Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Variability in length of stay following neuromuscular spinal fusion

  • Case Series
  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Patients with neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS) who undergo posterior spinal fusion (PSF) often have long, protracted hospital stays because of numerous comorbidities. Coordinated perioperative pathways can reduce length of hospitalization (LOH) without increasing complications; however, a subset of patients may not be suited to rapid mobilization and early discharge.

Methods

197 patients with NMS underwent PSF at a single hospital by two surgeons with a post-operative care pathway emphasizing early mobilization, rapid transition to enteral feeds, and discharge prior to first bowel movement. Average LOH was 4.9 days for all patients. Patients were divided into quartiles (< 3 days, 3–5 days, 5–7 days, > 7 days) based on their LOH, and their charts were retrospectively reviewed for preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors associated with their LOH.

Results

Age at surgery, gender, the need for tube feeds, and specific underlying neuromuscular disorder were not significant predictors of LOH; however, severely involved cerebral palsy (CP) patients (GMFCS 4/5) were more likely to have extended stays than GMFCS 1–3 patients (p = 0.02). Radiographic predictors of LOH included major coronal Cobb angle (p = 0.002) and pelvic obliquity (p = 0.02). Intraoperative predictors included longer surgical times, greater numbers of levels fused and need for intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusion (p < 0.05). The need for ICU admission and development of a pulmonary complication were significantly more likely to fall into the extended LOH group (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Several variables have been identified as significant predictors of LOH after PSF for NMS in the setting of a standardized discharge pathway. Patients with smaller curves and less complex surgeries were more amenable to accelerated discharge. Conversely, patients with severe CP with large curves and pelvic obliquity requiring longer surgeries with more blood loss may not be ideal candidates. These data can be used to inform providers’ and families’ post-operative expectations.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic Level III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hasler C (2013) Operative treatment for spinal deformities in cerebral palsy. J Child Orthop 7:419–423

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Fletcher ND, Andras LM, Lazarus DE et al (2015) Use of a novel pathway for early discharge was associated with a 48% shorter length of stay after posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 37:92–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jevsevar D, Karlin L (1993) The relationship between preoperative nutritional status and complications after an operation for scoliosis in patients who have cerebral palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:880–884

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barsdorf A, Sproule D, Kaufmann P (2010) Scoliosis surgery in children with neuromuscular disease: findings from the US National Inpatient Sample, 1997–2003. Arch Neurol 67:231–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Murphy NA, Firth S, Jorgensen T, Young PC (2006) Spinal surgery in children with idiopathic and neuromuscular scoliosis. What’s the difference? J Pediatr Orthop 26(2):216–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rumalla KYC, Pugely AJ, Koester L, Dorward IG (2016) Spinal fusion for pediatric neuromuscular scoliosis: national trends, complications, and in-hospital outcomes. J Neurosurg Spine 25(4):500–508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Diefenbach C, Ialenti MN, Lonner BS, Jonathan RK, Verma K, Errico TJ (2013) Hospital cost analysis of neuromuscular scoliosis surgery. Bull Hosp Joint Dis 71(4):272–277

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beckmann KLT, Gosheger G, Bövingloh AS, Borowski M, Bullmann V, Liljenqvist U, Schulte TL (2016) Surgical correction of scoliosis in patients with severe cerebral palsy. Eur Spine J 25(2):506–516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Holt JBDL, Weinstein SL (2017) Outcomes of primary posterior spinal fusion for scoliosis in spinal muscular atrophy: clinical, radiographic, and pulmonary outcomes and complications. J Pediatr Orthop 37(8):505–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bellaire LL, Bruce RW Jr, Ward LA, Bowman CA, Fletcher ND (2019) Use of an accelerated discharge pathway in patients with severe cerebral palsy undergoing posterior spinal fusion for neuromuscular scoliosis. Spine Deform 7(5):804–811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Abu-Kishk I, Kozer E, Hod-Feins R et al (2013) Pediatric scoliosis surgery–is postoperative intensive care unit admission really necessary? Paediatr Anaesth 23(3):271–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Almenrader N, Patel D (2006) Spinal fusion surgery in children with non-idiopathic scoliosis: is there a need for routine postoperative ventilation? Br J Anaesth 97(6):851–857

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brooks JT, Yaszay B, Bartley CE et al (2019) Do all patients with cerebral palsy require postoperative intensive care admission after spinal fusion? Spine Deform 7(1):112–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cahill PJ, Samdani AF, Brusalis CM et al (2018) Youth and experience: the effect of surgeon experience on outcomes in cerebral palsy scoliosis surgery. Spine Deform 6(1):54–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Crowther MA, Webb PJ, Eyre-Brook IA (2002) Superior mesenteric artery syndrome following surgery for scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27(24):E528–E533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jain A, Sponseller PD, Shah SA et al (2016) Subclassification of GMFCS Level-5 cerebral palsy as a predictor of complications and health-related quality of life after spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98(21):1821–1828

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jalanko T, Helenius I, Pakarinen M, Koivusalo A (2018) Gastrointestinal complications after surgical correction of neuromuscular scoliosis: a retrospective cohort study. Scand J Surg 107(3):252–259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lonstein JE, Koop SE, Novachek TF, Perra JH (2012) Results and complications after spinal fusion for neuromuscular scoliosis in cerebral palsy and static encephalopathy using luque galveston instrumentation: experience in 93 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(7):583–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Luhmann SJ, Furdock R (2019) Preoperative variables associated with respiratory complications after pediatric neuromuscular spine deformity surgery. Spine Deform 7(1):107–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mills B, Bach JR, Zhao C, Saporito L, Sabharwal S (2013) Posterior spinal fusion in children with flaccid neuromuscular scoliosis: the role of noninvasive positive pressure ventilatory support. J Pediatr Orthop 33(5):488–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Persson-Bunke M, Hagglund G, Lauge-Pedersen H, Wagner P, Westbom L (2012) Scoliosis in a total population of children with cerebral palsy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(12):E708–E713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ramo BA, Roberts DW, Tuason D et al (2014) Surgical site infections after posterior spinal fusion for neuromuscular scoliosis: a thirty-year experience at a single institution. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(24):2038–2048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rumalla K, Yarbrough CK, Pugely AJ, Koester L, Dorward IG (2016) Spinal fusion for pediatric neuromuscular scoliosis: national trends, complications, and in-hospital outcomes. J Neurosurg Spine 25(4):500–508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Soudon P, Hody JL, Bellen P (2000) Preoperative cardiopulmonary assessment in the child with neuromuscular scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop B 9(4):229–233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sponseller PD, Shah SA, Abel MF et al (2009) Scoliosis surgery in cerebral palsy: differences between unit rod and custom rods. Spine(Phila Pa 1976) 34(8):840–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tsirikos AI, Lipton G, Chang WN, Dabney KW, Miller F (2008) Surgical correction of scoliosis in pediatric patients with cerebral palsy using the unit rod instrumentation. Spine(Phila Pa 1976) 33(10):1133–1140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nishnianidze T, Bayhan IA, Abousamra O et al (2016) Factors predicting postoperative complications following spinal fusions in children with cerebral palsy scoliosis. Eur Spine J 25(2):627–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Borden TC, Bellaire LL, Fletcher ND (2016) Improving perioperative care for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients: the impact of a multidisciplinary care approach. J Multidiscip Healthc 9:435–445

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Fletcher ND, Andras LM, Lazarus DE et al (2017) Use of a novel pathway for early discharge was associated with a 48% shorter length of stay after posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 37(2):92–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fletcher ND, Glotzbecker MP, Marks M, Newton PO, Harms Study G (2017) Development of consensus-based best practice guidelines for postoperative care following posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42(9):E547–E554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fletcher ND, Shourbaji N, Mitchell PM, Oswald TS, Devito DP, Bruce RW (2014) Clinical and economic implications of early discharge following posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Child Orthop 8(3):257–263

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Bellaire LLW, Ward LA, Bruce RW Jr, Bowman CA, Fletcher ND (2019) Use of an accelerated discharge pathway in patients with severe cerebral palsy undergoing posterior spinal fusion for neuromuscular scoliosis. J Spine Deform 7:804–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No external funding was used for this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dr. Fletcher was a substantial contributor to the concept design, study planning, data interpretation, revision of the manuscript, and final approval of the manuscript. Dr. Bellaire contributed to concept design, substantial contributor to the data collection, original drafting and revision of the manuscript, and gave final approval of the manuscript. Dr. Dilbone, a medical student at the time of data collection, was a substantial contributor to concept design, data collection, and manuscript revision. He gave final approval of the manuscript. Ms. Ward was a substantial contributor to statistical analysis, manuscript revision, and gave approval of the final manuscript. Dr. Bruce was a substantial contributor to concept design, study planning, and revision of the manuscript and gave final approval of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas D. Fletcher.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Fletcher is a consultant with Medtronic Spine, Nuvasive, and Orthopaediatrics; Speakers bureau for Orthopaediatrics and Zimmer/Biomet. Board member: Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta. Research support from the Harrison Foundation. Dr. Bruce, Dr. Bellaire, Dr. Dilbone, and Laura Ward have no disclosures.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for this study at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fletcher, N.D., Bellaire, L.L., Dilbone, E.S. et al. Variability in length of stay following neuromuscular spinal fusion. Spine Deform 8, 725–732 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-020-00081-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-020-00081-w

Keywords

Navigation