Background

Hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), Human immune deficiency virus (HIV) and syphilis are the most important lethal agents in transfusion transmitted infections (TTIs) and it remains a large health care burden globally. The incidence rates across the world are difficult to calculate given the asymptomatic and often latent nature of the disease prior to clinical presentation [1]. Every blood transfusion therefore carries a potential risk for transmissible diseases [1, 2].

TTIs are significant contemporary for medicine and society problem in Pakistan, but there exact burden is still unknown due to lack of awareness, poor use of screening tests or their high cost, limited access to a health facility, nonexistence of surveillance system and due to there asymptomatic or have non-specific symptoms. The incidence rates across the world have declined due to the awareness while Pakistan is still in the state of war against these killer infections [3, 4].

Blood transfusion is a therapeutic procedure, as there is no genuine substitution. But contaminated blood transfusion can transmit infectious diseases and can be fatal instead of saving life. Safe blood transfusion services are a cornerstone of an effective high quality health care system [5] and require organized infrastructure, properly trained and well-educated staff, availability of expensive equipments and good reagents and continuous supply of electricity. It is however important to mention that TTIs is associated with low viral titer, thus screening of blood donor through molecular mean was believed to be more reliable method for detection [2, 6]. Data on the safety of blood transfusion process in Pakistan are scanty and majority of blood banks are not providing safe services according to the recommendation of World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Poorly organized transfusion network likely contributes significantly in transmission of these serious infectious diseases [7, 8]. The dangers of blood transfusions were compounded by poverty as in few blood banks, the screening of the selective blood samples depends upon the recipient's willingness to pay for the cost of the screening. Moreover, 66% of Pakistanis are reside in rural areas with limited access to blood transfusion services [8, 9]. Therefore stringent screening of blood donors for TTIs is crucial to ensure safe supply of blood and blood products [1].

Evaluation of data on the prevalence of TTIs among blood donors permits an assessment of the accurate estimate of risk of TTIs which helps in the creation of long-term strategies to improve public health and to prevent spreading of the disease in the local population [1]. The aim of current study was to provide the detail epidemiological analysis of TTIs in blood donors of Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.

Methods

This study was conducted to evaluate the prevalence of TTIs in healthy blood donors.

Ethical approval

This study was conducted with the approval of Superintended of the source hospital.

Study design

It was hospital based retrospective and descriptive study.

Study location

The data was collected from the blood bank of Lady Reading Hospital (LRH), Postgraduate Medical Institute, Peshawar Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan over a period of three and half years. LRH is 1450 bed hospital and has been providing tertiary health care delivery and teaching facilities to population all over the province. Coupled with presence of 0.6 million Afghan refugees and their rush on this hospital, the institution seems over-burdened given its present physical size, administrative human and financial resources. The screening of blood for TTIs is mandatory for blood safety in the source hospital.

Study population

127828 blood donors of both sexes attended the blood bank during this period which was screened for HBs Ag, anti-HCV, anti-HIV and syphilis.

Study duration

Records were collected from blood bank of all donors coming to blood bank of LRH during 1st January 2008 to 31st June 2011.

Inclusion criterion

Selection criteria followed in blood donors is age between 18 to 60 years.

Exclusion criterion

An exclusion criterion is the pervious history of HBV, HCV and HIV infections. Before screening, all blood donors were subjected to routine physical checkups for exclusion criteria. Apparently unhealthy or malnourished individuals were also refused for blood donations.

Laboratory test

Blood sample was collected and tested in the blood bank of LRH. HBs Ag, anti-HCV, anti-HIV and Venereal Disease Research Laboratory Test (VDRL) for Syphilis were detected using BEST 2000 ELISA (Biokit, Spain), according to manufacturer's instructions. All seropositive samples were re-tested for the confirmation with the same serological test kit for confirmation.

Limitation

The study was based on record of blood bank, which did not offer record management of blood donors related to risk factors, thus follow up was not possible in the confirmed positive cases. The same situation exists all across the country due to the heavy work load and dearth of manpower in hospitals.

Statistical analysis

Data was statistically analysed with statistix9 software. A p value less than 0.05 was set as significant level.

Results

HBV infection

HBs Ag positive rate for blood donors was found to be 2.68% (3432).

HCV infections

Anti-HCV prevalence was found to be 2.46% (3147).

HIV infections

0.06% (77) was found to be positive for anti-HIV.

VDRL infection

VDRL was positive in 0.43% (544) blood donors.

Table 1 showed the epidemiological rate and statistical figure for TTIs in blood donors during the whole study period. Majority of donors were male (male = 127780 and female = 48). None of the female blood donor was found positive to TTIs. Over all, HBV rate is high when compared to the prevalence HIV and syphilis. This study indicated downward trend in the HCV, HIV and syphilis while significant increase was noted in figure of HBV and HCV in 2011(Figure 1).

Table 1 Prevalence of TTIs in Blood Donors from January 2008 to June 2011
Full size table
Figure 1
figure 1

Trend in the prevelence of HBV, HVV, HIV and Syphilis in blood donors from 2008 to 2011.

Full size image

Discussion

Globally mass of evidence supported that blood transfusion is an efficient route of TTIs transmission [3]. According to the WHO, in Pakistan about 1.5 million units of blood products transfused annually [8]. 15% of blood is professional donation, 75% are replacement (hidden payment) donation while only 10% are voluntary unpaid donations [10]. Blood transfusion departments or blood banks not only screen the blood but also give clue about rate of prevalence of TTIs [3]. Ali and colleagues [7] reported that overall HBs Ag and HCV prevalence was higher in the non blood donor population (3.8% weighted average, range 1.4-11%; 5.4% weighted average, range 2.1-31.9%) than blood donor population (2.3% weighted average, range 1.4-8.4%; 2.8% weighted average, range 0.5-20.7%). It requires highlighting the strategies to identify, recruit and retain donors from low-risk populations. The epidemiological characteristics and risk factors for transmission vary across country [11].

Hakim et al., [12] from over 350 reports, papers and presentations estimated the combined prevalence of HBV and HCV in various parts of country at 8-10% and a substantial decline in HBV has been observed due to mass scale immunization program against HBV infection while prevalence of HCV has risen due to unavailability of vaccine. Farooqi et al., [13] documented 1,66,189 blood donors (from year 2001 to 2006) from the same hospital and reported 2.54% mean prevalence for HBV and 3.21% for HCV. The findings of the current study was in line with the reports of high prevalence of HBs Ag and comparatively low prevalence of HCV [12, 13].

Limited surveillance data exist for HIV and syphilis in Pakistan. In 1992 prevalence of HIV in blood donors of same hospital was estimated to be 0%, 0.0086% (2/23,278) in 2002 [14] while current study reported the figure of 0.06%. it showed the rising burden of HIV and demonstrated a clear need for an integrated cross-disciplinary and regional approach to the emerging threat of HIV. Our country still has a window of opportunity to act decisively to prevent its spread. Important issue is to not neglect the rising rates of HIV in neighboring Asian nations as 0.35% in India [15]. Syphilis seemed to have been controlled over the years, but now re-emerged as a major public health problem in many communities [4]. A VDRL test was found to be positive in 0.5% blood donors in Lahore [5]. Current result (0.43%) showed high prevalence in Peshawar blood donors.

Investigation of the prevalence TTIs is often conducted in blood donor population because of convenience and access to a large sample size [7]. They are generally considered a healthier segment of the community and have been used as a surrogate marker for the prevalence of infection in the population at large [9, 16]. In Pakistan majority of blood donors are first time blood donors and can be considered true reflector of infection among the community [3].

According to other authors [7, 17], blood donors may not be considered the representative of general population as the prevalence rate may underestimate or overestimate due to their different characteristics. Prevalence source may underestimate the real prevalence due to certain limitations as most of them included men, young or middle aged people. So the prevalence rate was missed in other age groups as well as in female's population. Prevalence rate may be an overestimate if professional blood donors were injecting drug users who sold blood for money and found highly engaged in unprotected sex with commercial partners [7]. Other important issue is that the main source of replacement in our region includes donors recruited from among a patient's family or acquaintances who hide their health conditions from their relatives. Thus selection of donor and their proper screening are key factors to ensure safe transfusion [9].

One probable reason for high prevalence rate in this study may be inclusion of professional blood donors, but still it can not eliminate the threat of disease spreading to other populations. On other hand if major blood donors were volunteers, than these figures is alarming sending a clear warning the health care and policy makers about the control of this monster. However, majority of blood donor's data set in Pakistan including current study cannot evaluate the exact situation as potential donors with a high-risk profile (like history of jaundice, injection drug use, multiple sexual partners, etc.), has screened out only by questionnaires. The Department of Health is advised to conduct sentinel surveys for blood banks to contribute significantly for the identification and monitoring of high-risk blood donors.

Government of Pakistan has introduced a national blood policy of proper screening of blood before recommending for transfusion as late as 2003 [9]. In Brazil, screening test among blood donors was mandatory in 1993. That is one of the significant factors of low magnitude of hepatitis in all studied population of Brazil as compared to Pakistan (1.42% to 1.7% vs. 4.95% ± 3.5% in the general population, 0.9% vs. 3.78% ± 0.41 in blood donors and 23.8% to 52.0% vs. 23.7% to 68.0% in haemodialysis patients) [9, 18]. The risk of hepatitis transmission through blood transfusion is considered to be high in Pakistani population due to a lack of appropriate screening of blood in past. Late vaccination also resulted in spreading of HBV. Several studies confirmed the prevalence of hepatitis among people with a history of blood transfusion before the advent of blood screening procedures [2, 6].

Guide line

Blood transfusion is an important preventable modality of spread of TTIs. It is a time of urgent and concrete measures to eliminate the transfusions from paid donors and to improve the safety of the blood supply. To provide proper transfusion facilities to underdeveloped areas requires economic growth. These conditions can be overcome by development of a fair and organized system of blood screening and transfusion [9]. This debate should count sufficient to sensitize the policy maker about the gravity of situation.

Conclusions

Despite stringent donor screening and testing practices, safe blood free from TTIs remains an elusive goal because the threat of TTIs agents entering the blood supply is not static. This finding showed growing evidence in the burden of TTIs in blood donors. The field of transfusion medicine has encountered huge precautions in providing safe blood. Prevention of spread of TTIs should be the main goal at the current time, therefore number of indicators, both quantitative and qualitative, for monitoring the implementation strategies for recruitment and retention of safe regular donors is the need of the time.