Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Approach for HVCB Mechanical Fault Diagnosis Based on a Deep Belief Network and a Transfer Learning Strategy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional fault diagnosis for a high-voltage circuit breaker (HVCB) encounters the following problems: the fault features extracted by traditional shallow models is of weak expression ability, and the accuracy of fault identification can be affected by the lack of labeled training samples. To overcome these problems, we present a new approach for HVCB mechanical fault diagnosis based on a deep belief network (DBN) and a transfer learning strategy. This approach uses a DBN to achieve the deep mining and adaptive extraction of the inherent features of sample data, and combines the transfer learning method to improve the accuracy of the fault diagnosis model, which uses a large amount of selective auxiliary data to augment the tiny amount of target data learning by adjusting the weight of training samples. The target sample data are obtained by collecting the coil current signal of the HVCB from fault simulation experiments, and the auxiliary sample data are obtained through simulation based on the electromagnetic system mathematical model of the HVCB spring mechanism. The experimental results show that compared with the traditional feature extraction and fault diagnosis method, the DBN approach combined with transfer learning can achieve stronger feature learning and generalization ability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig.7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang X, Gockenbach E, Liu Z, Chen H, Yang L (2013) Reliability estimation of high voltage SF6 circuit breakers by statistical analysis on the basis of the field data. