Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Maximum Torque per Ampere Control for IPMSM Traction System Based on Current Angle Signal Injection Method

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rail transportation interior permanent magnet synchronous motor traction control system (IPMSM TCS) requires high torque output capability. Traditional algorithms used to find the maximum torque per ampere (MTPA) operating point in TCS have strong dependence on motor parameters. Because the algorithm is less robust to motor parameters, there will be deviation between the MTPA operating point and the actual value when the parameters change, so that it is difficult to guarantee the torque output capability of the traction system under different working conditions. This paper introduces a current angle signal injection control method (CASIM) to solve this problem. The proposed method tracks the MTPA operating point and generates d-axis current command according injecting an angle signal to current and making the partial derivative of torque to current angle equal to zero. At the same time, less motor parameters are needed to calculate the torque in this method. Consequently, in the process of looking for MTPA operating point, the accuracy is less affected by the variation of motor parameters. And also it does not inject any real signal to IPMSM, so that it does not increase copper and iron losses. Moreover, it is robust to speed mutation and torque disturbances. The effectiveness of CASIM proposed in this paper is proved by simulation and experiment results on an IPMSM TCS platform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miyajima T, Fujimoto H, Fujitsuna M (2013) A precise model-based design of voltage phase controller for IPMSM. IEEE Trans Power Electron 28(12):5655–5664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bolognani S, Calligaro S, Petrella R (2014) Adaptive flux-weakening controller for interior permanent magnet synchronous motor drives. IEEEJ Emerg Sel Topics Power Electron 2(2):236–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wallmark O, Lundberg S, Bongiorno M (2012) Input admittance expressions for field-oriented controlled salient PMSM drives. IEEE Trans Power Electron 27(3):1514–1520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rang G, Lim J, Nam K et al (2004) A MTPA control scheme for an IPM synchronous motor considering magnet flux variation caused by temperature. In: Proceeding of nineteenth annual IEEE applied power electronics conference and exposition, Anaheim, CA, USA

  5. Kim H-S et al (2019) Online MTPA control of IPMSM based on robust numerical optimization technique. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 53(4):3752–3767

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kim H, Lee Y, Sul S, Yu J et al (2018) Online MTPA Control of IPMSM for automotive applications based on robust numerical optimization technique. In: Proceeding of  2018 IEEE transportation electrification conference and expo (ITEC), Long Beach, CA

  7. Uddin MN, Radwan TS, Rahamn MA (2002) Performance of interior permanent magnet motor drive over wide speed range. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 17(1):79–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pan CT, Sue SM (2005) A linear maximum torque per control for IPMSM drives over full-speed range. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 20(2):359–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Consoli A, Scarcella G, Scelba G et al (2008) Modeling control of IPM synchronous motors. in Proceeding of 2008 IEEE power and energy society general meeting - conversion and delivery of electrical energy in the 21st century, Pittsburgh, PA

  10. Yang NF, Luo GZ, Liu WG et al (2012) Interior permanent magnet synchronous motor control for electric vehicle using look-up table. In: Proceeding of the 7th international power electronics and motion control conference, Harbin

  11. Jung S, Hong J, Nam K (2013) Current minimizing torque control of the IPMSM using Ferrari’s method. IEEE Trans Power Electron 28(12):5603–5617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee k, Lee SB (2010) MTPA operating point tracking control scheme for vector controlled PMSM drives. In: Proceeding of SPEEDAM 2010, Pisa

  13. Ahmed A, Sozer Y, Hamdan M (2014) Maximum torque per ampere control for interior permanent magnet motors using DC link power measurement. In: Proceeding of 2014 IEEE applied power electronics conference and exposition, Fort Worth, TX

  14. Sato T, Araki N, Konishi Y et al (2010) Discrete-time weigh feeder control using extremum-seeking method. In: Proceeding of 2010 IEEE international conference on control applications, Yokohama

  15. Tang Q, Wang P (2019) IPMSMs sensorless MTPA control based on virtual Q-axis inductance by using virtual high frequency signal injection. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 63(11):6862–6874

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chen Q, Liu R et al (2019) Extension of virtual-signal-injection-based MTPA control for five-phase IPMSM into fault-tolerant operation. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 66(2):944–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li K, Wang Y (2019) Maximum Torque per Ampere (MTPA) control for IPMSM drives using signal injection and an MTPA control law. IEEE Trans Ind Info 71(11):5718–5729

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bolognani S, Peretti L, Zigliotto M (2011) Online MTPA control strategy for DTC synchronous–reluctance–motor drives. IEEE Trans Power Electron 26(1):20–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bolognani S, Petrella R, Prearo A et al (2011) Automatic tracking of MTPA trajectory in IPM motor dirves based on AC current injection. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 47(1):105–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim S, Yoon Y, Sul S et al (2013) Maximum torque per ampere(MTPA) control of an IPM machine based on signal injection considering inductance saturation. IEEE Trans Power Electron 28(1):488–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chy M, Uddin MN (2007) Analysis of flux control for wide speed range operation of IPMSM drive. In: Proceeding of 2007 large engineering systems conference on power engineering, Montreal, Que

  22. Liu Q, Hameyre K (2017) High-performance adaptive torque control for an IPMSM with real time MTPA operation. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 32(2):571–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bi YB, Luo XG, Ruan LT et al (2014) Research on MTPA predictive control of permanent magnet synchronous motor. Comput Eng Appl 50(11):256–260

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ohnuma T, Doki S, Okuma S et al (2009) Maximum torque control with inductance setting of extended EMF observer. In: Proceeding of  2009 35th annual conference of IEEE industrial electronics, Porto

  25. Sun T, Wang J, Chen X (2015) Maximum Torque Per Ampere (MTPA) control for interior permanent magnet synchronous machine drives based on virtual signal injection. IEEE Trans Power Electron 30(9):5036–5045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang J, Huang X, Dong Yu et al (2018) An accurate virtual signal injection control of MTPA for an IPMSM with fast dynamic response. IEEE Trans Power Electron 33(9):7916–7927

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the national natural science foundation of China (51477180) and national natural science foundation of China (51807200).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jilong Liu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, W., Xiao, F., Liu, J. et al. Maximum Torque per Ampere Control for IPMSM Traction System Based on Current Angle Signal Injection Method. J. Electr. Eng. Technol. 15, 1681–1691 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-020-00434-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-020-00434-5

Keywords

Navigation