Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Application of 3D Printing in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Ideal surgical positioning and placement of implants during arthroplasty are crucial for long-term survival and optimal functional outcomes. Inadequate bone stock or defects, and anatomical variations can influence the outcomes. Three-dimensional printing (3DP) is an evolving technology that could provide patient-specific instrumentation and implants for arthroplasty, taking into account anatomical variations and defects. However, its application in this field is still not adequately studied and described. The present review was conceptualised to assess the practicality, the pros and cons and the current status of usage of 3DP in the field of hip and knee arthroplasties and joint reconstruction surgeries.

Methods

A PubMed database search was conducted and a total number of 135 hits were obtained, out of which only 30 articles were relevant. These 30 studies were assessed to obtain the qualitative evidence of the applicability and the current status of 3D printing in arthroplasty.

Results

Currently, 3DP is used for preoperative planning with 3D models, to assess bone defects and anatomy, to determine the appropriate cuts and to develop patient-specific instrumentation and implants (cages, liners, tibial base plates, femoral stem). Its models can be used for teaching and training young surgeons, as well as patient education regarding the surgical complexities. The outcomes of using customised instrumentations and implants have been promising and 3D printing can evolve into routine practice in the years to come.

Conclusion

3D printing in arthroplasty is an evolving field with promising results; however, current evidence is insufficient to determine significant advantages that can be termed cost effective and readily available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Huang, Y., Leu, M. C., Mazumder, J., & Donmez, A. (2015). Additive manufacturing: current state, future potential, gaps and needs, and recommendations. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 137(1), 014001–14010.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Trauner, K. B. (2018). The emerging role of 3D printing in arthroplasty and orthopedics. Journal of Arthroplasty, 33, 2352–2354.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Crawford, M. (2020). Manufacturing in layers: 3D printing’s impact on orthopedics. Orthopedic Design and Technologyhttps://www.odtmag.com/issues/2017-08-01/view_features/manufacturing-in-layers-3d-printings-impact-on-orthopedics/. Accessed 10 May 2020.

  4. Narra, S. P., Mittwede, P. N., DeVincent, W. S., & Urish, K. L. (2019). Additive manufacturing in total joint arthroplasty. Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 50(1), 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Javaid, M., & Haleem, A. (2018). Additive manufacturing applications in orthopaedics: a review. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 9(3), 202–206.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Jardini, A. L., Larosa, M. A., Maciel Filho, R., et al. (2014). Cranial reconstruction: 3D bio model and custom-built implant created using additive manufacturing. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, 42(8), 1877–1884.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dall’Ava, L., Hothi, H., Henckel, J., Di Laura, A., Shearing, P., & Hart, A. (2019). Comparative analysis of current 3D printed acetabular titanium implants. 3D Printing in Medicine, 5(1), 15.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hughes, A. J., DeBuitleir, C., Soden, P., et al. (2017). 3D printing aids acetabular reconstruction in complex revision hip arthroplasty. Advances in Orthopedics, 2017, 8925050.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Vaishya, R., Vijay, V., Vaish, A., & Agarwal, A. (2018). Three-dimensional printing for complex orthopedic cases and trauma: a blessing. Apollo Med, 15, 51–54.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moskal, J. T., & Capps, S. G. (2010). Improving the accuracy of acetabular component orientation: avoiding malposition. Journal of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 18, 286–296.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vaish, A., & Vaish, R. (2018). 3D printing and its applications in orthopedics. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 9(1), S74–S75.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Li, H., Qu, X., Mao, Y., Dai, K., & Zhu, Z. (2016). Custom acetabular cages offer stable fixation and improved hip scores for revision THA with severe bone defects. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 474, 731–740.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mao, Y., Xu, C., Xu, J., Li, H., Liu, F., Yu, D., et al. (2015). The use of customized cages in revision total hip arthroplasty for Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects. International Orthopaedics, 39, 2023–2030.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kieser, D. C., Ailabouni, R., Kieser, S. C. J., et al. (2018). The use of an Ossis custom 3D-printed tri-flanged acetabular implant for major bone loss: minimum 2-year follow-up. HIP International, 28, 668–674.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, S., Wang, L., Liu, Y., et al. (2017). 3D printing technology used in severe hip deformity. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 14, 2595–2599.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Aprato, A., Giachino, M., Bedino, P., et al. (2019). Management of Paprosky type three B acetabular defects by custom-made components: early results. International Orthopaedics, 43, 117–122.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Citak, M., Kochsiek, L., & Gehrke, T. (2018). Preliminary results of a 3D-printed acetabular component in the management of extensive defects. HIP International, 28, 266–271.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Angelini, A., Trovarelli, G., Berizzi, A., Pala, E., Breda, A., & Ruggieri, P. (2019). Three-dimension-printed custom-made prosthetic reconstructions: from revision surgery to oncologic reconstructions. International Orthopaedics, 43, 123–132.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Small, T., Krebs, V., Molloy, R., Bryan, J., Klika, A. K., & Barsoum, W. K. (2014). Comparison of acetabular shell position using patient specific instruments vs. standard surgical instruments: a randomized clinical trial. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 29, 1030–1037.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cao, L., Wang, Y., Zou, S., & Cheng, H. (2019). A novel positioner for accurately sitting the acetabular component: a retrospective comparative study. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 14, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schneider, A. K., Pierrepont, J. W., Hawdon, G., & McMahon, S. (2018). Clinical accuracy of a patient-specific femoral osteotomy guide in minimally-invasive posterior hip arthroplasty. HIP Int., 28, 636–641.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Spencer-Gardner, L., Pierrepont, J., Topham, M., Baré, J., McMahon, S., & Shimmin, A. J. (2016). Patient-specific instrumentation improves the accuracy of acetabular component placement in total hip arthroplasty. Bone and Joint Journal, 98-B(10), 1342–1346.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mishra, A., Verma, T., Agarwal, G., Sharma, A., & Maini, L. (2020). 3D printed patient-specific acetabular jig for cup placement in total hip arthroplasty. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 54(2), 174–180.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hananouchi, T., Saito, M., Koyama, T., Sugano, N., & Yoshikawa, H. (2010). Tailor-made surgical guide reduces incidence of outliers of cup placement. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 468, 1088–1095.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kavalerskiy, G. M., Murylev, V. Y., Rukin, Y. A., Elizarov, P. M., Lychagin, A. V., & Tselisheva, E. Y. (2018). Three-dimensional models in planning of revision hip arthroplasty with complex acetabular defects. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 52(6), 625–630.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Aprato, A., Olivero, M., Iannizzi, G., Bistolfi, A., Sabatini, L., Masse, A. (2019) Pelvic discontinuity in acetabular revisions: does CT scan overestimate it? A comparative study of diagnostic accuracy of 3D-modeling and traditional 3D CT scan. Musculoskeletal Surgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-019-00608-z. [Epub ahead of print]

  27. Sun, M. L., Zhang, Y., Peng, Y., Fu, D. J., Fan, H. Q., & He, R. (2020). Accuracy of a novel 3D-printed patient-specific intramedullary guide to control femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopaedic Surgery, 12(2), 429–441.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Tian, H., Zhao, M. W., Geng, X., Zhou, Q. Y., & Li, Y. (2018). Patient-specific instruments based on knee joint computed tomography and full-length lower extremity radiography in total knee replacement. Chinese Medical Journal (England), 131, 583–587.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lustig, S., Scholes, C. J., Oussedik, S. I., Kinzel, V., Coolican, M. R., & Parker, D. A. (2013). Unsatisfactory accuracy as determined by computer navigation of VISIONAIRE patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty, 28(3), 469–473.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Victor, J., Dujardin, J., Vandenneucker, H., Arnout, N., & Bellemans, J. (2014). Patient-specific guides do not improve accuracy in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 472(1), 263–271.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Stronach, B. M., Pelt, C. E., Erickson, J. A., & Peters, C. L. (2014). Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty provides no improvement in component alignment. Journal of Arthroplasty, 29(9), 1705–1708.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nunley, R. M., Ellison, B. S., Ruh, E. L., et al. (2012). Are patient-specific cutting blocks cost-effective for total knee arthroplasty? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 470(3), 889–894.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nam, D., Park, A., Stambough, J. B., Johnson, S. R., Nunley, R. M., & Barrack, R. L. (2016). The Mark Coventry Award: custom cutting guides do not improve total knee arthroplasty clinical outcomes at 2 years follow up. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 474(1), 40–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Qiu, B., Liu, F., Tang, B., et al. (2017). Clinical study of 3D imaging and 3D printing technique for patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Knee Surgery, 30, 822–828.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Shen, Z., Wang, H., Duan, Y., Wang, J., & Wang, F. (2019). Application of 3D printed osteotomy guide plate-assisted total knee arthroplasty in treatment of valgus knee deformity. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 14(1), 327. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1349-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Gemalmaz, H. C., Sarıyılmaz, K., Ozkunt, O., Sungur, M., Kaya, I., & Dikici, F. (2019). Postoperative mechanical alignment analysis of total knee replacement patients operated with 3D printed patient specific instruments: a prospective cohort study. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, 53, 323–328.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Barrett, W., Hoeffel, D., Dalury, D., Mason, J. B., Murphy, J., & Himden, S. (2014). In-vivo alignment comparing patient specific instrumentation with both conventional and computer assisted surgery (CAS) instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty, 29(2), 343–347.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sultan, A. A., Mahmood, B., Samuel, L. T., et al. (2020). Cementless 3D printed highly porous titanium-coated baseplate total knee arthroplasty: survivorship and outcomes at 2-year minimum follow-up. Journal of Knee Surgery, 33(3), 279–283.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ogura, T., Le, K., Merkely, G., Bryant, T., & Minas, T. (2019). A high level of satisfaction after bicompartmental individualized knee arthroplasty with patient-specific implants and instruments. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 27, 1487–1496.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Arbab, D., Reimann, P., Brucker, M., Bouillon, B., & Lüring, C. (2018). Alignment in total knee arthroplasty—A comparison of patient-specific implants with the conventional technique. The Knee, 25, 882–887.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Levengood, G. A., & Dupee, J. (2018). Accuracy of coronal plane mechanical alignment in a customized, individually made total knee replacement with patient-specific instrumentation. Journal of Knee Surgery, 31(8), 792–796.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Marongiu, G., Prost, R., Capone, A. (2020) Use of 3D modelling and 3D printing for the diagnostic process, decision making and preoperative planning of periprosthetic acetabular fractures. BMJ Case Report 9:13(1). pii: e233117. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2019-233117

