Background
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) remains a disease with high morbidity/mortality in pediatrics. Understanding ventricular-arterial coupling, a measure of how well matched the ventricular and vascular function is, may elucidate the pathway leading to right heart failure.
Methods
This retrospective study included subjects with PAH who a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) study within 14 days of cardiac catheterization between January 2009-August 2013. The effective elastance (Ea, index of arterial load) and right ventricular maximal end-systolic elastance (Emax, index of contractility) were determined by a combination of CMR and hemodynamic data. Ea is defined as (mean pulmonary arterial pressure minus pulmonary capillary wedge pressure)/stroke volume. Emax is defined as mean pulmonary arterial pressure/end systolic volume. Ea/Emax ratio was derived. Additionally, a measure of non-invasive ventricular arterial coupling (assuming PWCP is insignificant, making Ea/Emax = end systolic volume/stroke volume) was derived from only CMR. Pulmonary vascular resistance indexed (PVRi) and pulmonary vascular reactivity, as defined by Barst criteria (decrease in mean pulmonary artery pressure of > 20%, unchanged/increased cardiac index, and decreased/unchanged pulmonary to systemic vascular resistance ratio), were also determined. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between PVRi and Ea, Emax, and Ea/Emax. Receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis determined the diagnostic value of Ea/Emax in predicting vascular reactivity.
Results
Sixteen subjects were identified for inclusion with equal gender distributions. Age ranged from 3 months to 23 years (mean 11.3+7.4 years). Ea and Ea/Emax increased with increasing severity defined by PVRi, with p < 0.001 for both. Ea/Emax (range 0.43-2.82) was highly correlated with PVRi (r = 0.92, 95% CI 0.79-0.97, p < 0.0001). Non-invasively derived ventricular arterial coupling was found to be significantly correlated with PVRi (r = 0.85, 95% CI 0.62-0.95, p < 0.0001), but with a lower correlation coefficient than with Ea/Emax derived from combined hemodynamic and CMR data. Regression of Ea/Emax and PVRi demonstrated differing lines when separated by reactivity, however, the lines were not significantly different (Figure 1). ROC curve analysis (Figure 2) revealed high accuracy of the Ea/Emax ratio in determining vascular reactivity. Ea/Emax of 0.85 had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 80%. The area under the curve is 0.89 (p = 0.008), suggesting good discrimination between those who were and were not reactive.
Regression of ventricular arterial coupling ratio (Ea/Emax) and pulmonary vascular resistance indexed by reactivity. The shaded areas represent the 95% confidence interval for each regression line. The lines depict different trajectories based on reactivity, which approached, but not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05).
Conclusions
Measurement of ventricular arterial coupling, Ea/Emax, in pediatrics is feasible. Pulmonary vascular non-reactivity may be due to ventricular-arterial decoupling in which ventricular contractility fails to parallel increasing afterload in severe PAH. Use of Ea/Emax may have significant prognostic implication.
Funding
This work was supported by UL1 TR000154 from NCATS/NIH, 5R01HL114753 from NHLBI/NIH, as well as K25-094749 and K24-081506.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Truong, U., Patel, S., Fonseca, B. et al. Combined CMR and catheterization data in determining right ventricular-arterial coupling in children and adolescents with pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 16 (Suppl 1), O43 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-16-S1-O43
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-16-S1-O43