1. Introduction

Wilker in [1] proposed two open problems:

  1. (a)

    Prove that if 0 < x < π/2, then

    sin x x 2 + tan x x > 2 . 1
    (1)
  2. (b)

    Find the largest constant c such that

    sin x x 2 + tan x x > 2 + c x 3 tan x

for 0 < x < π/2.

In [2], inequality (1) was proved, and the following inequality

2 + 2 π 4 x 3 tan x < sin x x 2 + tan x x < 2 + 8 45 x 3 tan x for 0 < x < π 2 ,
(2)

where the constants 2 π 4 and 8 45 are best possible, was also established.

Wilker type inequalities (1) and (2) have attracted much interest of many mathematicians and have motivated a large number of research papers involving different proofs and various generalizations and improvements (cf. [213] and the references cited therein). A brief survey of some old and new inequalities associated with trigonometric functions can be found in [14]. These include (among other results) Wilker's inequality.

Another inequality which is of interest to us is Huygens [15] inequality, which asserts that

2 sin x x + tan x x > 3 for all 0 < x < π 2 .
(3)

Neuman and Sándor [16] have pointed out that (3) implies (1). In [17], Zhu established some new inequalities of the Huygens type for trigonometric and hyperbolic functions. Baricz and Sándor [18] pointed out that inequalities (1) and (3) are simple consequences of the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality together with the well-known Lazarević-type inequality [[19], p. 238]

( cos x ) 1 / 3 < sin x x for all 0 < x < π 2 ,
(4)

or equivalently,

sin x x 2 tan x x > 1 for all 0 < x < π 2 .

Wu and Srivastava [[7], Lemma 3] established another inequality

x sin 2 + x tan x > 2 for all 0 < x < π 2 .
(5)

In [20], Chen and Cheung showed that Wilker inequality (1), Huygens inequality (3), Lazarević-type inequality (4) and Wu-Srivastava inequality (5) can be grouped into the following inequality chain:

( sin x / x ) 2 + tan x / x 2 > 2 ( sin x / x ) + tan x / x 3 > sin x x 2 tan x x 3 > 1 > 2 1 / ( sin x / x ) 2 + 1 / ( tan x / x ) , 0 < x < π 2 ,
(6)

in terms of the arithmetic, geometric and harmonic means.

In this article, we present an elementary proof of Wilker's inequality (2), and we establish sharp Wilker and Huygens type inequalities.

The following elementary power series expansions are useful in our investigation.

sin x = n = 0 ( - 1 ) n x 2 n + 1 ( 2 n + 1 ) ! , x < ,
(7)
cos x = n = 0 ( - 1 ) n x 2 n ( 2 n ) ! , x < ,
(8)
tan x = n = 1 2 2 n ( 2 2 n - 1 ) ( - 1 ) n - 1 B 2 n ( 2 n ) ! x 2 n - 1 , x < π 2 ,
(9)
x cot x = n = 0 ( - 1 ) n B 2 n ( 2 x ) 2 n ( 2 n ) ! , 0 < x < π .
(10)

where B n (n = 0, 1,2,...) are Bernoulli numbers, defined by

t e t - 1 = n = 0 B n t n n ! .

The following lemma is also needed in the sequel.

Lemma 1. [21] Let a n ∈ ℝ and b n > 0, n = 0,1, 2,... be real numbers with a n b n n = 1 being strictly increasing (respectively, decreasing). If the power series A ( x ) := n = 0 a n x n and B ( x ) := n = 0 b n x n are convergent for |x| < R, then the function A(x)/B(x) is strictly increasing (respectively, decreasing) on (0, R).

2. An elementary proof of Wilker's inequality (2)

Proof of (2). Consider the function

f ( x ) : = sin x x 2 + tan x x - 2 x 3 tan x , 0 < x < π 2 .

By using power series expansions (7) and (8), we obtain

- x 6 sin 2 x f ( x ) = - 3 x 2 sin ( 2 x ) + 5 sin 3 x cos x + 5 x - 2 x 3 + 2 x cos 4 x - 7 x cos 2 x = - 3 x 2 + 5 4 sin ( 2 x ) - 5 8 sin ( 4 x ) - 2 x 3 + 9 4 x + 1 4 x cos ( 4 x ) - 5 2 x cos ( 2 x ) = n = 4 ( - 1 ) n u n ( x ) = 16 945 x 9 - 16 1575 x 11 + 16 7425 x 13 - 11072 42567525 x 15 + n = 8 ( - 1 ) n u n ( x ) ,

where

u n ( x ) : = ( ( 2 n - 9 ) 4 n - 1 + 6 n 2 - 2 n ) 4 n ( 2 n + 1 ) ! x 2 n + 1 .

Elementary calculations reveal that, for 0 < x < π/2 and n ≥ 8,

u n + 1 ( x ) u n ( x ) = 8 x 2 6 n 2 + 10 n + 4 + ( 2 n - 7 ) 4 n ( n + 1 ) ( 2 n + 3 ) ( 24 n 2 - 8 n + ( 2 n - 9 ) 4 n ) < 8 π 2 2 6 n 2 + 10 n + 4 + ( 2 n - 7 ) 4 n ( n + 1 ) ( 2 n + 3 ) ( 24 n 2 - 8 n + ( 2 n - 9 ) 4 n ) = π 2 2 n + 3 12 n 2 + 20 n + 8 + 2 ( 2 n - 7 ) 4 n ( n + 1 ) ( 24 n 2 - 8 n + ( 2 n - 9 ) 4 n ) .

Write

α n : = π 2 2 n + 3 12 n 2 + 20 n + 8 + 2 ( 2 n - 7 ) 4 n ( n + 1 ) ( 24 n 2 - 8 n + ( 2 n - 9 ) 4 n ) .

It is easy to see that for n ≥ 8,

12 n 2 + 20 n + 8 + 2 ( 2 n - 7 ) 4 n ( n + 1 ) ( 24 n 2 - 8 n + ( 2 n - 9 ) 4 n ) < 1 .

Hence for all 0 < x < π/2 and n ≥ 8,

u n + 1 ( x ) u n ( x ) < α n < π 2 2 n + 3 < 1 .

Therefore, for fixed x ∈ (0, π/2), the sequence nu n (x) is strictly decreasing with regard to n ≥ 8. Hence, for 0 < x < π/2,

- x 6 sin 2 x f ( x ) > 16 945 x 9 - 16 1575 x 11 + 16 7425 x 13 - 11072 42567525 x 15 = x 9 16 945 - 16 1575 x 2 + 16 7425 x 4 - 11072 42567525 x 6 > 0 .

Hence f(x) is strictly decreasing on (0, π/2). Noting that lim t 0 + f ( t ) = 8 45 , we have

16 π 4 = lim t ( π / 2 ) - f ( t ) < f ( x ) = sin x x 2 + tan x x - 2 x 3 tan x < lim t 0 + f ( t ) = 8 45

for all x 0 , π 2 , with the constants 16 π 4 and 8 45 being best possible. This completes the proof of (2).

3. Sharp Wilker's inequality

By using power series expansions (8) and (9), we have, for 0 < x < π/2,

sin x x 2 + tan x x = 1 2 x 2 = - 1 2 x 2 cos ( 2 x ) + tan x x = 2 + k = 3 ( 2 ( 2 2 k - 1 ) B 2 k - ( - 1 ) k ) 2 2 k - 1 ( 2 k ) ! x 2 k - 2 .

It is well known [[22], p. 805] that

2 ( 2 k ) ! ( 2 π ) 2 k < B 2 k < 2 ( 2 k ) ! ( 2 π ) 2 k ( 1 - 2 1 - 2 k ) , k 1 .
(11)

By (11), we find that

2 ( 2 2 k - 1 ) B 2 k > 2 ( 2 2 k - 1 ) 2 ( 2 k ) ! ( 2 π ) 2 k > 1 , k 3 .

Hence, we have

sin x x 2 + tan x x > 2 + k = 3 n ( 2 ( 2 2 k - 1 ) B 2 k - ( - 1 ) k ) 2 2 k - 1 ( 2 k ) ! x 2 k - 2 = 2 + 8 45 x 4 + 16 315 x 6 + 104 4725 x 8 + 592 66825 x 10 + + ( 2 ( 2 2 n - 1 ) B 2 n - ( - 1 ) n ) 2 2 n - 1 ( 2 n ) ! x 2 n - 2 .
(12)

Motivated by (12), we are now in a position to establish our first main result.

Theorem 1. (i) For 0 < x < π/2, we have

2 + 8 45 x 4 + 16 315 x 5 tan x < sin x x 2 + tan x x < 2 + 8 45 x 4 + 2 π 6 x 5 tan x .
(13)

The constants 16 315 and 2 π 6 are best possible.

  1. (ii)

    For 0 < x < π/2, we have

    2 + 8 45 x 4 + 16 315 x 6 + 104 4725 x 7 tan x < sin x x 2 + tan x x < 2 + 8 45 x 4 + 16 315 x 6 + 2 π 8 x 7 tan x .
    (14)

The constants 104 4725 and 2 π 8 are best possible.

Proof. We only prove inequality (13). The proof of (14) is analogous.

Consider the function

g ( x ) : = sin x x 2 + tan x x - 2 - 8 45 x 4 x 5 tan x = sin ( 2 x ) 2 x 7 + 1 x 6 - 2 cot x x 5 - 8 cot x 45 x , 0 < x < π 2 .

By using power series expansions (7) and (10), we find that

g ( x ) = n = 3 β n 2 2 n - 1 x 2 n - 6 ,

where

β n : = 4 B 2 n ( 2 n ) ! + B 2 ( n - 2 ) 45 ( 2 n - 4 ) ! + ( - 1 ) n 2 ( 2 n + 1 ) ! , n 3 .

By (11), we obtain

4 B 2 n ( 2 n ) ! + B 2 ( n - 2 ) 45 ( 2 n - 4 ) ! > 4 ( 2 n ) ! 2 ( 2 n ) ! ( 2 π ) 2 n + 1 45 ( 2 n - 4 ) ! 2 ( 2 n - 4 ) ! ( 2 π ) 2 n - 4 = 180 + 2 ( 2 π ) 4 45 ( 2 π ) 2 n .

By induction on n, it is easy to see that

180 + 2 ( 2 π ) 4 45 ( 2 π ) 2 n > 2 ( 2 n + 1 ) ! for all n 3 .

Hence β n > 0 for n ≥ 3, and we have

g ( x ) = n = 4 b n 2 2 n - 1 ( 2 n - 6 ) x 2 n - 7 > 0 , 0 < x < π 2 .

Therefore, g(x) is strictly increasing on (0, π/2). Noting that lim t ( π / 2 ) - g ( t ) = 2 π 6 , we have

16 315 = lim t 0 + g ( t ) < g ( x ) = sin x x 2 + tan x x - 2 - 8 45 x 4 x 5 tan x < lim t ( π / 2 ) - g ( t ) = 2 π 6

for all x 0 , π 2 , with the constants 16 315 and 2 π 6 being best possible. This completes the proof of (13).

Remark 1. Inequality (14) is sharper than (13). On the other hand, there is no strict comparison between inequalities (2) and (13). There is no strict comparison between inequalities (2) and (14) either.

In view of inequalities (13) and (14), we propose the following conjecture.

Conjecture 1. For 0 < x < π/2 and n ≥ 3, we have

2 + k = 3 n ( 2 ( 2 2 k - 1 ) B 2 k - ( - 1 ) k ) 2 2 k - 1 ( 2 k ) ! x 2 k - 2 + ( 2 ( 2 2 n + 2 - 1 ) B 2 n + 2 - ( - 1 ) n + 1 ) 2 2 n + 1 ( 2 n + 2 ) ! x 2 n - 1 tan x < sin x x 2 + tan x x < 2 + k = 3 n ( 2 ( 2 2 k - 1 ) B 2 k - ( - 1 ) k ) 2 2 k - 1 ( 2 k ) ! x 2 k - 2 + 2 π 2 n x 2 n - 1 tan x .

4. Sharp the Wu-Srivastava inequality

By using power series expansion (10), we obtain for 0 < x < π/2,

csc 2 x = - ( cot x ) = 1 x 2 + k = 1 2 2 k ( 2 k - 1 B 2 k ) ( 2 k ) ! x 2 k - 2 .
(15)

Hence for 0 < x < π/2,

x sin x 2 + x tan x = x 2 csc 2 x + x cot x = 2 + k = 2 2 2 k + 1 ( k - 1 ) B 2 k ( 2 k ) ! x 2 k = 2 + 2 45 x 4 + 8 945 x 6 + 2 1575 x 8 + 16 93555 x 10 + .
(16)

Motivated by (16), we establish our second main result:

Theorem 2. (i) For 0 < x < π/2, we have

x sin x 2 + x tan x < 2 + 2 45 x 3 tan x .
(17)

The constant 2 45 is best possible.

  1. (ii)

    For 0 < x < π/2, we have

    x sin x 2 + x tan x < 2 + 2 45 x 4 + 8 945 x 5 tan x .
    (18)

The constant 8 945 is best possible.

Proof. We only prove inequality (18). The proof of (17) is analogous.

Consider the function

G ( x ) : = x sin x 2 + x tan x - 2 - 2 45 x 4 x 5 tan x = A ( x ) B ( x ) ,

where

A ( x ) : = x sin x 2 + x tan x - 2 - 2 45 x 4 = n = 1 2 2 n + 5 ( n + 1 ) B 2 ( n + 2 ) ( 2 n + 4 ) ! x 2 n + 4 = n = 1 a n x 2 n + 4

with

a n : = 2 2 n + 5 ( n + 1 ) B 2 ( n + 2 ) ( 2 n + 4 ) ! ,

and

B ( x ) : = x 5 tan x = n = 1 2 2 n ( 2 2 n - 1 ) B 2 n ( 2 n ) ! x 2 n + 4 = n = 1 b n x 2 n + 4

with

b n : = 2 2 n ( 2 2 n - 1 ) B 2 n ( 2 n ) ! .

We claim that the function G(x) is strictly decreasing on (0, π/2). By Lemma 1, it suffices to show that

a n b n > a n + 1 b n + 1 , n 1 .
(19)

It is known [[23], p. 96] that

2 ( 2 n ) ! ( 2 π ) 2 n < B 2 n < π 2 ( 2 n ) ! 3 ( 2 π ) 2 n , n 1 .
(20)

By using (20), we obtain

a n b n = 2 5 ( n + 1 ) B 2 ( n + 2 ) ( 2 n + 4 ) ! ( 2 n ) ! ( 2 2 n - 1 ) B 2 n > 192 ( n + 1 ) π 2 ( 2 π ) 4 ( 4 n - 1 )

and

a n + 1 b n + 1 = 2 5 ( n + 2 ) B 2 ( n + 3 ) ( 2 n + 6 ) ! ( 2 n + 2 ) ! ( 2 2 n + 2 - 1 ) B 2 ( n + 1 ) < 16 π 2 ( n + 2 ) 3 ( 2 π ) 4 ( 4 n + 1 - 1 ) .

So (19) is a consequence of the elementary inequality

192 ( n + 1 ) π 2 ( 2 π ) 4 ( 4 n - 1 ) > 16 π 2 ( n + 2 ) 3 ( 2 π ) 4 ( 4 n + 1 - 1 ) ,

which is equivalent to

36 ( n + 1 ) 4 n - 1 > π 4 ( n + 2 ) 4 n + 1 - 1 , n 1 .
(21)

The proof of the inequality (21) is not difficult, and is left with the readers. This proves the claim.

Noting that lim t 0 + G ( t ) = 8 945 , we have

G ( x ) < lim t 0 + G ( t ) = 8 945 for all x 0 , π 2

with the constant 8 945 being best possible. This completes the proof of (18).

In view of inequalities (17) and (18), we propose the following conjecture.

Conjecture 2. For 0 < x < π/2 and n ≥ 1,

x sin x 2 + x tan x < 2 + k = 2 n ( k - 1 ) 2 2 k + 1 B 2 k ( 2 k ) ! x 2 k + n 2 2 n + 3 B 2 ( n + 1 ) ( 2 n + 2 ) ! x 2 n + 1 tan x .
(22)

5. Skarp Huygens inequality

By using power series expansions (7) and (9), for 0 < x < π/2, we have

2 sin x x + tan x x = 3 + k = 3 2 2 k ( 2 2 k - 1 ) B 2 k 4 k - ( - 1 ) k 2 x 2 k - 2 ( 2 k - 1 ) ! .

By (11), we find that

2 2 k ( 2 2 k - 1 ) B 2 k 4 k > 2 2 k ( 2 2 k - 1 ) 4 k 2 ( 2 k ) ! ( 2 π ) 2 k = ( 2 2 k - 1 ) ( 2 k - 1 ) ! π 2 k > 1 , k 3 .

Hence we have

2 sin x x + tan x x > 3 + k = 3 n 2 2 k ( 2 2 k - 1 ) B 2 k 4 k - ( - 1 ) k 2 x 2 k - 2 ( 2 k - 1 ) ! = 3 + 3 20 x 4 + 3 56 x 6 + 7 320 x 8 + 3931 443520 x 10 + + ( 2 2 n ( 2 2 n - 1 ) B 2 n ) 4 n - ( - 1 ) n 2 x 2 n - 2 ( 2 n - 1 ) ! .
(23)

Motivated by (23), we establish our third main result:

Theorem 3. (i) For 0 < x < π/2, we have

3 + 3 20 x 3 tan x < 2 sin x x + tan x x < 3 + 2 π 4 x 3 tan x .
(24)

The constants 3 20 and 2 π 4 are best possible.

  1. (ii)

    For 0 < x < π/2, we have

    3 + 3 20 x 4 + 3 56 x 5 tan x < 2 sin x x + tan x x < 3 + 3 20 x 4 + 2 π 6 x 5 tan x .
    (25)

The constants 3 56 and 2 π 6 are best possible.

Proof. We only prove inequality (25). The proof of (24) is analogous.

Consider the function

h ( x ) : = 2 sin x x + tan x x - 3 - 3 20 x 4 x 5 tan x = 2 cos x x 6 + 1 x 6 - 3 cot x x 5 - 3 cot x 20 x , 0 < x < π 2 .

By using power series expansions (8) and (10), we find that

h ( x ) = n = 3 c n x 2 n - 6 ,

where

c n : = 3 2 2 n B 2 n ( 2 n ) ! + 3 2 2 n - 4 B 2 ( n - 2 ) 20 ( 2 n - 4 ) ! + ( - 1 ) n 2 ( 2 n ) ! , n 3 .

By (11), we obtain

3 2 2 n B 2 n ( 2 n ) ! + 3 2 2 n - 4 B 2 ( n - 2 ) 20 ( 2 n - 4 ) ! > 3 2 2 n ( 2 n ) ! 2 ( 2 n ) ! ( 2 π ) 2 n + 3 2 2 n - 4 20 ( 2 n - 4 ) ! 2 ( 2 n - 4 ) ! ( 2 π ) 2 n - 4 = 60 + 3 π 4 10 π 2 n .

By induction on n, it is easy to show that

60 + 3 π 4 10 π 2 n > 2 ( 2 n ) ! for all n 3 .

Hence c n > 0 for n ≥ 3, and we have

h ( x ) = n = 4 c n ( 2 n - 6 ) x 2 n - 7 > 0 for all 0 < x < π 2 .

Therefore, h(x) is strictly increasing on (0, π/2). Noting that lim t 0 + h ( t ) = 3 56 and lim t ( π / 2 ) - h ( t ) = 2 π 6 , we have

3 56 = lim t 0 + h ( t ) < h ( x ) = 2 sin x x + tan x x - 3 - 3 20 x 4 x 5 tan x < lim t ( π / 2 ) - h ( t ) = 2 π 6

for all x 0 , π 2 with the constants 3 56 and 2 π 6 being possible. This completes the proof of (25).

Remark 2. There is no strict comparison between inequalities (24) and (25).

In view of inequalities (24) and (25), we propose the following conjecture.

Conjecture 3. For 0 < x < π/2 and n ≥ 2, we have

3 + k = 3 n 2 2 k ( 2 2 k - 1 ) B 2 k 4 k - ( - 1 ) k 2 ( 2 k - 1 ) ! x 2 k - 2 + 2 2 n + 2 ( 2 2 n + 2 - 1 ) B 2 n + 2 4 ( n + 1 ) - ( - 1 ) n + 1 2 ( 2 n + 1 ) ! x 2 n - 1 tan x < 2 sin x x + tan x x < 3 + k = 3 n 2 2 k ( 2 2 k - 1 ) B 2 k 4 k - ( - 1 ) k 2 ( 2 k - 1 ) ! x 2 k - 2 + 2 π 2 n x 2 n - 1 tan x .
(26)