti-CD11b (microglia marker, 1:400, Chemicon, California, US). The secondary antibodies used were Cy3-conjugated affinity purified goat anti-mouse (1:1000, Millipore, CA) and Alexa Fluor 488-labeled donkey anti-rabbit (1:200, Invitrogen, Eugene, Oregon, USA). The stained sections were examined with a Leica fluorescence microscope. The number of pJNK-IR cells was counted in lamina I-II and lamina III-IV of the ipsilateral spinal dorsal horn that captured by using a computerized image analysis system (Leica Qwin 500). The specificity for pJNK antibody we used was confirmed by the lack of staining in the absence of primary antibody, and also specific bands on the membrane in Western blots. Based on the intensity of the staining, a threshold was chosen from the spinal cord of naïve animal to judge the signal was true or false. A signal below the threshold was considered as false positive. The backgrounds of the cell free area nearby the positive pJNK-IR and the depth lamina were subtracted. The number of pJNK-IR cells was recorded after removing the repeated count. For counting the double staining, the pJNK-IR neurons were determined by the distinct morpho-logy from glia cells and the colocalization with NeuN. The pJNK-IR glia cells were determined by the morphology and the colocalization with CD11b or GFAP. At least 4 rats from each group and each time point were analyzed. A minimum of 6 sections randomly selected from each rat were used in the experiment.

Behavioral tests

Eight rats in each group were used in the experiment. The day of carcinoma cell inoculation was referred to as day 0. Mechanical allodynia was assessed using a von Frey hair filament (Stoelting, Wood Dale, Illinois, US) as previously described [16]. An ascending series of von Frey filaments with logarithmically incremental stiffness (0.40, 0.60, 1.4, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0 and 15.0 g) were used in the experiment. The test began with the application of the 2.0 g von Frey filament. Each plantar surface of the hind paws was stimulated individually in the experiment. Each von Frey hair was held about 1–2 s, the positive response was defined as a withdrawal of hind paw or licking. We used a lower hair when the positive response was appeared, otherwise used the higher hair. After five more stimuli counted from the first change, a score was record. The final score was gotten by using the method described by Dixon which converted to a 50% von Frey threshold. Animals were habituated to the environment daily for at least 2 days before baseline testing. To test the paw withdrawal thresholds, animals were put into the experimental environment for 30 min before stimulation. The pre-drug baseline was assessed 1 h before intrathecal injection. All of the tests were performed with researchers blinded with respect to the drugs injected.

Statistical analysis

All data were presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). The statistical significance of differences between groups was analyzed with one-way ANOVA following the Bonferroni post-test or with Student’s t-test. p < 0.05 was set as the threshold of significance.