Approach

The National Institute of Virology is the WHO Collaborating Centre For Arbovirus And Hemorrhagic Fever Reference And Research. We work in close collaboration with clinicians in providing dengue diagnosis. Samples from suspected dengue cases are tested for dengue specific IgM, using NIV MAC-ELISA kit [1], viral RNA using dengue-specific real time RT-PCR [2] and serotyped by multiplex nested RT-PCR test [3]. As a gold standard, virus isolation is attempted by infecting C6/36 cells (Aedes albopictus mosquito cell line) with patient sera. The infected cells are examined for the presence of virus by immunofluorescence assay (IFA) and RT-PCR. Sequencing of viral RNA is carried out using big dye terminator kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster city, CA, USA). The infection is characterized as primary or secondary based on the HI antibody response.

Findings

Our studies on Dengue in Pune from 2002 to 2008 revealed that DENV-1, 2 and 3 were co-circulating in Pune (unpublished data). From May 2009 to September 2010, 56 cases could be serotyped by the multiplex RT-PCR test. Thirteen cases of DENV-1, 21 of DENV-2, 20 of DENV-3 and two of DENV-4 were detected. The serotype was confirmed by sequencing the amplicon. The first DENV-4 case, Case 1, occurred at the end of the seasonal outbreak period in November 2009. The second case, Case 2 was in the early phase of the season in June 2010. The two cases were hospitalised patients and underwent standard daily clinical evaluation and physical examinations. The case history forms of the patients were filled from the time of admission. Neither of the patients had any recorded history of dengue infection in the past. Both cases presented severe manifestations and required ICU level of care. They could thus be considered as Category 3 (patients requiring bed rest, intensive care-unit level observation protocol) according to the new WHO classification system, which depends on the intervention protocol [4]. Both the cases presented the common symptoms of dengue and symptoms indicative of plasma leakage (Table 1). Case 1 recovered while Case 2 died. Both cases had thrombocytopenia, however the counts normalized by day 5 (post hospitalisation) in Case 1 while it continued to decline in Case 2. Both cases had no symptoms of haemorrhage. There was mild ascites in Case 1, who survived and pleural effusion in Case 2, who died. Respiratory distress has been reported in death cases of dengue [5, 6]. Case 2 had severe liver damage as indicated by the dramatic increase in the ALT/AST levels (>1000 IU/L). Liver damage is one of the major symptoms reported for DHF/DSS cases in India [7].

Table 1 Clinical profile of patients infected with DENV-4

DENV-specific IgM antibodies were assessed in serum samples collected on 5th day post onset of illness for Case 1 and 4th day post onset of illness for Case 2. Case 1 was positive for IgM while Case 2 was negative. The titre of HI antibodies in the serum was determined to define whether the individuals had suffered primary or secondary infections. HI antibody titre of >1:2560 in the acute phase of infection is considered confirmatory of secondary infection [8]. Case 1 had very low levels of HI antibodies (1:40 to 1:80) indicating a primary infection. Case 2 had HI titre of 1:2560 indicating a secondary infection. The serum samples were also tested in the dengue IgG capture ELISA (Panbio Ltd.) and showed the presence of 31 units of IgG in Case 1 and 78 units in Case 2.

DENV-4 as the aetiological agent was confirmed by multiplex RT-PCR and sequencing of the amplicon. Sequence analysis of the 500 bp fragment, which represented the core-prM region, revealed that the 2009 and 2010 viruses had high similarity with each other (>99%). An isolate was obtained from Case 1 by infecting C6/36 cells with the patient serum, no isolate could be obtained from the serum of Case 2. The envelope (E) gene was sequenced from the virus obtained after a single passage (HQ600557) and analysed in context with other sequences of DENV-4, present in the GenBank using Maximum Likelihood method, PhyML_3.0 [9]. To date, four genotypes of DENV-4 virus have been described consisting of viruses from Southeast Asia (genotype I), Southeast Asia and the Americas (genotype II), Thailand (genotype III) and Malaysia (Sylvatic) [10]. The 2009 isolate belonged to genotype I or the South East Asian genotype (Figure 1). Within the genotype there were three major clusters representing viruses from A) China and Philippines, B) Malaysia and Thailand and C), India and Sri Lanka suggesting the presence of clades within the genotype. The DENV-4 isolates even within the Indian cluster showed high diversity in the E gene. The Pune 2009 isolate (0952326/India/2009) showed a diversity of >4% as compared to the other Indian isolates of cluster A and 7% as compared to a Thailand isolate from cluster B. The amino-acid diversity ranged between 1.6% to 3.1%. The diversity in nucleotide as well as amino acid sequence of the E gene of Indian isolates increased from 1996 [GenBank: AB111086] to 2007 [GenBank: HM237348] to 2009 (0952326/India/2009) as shown by the arrows in Additional file 1: Table S1, when compared to the other isolates from the region i.e Sri Lanka, Malaysia and Thailand. The nucleotide diversity observed between the DENV-4 isolates was much higher than that reported for DENV-2 isolates within a particular genotype [11]. To strengthen the data and carry out in depth analysis, isolates from the other centres of India reporting the circulation of DENV-4 need to be sequenced.

Figure 1
figure 1

Phylogenetic analysis of Dengue 4 based on the Envelope (E) gene sequence. The ML tree was constructed using the PhyML 3.0 [9] software. Bootstrap values for 1000 replicates are indicated on each branch. The scale at the bottom indicates the number of nucleotide substitutions per site. The Indian strains are indicated in bold letters, HM indicates Hyderabad and the isolate sequenced in the present study is underlined.

Conclusion

The high degree of diversity in the envelope gene observed for the DENV-4 viruses circulating on the subcontinent indicates that the serotype is evolving and that close monitoring of the serotype is needed.