Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of the Method of Endometrial Preparation Prior to Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer: a Retrospective Cohort Study from 9733 Cycles

  • Infertility: Original Article
  • Published:
Reproductive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our objective was to compare the effectiveness of natural cycles (NC), modified natural cycle (mNC), and artificial cycles (AC) in women undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) after in vitro fertilization (IVF). This is a retrospective cohort study analyzing 9733 women undergoing the first cycle of FET over a 3-year period (June 2014–December 2017) at Northwest Women’s and Children’s Hospital after IVF-ICSI cycles. The type of endometrial preparation was determined by the treating physician’s preference, based on patients’ characteristics. Women with regular ovulation were allocated to natural cycles (n = 1480) or modified natural cycles (n = 196) when the leading follicle was triggered with hCG, while patients who were reluctant to frequently monitoring or living far from the hospital were allocated to artificial cycles (n = 8057). A logistic regression model was used to assess the association between endometrial preparation and clinical outcomes while adjusting for potential confounders. Live birth rate was primary outcome while miscarriage rate, clinical pregnancy rate, preterm birth rate, and ectopic pregnancy rate were secondary outcomes. In the adjusted model, type of endometrial preparation did not affect live birth (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.74–0.96), clinical pregnancy (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.81–1.06), preterm birth (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.84–1.26), and ectopic pregnancy (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.33–1.59), while AC significantly increased the miscarriage rate (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.17–1.89, P=0.001). In conclusions, in women undergoing FET, natural cycles and artificial cycles resulted in comparable live birth rate while miscarriage rate was higher in artificial cycles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhu D, Zhang J, Cao S, Zhang J, Heng BC, Huang M, et al. Vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles yield higher pregnancy and implantation rates compared with fresh blastocyst transfer cycles--time for a new embryo transfer strategy? Fertil Steril. 2011;95(5):1691–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Loutradi KE, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, et al. Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(1):186–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Belva F, Bonduelle M, Roelants M, Verheyen G, van Landuyt L. Neonatal health including congenital malformation risk of 1072 children born after vitrified embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(7):1610–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ghobara T, Gelbaya TA, Ayeleke RO. Cycle regimens for frozen-thawed embryo transfer. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2017; 7(7): Cd003414.

  5. Lathi RB, Chi YY, et al. Frozen blastocyst embryo transfer using a supplemented natural cycle protocol has a similar live birth rate compared to a programmed cycle protocol. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32(7):1057–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Agha-Hosseini M, Hashemi L, Aleyasin A, Ghasemi M, Sarvi F, Shabani Nashtaei M, et al. Natural cycle versus artificial cycle in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a randomized prospective trial. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;15(1):12–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jing S, Li XF, Zhang S, et al. Increased pregnancy complications following frozen-thawed embryo transfer during an artificial cycle. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(5):925–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhao J, Zhang Q, Wang Y, Li Y. Endometrial pattern, thickness and growth in predicting pregnancy outcome following 3319 IVF cycle. Reprod BioMed Online. 2014;29(3):291–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Dyer S, Racowsky C, de Mouzon J, Sokol R, et al. The international glossary on infertility and fertility care, 2017. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(9):1786–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. American College of O, Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice BO. Practice Bulletin No. 171: Management of Preterm Labor. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128(10): e155-e164.

  11. Gelbaya TA, Nardo LG, Hunter HR, Fitzgerald CT, Horne G, Pease EEH, et al. Cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer in natural or down-regulated hormonally controlled cycles: a retrospective study. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(3):603–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hancke K, More S, Kreienberg R, Weiss JM. Patients undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer have similar live birth rates in spontaneous and artificial cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29(5):403–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tomas C, Alsbjerg B, Martikainen H, et al. Pregnancy loss after frozen-embryo transfer--a comparison of three protocols. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(5):1165–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. HillMJ MKA, Frattarelli JL. A GnRH agonist and exogenous hormone stimulation protocol has a higher live-birth rate than a natural endogenous hormone protocol for frozen-thawed blastocyst-stage embryo transfer cycles: an analysis of 1391 cycles. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(2):416–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zheng Y, Li Z. XiongM, et al. Hormonal replacement treatment improves clinical pregnancy in frozen thawed embryos transfer cycles: a retrospective cohort study. Am J Transl Res. 2014;6(1):85–90.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kosmas IP, Tatsioni A, Fatemi HM, et al. Human chorionic gonadotropin administration vs. luteinizing monitoring for intrauterine insemination timing, after administration of clomiphene citrate: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(3):607–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cerrillo M, Herrero L, Guillen A, et al. Impact of endometrial preparation protocols for frozen embryo transfer on live birth rates. Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2017;8(2):e0020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Givens CR, Markun LC, Ryan IP, Chenette PE, Herbert CM, Schriock ED. Outcomes of natural cycles versus programmed cycles for 1677 frozen-thawed embryo transfers. Reprod BioMed Online. 2009;19(3):380–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lyall F, Robson SC, Bulmer JN. Spiral artery remodeling and trophoblast invasion in preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction: relationship to clinical outcome. Hypertension. 2013;62(6):1046–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hiura H, Hattori H, Kobayashi N, Okae H, Chiba H, Miyauchi N, et al. Genome-wide microRNA expression profiling in placentae from frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer. Clin Epigenetics. 2017;9(3):79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rizzo G, Aiello E, Pietrolucci ME, Arduini D. Are there differences in placental volume and uterine artery Doppler in pregnancies resulting from the transfer of fresh versus frozen-thawed embryos through in vitro fertilization. Reprod Sci. 2016;23(10):1381–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fritz R, Jindal S, Feil H, Buyuk E. Elevated serum estradiol levels in artificial autologous frozen embryo transfer cycles negatively impact ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34(12):1633–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Patel S, Kilburn B, Imudia A, Armant DR, Skafar DF. Estradiol elicits proapoptotic and antiproliferative effects in human trophoblast cells. Biol Reprod. 2015;93(3):74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shavit T, Oron G, Weon-Young S, Holzer H, Tulandi T. Vitrified-warmed single-embryo transfers may be associated with increased maternal complications compared with fresh single-embryo transfers. Reprod BioMed Online. 2017;35(1):94–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sites CK, Wilson D, Barsky M, Bernson D, Bernstein IM, Boulet S, et al. Embryo cryopreservation and preeclampsia risk. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(5):784–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the staff from Northwest Women’s and Children’s Hospital for their assistance with the data collection. We thank all participants in this study.

Funding

This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81771657; http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Juanzi Shi and Shaohua Zhang contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Assisted Reproduction Center, Northwest Women’s and Children’s Hospital, No. 73 Houzai Gate, Xincheng District, Xi’an City, Shaanxi Province, China

    Xitong Liu, Hui Wang, Rong Pan, Qian Li & Juanzi Shi

  2. Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Medical College, Xi’an City, Shaanxi Province, China

    Shaohua Zhang

Authors
  1. Xitong Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hui Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rong Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qian Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Juanzi Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shaohua Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

XL, HW, and RP designed the study, performed data analysis, and drafted the manuscript; QL, JS, and SZ critically review and corrected the final version of the manuscript. All participants approved the final version to be submitted.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Juanzi Shi or Shaohua Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 27 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, X., Wang, H., Pan, R. et al. Comparison of the Method of Endometrial Preparation Prior to Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer: a Retrospective Cohort Study from 9733 Cycles. Reprod. Sci. 28, 3155–3163 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00603-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00603-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation