Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surgeon-specific risk stratification model for early complications after complex adult spinal deformity surgery

  • Case Series
  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study design

Retrospective outcome analysis of a prospectively collected single-surgeon cases

Objectives

Identify risk factors for complications in adult surgical spine deformity patients, develop a surgeon-specific risk stratification model, and predict the likelihood of 6-week postoperative complications based on prospectively collected preoperative measures.

Summary of background data

Adult spinal deformity surgery is challenging technically as well as economically. Although many risk factors are well known for spine surgery, complications after complex spine deformity surgery remain a significant problem worldwide.

Methods

We reviewed 124 consecutive adult patients who have undergone instrumented spinal fusion with nine or more levels over a 21-month period in a single institution. We extracted data from patient medical records. Complications within the 6 weeks after surgery were identified. Univariate and logistic regression analyses (LRAs) were implemented. We generated a formula based on the LRA predictive algorithm—a numeric probabilistic likelihood statistic representing an individual patient’s risk of developing a complication.

Results

A total of 34 (27%) patients had complications that were categorized into either 21 (17%) medical or 17 (13.7%) surgical complications, including 3 (2.4%) proximal junctional kyphosis, 8 (6.4%) neurologic deficit, and 9 (6.5%) any wound issue. The predictive model was significant and calibrated using area under the receiver operating characteristics curve analysis. The model correctly classified 83.1% cases. Patients with a three-column osteotomy or history of deep vein thrombosis have 6 and 19 times higher overall complications, respectively, compared with patients without. Patients with a three-column osteotomy or body mass index > 30, respectively, are 24 and 11 times more likely to develop a wound complication. Patients with a three-column osteotomy have 10 times higher rates of surgical complication.

Conclusions

Complex spine deformity is often associated with complications. No single variable effectively predicts postoperative complications for such a complicated situation. However, when all risk factors are considered, patients with three-column osteotomy have a significantly higher chance to develop early complications.

Level of Evidence

Level IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Qiao J, Xiao L, Sun X et al (2018) Three column osteotomy for adult spine deformity: comparison of outcomes and complications between kyphosis and kyphoscoliosis. Br J Neurosurg 32:32–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Saifi C, Laratta JL, Petridis P et al (2017) Vertebral column resection for rigid spinal deformity. Glob Spine J 7:280–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Bess S et al (2017) Recent and emerging advances in spinal deformity. Neurosurgery 80:S70–S85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lenke LG, Fehling MG, Shaffrey C et al (2013) Prospective, multicenter assessment of acute neurologic complications following complex adult spinal deformity surgery: the Scoli-Risk-1 Trial. Spine J 13:S67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schwab FJ, Hawkinson N, Lafage V et al (2012) Risk factors for major peri-operative complications in adult spinal deformity surgery: a multi-center review of 953 consecutive patients. Eur Spine J 21:2603–2610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Buchlak QD, Yanamadala V, Leveque JC et al (2017) The seattle spine score: predicting 30-day complication risk in adult spinal deformity surgery. J Clin Neurosci 43:247–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Glassman SD, Hamill CL, Bridwell KH et al (2007) The impact of perioperative complications on clinical outcome in adult deformity surgery. Spine 32:2764–2770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Acosta FL Jr, McClendon J Jr, O’Shaughnessy BA et al (2011) Morbidity and mortality after spinal deformity surgery in patients 75 years and older: complications and predictive factors: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 15:667–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Somani S, Capua JD, Kim JS et al (2017) ASA classification as a risk stratification tool in adult spinal deformity surgery: a study of 5805 patients. Glob Spine J 7:719–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Leven DM, Lee NJ, Kothari P et al (2016) Frailty index is a significant predictor of complications and mortality after surgery for adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41:E1394–E1401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Boachie-Adjei O, Yagi M, Sacramento-Dominguez C et al (2014) Surgical risk stratification based on preoperative risk factors in severe pediatric spinal deformity surgery. Spine Deform 2:340–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Diebo BG, Lafage V, Varghese JJ et al (2018) After 9 years of 3-column osteotomies, are we doing better? Performance curve analysis of 573 surgeries with 2-year follow-up. Neurosurgery 83:69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang K, Vitale M (2016) Risk stratification: perspectives of the patient, surgeon, and health system. Spine Deform 4:1–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Martin BI, Mirza SK, Franklin GM et al (2013) Hospital and surgeon variation in complications and repeat surgery following incident lumbar fusion for common degenerative diagnoses. Health Serv Res 48:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Le Cessie S, Van Houwelingen J (1992) Ridge estimators in logistic regression. Appl Stat 41:191–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schwab F, Blondel B, Chay E et al (2014) The comprehensive anatomical spinal osteotomy classification. Neurosurgery 74:112–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bridwell KH, Lewis SJ, Lenke LG et al (2003) Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85:454–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gum JL, Carreon LY, Buchowski JM et al (2016) Utilization trends of pedicle subtraction osteotomies compared to posterior spinal fusion for deformity: a national database analysis between 2008–2011. Scoliosis Spinal Disord 11:25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Auerbach JD, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH et al (2012) Major complications and comparison between 3-column osteotomy techniques in 105 consecutive spinal deformity procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:1198–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cho KJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG et al (2005) Comparison of Smith-Petersen versus pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the correction of fixed sagittal imbalance. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2030–2037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim SS, Cho BC, Kim JH et al (2012) Complications of posterior vertebral resection for spinal deformity. Asian Spine J 6:257–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lenke LG, Newton PO, Sucato DJ et al (2013) Complications after 147 consecutive vertebral column resections for severe pediatric spinal deformity: a multicenter analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:119–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lenke LG, O’Leary PT, Bridwell KH et al (2009) Posterior vertebral column resection for severe pediatric deformity: minimum two-year follow-up of thirty-five consecutive patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:2213–2221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Daubs MD, Lenke LG, Cheh G et al (2007) Adult spinal deformity surgery: complications and outcomes in patients over age 60. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2238–2244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Buchowski JM, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG et al (2007) Neurologic complications of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a 10-year assessment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2245–2252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Boachie-Adjei O, Yagi M, Nemani VM et al (2015) Incidence and risk factors for major surgical complications in patients with complex spinal deformity: a report from an SRS GOP site. Spine Deform 3:57–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Klineberg E, On behalf of the International Spine Study Group et al (2017) Complication rates associated with 3-column osteotomy in 82 adult spinal deformity patients: retrospective review of a prospectively collected multicenter consecutive series with 2-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 27:444–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. De La Garza Ramos R, Nakhla J, Nasser R et al (2017) Case-control study of risk factors for surgical site infection after three-column osteotomy for spine deformity [published online June 2, 2017]. Turk Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.jtn.20372-17.0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. McClendon J Jr, Smith TR, O’Shaughnessy BA et al (2015) Time to event analysis for the development of venous thromboembolism after spinal fusion ≥ 5 levels. World Neurosurg 84:826–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ikeda T, Miyamoto H, Hashimoto K, Akagi M (2017) Predictable factors of deep venous thrombosis in patients undergoing spine surgery. J Orthop Sci 22:197–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mirza SK, Deyo R, Heagerty PJ et al (2008) Development of an index to characterize the “invasiveness” of spine surgery: validation by comparison to blood loss and operative time. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:2651–2661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Marquez-Lara A, Nandyala S, Sankaranarayanan S et al (2014) Body mass index as a predictor of complications and mortality after lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:798–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bono OJ, Poorman GW, Foster N et al (2018) Body mass index predicts risk of complications in lumbar spine surgery based on surgical invasiveness. Spine J 18:1204–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Soroceanu A, Burton DC, Oren JH, International Spine Study Group et al (2016) Medical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery: incidence, risk factors, and clinical impact. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41:1718–1723

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No financial support was received for this research project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrence G. Lenke.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

XJL (none), LGL (personal fees from Medtronic, K2M, Fox Rothschild, LLC, and Quality Medical Publishing; grants and personal fees from DePuy-Synthes Spine; nonfinancial support from Broadwater, Seattle Science Foundation, Stryker Spine, and The Spinal Research Foundation; grants and nonfinancial support from Scoliosis Research Society and AOSpine; grants from EOS and Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation; other from Evans Family Donation and Fox Family Foundation, outside the submitted work), LJ (none), AT (none), LAT (none), RAL (other from Medtronic, Stryker, and DePuy Synthes Spine, outside the submitted work), MC (none).

IRB approval

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X.J., Lenke, L.G., Jin, L. et al. Surgeon-specific risk stratification model for early complications after complex adult spinal deformity surgery. Spine Deform 8, 97–104 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-020-00047-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-020-00047-y

Keywords

Navigation