  43. Ding, H. W., Shen, J. J., Tu, Q., et al. (2011). Application of computer aided technique in osteoarthrosis. Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research, 15(17), 3113–3118.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Arabnejad, S., Johnston, B., Tanzer, M., & Pasini, D. (2017). Fully porous 3D printed titanium femoral stem to reduce stress-shielding following total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 35, 1774–1783.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Martelli, N., Serrano, C., van den Brink, H., et al. (2016). Advantages and disadvantages of 3-dimensional printing in surgery: a systematic review. Surgery, 159(6), 1485–1500.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ballard, D. H., Mills, P., Duszak, R., Jr., et al. (2020). Medical 3D printing cost-savings in orthopedic and maxillofacial surgery: cost analysis of operating room time saved with 3D printed anatomic models and surgical guides. Academic Radiology, 27(8), 1103–1113.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Vitali, J., Cheng, M., & Wagels, M. (2019). Utility and cost–effectiveness of 3D-printed materials for clinical use. Journal of 3D Printing in Medicine, 3(4), 209–218.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Mahmoud, A., & Bennett, M. (2015). Introducing 3-dimensional printing of a human anatomic pathology specimen: potential benefits for undergraduate and postgraduate education and anatomic pathology practice. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 139(8), 1048–1051.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Hurson, C., Tansey, A., O'Donnchadha, B., et al. (2007). Rapid prototyping in the assessment, classification and preoperative planning of acetabular fractures. Injury, 38(10), 1158–1162.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kim, T. W. B., Lopez, O. J., Sharkey, J. P., Marden, K. R., Murshed, M. R., & Ranganathan, S. I. (2017). 3D printed liner for treatment of periprosthetic joint infections. Medical Hypotheses, 102, 65–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Allen, B., Moore, C., Seyler, T., & Gall, K. (2020). Modulating antibiotic release from reservoirs in 3D-printed orthopedic devices to treat periprosthetic joint infection. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.24640.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Pinninti, R. R., & Devi, P. A. (2018). Review on the advancements to additive manufacturing-4D and 5D printing. International Journal of Mechanical and Production Engineering Research and Development, 8(4), 397–402.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Haleem, A., Javaid, M., & Vaishya, R. (2019). 5D printing and its expected applications in orthopaedics. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 10(4), 809–810.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

    Prasoon Kumar, Rajesh Kumar Rajnish, Aman Hooda & Mandeep S. Dhillon

  2. Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi, India

    Pulak Vatsya

Authors
  1. Prasoon Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pulak Vatsya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rajesh Kumar Rajnish
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aman Hooda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mandeep S. Dhillon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mandeep S. Dhillon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare no source of funding and no conflict of interest.

Ethical Standard Statement

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the any of the authors.

Informed Consent

For this type of study, informed consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, P., Vatsya, P., Rajnish, R.K. et al. Application of 3D Printing in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review. JOIO 55 (Suppl 1), 14–26 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-020-00263-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-020-00263-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation