Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Bi-Level Optimal Scheduling Strategy of Integrated Energy System Considering Adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage and Integrated Demand Response

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aiming at the energy consumption and economic operation of the integrated energy system (IES), this paper proposes an IES operation strategy that combines the adiabatic compressed air energy storage (A-CAES) device and the integrated demand response (IDR) theory with the two-layer optimization model, and comprehensively considers the interaction between the planning and operation of two different time scales. The improved two-level optimal scheduling method in this paper takes IES operators and users as different subjects, and coordinates the output of multiple energy sources on the basis of meeting IES constraints to minimize the cost. The upper layer is the energy network system. The introduced IDR theory participates in the upper layer planning to improve the operation reliability and economy of IES and reduce the total network cost under the IES configuration. The lower layer is the energy hub system. The added A-CAES device is used to improve the imbalance of energy supply and demand of IES and reduce the operation cost of the lower layer power grid. First of all, under the IES framework with electricity, gas and heat as the main demand, preliminary investigation and statistics are conducted on the energy demand of various loads. Secondly, the IES two-layer scheduling model is established. The objective function of economic dispatch is to minimize the operation cost. The CPLEX tool kit of GAMS software is used to solve the problem. Finally, a simulation example shows that the improved two-level optimal scheduling model can effectively restrain the frequent adjustment of unit output caused by load fluctuation. IES operation cost can be effectively reduced by 5.3%. This two-layer optimization model can improve energy utilization, reduce operation cost, improve the accuracy of scheduling plan, and achieve low-carbon economic operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wu D, Han Z, Liu Z, Li P, Ma F, Zhang H, Yin Y, Yang X (2020) Comparative study of optimization method and optimal operation strategy for multi-scenario integrated energy system. Energy 217:119311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu T, Zhang D, Wu T (2020) Standardised modelling and optimisation of a system of interconnected energy hubs considering multiple energies—electricity, gas, heating, and cooling. Energy Convers Manag 205:112410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu Z, Guo J, Li Y, Wu D, Zhang S, Yang X, Ge H, Cai Z (2021) Multi-scenario analysis and collaborative optimization of a novel distributed energy system coupled with hybrid energy storage for a nearly zero-energy community. J Energy Storage 41:102992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tostado-Véliz M, Kamel S, Hasanien HM, Turky RA, Jurado F (2022) Optimal energy management of cooperative energy communities considering flexible demand, storage and vehicle-to-grid under uncertainties. Sustain Cities Soc 84:104019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pérez-Iribarren E, González-Pino Z, Azkorra-Larrinaga I et al (2020) Optimal design and operation of thermal energy storage systems in micro-cogeneration plants. Appl Energy 265:114769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Calise F, Cappiello FL, d’Accadia MD, Vicidomini M (2021) Smart grid energy district based on the integration of electric vehicles and combined heat and power generation. Energy Convers Manag 234:113932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Akbari-Dibavar A, Tabar VS, Zadeh SG, Nourollahi R (2021) Two-stage robust energy management of a hybrid charging station integrated with the photovoltaic system. Int J Hydrog Energy 46(24):12701–12714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Akbari-Dibavar A, Tabar VS, Zadeh SG, Nourollahi R (2018) Optimization strategy of AC/DC hybrid power supply in multi energy system considering environmental factors. Autom Electr Power Syst 42(4):128–134

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guo Y, Xiang Y (2022) Low-Carbon Strategic planning of integrated energy systems. Front Energy Res 10:858119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yaohua C, Ning Z, Baosen Z et al (2020) Low-carbon operation of multiple energy systems based on energy-carbon integrated prices. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 11(2):1307–1318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cesena EA, Loukarakis E, Good N, Mancarella P (2020) Integrated Electricity-heat-gas systems: techno-economic modeling, optimization, and application to multienergy districts. Proc IEEE 108(9):2989382

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhu Mengting Xu, Chengsi DS et al (2021) An integrated multi-energy flow calculation method for electricity-gas-thermal integrated energy systems. Protect Control Modern Power Syst 6(1):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  13. Xi Z, Hossein A, Zihang D et al (2022) Values of latent heat and thermochemical energy storage technologies in low-carbon energy systems: Whole system approach. J Energy Storage 50:104126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xiao Y, Sun W, Sun L (2021) Dynamic programming based economic day-ahead scheduling of integrated tri-generation energy system with hybrid energy storage. J Energy Storage 44:103395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Janusz K, Wojciech U (2021) Analysis of the integrated energy system in residential scale: photovoltaics, micro-cogeneration and electrical energy storage. Energy 227:120469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Farzam M, Hossein S, Nicu B (2022) Developing optimal energy management of integrated energy systems in the hybrid electricity and gas networks. J Energy Storage 48:103984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar DS, Maharjan S, Srinivasan D (2022) Ramp-rate limiting strategies to alleviate the impact of PV power ramping on voltage fluctuations using energy storage systems. Sol Energy 234:377–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Junhong H, Xing G, Shunjiang W et al (2022) Dynamic modeling and flexibility analysis of an integrated electrical and thermal energy system with the heat pump-thermal storage. Front Energy Res 10:817503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu J, Tang H, Zhang D et al (2020) Performance evaluation of the hybrid photovoltaic-thermoelectric system with light and heat management. Energy 211:118618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jiacheng G, Zhijian L, Ying Li et al (2022) Thermodynamic performance analyses and optimization design method of a novel distributed energy system coupled with hybrid-energy storage. Renew Energy 182:11–035

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jian L, Xinyue S, Rui Bo et al (2022) Economic dispatch for electricity merchant with energy storage and wind plant: state of charge based decision making considering market impact and uncertainties. J Energy Storage 53:104816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Minglei Y, Qian W, Hongjian S et al (2022) Digital twins based day-ahead integrated energy system scheduling under load and renewable energy uncertainties. Appl Energy 305:117899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sharma P, Kolhe M, Sharma A (2020) Economic performance assessment of building integrated photovoltaic system with battery energy storage under grid constraints. Renew Energy 145:1901–1909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Narula K, de Oliveira FF, Villasmil W, Patel MK (2020) Simulation method for assessing hourly energy flows in district heating system with seasonal thermal energy storage. Renew Energy 151:1250–1268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Panda A, Mishra U, Aviso KB (2020) Optimizing hybrid power systems with compressed air energy storage. Energy 205:117962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bennett JA, Simpson JG, Qin C, Fittro R, Koenig GM Jr, Clarens AF, Loth E (2021) Techno-economic analysis of offshore isothermal compressed air energy storage in saline aquifers co-located with wind power. Appl Energy 303:117587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Azizivahed A, Razavi SE, Arefi A, Ghadi MJ, Li L, Zhang J, Shafie-khah M, Catalão JP (2020) Risk-oriented multi-area economic dispatch solution with high penetration of wind power generation and compressed air energy storage system. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 11(3):1569–1578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chang J, Yang X, Zhang Z, Zheng S, Cui B (2021) Multi-Objective Optimal Source-Load Interaction Scheduling of Combined Heat and Power Microgrid Considering Stable Supply and Demand. Front Energy Res 10:901529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wei He, Mark D, Marcus K et al (2021) Techno-economic analysis of bulk-scale compressed air energy storage in power system decarbonisation. Appl Energy 282:116097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang X, Zhao H, Su Q, Siqin Z, Zhao Y, Wang J (2022) Value quantification of multiple energy storage to low-carbon combined heat and power system. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 29:73577–73598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Huang Yu, Jing Xu, Shan G et al (2021) Incomplete information oriented optimal scheduling of multi-energy hub systems with thermal energy storage. J Energy Storage 42:103062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Han Z, Ma F, Wu D, Zhang H, Dong F, Li P, Xiao L (2021) Collaborative optimization method and operation performances for a novel integrated energy system containing adiabatic compressed air energy storage and organic Rankine cycle. J Energy Storage 41:102942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Jiayu B, Wei W, Laijun C et al (2022) Robust online operation of power systems with advanced adiabatic compressed air energy storage and renewable generation. J Energy Storage 50:104207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Germán M-E, Rafael M-G, Jos S (2022) Classifying and modelling demand response in power systems. Energy 242:122544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Weishang G, Pingkuo L, Xiaole S (2021) Optimal dispatching of electric-thermal interconnected virtual power plant considering market trading mechanism. J Clean Prod 279:123446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhu Xu, Yuanzhang S, Jun Y, Zhenlan D et al (2022) Day-ahead energy pricing and management method for regional integrated energy systems considering multi-energy demand responses. Energy 251:123914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yunqi W, Jing Q, Yuechuan T (2022) Robust energy systems scheduling considering uncertainties and demand side emission impacts. Energy 239:122317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mehdi N, Abouzar S (2021) Integration of designing price-based demand response models into a stochastic bi-level scheduling of multiple energy carrier microgrids considering energy storage systems. Appl Energy 282:116163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yaowang Li, Shihong M, Xing L et al (2020) Dynamic modelling and techno-economic analysis of adiabatic compressed air energy storage for emergency back-up power in supporting microgrid. Appl Energy 261:114448

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Automation and Electrical Engineering, Linyi University, Linyi, China

    Jiakai Men

Authors
  1. Jiakai Men
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiakai Men.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Men, J. Bi-Level Optimal Scheduling Strategy of Integrated Energy System Considering Adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage and Integrated Demand Response. J. Electr. Eng. Technol. 19, 97–111 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-023-01529-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-023-01529-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation