Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Pragmatic Approach to Qualitative Formative Evaluation of an Integrated Primary Care Program in Togo, West Africa

  • Published:
Global Implementation Research and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the utility of formative evaluation in implementation research, few published projects in low- and middle-income countries have used this approach and incorporating qualitative data into implementation projects can be challenging. Implementation science and qualitative formative evaluation can help inform the delivery of evidence-based practices, specifically identifying gaps in service delivery and implementation fidelity. Including stakeholders in formative evaluation facilitates actionable feedback and practical problem-solving of real-time implementation challenges. This paper presents a real-world example of qualitative formative evaluation that was used to inform the implementation of an integrated healthcare intervention in Togo, West Africa. We organize our results around the five main advantages of implementation-focused formative evaluation that can provide context-specific data useful for implementation teams: (a) highlighting actual versus planned interventions; (b) enabling implementation through identification of modifiable barriers; (c) facilitating any needed refinements in the original implementation intervention; (d) enhancing interpretation of project results; and (e) identifying critical details and guidance necessary for replication of results in other clinical settings. We provide specific examples of how these qualitative findings provide context-specific data and result in actionable steps, with a specific focus on including program implementers and stakeholders in the process. This paper describes lessons learned from the implementation of qualitative implementation-focused formative evaluation.

Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03694366 (registered 10/03/2018).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

LMIC:

Low- and middle-income country

SDG:

Sustainable development goal

CHW:

Community Health Worker

IMCI:

Integrated Management of Childhood Illness

QUERI:

Quality Enhancement Research Initiative

CFIR:

Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

MOH:

Ministry of Health and Public Hygiene

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge all those who participated in the interviews conducted for this study. Without their work and their words, this paper would not have been possible.

Funding

Study funded by Integrate Health through generous philanthropic support. No funders had any role in the design or analysis of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elissa Z. Faro.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors have indicated that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

Ethics approvals for this study were obtained from the institutional review. Boards of the Togolese Ministry of Health in Lomé, Togo and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York, USA (ref: 072744).

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Faro, E.Z., Haughton, J., Lauria, M.E. et al. A Pragmatic Approach to Qualitative Formative Evaluation of an Integrated Primary Care Program in Togo, West Africa. Glob Implement Res Appl 2, 209–218 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43477-022-00055-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43477-022-00055-2

Keywords

Navigation