Skip to main content
Log in

PTO Torque and Draft Analyses of an Integrated Tractor-Mounted Implement for Round Ridge Preparation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Research on labor-saving of upland cultivation has been more actively conducted in Korea, since the consumption of and interest in local food have increased. The objectives of this study were to investigate characteristics of rotary-base implement for intensive farming and to suggest an operational strategy by analyzing draft (Ph) and power take-off (PTO) torque (Tq) of an integrated implement for round ridge preparation.

Methods

A dynamometer and torque meter were installed between a tractor hitch and an attachment to measure Ph and Tq and to analyze performance of the integrated implement.

Results

Increase in forward speed (SPD), decrease in Ph, and increase in Tq were observed. Rotary tilth depth (DEP) was a major factor in increasing Ph and Tq. In the operation of the integrated implement based on rotavator, the specific draft (SD) tended to decrease but the specific torque (ST) approached to a maximum value as the rotary pitch (p) increased.

Conclusion

The optimum p and velocity ratio (λ) for draft reduction were 36.15 cm/rev and 3.9, respectively for the actual SPD of 4.18 km/h at 540 rpm of PTO rotating speed (RPM). The regression of the rear wheel reaction (Rr) and slip showed a decaying exponential relation. If the Rr is reduced to 27 kN, slip will be properly maintained at 12–15%. Furthermore, the implement could be operated using a category I tractor with a front loader ballast.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

SPD:

Forward speed, km/h

RPM:

PTO rotating speed, rpm

DEP:

Rotary tilth depth, mm (in D, cm)

SET:

Experiment set conducted on different dates and sites

REP:

Repetition of test

W:

Swath, 120 cm

SD:

Specific draft, N/cm2

ST:

Specific torque, N·cm/cm2

T q :

PTO torque, N·m

P h :

Draft, N

p :

Rotary pitch, cm/rev

r d :

Radius of rotary, 0.225 m

λ :

Velocity ratio

Ω :

Rotary rotating speed, rpm (= RPM/2.805)

P h :

Longitudinal draft, N

P v :

Vertical force, N

P s :

Horizontal force, N

F 1 :

Force acting on load cell ①, N

F 2 :

Force on load cell ②, N

F 3 :

Force on load cell ③, N

F 4 :

Force on load cell ④, N

F 5 :

Force on load cell ⑤, N

F 6 :

Force on load cell ⑥, N

θ :

Angle between load cells ④ and ⑥, 60 deg

M x :

Roll moment at forward axis of tractor, N·m

M y :

Pitch moment at the horizontal axis, N·m

M z :

Yaw moment at the vertical axis, N·m

a :

Horizontal distance of load cells ④ and ⑥ at the moment center, 0.193 m

b :

Vertical distance of load cell ① at the moment center, 0.435 m

c :

Vertical distance of load cells ④ and ⑥ at the moment center, 0.108 m

d :

Horizontal distance of load cells ② and ③ at the moment center, 0.253 m

e 1 :

Vertical distance of load cells ② and ③ at the moment center, 0.215 m

e 2 :

Vertical distance of load cell ⑤ at the moment center, 0.272 m

M A :

Moment equilibrium about A point

R f :

Reaction of front wheel, N

R r :

Reaction of rear wheel, N

R a :

Reaction of attachment, N

L = L r + L f :

Wheel base, 2.142 m

L r :

Rear wheel distance from GC, 0.814 m

L f :

Front wheel distance from GC, 1.328 m

L 4 :

Ballast location from front wheel, 0.970 m

L 5 :

Integrated attachment location from rear wheel, 2.100 m

 L m :

Additional attachment location from rear wheel, 2.910 m

W t :

Frame total weight, N

W f :

Front ballast weight, N

W a :

Weight of integrated attachment, N

W c :

Weight of additional attachment, N

w d :

Rear half weight of dynamometer, 491 N

References

  • ASABE. (2011). D497.7 MAR2011: Agricultural machinery management data. St. Joseph, MI USA: ASABE.

  • ASAE. (2006). EP496.3 FEB2006: Agricultural machinery management. St. Joseph, MI USA: ASABE

  • Balsari, P., Biglia, A., Comba, L., Sacco, D., Eloi Alcatrao, L., Varani, M., Mattetti, M., Barge, P., Tortia, C., Manzone, M., Gay, P., & Ricauda Aimonnino, D. (2021). Performance analysis of a tractor – Power harrow system under different working conditions. Biosystems Engineering, 202, 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behera, A., & Raheman, H. (2021). Effect of peripheral to forward speed ratio on overall performance an active tillage implement: Tractor drawn rotavator. Journal of Institute of Engineers (India) Series A, 102(4), 981–988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-021-00567-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behera, A., Raheman, H., & Thomas, E. V. (2021). A comparative study on tillage performance of rota-cultivator (a passive-active combination tillage implement) with rotavator (an active tillage implement). Soil & Tillage Research, 207(104861), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, J. E. (1992). Particle size analysis – Mechanical method. In Engineering Properties of Soils and their Measurement (4th ed., pp. 43–57). McGraw-Hill Co. NY. http://worldcat.org/isbn/0071129219

  • Casady, W. W. (1997). Tractor tire and ballast management. Agricultural Pub. G1235. University of Missouri at Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, C. J. (2015). Agricultural machinery engineering (3rd. ed.). Hyang-moon Pub. Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, R. D., Yasin, M., & Kocher, M. F. (1996). Tillage implement forces operating in silty clay loam. Transactions of the ASAE, 39(6), 1977–1982. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.27699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, C. P., & Visvanathan, R. (1993). Power requirement of a rotary tiller in saturated soil. Transactions of the ASAE, 36(4), 1009–1012. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.28427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hann, M. J., & Giessibl, J. (1998). Force measurements on driven discs. Journal of Agriculture Engineering Research, 69, 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1997.0241

  • Harrigan, T. M., & Rotz, C. A. (1995). Draft relationships for tillage and seeding equipment. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 11(6), 773–783. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.25801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick, J. G. (1980). A powered rotary chisel. Transactions of the ASAE, 23(6), 1349–1352. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.34777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick, J. G., & Gill, W. R. (1971a). Rotary tiller design parameters part I: Direction of rotation. Transactions of the ASAE, 14(4), 669–674. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.38364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick, J. G. & Gill, W. R. (1971b). Rotary tiller design parameters part III: Ratio of peripheral and forward velocities. Transactions of the ASAE, 14(4), 679–683. 10.13031/2013.38366.

  • Kim, Y. J., Chung, S. O., Park, S. J., & Choi, C. H. (2011). Analysis of the power requirements of agricultural tractors by major field operation. Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 36(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2011.36.2.79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koo, Y. M. (2021). Field capacity and cost analyses of an integrated tractor implement for round ridge preparation. Journal of Agriculture & Life Science, 55(5), 115–124 (In Korean, with English abstract). 10.14397/jals.2021.55.5.115.

  • Koo, Y. M., & Kim, B.M. (2020). Slip analysis of an integrated tractor implement for round ridge preparation. Journal of Agriculture & Life Science, 54(5), 127–136. (In Korean, with English abstract). 10.14397/jals.2020.54.5.127.

  • Koo, Y. M., Hong, J. G., Han, J. W., & Ha, Y. S. (2018). Operating power and draft performance of an integrated tractor implement for flat ridge preparation. Journal of Agriculture & Life Science, 52(4), 137–150. 10.14397/jals.2018.52.4.137.

  • Lee, D. H., Lee, K. S., & Park, W. Y. (2009). A study on traction prediction of agricultural tractor by empirical method. Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 34(5), 297–304. https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2009.34.5.297

  • Lee, J. W. (2015). Development of integrated adjustment system for maximizing fuel efficiency of agricultural tractors. Ph.D. dissertation. Seoul, Korea: Major of Biosystem Engineering, Seoul National University.

  • Lee, K. M., Jang, I. J., Song, J. K., & Koo, G. H. (1992). Development of a draft and PTO dynamometer for three-point hitch of tractor. Saemaul Research Review, 13, 151–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nataraj, E., Sarkar, P., Raheman, H., & Upadhyay, G. (2021). Embedded digital display and warning system of velocity ratio and wheel slip for tractor operated active tillage implements. Journal of Terramechanics, 97, 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2021.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, W. Y., & Lee, S. S. (2012). Development of a tractive performance prediction program of tractors. Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 37(3), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2012.37.3.131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS. (2013). SAS user’s guide (release 9.4). SAS Institute Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Shim, S. B., Koo, Y. M., & Nam, Y. J. (2018). Conceptual design and rearward stability analysis of an integrated tractor implement for flat ridge preparation. Journal of Agriculture & Life Science, 52(3), 111–222. 10.14397/jals.2018.52.3.111.

  • Smith, L. A., & Barker, G.L. (1982). Equipment to monitoring energy requirements. Transactions of the ASAE, 25(3), 1556–1559. 10.13031/2013.33766.

  • Taylor, R., Schlock, M., & Werz, K. (1991). Getting the most from your tractor. MF-588, Farm Machinery and Equipment. : Kansas State University.

  • Thomson, N. P., & Shinners, K. J. (1989). A portable instrumentation system for measuring draft and speed. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 36(2), 133–137. 10.13031/2013.26491.

  • Upadhyay, G., & Raheman, H. (2018). Performance of combined offset disc harrow (front active and rear passive set configuration) in soil bin. Journal of Terramechanics, 78, 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2018.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upadhyay, G., & Raheman, H. (2020a). Effect of velocity ratio on performance characteristics of an active-passive combination tillage implement. Biosystems Engineering, 191, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystenseng.2019.12.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upadhyay, G., & Raheman, H. (2020b). Comparative assessment of energy requirement and tillage effectiveness of combined (active-passive) and conventional offset disc harrows. Biosystems Engineering, 198, 266–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystenseng.2020.08.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upadhyaya, S. K. (2007). Interpretation of empirical parameters involved in UC Davis traction prediction equation. In: Technical paper of 2007 ASABE Annual International Meeting, ASABE Paper No. 071108. St Joseph, MI, USA: ASAE. 10.13031/2013.23362.

  • Usaborisut, P., & Prasertkan, K. (2018). Performance of combined tillage tool operation under four different linkage. Soil & Tillage Research, 183, 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA-NRCS. (2014). Keys to soil taxonomy (12th ed.). NRCS. 2014_Keys_to_Soil_Taxonomy.pdf. accessed at https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/survey/class/taxonomy/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580

  • Weise, G. (1993). Active and passive elements of a combined tillage machine: Interaction, draught requirement and energy consumption. Journal of Agriculture Engineering Research, 56, 287–299. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1993.1080

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young Mo Koo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koo, Y.M. PTO Torque and Draft Analyses of an Integrated Tractor-Mounted Implement for Round Ridge Preparation. J. Biosyst. Eng. 47, 330–343 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42853-022-00146-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42853-022-00146-w

Keywords

Navigation