Abstract
Purpose
Chiseling is an essential tillage practice in conservation tillage systems. One of the main methods in soil–tool behaviour analysis of a tillage implement like chisel plough is numerical simulation. The discrete element method (DEM) is one of the most powerful techniques for this purpose. In this study, draught force of a mounted type chisel plough with nine C-shanks was predicted using DEM when working in a clay-loam soil.
Methods
The effects of forward speed (3, 4 and 5 km h-1) and working depth (10, 15 and 20 cm) on the draught force were investigated. The available commercial EDEM software was used for the simulations, and combination of hysteric spring with cohesion/adhesion forces was employed as the contact model.
Results
The numerical results were compared to experimental trials and well-known analytical model (McKyes and Ali) results. The experimental results were obtained to be within 3.24–34.9% and 9–35% larger than DEM-simulated and analytical calculated draught, respectively. A regression equation was developed in accordance with the simulated data. According to the values of statistical parameters (R2, RMSE and MRD), the established model had good accuracy.
Conclusions
From the simulations, it was concluded that draught force increased with an increase in working depth and forward speed. Also, it was found that the DEM results had higher accuracy than analytical results.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- Ac :
-
Contact area (m2)
- a:
-
Translational acceleration (m s−2)
- bn :
-
User-defined damping factor
- C:
-
Soil cohesion (Pa)
- Ca :
-
Soil metal adhesion (Pa)
- d:
-
Tillage depth (m)
- E:
-
Young’s modulus (Pa)
- E* :
-
Equivalent Young’s modulus (Pa)
- e:
-
Coefficient of restitution
- Fn :
-
Total normal contact force (N)
- \( {F}_n^d \) :
-
Normal damping force (N)
- \( {F}_n^s \) :
-
Normal contact force (N)
- F c/a :
-
Cohesion/adhesion force (N)
- F result :
-
Resultant force (N)
- F t :
-
Total tangential contact force (N)
- \( {F}_t^d \) :
-
Tangential damping force (N)
- \( {F}_t^s \) :
-
Tangential contact force (N)
- G:
-
Shear modulus (Pa)
- G ∗ :
-
Equivalent shear modulus (Pa)
- g :
-
Acceleration due to gravity (9.81 m s−2)
- H:
-
Draught force (N)
- J:
-
Mass moment of inertia (kg m2)
- K1 :
-
Stiffness for loading (N m−1)
- K2 :
-
Stiffness for unloading (N m−1)
- M r :
-
Moment due to rolling friction (N m)
- M result :
-
Resultant moment (N m)
- M t :
-
Moment of total tangential force (N m)
- m:
-
Mass (kg)
- m ∗ :
-
Equivalent mass (kg)
- N a :
-
Factor due to acceleration forces (dimensionless)
- N c :
-
Soil cohesion factor (dimensionless)
- N ca :
-
Soil adhesion factor (dimensionless)
- N q :
-
Surcharge factor (dimensionless)
- N γ :
-
Soil density factor (dimensionless)
- P:
-
Cutting force (N)
- q :
-
Surcharge pressure (Pa)—zero for current research
- r :
-
Radius (m)
- r c :
-
Contact radius (m)
- r con :
-
Perpendicular distance of the contact point from the centre of mass (m)
- r ∗ :
-
Equivalent radius (m)
- V:
-
Velocity (m s−1)
- \( {\overrightarrow{v}}_n^{rel} \) :
-
Relative normal velocity (m s−1)
- \( {\overrightarrow{v}}_t^{rel} \) :
-
Relative tangential velocity (m s−1)
- w :
-
Tool width (m)
- Y:
-
Yield strength (Pa)
- α :
-
Rake angle of the tool (degree)
- β :
-
Soil failure angle (degree)
- γ :
-
Soil density (kg m−3)
- γ t :
-
Stiffness factor
- δ :
-
Angle of soil metal friction (degree)
- δ 0 :
-
Residual overlap due to the plastic deformation (m)
- δ n :
-
Normal overlap at the contact point (m)
- \( \ddot{\theta} \) :
-
Rotational acceleration (rad s−2)
- λ θ :
-
Unit vector of angular velocity at the contact point
- μ :
-
Coefficient of friction
- μ r :
-
Coefficient of rolling friction
- ν :
-
Poisson’s ratio (dimensionless)
- ξ :
-
Cohesion energy density (J m−3)
- σ pc :
-
Pre-compression stress (Pa)
- σ y :
-
Particle yield stress (Pa)
- φ :
-
Angle of internal friction of soil (degree)
- d.b:
-
Dry basis
- DEM:
-
Discrete element method
- RNAM:
-
Regional network for agricultural machinery
References
Ahmadi, I. (2018). A draught force estimator for disc harrow using the laws of classical soil mechanics. Biosystems Engineering, 171, 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2018.04.008
Ajit, K. S., Carroll, E. G., Roger, P. R., & Denis, R. B. (2013). Engineering principles of agricultural machines. USA: American Society of Ag. and Biological Engineers, Textbook, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.13031/epam.2013
Al-Kheer, A. A., Kharmanda, M. G., El Hami, A., & Mouazen, A. M. (2011). Estimating the variability of tillage forces on a chisel plough shank by modeling the variability of tillage system parameters. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 78(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPAG.2011.06.001
Alvarez, R., & Steinbach, H. S. (2009). A review of the effects of tillage systems on some soil physical properties, water content, nitrate availability and crops yield in the Argentine Pampas. Soil and Tillage Research, 104(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.STILL.2009.02.005
Asaf, Z., Rubinstein, D., & Shmulevich, I. (2007). Determination of discrete element model parameters required for soil tillage. Soil and Tillage Research, 92(1–2), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2006.03.006
Azimi-Nejadian, H., Karparvarfard, S. H., Naderi-Boldaji, M., & Rahmanian-Koushkaki, H. (2019). Combined finite element and statistical models for predicting force components on a cylindrical mouldboard plough. Biosystems Engineering, 186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.07.007
Bahrami, M., Naderi-Boldaji, M., Ghanbarian, D., Ucgul, M., & Keller, T. (2020). DEM simulation of plate sinkage in soil: Calibration and experimental validation. Soil and Tillage Research, 203(March), 104700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104700
Bainer, R., Kepner, R. A., & Barger, E. L. (1956). Principles of farm machinery (Vol. 81, Issue 2). LWW.
Barr, J., Desbiolles, J., Ucgul, M., & Fielke, J. M. (2020). Bentleg furrow opener performance analysis using the discrete element method. Biosystems Engineering, 189, 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.11.008
Blunk, S., Bussell, J., Sparkes, D., de Heer, M. I., Mooney, S. J., & Sturrock, C. J. (2021). The effects of tillage on seed-soil contact and seedling establishment. Soil and Tillage Research, 206, 104757. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.STILL.2020.104757
Cundall, P. A., & Strack, O. D. L. (1979). A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique, 29(1), 47–65.
Desbiolles, J. M. A., Godwin, R. J., Kilgour, J., & Blackmore, B. S. (1997). A novel approach to the prediction of tillage tool draught using a standard tine. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 66(4), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1006/JAER.1997.0150
Grisso, R. D., & Perumpral, J. V. (1985). Review of models for predicting performance of narrow tillage tool. Transactions of the ASAE, 28(4), 1062–1067. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.32388
Hang, C., Gao, X., Yuan, M., Huang, Y., & Zhu, R. (2018). Discrete element simulations and experiments of soil disturbance as affected by the tine spacing of subsoiler. Biosystems Engineering, 168, 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.03.008
Ibrahmi, A., Bentaher, H., & Maalej, A. (2014). Soil-blade orientation effect on tillage forces determined by 3D finite element models. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 4, 941–951. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2014124-5766
Jang, G., Lee, S., & Lee, K.-J. (2016). Discrete element method for the characterization of soil properties in Plate-Sinkage tests. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 30(6), 2743–2751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-016-0536-4
Karmakar, S., Ashrafizadeh, S. R., & Kushwaha, R. L. (2009). Experimental validation of computational fluid dynamics modeling for narrow tillage tool draft. Journal of Terramechanics, 46(6), 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTERRA.2009.06.001
Karmakar, S., & Kushwaha, R. L. (2006). Dynamic modeling of soil–tool interaction: An overview from a fluid flow perspective. Journal of Terramechanics, 43(4), 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTERRA.2005.05.001
Karparvarfard, S. H., & Rahmanian-Koushkaki, H. (2015). Development of a fuel consumption equation: Test case for a tractor chisel-ploughing in a clay loam soil. Biosystems Engineering, 130, 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.11.015
Khaledian, M. R., Mailhol, J. C., Ruelle, P., Mubarak, I., & Perret, S. (2010). The impacts of direct seeding into mulch on the energy balance of crop production system in the SE of France. Soil and Tillage Research, 106(2), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.STILL.2009.10.002
Kim, Y.-S., Siddique, M. A. A., Kim, W.-S., Kim, Y.-J., Lee, S.-D., Lee, D.-K., Hwang, S.-J., Nam, J.-S., Park, S.-U., & Lim, R.-G. (2021). DEM simulation for draft force prediction of moldboard plow according to the tillage depth in cohesive soil. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 189, 106368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106368
McKyes, E. (1985). Soil cutting and tillage. Elsevier.
Okayasu, T., Morishita, K., Terao, H., Mitsuoka, M., Inoue, E., & Fukami, K. O. (2012). Modeling and prediction of soil cutting behavior by a plow. CIGR-Ag Eng. Agriculture & Engineering for a Healthier Life, 23.
Onwualu, A. P., & Watts, K. C. (1998). Draught and vertical forces obtained from dynamic soil cutting by plane tillage tools. Soil and Tillage Research, 48(4), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(98)00127-5
Pytka, J., & Konstankiewicz, K. (2002). A new optical method for soil stress and strain investigation. Soil and Tillage Research, 65(2), 243–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(01)00269-0
Reece, A. R. (1965). Thefundamental equation of earth-moving mechanics. Proc Symp Earthmoving Machinery, Instn Mech Engrs.
Sadek, M. A., & Chen, Y. (2015). Feasibility of using PFC3D to simulate soil flow resulting from a simple soil-engaging tool. Transactions of the ASABE, 58(4), 987–996. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.58.10900
Sadek, M. A., Chen, Y., & Zeng, Z. (2021). Draft force prediction for a high-speed disc implement using discrete element modelling. Biosystems Engineering, 202, 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.12.009
Salar, M. R., Esehaghbeygi, A., & Hemmat, A. (2013). Soil loosening characteristics of a dual bent blade subsurface tillage implement. Soil and Tillage Research, 134, 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.STILL.2013.07.005
Saunders, C., Ucgul, M., & Godwin, R. J. (2021). Discrete element method (DEM) simulation to improve performance of a mouldboard skimmer. Soil and Tillage Research, 205, 104764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104764
Shmulevich, I. (2010). State of the art modeling of soil–tillage interaction using discrete element method. Soil and Tillage Research, 111(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.STILL.2010.08.003
Shmulevich, I., Asaf, Z., & Rubinstein, D. (2007). Interaction between soil and a wide cutting blade using the discrete element method. Soil and Tillage Research, 97(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.STILL.2007.08.009
Solutions, D. E. M. (2014). EDEM 2.6 theory reference guide. Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Sun, J., Wang, Y., Ma, Y., Tong, J., & Zhang, Z. (2018). DEM simulation of bionic subsoilers (tillage depth >40 cm) with drag reduction and lower soil disturbance characteristics. Advances in Engineering Software, 119, 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ADVENGSOFT.2018.02.001
Tabatabaeefar, A., Emamzadeh, H., Varnamkhasti, M. G., Rahimizadeh, R., & Karimi, M. (2009). Comparison of energy of tillage systems in wheat production. Energy, 34(1), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2008.09.023
Ucgul, M., Fielke, J. M., & Saunders, C. (2014). Three-dimensional discrete element modelling of tillage: Determination of a suitable contact model and parameters for a cohesionless soil. Biosystems Engineering, 121, 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.02.005
Ucgul, M., Fielke, J. M., & Saunders, C. (2015a). Defining the effect of sweep tillage tool cutting edge geometry on tillage forces using 3D discrete element modelling. Information Processing in Agriculture, 2(2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2015.07.001
Ucgul, M., Fielke, J. M., & Saunders, C. (2015b). Three-dimensional discrete element modelling (DEM) of tillage: Accounting for soil cohesion and adhesion. Biosystems Engineering, 129, 298–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.11.006
Ucgul, M., & Saunders, C. (2020). Simulation of tillage forces and furrow profile during soil-mouldboard plough interaction using discrete element modelling. Biosystems Engineering, 190(1), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.11.022
Ucgul, M., Saunders, C., & Fielke, J. M. (2016). The effect of discrete element particle parameters on angle of repose and soil-tool force simulation results. 2016 ASABE Annual International Meeting, 1.
Ucgul, M., Saunders, C., & Fielke, J. M. (2017a). Discrete element modelling of tillage forces and soil movement of a one-third scale mouldboard plough. Biosystems Engineering, 155, 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.12.002
Ucgul, M., Saunders, C., & Fielke, J. M. (2017b). Discrete element modelling of top soil burial using a full scale mouldboard plough under field conditions. Biosystems Engineering, 160, 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.06.008
Ucgul, M., Saunders, C., & Fielke, J. M. (2018). Comparison of the discrete element and finite element methods to model the interaction of soil and tool cutting edge. Biosystems Engineering, 169, 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2018.03.003
Walton, O. R., & Braun, R. L. (1986). Stress calculations for assemblies of inelastic speres in uniform shear. Acta Mechanica, 63(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01182541
Wang, D., Wang, Y., Yang, B. I. N., Zhang, W. E. I., & Lancaster, N. (2008). Statistical analysis of sand grain/bed collision process recorded by high-speed digital camera. Sedimentology, 55(2), 461–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.2007.00909.x
Wang, X., Zhang, S., Pan, H., Zheng, Z., Huang, Y., & Zhu, R. (2019). Effect of soil particle size on soil-subsoiler interactions using the discrete element method simulations. Biosystems Engineering, 182, 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.04.005
Wei, M., Zhu, L., Luo, F., Zhang, J. W., Dong, X. W., & Jen, T. C. (2019). Share-soil interaction load and wear at various tillage conditions of a horizontally reversible plough. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 162, 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPAG.2019.03.032
Zeng, Z., Ma, X., Chen, Y., & Qi, L. (2020). Modelling residue incorporation of selected chisel ploughing tools using the discrete element method (DEM). Soil and Tillage Research, 197(November 2019), 104505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.104505
Zhang, L., Cai, Z., Wang, L., Zhang, R., & Liu, H. (2018). Coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian finite element method for simulating soil-tool interaction. Biosystems Engineering, 175, 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOSYSTEMSENG.2018.09.003
Zhang, J., & Kushwaha, R. L. (1995). A modified model to predict soil cutting resistance. Soil and Tillage Research, 34(3), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(95)00466-6
Zhang, Z. X., & Kushwaha, R. L. (1999). Operating speed effect on the advancing soil failure zone in tillage operation. Canadian Agricultural Engineering, 41(2), 87–92.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express their appreciation to anonymous reviewers who devoted their valuable time to inspect the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Highlights
• Draught force of a chisel plough was predicted in clay-loam soil using DEM.
• Combination of hysteric spring with cohesion/adhesion was used as contact model.
• The results were compared to analytical model and experimental data.
• A regression model was developed based on DEM data.
• The DEM model could predict the draught force with good accuracy.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rahmanian-Koushkaki, H., Mahmoodi-Eshkaftaki, M. & Azimi-Nejadian, H. Simulation of Draught Force During Chisel Ploughing Using Discrete Element Method. J. Biosyst. Eng. 47, 152–166 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42853-022-00133-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42853-022-00133-1