Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Serum Gonadotropin Levels Predict Post-Trigger Luteinizing Hormone Response in Antagonist Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation Cycles

  • Reproductive Endocrinology: Original Article
  • Published:
Reproductive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the utility of using serum gonadotropin levels to predict optimal luteinizing hormone (LH) response to gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) trigger. A retrospective cohort study was performed of all GnRH-antagonist controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) cycles at an academic fertility center from 2017–2020. Cycles that utilized GnRHa alone or in combination with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) for trigger were included. Patient and cycle characteristics were collected from the electronic medical record. Optimal LH response was defined as a serum LH ≥ 40 mIU/mL on the morning after trigger. Total sample size was 3865 antagonist COH cycles, of which 91% had an optimal response to GnRHa trigger. Baseline FSH (B-FSH) and earliest in-cycle LH (EIC-LH) were significantly higher in those with optimal response. Multivariable logistic regression affirmed association of optimal response with EIC-LH, total gonadotropin dosage, age, BMI and Asian race. There was no difference in the number of oocytes retrieved (p = 0.14), maturity rate (p = 0.40) or fertilization rates (p = 0.49) based on LH response. There was no difference in LH response based on use of combination vs. GnRHa alone trigger (p = 0.21) or GnRHa trigger dose (p = 0.46). The EIC-LH was more predictive of LH trigger response than B-FSH (p < 0.005).The optimal B-FSH and EIC-LH values to yield an optimal LH response was ≥ 5.5 mIU/mL and ≥ 1.62 mIU/mL, respectively. In an era of personalized medicine, utilizing cycle and patient characteristics, such as early gonadotropin levels, may improve cycle outcomes and provide further individualized care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Available upon request.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Humaidan P, Kol S. Suboptimal response to GnRH agonist trigger: causes and practical management. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2021;33(3):213–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Meyer L, Murphy LA, Gumer A, Reichman DE, Rosenwaks Z, Cholst IN. Risk factors for a suboptimal response to gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist trigger during in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(3):637–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Prevention and treatment of moderate and severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a guideline Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(7):1634–47.

  4. Popovic-Todorovic B, Santos-Ribeiro S, Drakopoulos P, De Vos M, Racca A, Mackens S, et al. Predicting suboptimal oocyte yield following GnRH agonist trigger by measuring serum LH at the start of ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod (Oxford). 2019;34(10):2027.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yen SS, Llerena O, Little B, Pearson OH. Disappearance rates of endogenous luteinizing hormone and chorionic gonadotropin in man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1968;28(12):1763–7. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-28-12-1763.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ludwig M, Felberbaum RE, Devroey P, Albano C, Riethmuller-Winzen H, Schuler A, et al. Significant reduction of the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) by using the LHRH antagonist Cetrorelix (Cetrotide) in controlled ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2000;264:29–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Engmann L, DiLuigi A, Schmidt D, Nulsen J, Maier D, Benadiva C. The use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist to induce oocyte maturation after cotreatment with GnRH antagonist in high-risk patients undergoing in vitro fertilization prevents the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a prospective randomized controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(1):84–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Melo M, Melo M, Busso CE, Bellver J, Alama P, Garrido N, et al. GnRH agonist versus recombinant HCG in an oocyte donation programme: a randomized, prospective, controlled, assessor-blind study. RBM Online. 2010;19(4):486–92.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Furui K, Suganuma N, Tsukahara S, Asada Y, Kikkawa F, Tanaka M, Ozawa T, Tomoda Y. Identification of two point mutations in the gene coding luteinizing hormone (LH) beta-subunit, associated with immunologically anomalous LH variants. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;78(1):107–13. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.78.1.7904610.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chevrier L, Guimiot F, de Roux N. GnRH receptor mutations in isolated gonadotropic deficiency. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2011;346(1–2):21–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2011.04.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Haavisto AM, Pettersson K, Bergendahl M, Virkamäki A, Huhtaniemi I. Occurrence and biological properties of a common genetic variant of luteinizing hormone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80(4):1257–63. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.80.4.7714098.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen SL, Ye DS, Chen X, Yang XH, Zheng HY, Tang Y, He YX, Guo W. Circulating luteinizing hormone level after triggering oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist may predict oocyte yield in flexible GnRH antagonist protocol. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(5):1351–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des049.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chang FE, Beall SA, Cox JM, Richter KS, DeCherney AH, Levy MJ. Assessing the adequacy of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist leuprolide to trigger oocyte maturation and management of inadequate response. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(5):1093-1100.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.06.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dunne C, Shan A, Nakhuda G. Measurement of Luteinizing Hormone Level After Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Trigger Is Not Useful for Predicting Oocyte Maturity. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018;40(12):1618–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2018.01.032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashley Wiltshire.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Use of these data was approved by the Institutional Review Board of NYU Langone Health (Study #s13-00389).

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

All authors approve of publication of this manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wiltshire, A., Tozour, J., Hamer, D. et al. Serum Gonadotropin Levels Predict Post-Trigger Luteinizing Hormone Response in Antagonist Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation Cycles. Reprod. Sci. 30, 1335–1342 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-022-01105-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-022-01105-8

Keywords

Navigation