Background

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an age-dependent neurodegenerative disease that causes progressive motoneuron degeneration, skeletal muscle atrophy, paralysis and death [1–3]. Although clinically indistinguishable, the majority of cases are sporadic (SALS) and approximately 10 % are due to inherited causes (familial ALS or FALS). Of the FALS cases about 20% are due to mutations in SOD1 [4]. Rodents transgenic for mutant human SOD1 develop progressive skeletal muscle atrophy, paralysis and death similar to human cases [5–8]. The disease causing property of mutant SOD1 is independent of the normal SOD1 activity, and thus, mutant SOD1 kills motor neurons by gaining a toxic property (reviewed in [9, 10]).

Pathological examination of transgenic mice revealed early changes that are not prominent in human spinal cord autopsies at the terminal disease stage. These changes include astrogliosis, fragmentation of Golgi apparatus, SOD1 aggregation and vacuolar degeneration [7, 11–14]. Vacuolar degeneration is most prominent at the onset of the disease and precedes motoneuron death by two to three months [15]. Although the high expresser line of SOD1G93A showed vacuoles derived from both endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria [13], the lower expresser line of SOD1G93A, which more closely mimics the human SOD1 levels [16], showed vacuoles that are nearly all developed from degenerating mitochondria [15, 17]. Mitochondrial vacuolation was also reported in another transgenic line SOD1G37R [7].

The early onset of mitochondrial degeneration suggests that mutant SOD1 damages mitochondria and this damage plays a causative role in motoneuron degeneration. Increasing evidence supports this proposal. Mutant SOD1 causes dysfunction and structural damage of mitochondria in cultured neuronal cells [18–20] and at early disease stages in mutant SOD1 transgenic mice [21, 22]. Human ALS also shows mitochondrial damage, dysfunction and loss [23, 24]. The mechanism whereby mutant SOD1 causes mitochondrial damage has not been determined, but recent evidence shows that mutant SOD1 is imported into mitochondria [21, 25, 26], and this mitochondrial localization may cause direct damage to mitochondria and induce cell death [27]. Consistent with this possibility, previous work suggested that mitochondrial vacuolation was developed from expansion of the intermembrane space [17]. However, the possibility that the vacuoles represent autophagic vacuolation has not been ruled out, because the source of the vacuolar membrane was not known.

In the current work we sought to determine whether the vacuoles are developed from autophagy, MPT or another mechanism. We examined vacuoles using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), immunogold electron microscopy and immunoflouresence microscopy. We present new evidence that, together with the published literature [17], unequivocally demonstrates that vacuoles are developed by expansion of mitochondrial intermembrane space and extension of the outer membrane. This is neither autophagy nor MPT, but a new mitochondrial degeneration mechanism in the CNS.

Results

Patterns of mitochondrial abnormalities revealed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) suggest a model of vacuole formation by extension of mitochondrial outer membrane and expansion of the intermembrane space (Fig. 1). Vacuoles might be initiated at focal weakening of inner and outer mitochondrial membrane contact, resulting in small protrusions from the outer membrane (Fig. 1A, arrow). This protrusion might then expand (Fig. 1B,1C, arrows), leading to further detachment of the outer membrane from the inner membrane (Fig. 1D,1E, unfilled arrowheads). Eventually the mature vacuoles form (Fig. 1F,1G,1H,1I), which contain inner membrane remnants (Fig. 1F,1G,1I, large arrows) and vesicular structures (Fig. 1H,1I, unfilled arrows). Often noticeable is the discontinuity in the vacuolar membrane in large vacuoles (Fig. 1D,1I, small arrows), suggesting that as the vacuoles expand the vacuolar membrane becomes porous.

Figure 1
figure 1

Patterns of mitochondrial vacuoles. (A) a small outer membrane bud (arrow); (B-D) enlargement of the buds (arrows) and expansion of the intermembrane space; (E) further separation of outer and inner membrane and intermembrane space expansion; (F-I) patterns of mature vacuoles. Unfilled arrowheads in D-I mark the vacuolar membrane. Large arrows in F-I indicate remnants of inner membrane. Small arrows in D and I indicate broken areas of vacuolar membrane. Small unfilled arrows in H and I point to vesicular membranous elements within the vacuoles. Arrowheads in D and F indicate dendritic membranes.

Full size image

To test this model, we immunologically located the inner and outer membrane components in the vacuoles. We took advantage of a previous observation that SOD1 marks the boundary of vacuoles [17, 28] and doubly stained spinal cord sections with antibodies against SOD1 and cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (CO1), an inner mitochondrial membrane marker. CO1 and the inner membrane structure are located focally within the boundary of vacuoles (Fig. 2A,2B,2C,2D). Intense SOD1 signal is located both at the boundary of the vacuoles and inside (Fig. 2A,2B,2C,2D), most of which appear to be associated with membranes (Fig. 2C,2D).

Figure 2
figure 2

SOD1 is concentrated at the boundary of vacuoles and in focal areas inside vacuoles, while cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (CO1) is located only in focal areas inside vacuoles. (A, B) Spinal cord sections from SODG93A mice were doubly stained for SOD1 (red) and CO1 (green). Vacuoles are photographed using a confocal microscope and viewed by 3-d reconstruction. The right panels show the superimposition of the red and green signals. The two right-most panels are viewed from a 30° angel. White circles are added to the top and bottom to aid visualization of 3-d structure. Arrows point to small vesicular structure inside vacuoles. Arrowheads point to SOD1 aggregates.(C, D) Spinal cord sections from SODG93A mice were doubly stained for SOD1 (small particles) and CO1 (large particles). D is a high magnification view of the mitochondrial matrix remnants pointed by the arrowhead in C. The arrow points to a vesicular structure inside the vacuole. The arrowhead points to the inner membrane remnants within this vacuole.

Full size image

Next, we doubly stained spinal cord sections with antibodies against SOD1 and two protein subunits of TOM (translocator of outer membrane), TOM20 and TOM40. Both are outer mitochondrial membrane proteins [29]. Similar to Figure 2, SOD1 signal marked the boundary of a barrel-shaped vacuole (Fig. 3A,3D). In contrast to the location of the CO1 signal (Fig. 2), TOM20/40 signals are at the boundary of the vacuole (Fig. 3B,3E), partially overlapping with the SOD1 signal (Fig. 3C,3F, small arrows). TOM20/40 signals are patchy, concentrated in certain areas of the vacuolar boundary (large arrows).

Figure 3
figure 3

Mitochondrial outer membrane markers TOM20 and TOM40 are localized in the vacuolar wall. Spinal cord sections were doubly stained with anti-SOD1 (red) and a mixture of anti-TOM40 and anti-TOM20 antibodies (green), photographed using a confocal microscope, and visualized by 3-D reconstruction. This vacuole is barrel-shaped. The front and the back openings of the vacuole are marked by two line circles. D-F are the same vacuole as A-C but rotated downwards 30 degrees. Staining using either TOM40 or TOM20 alone yielded the same staining pattern except that the signals were somewhat weaker than using both antibodies together. Arrowheads in A point to SOD1 aggregates, large arrows show patches of TOM and small arrows point to where TOM overlaps with SOD1.

Full size image

Because TOM20/40 staining also labeled many normal mitochondria outside of the vacuoles, the signal near the vacuole obscured the signal associated with the vacuole. This left open the possibility that the TOM20/40 signal at the boundary of the vacuole represents surrounding mitochondria, which are compressed by the expanding vacuole. Although this possibility is inconsistent with the absence of CO1 signal at the vacuolar boundary (Fig. 2), we further examined this possibility by cutting a middle section of the vacuole out and visualized it in three dimensions (Fig. 4). The patches of TOM20/40 signals (Fig. 4B,4E, arrows) did form a ring around the vacuole, and this ring overlaps with the inner boundary of the ring formed by the SOD1 signal (Fig. 4C,4F). This indicates that mitochondrial outer membrane forms the boundary of vacuoles and mutant SOD1 may be attached to the outside of the vacuolar membrane.

Figure 4
figure 4

Mitochondrial outer membrane markers TOM40 and TOM20 are localized in the vacuolar wall, inside the SOD1 signal at the vacuolar boundary. The panels are the mid section of the vacuole shown in Figure 3. D-F are the same as A-C but rotated to the right by 45°. Arrows point to patches of TOM signal.

Full size image

Is cytochrome c, an intermembrane space protein, present in the expanded intermembrane space? To answer this question, we doubly stained spinal cord sections with antibodies against SOD1 and cytochrome c. Inside large vacuoles cytochrome c signal is absent (Fig. 5A,5B,5C,5D). On the other hand, small vacuoles contain abundant cytochrome c signal, which nearly completely overlaps with the SOD1 signal (Fig. 5E,5F,5G,5H, arrows). As a control, we also examined small vacuoles doubly stained with SOD1 and CO1 antibodies. CO1 is still localized focally in these small vacuoles (Fig. 5I,5J,5K,5L, arrows) and only partially overlaps with SOD1 signal. Together, these observations suggest that cytochrome c is present in the intermembrane space of the early, small vacuoles and either being diluted to below the detection levels in large, intact vacuoles, or leaked out in the late, large vacuoles because of porous nature of the large vacuoles (Figs. 1, 2 and 5).

Figure 5
figure 5

Early vacuoles contain cytochrome c but the late ones do not. Spinal cord sections from SOD1G93A mice at the pre-muscle-weakness (PMW) stage were stained with anti-SOD1 (red) and anti-cyt c (green) antibodies (A-H), or anti-SOD1 (red) and anti-CO1 (green) antibodies (I-L), and shown as 3-D reconstructed confocal images. C, G and K are superimpositions of the red and green signals. D, H and L are the same as C, G and K, respectively, but rotated to the right for 30°. Arrows point to small vacuoles and arrowheads point to SOD1 aggregates. Early vacuoles contain cytochrome c (E-H) but the late ones do not (A-D). Notice that the inner member marker CO1 does not colocalize with SOD1 (I-L).

Full size image

In normal mitochondria the outer membrane wraps closely around the inner membrane and is not folded like the inner membrane. Therefore, for the outer membrane to extend, additional membrane would be needed. Because, in addition to mitochondria, peroxisomes are also involved in phospholipid synthesis and metabolism (see Discussion), we examined whether peroxisomes might participate in vacuole formation. Vacuoles contain many catalase-positive granules, the vast majority of which are positioned closely against the inner vacuolar wall (Fig. 6B,6C,6D,6F,6G,6H, filled arrows). A small minority of these granules are attached to the outside of the vacuolar wall (Fig. 6B,6C,6D,6F,6G,6H, unfilled arrows). Similarly, numerous PMP70-positive granules are observed close to the inner wall of the vacuole (Fig. 6J,6K,6L, filled arrows) and a small number of these granules are attached to the outside (Fig. 6J,6K,6L, unfilled arrows). Furthermore, catalase signal is present together with CO1 signal in the same vacuoles (Fig. 7). Finally, catalase signal is also detected in both small and large, SOD1-positive vacuoles at early disease stages (Fig. 8). These results suggest that peroxisomes actively participate in the formation of mitochondrial vacuoles at the early stages.

Figure 6
figure 6

Peroxisomes participate in mitochondrial vacuolation. Spinal cord sections from SOD1G93A mice were stained with anti-SOD1 (red) and anti-catalase (green) antibodies (A-H), or anti-SOD1 (red) and anti-PMP70 (green) antibodies (I-L), and shown as 3-D reconstructed confocal images. C, G and K are superimpositions of the red and green signals. D and H are the same as C and G, respectively, but rotated to the right for 30°. L is the same as K but rotated for 90°. Arrows in B-D and F-H point to small, catalase-positive granules that line against the inner wall of vacuoles. Arrows in J-L point to small, PMP70-positive granules that line against the inner wall of vacuoles. Notice one PMP-70 granule in J and K represents two granules when viewed at the 90° in L. Unfilled arrows point to granules that lie against the outer wall of the vacuoles.

Full size image
Figure 7
figure 7

Colocalization of catalase and CO1 in vacuoles.Spinal cord sections from SOD1G93A mice were stained with anti-catalase (red) and anti-CO1 (green) antibodies. Lower panels show the same vacuoles as in the upper panels except that the vacuole is turned 45 degrees.

Full size image
Figure 8
figure 8

Peroxisoms are involved in early vacuoles. Spinal cord sections from a SOD1G93A mouse at early disease stage (pre-muscle weakness stage; see [15]) were stained with anti-SOD1 (red) and anti-catalase (green) antibodies.

Full size image

Because lysosomes participate in autophagy [30], we examined whether lysosomes participate in vacuole formation. We doubly stained spinal cord sections with antibodies against SOD1 and cathepsin D, a lysosomal protease. Vacuoles do not contain high levels of cathepsin D signal (Fig. 9). For example, the vacuole in figure 9B contains no more cathepsin D signal than a normal motor neuron cell body in figure 9F. Noticeably, no cathepsin D signal is associated with small vacuoles (Fig. 9E,9F,9G,9H, arrows). These results indicate that lysosomes do not actively participate in vacuole formation.

Figure 9
figure 9

Lysosomes do not actively participate in vacuole formation. Spinal cord sections from SOD1G93A mice were stained with anti-SOD1 (red) and anti-cathepsin D (green) antibodies, and visualized by 3-D reconstruction of confocal images. C and G are superimpositions of the red and green signals. D and H are the same as C and G, respectively, but rotated 30° to the right. Arrows point to small vacuoles that contain SOD1 but not cathepsin D signals. MN marks a motor neuron cell body. Arrows point to small vacuoles. The arrowhead points to SOD1 aggregates.

Full size image

The absence of matrix expansion and the involvement of peroxisomes but not lysosomes together indicate that mutant SOD1-induced mitochondrial vacuolation is neither MPT nor autophagy. Because mutant SOD1 is prone to unfold [31–34] and form aggregates [11, 14, 35, 36], it has been proposed that abnormal SOD1 aggregation generates toxicity [10]. To determine whether SOD1 aggregates are involved in mitochondrial vacuolation, we examined whether vacuoles contain SOD1 aggregates by immunofluorescence and immuno EM. SOD1 aggregates are in the majority of vacuoles (Fig. 10; also see figures 2, 3, 5, 6 and 9, arrowheads). In all cases, the aggregates were found to be on or near the boundary of the vacuoles (Fig. 10, arrowheads). Some SOD1 aggregates overlap with CO1 signal while others do not (see Fig. 2A and 2B). In small vacuoles, SOD1 aggregates overlap with cytochrome c signal (see Fig. 5E,5F,5G). These results suggest a role of mutant SOD1 aggregation in Mitochondrial Vacuolation by Intermembrane Space Expansion (MVISE).

Figure 10
figure 10

Vacuoles contain focal SOD1 aggregates. Panels A-C are 3-D reconstructed images of a vacuole from SOD1G93A mouse spinal cord sections stained with anti-SOD1 antibodies (red). The vacuole is bounded by SOD1 and contains many SOD1 aggregates (arrowheads). Panel D is an immunogold electron microscopic image from SOD1G93A mouse spinal cord stained with an anti-SOD1 antibody (5 nm gold) and an anti-cytochrome oxidase subunit 4 antibody (10 nm gold). The arrowhead indicates a region of SOD1 aggregation.

Full size image

Discussion

Our EM observations (Fig. 1) suggest that mutant SOD1G93A causes MVISE in vivo. These observations agree with an earlier suggestion that vacuoles in the SOD1G93A mouse model of ALS are derived from the expansion of mitochondrial intermembrane space [17]. Our subsequent experiments confirm this model. First, the inner mitochondrial membrane does not constitute the vacuole boundary and is contained within the vacuoles (Fig. 2). Second, the outer mitochondrial membrane composes a large part of the vacuolar membrane (Figs. 3, 4). Third, cytochrome c colocalizes with SOD1 in small vacuoles. Both molecules are known intermembrane space proteins. Although cytochrome c signal is lost in the subsequent vacuolar expansion (Fig. 5), this absence could be due to a dilution of cytochrome c by the increased vacuolar volume [17] and leakage of the outer mitochondrial membrane. Fourth, catalase- and PMP70-positive granules are concentrated in the vacuoles (Fig. 6,7,8) but lysosomes are not (Fig. 9). This suggests that peroxisomes actively participate in the vacuole formation but lysosomes do not play a significant role. These observations indicate that neither MPT (expansion of matrix) nor autophagy (in which lysosomes participate) is responsible for mutant SOD1-induced mitochondrial vacuolation. Thus, MVISE represents a previously uncharacterized mechanism of mitochondrial degeneration in the CNS.

How mutant SOD1 causes MVISE is not known but could be associated with SOD1 localization. Fridovich and colleagues first noticed the presence of SOD1 in the intermembrane space in liver mitochondria [37]. Although this was disputed later [38, 39], recent experiments in yeast and mammalian cells reaffirmed the presence of both wild type and mutant SOD1 in the intermembrane space of mitochondria [21, 25, 26, 40]. This finding suggests that mutant SOD1 could directly damage mitochondria by its toxicity. The increased cell death induced by direct targeting of mutant SOD1 to mitochondria supports this possibility [27]. Interestingly, low levels (compared with the levels caused by mutant SOD1) of mitochondrial vacuolation can also be caused by expression of high levels of wild type SOD1 [7, 13, 15, 41], suggesting that the mitochondria-damaging property also exists in the wild type protein and this property strengthens by the mutations.

The toxicity produced by mutant SOD1 that leads to mitochondrial damage remains to be identified. One possibility is that mutant SOD1 catalyzes abnormal redox reactions, thereby producing toxic reactive oxygen species (ROS) and damaging cellular structures in its vicinity. Two such activities have been proposed. The first proposes that the mutated SOD1 interacts with NO to produce peroxynitrite (ONOO-), which damages proteins by modifying tyrosine to nitrotyrosine residues [42–44]. The second postulates that the mutant SOD1 possesses an enhanced peroxidase activity, which causes oxidative modification of nucleic acids, proteins and lipids [45–47]. Both of these activities require copper at the active center of SOD1. However, dramatic reduction of copper in SOD1 by knocking out the copper chaperon for SOD1 (CCS), or by mutating the copper chelating residues, did not affect ALS progression in vivo [36, 48]. Therefore, the role of copper-mediated oxidative damage remains unclear [49, 50].

An alternative proposal is that the toxicity stems from the propensity of the mutated SOD1 to aggregate. SOD1 aggregates have been widely observed in mutant SOD1 transgenic mice and in human ALS caused by SOD1 mutations [11, 14, 35, 36]. In cultured cells, mutant SOD1 forms high molecular weight aggregates when the cells are stressed by high mutant protein expression [51], proteosome inhibition [52] and serum withdraw [27]. The role of mutant SOD1 aggregation, however, remains unclear. One study reports that SOD1 aggregation and cell death stimulating activity are dissociable in mutant SOD1-transfected PC12 cells [53].

All studies conducted on SOD1 aggregation thus far have been on the large aggregates that might be composed of long fibrils. The role of small, oligomeric SOD1 aggregation has not been investigated. Recent studies on neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson's, Alzheimer's and prion diseases, suggest that it is not the long fibrils that produce toxicity and kill neurons, rather, it is the oligomeric aggregation intermediates that produce toxicity [54, 55]. Interestingly, interactions between biomembranes and toxic proteins produce a dual effect of both promoting oligomeric aggregation of the proteins and membrane damage [56–59], suggesting that one possible toxicity of oligomeric aggregates is mediated through damaging membranes. In this context, our observation that SOD1 aggregates are associated with vacuolar membrane (Figs. 2, 10) suggests that mutant SOD1 interacts with mitochondrial membrane and this interaction promotes aggregation. The form of these aggregates is not yet known but could include both the large aggregates (e.g. Fig. 10, arrowheads) that bind to thioflavin S [36], and oligomers, which may be represented by the intense SOD1 immuno-reactive signals associated with vacuolar membrane (Fig. 10).

The presence of peroxisomes in mutant SOD1-induced MVISE is a surprise. How this occurs is unclear. Nevertheless, the higher concentration of peroxisomes in and around vacuoles suggests that peroxisomes actively migrate to or proliferate in the vicinity of abnormal mitochondria and participate in the vacuolation process. What might be the role of peroxisome? The answer is not known but the normal peroxisome function might provide some clues. Peroxisomes are indispensable in lipid metabolism and maintenance of lipid homeostasis. Peroxisomes shorten chains of very long fatty acids, unsaturated fatty acids and branched fatty acids by β-oxidation [60, 61]. They play critical roles in synthesis of ether phospholipids and cholesterol [62, 63]. Peroxisomal abundance is associated with high membrane demand such as myelination in the central nervous system [64, 65] and peroxisome diseases result in defective myelination [66]. Because the outer mitochondrial membrane normally tightly wraps around mitochondria, the extension of the outer membrane during vacuolation requires new membranes. Peroxisomes could provide the new membranes by either synthesis of lipids or fusing themselves with the vacuolar membrane. Alternatively, peroxisomes might be involved in membrane breakdown in the mitochondrial degeneration process. Interestingly, accumulation of ceramides and cholesterol esters has been observed in ALS patients and mice [67], which could be associated with peroxisomal proliferation.

The mitochondrial vacuolation could in part be the result of persistent mitochondrial dysfunction and further facilitate the downstream motor neuron degeneration events. Our previous study showed that functional decline of mitochondria appears in the SOD1G93A mice as early as 60 to 100 days of age [22]. This precedes the peak of mitochondrial vacuolation and the onset of the disease by two to three months [15]. Mitochondrial dysfunction can lead to energy deficiency and ionic imbalance [68], elevated ROS and oxidative damage [69], and increased sensitivity of neurons to excitotoxicity [19, 70–72]. These effects could precipitate MVISE, which trigger cell death programs by releasing pro-apoptotic proteins resided in the mitochondrial intermembrane space, such as cytochrome c, AIF, SMAC/DIABLO, endo G and Htra/Omi [73]. The absence of cytochrome c in the porous large vacuoles and the presence of cytochrome c in the small vacuoles (Fig. 5) are consistent with this possibility. Because the majority of vacuoles develop in distal small dendrites [28], the release of these proapoptotic molecules may not cause typical apoptotic changes in cell bodies including chromatin condensation and cytoplasmic blebbing. Indeed, the typical changes are not observed by EM (Higgins, Kong and Xu, unpublished observation; also see [74, 75]), but widespread caspase activation is detected in spinal cords [75–77], suggesting the occurrence of a neuritic death program [78].

Our results as well as others' show that mitochondrial vacuolation provides an important window for examination of the mechanism whereby mutant SOD1 causes mitochondrial damage and motor neuron degeneration. However, some mutant SOD1 causes motor neuron degeneration without mitochondrial vacuolation [8, 11, 36]. One difference between the mutants that induce vacuoles and the ones that do not, is that the former accumulates at higher levels in the mouse spinal cord than that latter. It is possible that mitochondrial vacuolation represents an accelerated form of mitochondrial damage caused by high levels of mutant SOD1 accumulation. This does present a challenge to examine and define mitochondrial damage in low mutant SOD1 expressing transgenic lines.

Conclusions

Taken together, this study reveals a mitochondrial degeneration mechanism in the CNS, mitochondrial vacuolation by intermembrane space expansion or MVISE. The basic features of MVISE are expansion of mitochondrial intermembrane space, extension of mitochondrial outer membrane, collapse and/or disintegration of the matrix and inner membrane, and involvement of peroxisomes. These features bare resemblances to mitochondrial degeneration in other neurodegenerative conditions, including Alzheimer's disease [79], prion disease [80], Rett syndrome [81], excitotoxic neuronal death [70] and Mn++ superoxide dismutase (SOD2) deletion [82]. Although in none of these conditions are sufficiently detailed observations available for a comprehensive comparison, MVISE could play a role in other neurodegenerative disorders. Mitochondrial vacuolation may contribute to several non-apopototic cell death pathways, but its role in a wide spectrum of neurodegenerative diseases remains to be defined [83, 84].

Methods

Transgenic mice

The low expression line of transgenic mice expressing human mutant SOD1G93A (C57BL/6J-TgN(SOD1-G93A)1Gurdl) were purchased from Jackson Lab (Bar Harbor, ME) and bred onto FVB background at University of Massachusetts Medical School animal facility. Non-transgenic littermates of SODG93A transgenic mice were used as wild type controls (WT mice). All transgenic mice were identified using PCR according to Gurney et al. [85]. Mice were maintained at the University of Massachusetts Medical School animal facility according to the guidelines set forth by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).

Immunofluorescence Microscopy

Mice were perfused under anesthesia with fixative (4% paraformaldehyde, 0.1% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.5). Sections of lumbar spinal cords from fixed mice were dissected out and 30 μm sections were cut using a vibratome. Sections were processed for antibody staining using the following antibodies: rabbit [86] and sheep (BioDesign) anti-SOD1 (both recognize mouse and human SOD1), mouse anti-cytochrome c oxidase subunit CO1 and CO4 (Molecular Probes, OR), rabbit anti-TOM20 and TOM40 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA), mouse anti-cytochrome c (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA), sheep anti-catalase (The Binding Site, Birmingham, England), rabbit anti-catalase (Calbiochem, SanDiego, CA), rabbit anti-PMP70 (ABR, Golden, CO or Axxora, SanDiego, CA), and rabbit anti-cathepsin D (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA) according to the protocol described previously [26, 28]. The stained sections were examined and digitized using a confocal microscope (Leica TCS-SP). Imaging analysis and three-dimensional reconstruction were conducted using MetaMorph (Universal Imaging Corp.).

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

Animal fixation, tissue dissection, and microscopic analysis were performed as described previously [15]. In brief, mice were anesthetized and perfused with a solution of 4% paraformaldehyde and 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.6. Tissues were kept in the same solution for further fixation. The L4 and L5 spinal nerve roots and lumbar spinal cords (a 2 mm segment centered at the L5 root entry level) were dissected out and post-fixed with 2% osmium tetroxide in 100 mM cacodylate buffer, pH 7.6. After dehydration in graded alcohol, the tissue blocks were embedded in Epon. Thin sections of ventral horn were cut from the Epon tissue blocks, stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and visualized using a Philips CM10 transmission electron microscope.

Immuno-electron microscopy

Mice were perfused under anesthesia with fixative (4% paraformaldehyde, 0.1% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.5). Sections of lumbar spinal cords from fixed mice were dissected out, dehydrated through an ethanol series to 100% ethanol and embedded in hard grade LR White resin (EMS, Fort Washington, PA) by polymerization overnight at 60 deg. C. Sixty five nm sections were cut from the embedded tissue using a Reichert-Jung Ultracut E microtome and collected onto gold grids (200 mesh) (SPI Inc., Westchester, PA). Sections on grids were processed for immunogold electron microscopy according to recommendations by the manufacturer of the gold-conjugated antibodies (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ) with some modification. Sections were etched in 0.1 N HCl for 5 min., rinsed three times for five min each in TBS (25 mM Tris, 140 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, pH 8.0), placed in blocking buffer for 30 min (0.1% gelatin, 1% normal goat serum, 0.3% Triton-X-100 in TBS), placed in primary antibody (1:10 diluted in blocking buffer for all antibodies used) for 2 hours at room temperature, rinsed 3 times for 5 min each in TBS, placed in gold-conjugated secondary antibodies (10 nm gold anti-mouse and 5 nm gold anti-rabbit) for 1 hour, rinsed 3 times in TBS, fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde, rinsed 3 times in TBS, rinsed in water, stained with Reynold=s lead citrate followed by aqueous 2% uranyl acetate, dried on filter paper and viewed using a Philips CM10 transmission electron microscope. The following antibodies and sera were used, normal rabbit serum (Vector Laboratories Inc., Burlingame, CA), rabbit polyclonal anti-SOD1 [86], a second rabbit polyclonal anti-SOD1 (Biodesign, Saco, ME) and a mouse monoclonal antibody against CO1. All antibodies and serum were used at a 1:10 dilution.