Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of unoperated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in adulthood: a 10-year analysis

  • Case Series
  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study design

Retrospective, cross-sectional.

Objective

To evaluate the impact of unoperated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) in adulthood on pain, quality of life, and need for operative management.

Background

Long-term studies of AIS in adulthood demonstrate most patients function well, though some have increased disability. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and SRS-22r are validated questionnaires for assessing back disability and quality of life. Correlation of these questionnaires to patient outcomes and necessity for surgery have not been fully defined.

Methods

Unoperated adults with AIS seen in a tertiary deformity clinic from 2008–2018 were identified. Variables included demographics, comorbidities, family history, curve size/location, pain score, ODI, SRS-22r, and previous treatment. ODI and SRS-22r scores were analyzed across three age groups: 20–39, 40–59, and ≥ 60.

Results

275 eligible patients were identified and 255 (93%) patients had an ODI and/or SRS-22r score. ODI scores (220 patients) had a positive correlation with age, BMI, and curve size (p < .001). SRS-22r (204 patients) pain score was worse in all age–gender-matched domains (p < .05). Of the 255 patients in the study, 10% underwent surgery after presentation. In 118 patients with surgical-size curves (thoracic ≥ 50°; thoracolumbar ≥ 40°), no difference was seen in age or curve size between surgical and non-surgical patients; however, ODI and SRS-22r scores (excluding mental health) were significantly worse in surgical patients (p ≤ .01).

Conclusions

Patients with AIS have SRS-22r scores that are lower than age–gender-matched controls in most domains. ODI had a positive linear correlation with age, body mass index, and curve size. Only 10% of adults with surgical-size curves evaluated for scoliosis elected to undergo surgery. Patients treated surgically reported worse preoperative quality-of-life scores than their non-surgical counterparts. These results can help healthcare providers when counseling patients and families concerning management options.

Level of evidence

III

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Choudhry MN, Ahmad Z, Verma R (2016) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Open Orthop J 10:143–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Negrini S, Aulisa AG, Aulisa L et al (2012) 2011 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis 7(1):3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Cheng JC et al (2008) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet 371(9623):1527–1537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Horne JP, Flannery R, Usman S (2014) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician 89(3):193–198

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Asher MA, Burton DC (2006) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: natural history and long term treatment effects. Scoliosis 1(1):2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Danielsson AJ (2013) Natural history of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a tool for guidance in decision of surgery of curves above 50 degrees. J Child Orthop 7(1):37–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fowles JV, Drummond DS, L’Ecuyer S et al (1978) Untreated scoliosis in the adult. Clin Orthop 134:212–217

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nachemson A (1968) A long term follow-up study of non-treated scoliosis. Acta Orthop Scand 39(4):466–476

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nilsonne U, Lundgren KD (1968) Long-term prognosis in idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Orthop Scand 39(4):456–465

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Weinstein SLDL, Spratt KF, Peterson KK et al (2003) Health and function of patients with untreated idiopathic scoliosis. A 50-year natural history study. JAMA 289(5):9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Park S, Shin Y, Kim H et al (2014) The dischargeable cut-off score of Oswestry disability index (ODI) in the inpatient care for low back pain with disability. Eur Spine J 23(10):2090–2096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Baldus C, Bridwell K, Harrast J et al (2011) The scoliosis research society health-related quality of life (SRS-30) age-gender normative data: an analysis of 1346 adult subjects unaffected by scoliosis. Spine 36(14):1154–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lafage R, Schwab F, Challier V et al (2016) Defining spino-pelvic alignment thresholds: should operative goals in adult spinal deformity surgery account for age? SPINE 41(1):62–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Betz RR, Bunnell WP, Lambrecht-Mulier E et al (1987) Scoliosis and pregnancy. J Bone Jt Surg Am 69(1):90–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D et al (2003) The reliability and concurrent validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 28(1):63–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D et al (2003) Discrimination validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: relationship to idiopathic scoliosis curve pattern and curve size. Spine 28(1):74–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Larson A, Baky F, Ashraf A et al (2019) Minimum 20-year health-related quality of life and surgical rates after the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform 7(3):417–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Noonan KJ, Dolan LA, Jacobson WC et al (1997) Long-term psychosocial characteristics of patients treated for idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 17(6):712–717

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Danielsson AJ, Wiklund I, Pehrsson K et al (2001) Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a matched follow-up at least 20 years after treatment with brace or surgery. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 10(4):278–288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ascani E, Bartolozzi P, Logroscino CA et al (1986) Natural history of untreated idiopathic scoliosis after skeletal maturity. Spine 11(8):784–789

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Weinstein SL, Zavala DC, Ponseti IV (1981) Idiopathic scoliosis: long-term follow-up and prognosis in untreated patients. J Bone Jt Surg Am 63(5):702–712

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Setia MS (2016) Methodology series module 3: cross-sectional studies. Indian J Dermatol 61(3):261–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas Burton.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Erwin, J., Carlson, B.B., Bunch, J. et al. Impact of unoperated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in adulthood: a 10-year analysis. Spine Deform 8, 1009–1016 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-020-00142-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-020-00142-0

Keywords

Navigation