Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Operative Behandlungsstrategien bei posteromedialen oder -lateralen Kombinationsverletzungen des hinteren Kreuzbandes

Stellenwert fadenaugmentierter Bandnähte („ligament bracing“) in der akuten Versorgung

Surgical treatment strategies for combined posteromedial or posterolateral knee injuries

Anatomic repair and suture augmentation (ligament bracing) as a new treatment option in acute care

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Knie Journal Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Rupturen des hinteren Kreuzbandes (HKB) sind häufig assoziiert mit posterolateralen oder posteromedialen Begleitverletzungen. Derartige Kombinationsverletzungen zeigen schlechte funktionelle Resultate nach konservativer Behandlung. Daher gewinnt das für Knieluxationen etablierte Konzept des „ligament bracing“ auch bei akuten kombinierten HKB-Verletzungen sowohl für den zentralen Pfeiler (HKB) als auch die peripheren Strukturen an Bedeutung. Während auf der posteromedialen Seite die fadenaugmentierten Bandnähte vielversprechende Ergebnisse zeigen, ist die Rate an Therapieversagern posterolateral deutlich höher. Daher wird dort aktuell eine Hybridtechnik aus Naht der verletzten Strukturen mit primärer Sehnenaugmentation in anatomischer Technik favorisiert.

Abstract

Combined posteromedial or posterolateral posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tears are associated with poor functional outcome. Due to the promising clinical results of anatomic repair and suture augmentation (ligament bracing) in knee dislocations, this technique has become more important in the surgical treatment of combined PCL injuries. While ligament bracing techniques show promising results in cases of posteromedial injuries, posterolateral injuries are associated with higher failure rates and inferior outcome. Thus, in patients with posterolateral injuries, hybrid procedures involving anatomic repair and additional reconstruction of primary posterolateral corner (PLC) structures are preferred.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7
Abb. 8
Abb. 9
Abb. 10
Abb. 11

Literatur

  1. Shelbourne KD, Clark M, Gray T (2013) Minimum 10-year follow-up of patients after an acute, isolated posterior cruciate ligament injury treated nonoperatively. Am J Sports Med 41:1526–1533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lahner M, Vogel T, Schulz MS, Strobel MJ (2012) Vierjahresergebnisse nach isolierter hinterer Kreuzbandrekonstruktion in Einzelbündeltechnik. Orthopade 41:206–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Aroen A, Sivertsen EA, Owesen C, Engebretsen L (2013) Granan LP An isolated rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament results in reduced preoperative knee function in comparison with an anterior cruciate ligament injury. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:1017–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Strobel MJ, Weiler A, Schulz MS et al (2003) Arthroscopic evaluation of articular cartilage lesions in posterior-cruciate-ligament-deficient knees. Arthroscopy 19:262–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jung TM, Schmeling A, Weiler A (2006) Periphere Instabilitäten bei Läsion des hinteren Kreuzbandes. Arthroskopie 19:265–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chahla J et al (2019) Posterolateral corner of the knee: an expert consensus statement on diagnosis, classification, treatment, and rehabilitation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:2520–2529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Frosch KH, Preiss A, Heider S et al (2012) Primary ligament sutures as a treatment option of knee dislocations: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:1502–1509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Levy BA et al (2010) Repair versus reconstruction of the fibular collateral ligament and posterolateral corner in the multiligament-injured knee. Am J Sports Med 38(4):804–809. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546509352459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stannard JP, Brown SL, Farris RC, McGwin G Jr, Volgas DA (2005) The posterolateral corner of the knee: repair versus reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 33(6):881–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tibor LM, Marchant MH Jr., Taylor DC, Hardaker WT Jr., Garrett WE Jr., Sekiya JK (2011) Management of medial-sided knee injuries, part 2: posteromedial corner. Am J Sports Med 39(6):1332–1340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Phisitikul P, James SL, Wolf BR, Amendola A (2006) MCL injuries of the knee: current concepts revies. Iowa Orthop J 26:77–90

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marchant MH Jr., Tibor LM, Sekiya JK, Hardaker WT Jr., Garrett WE Jr., Taylor DC (2011) Management of medial-sided knee injuries, part 1: medial collateral ligament. Am J Sports Med 39(5):1102–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Forkel P, Mehl J, Petersen W, Imhoff AB (2017) Anatomische Refixation der akuten medialen Kniegelenkinstabilität. Arthroskopie 30:28–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Weimann A, Schatka I, Herbort M, Achtnich A, Zantop T, Raschke M, Petersen W (2012) Reconstruction of the posterior oblique ligament and the posterior cruciate ligament in knees with posteromedial instability. Arthroscopy 28(9):1283–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Weiler A, Schmeling A, Jung TM (2006) Management oft he acute PCL-deficient knee. Arthroskopie 19:229–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cooper DE, Stewart D (2004) Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single-bundle patella tendon graft with tibial inlay fixation: 2‑ to 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2:346–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Achtnich A, Schmitt A, Forkel P, Imhoff AB, Beitzel K (2019) Akute Verletzung des hinteren Kreuzbandes mit femoraler Avulsion – Banderhaltende arthroskopische Refixation und Bracing. Oper Orthop Traumatol 31(1):12–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Heitmann M, Gerau M, Hötzel J et al (2014) Ligament bracing—augmented primary suture repair in multiligamentous knee injuries. Oper Orthop Traumatol 26(1):19–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Heitmann M, Drazidis A, Jagodzinski M et al (2014) Ligament bracing—augmented cruciate ligament sutures: biomechanical studies of a new treatment concept. Unfallchirurg 117(7):650–657

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Petri M, Ettinger M, Dratzidis A et al (2012) Comparison of three suture techniques and three suture materials on gap formation and failure load in ruptured tendons: a human cadaveric study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132:649–654

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Heitmann M, Akoto R, Krause M, Hepp P, Schoepp C, Gensior TJ et al (2019) Management of acute knee dislocations: anatomic repair and ligament bracing as a new treatment option-results of a multicentre study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:2710–2718

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Liow RY, McNicholas MU, Keating JF et al (2003) Ligament repair and reconstruction in traumatic dislocation of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:845–851

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hopper GP, Heusdens CHW, Dossche L, Mackay GM (2018) Posterior cruciate ligament repair with suture tape augmentation. Arthrosc Tech 8(1):e7–e10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. van der List JP, DiFelice GS (2017) Arthroscopic primary posterior cruciate ligament repair with suture augmentation. Arthrosc Tech 6:e1685–e1690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gilmer BB, Crall T, DeLong J, Kubo T, Mackay G, Jani SS (2016) Biomechanical analysis of internal bracing for treatment of medial knee injuries. Orthopedics 39(3):e532–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ateschrang A, Dobele S, Freude T, Stöckle U, Schröter S, Kraus TM (2016) Acute MCL and ACL injuries: first results of minimal-invasive MCL ligament bracing with combined ACL single-bundle reconstruction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(9):1265–1272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lubowitz JH, MacKay G, Gilmer B (2014) Knee medial collateral ligament and posteromedial corner anatomic repair with internal bracing. Arthrosc Tech 3:e505–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ohkoshi Y, Nagasaki S, Shibata N et al (2002) Two-stage reconstruction with autografts for knee dis-locations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 398:169–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bin SI, Nam TS (2007) Surgical outcome of 2‑stage management of multiple knee ligament injuries after knee dislocation. Arthroscopy 23:1066–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pournaras J, Symeonides PP (1991) The results of surgical repair of acute tears of the posterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res 267:103–107

    Google Scholar 

  31. Richter M, Bosch U, Wippermann B et al (2002) Comparison of surgical repair or reconstruction of the cruciate ligaments versus nonsurgical treat-ment in patients with traumatic knee dislocations. Am J Sports Med 30:718–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Maotshe G et al (2018) The influence of graft tensioning sequence on tibiofemoral orientation during bicruciate and posterolateral corner knee ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 46(8):1863–1869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mehl JT et al (2019) The posteromedial ligament repair of the knee with suture tape augmentation: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 47(12):2952–2959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. LaPrade RF, Wijdicks CA (2012) Surgical technique: development of an anatomic medial knee reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(3):806–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wijdicks CA, Griffith CJ, Laprade RF et al (2009) Radiographic identification of the primary medial knee structures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:521–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Arciero RA (2005) Anatomic posterolateral corner knee recon-struction. Arthroscopy 21:1147

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ranger P, Senay A, Gratton GR, Lacelle M, Delisle J (2018) LARS synthetic ligaments for the acute management of 111 acute knee dislocations: effective surgical treatment for most ligaments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:3673–3681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Talbot M, Berry G, Fernandes J, Ranger P (2004) Knee disloca-tions: experience at the Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal. Can J Surg 47:20–24

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Otto A et al (2020) Promising clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results after internal bracing of acute posterior cruciate ligament lesions in multiple injured knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-05852-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. J. Gensior.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

T.J. Gensior und C. Schoepp geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autoren keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Additional information

Redaktion

A. Achtnich, München

K.-H. Frosch, Hamburg

M. Herbort, München

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gensior, T.J., Schoepp, C. Operative Behandlungsstrategien bei posteromedialen oder -lateralen Kombinationsverletzungen des hinteren Kreuzbandes. Knie J. 2, 186–195 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43205-020-00055-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43205-020-00055-y

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation