Background

More than 340 genetic diseases have been identified in the Tunisian population. In a previous study, we have reported on the spectrum of these disorders. The genetic aetiologies are known for only 50% and are caused by at least one mutation [1]. Due to the relatively high rate of endogamy and consanguinity, over 60% of genetic diseases in Tunisia are autosomal recessive [1]. This socio-cultural feature is shared by several other countries mainly in North Africa and Middle East. Individuals whose parents share a common ancestor are more likely to have inherited two copies of the same single allele (identical by descent). The flanking genomic sequence is usually inherited identical by descent, as well. Thus, consanguineous off springs of mating between relatives are more often “homozygous by descent” [2]. The probability that the consanguineous child of union between relatives will be autozygous for a particular allele is calculated by the coefficient of inbreeding noted “F” [3]. Many genetic disorders are due to mutations that could be traced back to a founder whose existence can be inferred from the particular chromosomal background on which the mutation arose [4]. Founder mutations are of particular interest because they provide a rapid tool for molecular diagnosis of some genetic disorders. Indeed, testing for one or a few prevalent founder mutations is more efficient than for many rare mutations [5]. Targeted screening of ethnically restricted disease mutations in the appropriate population subgroups has also demonstrated its efficiency in disease prevention [6]. This enhanced the importance of the population history which can have a serious impact on medical genetics [4, 7].

The following is an overview of the Tunisian population structure and history.

Tunisian population origins

Tunisia has approximately 10 million inhabitants. It is three times as much as in 1956 at the end of the French protectorate, and twice as much as in the seventies (Figure 1) [8, 9]. This growth is mainly attributed to the decrease of infantile mortality rates and the improvement of life expectancy; which are indicators of improvements in health status and medical management [9]. African, Near Eastern and European influences have shaped the Tunisian cultural identity. The overwhelming majority of the population is Muslim (98%) . Christian and Jewish communities also contribute to the Tunisian cultural diversity [10]. Like the other North African and Middle Eastern countries, Tunisia has kept the consanguineous and endogamous marriages as a social habit. Indeed, the frequencies of unions between relatives range from 20.1% to 39.33% [11–14] and those of endogamous marriages could reach more than 96% in some specific groups like those of Douiret in Southern Tunisia [Ben Halim, Unpublished data]. The Tunisian family structure is generally extended and often associated with inbreeding. Tunisia is classified as a middle-income country [15].

Figure 1
figure 1

Tunisian population growth [[8],[9],[16]].

Full size image

Prehistoric background

Tunisia has been inhabited since the Paleolithic period. Remainders of Acheulean industry (700,000 to 100,000 years BCE) have been discovered on several sites in the layer of Sidi Zin in the north west, Gafsa and Redayef in the south. The 100,000 last years of Paleolithic were characterized by the presence of Homo sapiens archaic contemporary of Homo neanderthalensis in Europe. Between 60,000 and 20,000 years BCE, the Mediterranean coast stretching over from Cap Bon to Monastir was occupied by Homo sapiens sapiens. In the Epipaleolithic period (23,000 years to 10,000 years BCE), the Mechta El Arbi Man, Homo sapiens sapiens specific to North Africa succeeded to the Aterian population. Around 8,000 years BCE, the Capsian civilization first identified in the eponymous city of Gafsa covered a broad area of Central and Southern Tunisia and could be considered as the ancestor of the Berber population. Berbers occupied the North African region including Tunisia. They have been for long self-identified as “Imazighen” which means “free people” [17, 18].

Major historical events

The Punic era initiated with the arrival of Phoenician traders from the eastern Mediterranean Sea and was marked by the founding of the City of Carthage on 814 BC (present Tunis). For many centuries, the Punic civilization either displaced the native Berbers to the city periphery or integrated them. Phoenicians expanded their dominance to the western Mediterranean and had settled in what are now Sardinia, Sicily, Spain, Morocco and Algeria. The emergence of the Roman Republic led to sustained rivalry with the more anciently established Carthage for dominion over the western Mediterranean. Carthage lost its influence over the Berbers leading to the defeat of Carthage during the Third Punic War (149–146 BC), therefore, marking the end of the Phoenician reign. Tunisia became the Roman Province of Africa. After the dissolution of the Roman Empire during the 5th century, the Germanic nation of the Wisigoths migrating downward to south Western Europe (the so called Vandals) took control of the coastal part of North Africa for nearly a hundred years. The Byzantine Empire re-established its dominion in 533 AD, which lasted till the Islamic conquest in the 7th century. This era started with the arrival of Arabs from the Arab Peninsula who brought their language, their culture and Islam [19]. They founded Kairouan in 670 AD, the first Arab-Muslim city in “Ifriqya” (nowadays: Tunisia, Eastern Algeria and Western Libya). Successive Arab dynasties were established in the region. The 11th century was marked by a breaking event: the invasion of Bedouins of Banu Hilal and Banu Sulaym originating from the Banu’Amir tribe from the southwest Arabia. These Arab newcomers (up to 200,000 individuals) represented the second large Arab immigration into Ifriqiya [19].

In 1135 AD, Ifriqiya was attacked by Normands and Sicilians who occupied four coastal cities of Tunisia. They were then expelled under the reign of the Almohad dynasty (1147–1269 AD) [19]. The arrival of Béni Soulaim in Tunisia had accelerated the administrative desagregation of the country and the dissolution of the Almohad dynasty [19]. Under the Hafsids (1230–1574 AD), the Black Death has caused extensive devastation from Tunis to Tanger. Since then it had hit every 10 years in addition to droughts and starvations [20, 21]. Spain had occupied a series of positions in North Africa including Tunis (1534 AD) until their incorporation in the Ottoman Empire. The population size of the region had evolved from 4.7 millions around 1500 AD, to 5.4 millions in 1620 AD after the mass migration of hundreds of thousands of Morrish Andalusian Muslims and Jews expelled from Spain to North Africa [19–21]. The 16th and the 17th centuries were characterised by successive epidemic waves, cricket invasions and starvations leading to severe human losss that reached hundreds of thousands [20, 21]. The beginning of the 18th century was hallmarked by the decline of the Ottoman Empire and the reemergence of plague that hit the entire Maghreb until the first half of the 19th century [20]. The Tunisian population growth was periodically slowed by successive and prolonged epidemics of plague, cholera and typhus during the 19th century as nearly one thousand individuals had died in the city of Tunis in 1918 [21]. In 1881, French forces established a protectorate. In 1936, the European population (French, Italian and Maltese) in Tunisia was of more than 213 thousands inhabitants [16]. The French protectorate ended in 1956 AD [19].

Tunisian Jews

A Jewish minority has existed in Tunisia since the Roman times. In the 7th century, the Jewish population in Tunisia largely increased due to Spanish immigrants fleeing the persecutions of the Visigoth king. They fled to Morocco and settled in the Byzantine cities. These settlers, according to the Arab historians, mixed with the Berber population and converted many tribes [22]. Later, during the Islamic expansion they continued to profess Judaism until the reign of the Idrisid dynasty in Western Maghreb (789–985 AD) though they could maintain their particularism thanks to the permissive Islamic rule of Dhimma. Molecular studies based on the analysis of mitochondrial DNA and Y-chromosome polymorphisms showed a negligible or low level of admixture of the Jewish community with Arab and Berber populations in Tunisia [23, 24]. As a conclusion, the genetic landscape of the Tunisian population has been shaped by successive invasions and migratory flows through its history. Epidemics, droughts and plagues have also impacted the Tunisian population [20, 21]. The new-comers and the local Berbers intermarried and mixed to some extent, although, some Berber groups like the Berbers of Douiret in the South and those of “El Gallala” in the island of Jerba are known to have poorly mixed with new-comers and are still Berber speaking and highly endogamous. Genetic investigations based on mitochondrial DNA analysis of current populations from Berber villages in Tunisia showed the absence of a common genetic Berber profile. Genetic differentiation was observed between Berbers from different localities (Sejnane, Takrouna, Kesra and Jerba Island) and between Berbers and Arabs (Zriba and Jerba Island) as well as among Jews (Jerba Island) [25–27]. This genetic heterogeneity between these current small groups is due essentially to founder effects and could also be due to their limited size and the variation of Sub-Saharan African traces detected in their gene pool. Nevertheless, when comparing samples from neighboring populations, the general ancient genetic profile of the native North Africans –the Berbers- appears not to be very different from that of the present-day North African populations despite some admixture with other people, particularly Arabs of little genetic contribution. This suggests that the populations of the Maghreb seem to share a substantial genetic background [28–30].

In a country with limited resources and with other public health and research priorities, the rare genetic diseases remain neglected. As no complete report on founder mutations in the Tunisian population was performed, we have collected data on these mutations in the region and discussed their usefulness for the design of cost effective diagnosis tool in the Tunisian, North African and the Middle Eastern populations.

Methods

To identify founder mutations among the Tunisian population, we searched the databases Pubmed and OMIM through March 2012 using combinations of the following key-words “founder, mutation, Tunisia, North Africa, Middle East, common, haplotype”. Furthermore, references cited in the published papers were examined until no further study was identified. Publications in English and French provided essential information. Abstracts from meeting proceedings were also retrieved. Geographic and population distributions of mutation were further checked by querying also available population and locus-specific databases. We present information about the timing of occurrence of these mutations and their contemporary geographic distribution in Tunisia when it is known. Mutation description according to the HGVS nomenclature was checked with the Mutalyzer version 2.0 β-4 software [31]. Some of them are reported as mentioned in the original text. When available, data on number of affected individuals and families or on carrier frequency are provided.

Results

In a recent study of the genetic disorders in Tunisia, over 340 genetic diseases were identified [1]. For 73 genetic conditions, one or several founder or likely founder mutations were reported. The classification according to the mode of transmission revealed that 63 (86%) are autosomal recessive, 8 (11%) are autosomal dominant and 2 (3%) are X-linked.

All the 73 reported diseases originated from at least one founder or one likely founder mutation. A founder mutation being a mutation that arose in a common ancestor, the same mutation is found in related individuals who share the same haplotype; it can be of low or high frequency in the population [32]. We have assigned diseases due to founder mutations to three main categories according to the geographic distribution:

  1. (1)

    Diseases with Tunisian specific founder mutations; when the mutation was identified only in the Tunisian population among unrelated individuals (Additional file 1).

  2. (2)

    Diseases with mutations shared with North African and Middle Eastern populations that are likely founder, and in some rare cases, mutations were shared with other populations mostly from Europe, the Mediterranean Basin and America (Additional file 2).

  3. (3)

    Diseases with both Tunisian specific and shared alleles with other populations (Additional file 3).

When common origin is not demonstrated on the basis of haplotype sharing, recurrent mutation could not be ruled out.

Tunisian specific founder mutations

In the Tunisian population, 22 genetic diseases are due to Tunisian specific founder alleles and likely founder alleles whereas 8 genetic diseases can be due to either Tunisian-specific alleles or non-specific alleles shared with other North African or Middle Eastern populations. Sixty two percent (21/34) mutations are due to common ancestors on the basis of shared haplotypes (Additional file 1, Additional file 3 and Figure 2). For the majority of these Tunisian founder mutations, geographic distribution is limited to a region of the country like mutations responsible for congenital muscular dystrophy 1C [Louhichi N, personal communication] and spastic paraplegia 15 encountered in Southern Tunisia [Boukhris A, personal communication]. The p.L273P founder mutation affecting the TAT gene that leads to Richner–Hanhart Syndrome is restricted to the region of Monastir [Charfeddine C, personal communication]. The p.Ser493ArgfsX11 mutation in LDLR gene causing familial hypercholesterolemia is limited to the village of Souassi [33] and the deletion in IL12p40 gene of disseminated BCGitis is restricted to the village of Akouda [34] and several other examples (Figure 2).

Figure 2
figure 2

Geographic distribution of Tunisian specific founder mutations.

Full size image

Some other founder mutations are specific to an ethnic and religious group such as the c.890_893del mutation in FANCA gene that underlies Fanconi anemia specifically among the Tunisian Jews [35]. They could be also specific to both an ethnic group and a geographic region. This is illustrated by the Jewish community living on the Island of Jerba who is affected with combined factor V and factor VIII deficiency due to the c.IVS9+2T>G mutation in LMAN1 gene [36].

Allele sharing with other North African and Middle Eastern populations

The Tunisian population shares founder mutations with other North African and Middle Eastern populations for 43 inherited conditions whereas 8 genetic diseases are due to either shared or specific alleles (Additional file 2, Additional file 3). Common haplotypes described in the Tunisian population could also be reported in restricted regions of North Africa. Founder chromosomal segments described in Tunisian patients with Meckel syndrome, mal de Meleda (MDM), sickle cell anemia and Xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) group A are identical to those described in Algerian affected individuals [37–40]. In addition, the founder mutations leading to adenomatous polyposis of the colon and the hepatocerebral mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome are reported on the same haplotypes only among Tunisian and Moroccan patients [41, 42].

Founder mutations could be shared in some countries of the Maghreb (defined today as Morroco, Tunisia, Libya, Mauritania and Algeria). In Tunisian, Algerian and Moroccan patients, autosomal recessive non syndromic optic atrophy and Bare lymphocyte syndrome are caused by the p.R2034X and 752delG-25 founder mutations, respectively [43, 44]. Identical haplotypes bearing founder mutations are observed for congenital myasthenia syndrome and XP group C in four North African countries [45, 46].

Founder mutations observed in Tunisia were also reported in populations from the Middle East such as the splice site mutation in the CA II gene responsible for carbonic anhydrase II deficiency in the Arabic peninsula [47] and the p.Q357R molecular defect in the UGT1A1 gene of the Crigler-Najjar type I syndrome in the Kuwaiti population [48]. In other cases, founder mutations are dispersed around the Mediterranean basin as illustrated by the c.744delA mutation in the TTPA gene of ataxia with isolated vitamin E deficiency [49] and the splice site defects in megaloblastic anemia 1 [50] and triple-A syndrome [51]. In other examples, the founder haplotypes are shared with populations from Europe and America, as for the Parkinson disease [52].

Some other founder mutations are reported in specific ethnic and religious groups mainly Jews from North Africa. The p.R35X founder mutation, responsible for ataxia-telangiectasia, is mainly reported in Jews from Tunisia and Morocco [53]. Common haplotype bearing the large CGG repeats on the FMR1 gene, responsible for fragile X, is observed among Tunisian and Sephardic Jewish patients and among Israeli Arabs as well [54]. A common founder mutation responsible for cutaneaous malignant melanoma was also reported only among Jewish patients from Tunisia, Morocco, Spain and France [55].

A same mutation could have arisen on different haplotypes. This could be explained by independent mutational events that could have occurred and have been introduced into the population by different founders during migrations and invasions. This is a possible hypothesis if we take into consideration the rich history of the Tunisian population. This is the case for mutations underlaying beta thalassemia [40], sickle cell anemia [40], familial Mediterranean fever [56], G6PD deficiency [57], 21 hydroxylase deficiency [58, 59], limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2C (LGMD2C) [60] and non syndromic hearing loss [61] that show a large distribution arround the Mediterranean basin.

Diseases with both Tunisian specific and shared alleles

For the same disease and/or the same causing gene, some mutations could be specific to the Tunisian population and others are shared by other populations (Additional file 3). Eight genetic diseases belong to this category. This is the case for 11-β hydroxylase deficiency [62, 63], hereditary breast and ovarian cancer [64, 65], cystic fibrosis [66, 67], glycogen storage disease type III [68, 69], Leber congenital amaurosis [70], leukocyte adhesion deficiency [71, 72] and MDM [Charfeddine C, personal communciation, 37,73]. For some founder mutations, the situation is relatively complex. Indeed, the p.C99Y mutation responsible for MDM is distributed in various geographic areas of the country, while the p.C77R mutation is restricted to the North. On the other hand, the c.82delT mutation is widely encountered in populations from the Mediterranean basin and also in Scottish and Croatian ones [37, 73].

Multiple founder effects are encountered for 4 inherited diseases caused by more than one founder mutation (Additional file 3). This phenomenon could affect the same gene. This is illustrated by the examples of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer [64, 65], leukocyte adhesion deficiency [71, 72] and MDM [Charfeddine C, personal communciation,73]. Another situation is encountered in genetically heterogeneous diseases with founder mutations in different underlying genes as is the case with Bardet-Biedl syndrome where two founder mutations affecting both BBS2 and BBS8 genes were reported [74] (Additional file 1).

Discussion

More than three hundred genetic disorders were reported in Tunisia [1]. Among them, 73 inherited diseases were likely due to a founder effect representing 42% of all the disorders with identified molecular defect described in Tunisian patients [1]. It is noteworthy that for half of the diseases reported in Tunisia, the genetic basis is still unknown; consequently, the proportion of founder mutations might be even larger and will expand with further identification of disease causing mutations. The high proportion of recessive founder alleles (86%) points out the role of endogamy and consanguinity as a major cause of the high prevalence of the diseases they cause.

Allelic heterogeneity is also noticed for 23 genetic diseases out of the 73 reported in this study. Two situations depict the fact that multiple mutations could affect the same gene responsible of a single genetic disease in a small geographic area or isolated population. In the first situation, one mutation is predominant thus consolidating the hypothesis of founder effect and genetic drift. In addition to this frequent mutation, rare or private deleterious variants are also observed and could be new mutations or introduced by migrations [75, 76]. This case is illustrated by the LGMD2C which is caused by three mutations one of which, the c.521delT is by far the most predominant [60, 77, 78]. The same picture is also shown for the major founder mutation p.R228X in xeroderma pigmentosum group A. Another private mutation was recently reported in one family [39, 79]. In the second observation, more than one frequent mutation is responsible for the genetic disease. The most illustrating examples are beta-thalassemia [40], cystic fibrosis [66] and familial Mediterranean fever [80]. A possible explanation for this observation is the selective advantage of heterozygous in the case of recessive disorders [75, 81]. The existence of multiple founder mutations affecting the same gene exclusively in the Tunisian population as in the case of Acrodermatitis enteropathica [82] and MDM [73] could be explained by an autochtonous mutational event. As these diseases have not yet been investigated in the neighboring countries, specificity of the mutations to Tunisian population should be taken cautiously.

Some mutations had a very limited geographical distribution in Tunisia like the p.G1483D and p.R1763X mutations in the COL7A1 gene that are encountered specifically in the region of Sidi Bouzid and Kasserine, respectively [Unpublished data]. It is noteworthy that these mutations have been reported among Kuwaiti patients [83]. These mutations likely arose in the Middle East and were introduced in Tunisia following Banu Hilal invasions that settled in the Maghreb in the eleventh century. Several other mutations like those responsible for carbonic anhydrase and Crigler Najjar disease were introduced similarly [47, 48]. The extent of geographic repartition of a founder mutation could give insights into its history and age. Older founder mutations tend to be widely distributed; mainly due to migration. This is the case for c.35delG mutation in GJB2 that causes deafness and is widely spread in Europe and around the Mediterranean basin. As haplotype data suggested, it arose from a single mutational event about 10,000 years ago somewhere in the Mediterranean region or in the Middle East. Then it spread throughout Europe along the two Neolithic population movement routes [84–86]. Comparing frequency data of HBB gene mutations such as the c.118C > T (also described as the codon 39 C > T mutation) and c.IVS1-110G>A substitutions within the different parts of the Maghreb region reveals important differences. The c.IVS1-110G>A mutation is predominant in the western part of Tunisia and in northern Algeria [40]. This fact is attributed to an introduction by Ottomans during their dominance over this region that does not reach the Moroccan territory, thus explaining its rarity in Morocco. However, the codon 39 C > T mutation is largely predominant in Tunisia, Morocco and north-western Algeria. It is thought to have an occidental origin and that it was introduced in the region during the Roman period through Italy [40]. The c.1070A > G mutation in UGT1A1 gene could be considered as the most recent as it arose 32 generations ago [48]. The age of the founder event was estimated to approximately 700 years for c.1293insG mutation in CHRNE gene [45], 80 generations for the autosomal non syndromic optic atrophy (2400 years) [43] and calculated to have arisen in the second half of the 13th century for Creutzefeldt-Jacob disease [87].

Knowledge of the genetic disease features and of the spectrum of their underlying likely founder molecular defect and their distribution among different groups of the Tunisian population could influence different aspects of clinical practice: differential diagnosis, design of diagnostic test, selection of the most suitable diagnostic test and result interpretation [88].

Application of a suitable molecular diagnostic test is useful for the diagnostic orientation especially for phenotypically homogenous but genetically heterogeneous diseases. Screening for the founder c.del521T mutation in SGCG gene may be at the top of diagnosis analysis as this form of severe childhood autosomal recessive muscular dystrophy (SCARMD) is the most frequent muscular dystrophy in Tunisia [89] and that most patients were homozygous for this mutation [60]. Though other forms of SCARMD were reported in Tunisia, detection of this mutation should be considered as the first diagnostic step of the disease.

Disease particularities in the local population must be taken into consideration when diagnostic tests are developed. In some cases when internationally agreed clinical diagnostic criteria are lacking and biochemical tests do not allow accurate diagnosis in all cases, a molecular test is more suitable and appropriate [90]. Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), a dominantly inherited and highly atherogenic condition due to a dysfunction of the LDLR, is frequent in Tunisia since carrier frequency is of 1/165 [33, 91]. Its diagnosis traditionally based on elevated total cholesterol levels is challenging since FH patients could present a mixed hyperlipidemia phenotype with elevation of both LDL-cholesterol and triglycerides [92, 93] which is a feature of another inherited lipid abnormality; the familial combined hyperlipidemia [90, 94, 95]. Therefore, the “Souassi” founder mutation should be screened first for the molecular diagnosis of FH in Central Tunisia since it is the most frequent in that area [33]. Early diagnosis for FH is very important as there is good evidence that early cholesterol-lowering therapy will delay or even prevent coronary heart disease in these persons [95].

The identification of the most prevalent mutation in different ethnic groups opened the way for molecular diagnosis particularly for metabolic diseases for which the biochemical investigation is unavailable in the country. This was the case for glycogenosis type Ia. Indeed, in the Tunisian population, two mutations in the G6PC gene, p.R38C and p.R170Q, account for more than 90% of mutations [96]. Therefore, developing direct DNA mutation analysis of the G6Pase gene allowed rapid carrier testing and avoided performing a liver biopsy for the biochemical confirmation [96]. For such disease and for some others, establishing the molecular basis allows a safer and less invasive diagnostic test therefore making it more acceptable and bearable to patients and their families.

In the context of limited resources for mutation screening of diseases that have not been studied yet in Tunisia, prioritizing mutation screening by relying on deleterious gene variants already identified in neighbouring populations was demonstrated to be particularly efficient. The recurrent mutation p.V548AfsX25 affecting the XPC gene and leading to XP group C, a rare severe genodermatosis associated with skin tumours [97], was first described in Algerian and Moroccan patients at homozygous state [98]. In a recent study and in an attempt to elucidate the mutation spectrum of the XPC gene in the Tunisian population, the authors prioritized the screening of the p.V548AfsX25 mutation in 20 Tunisian XP group C patients [97]. They demonstrated the homogeneous XPC gene mutation spectrum and confirmed a founder effect in this population [97].

Knowledge of the patients‘ ethnic background, origin and/or religion is also important in making a diagnosis and must be taken into consideration especially in the case of migrations. For several decades and until now, an important migration is taking place from North African and Middle Eastern countries to industrialised ones for work and study purposes. Marriages of North African migrant population occur preferentially between people of the same national origin or between people from two different Arabic countries because of religious barriers. The religious isolation has also favoured consanguinity and endogamy thus maintaining rare disease haplotypes in the host land. For Hurler syndrome, the point molecular lesion p.P533R is known to be frequent in all the Maghrebian populations even in the Maghrebian immigrant population in France [99, 100]. As p.P533R is a founder mutation in the Tunisian population, then a molecular diagnosis could be proposed for patients of Maghrebian origin. For congenital myasthenic syndrome, patients originating from four North African countries and living in France share the same haplotype bearing the c.1293insG mutation affecting the CHRNE gene [45]. The strong evidence for a single ancestral founder event in the North African population may have an important implication for diagnosis of congenital myasthenic syndrome in the immigrant Maghrebian and original populations. However, one should stress that because of fear of racial interpretation, some physicians feel uneasy to ask about the geographic origin of the patient. In addition, the patient’s family may prefer, for personal reasons and knowledgeability, not to reveal their origin or the genetic disease that affects their family [88].

Conclusion

Founder mutations identified in the Tunisian population provide special advantages for DNA diagnosis and carrier screening programs due to a limited spectrum of disease mutations; consequently one or a reduced number of tests could have high diagnostic specificity and sensitivity. The distribution of founder mutations is the result of historical events and could shed light on them as well as on migratory movements during the last few centuries. Taking into account these events, our report on founder mutations provides a valuable decision making tool for the diagnosis and prevention of diseases in North Africa, Middle East and migrant populations living in Europe or elsewhere in the world. Targeted screening of ethnically restricted disease mutations in the appropriate population subgroups has demonstrated its efficiency in disease prevention [5].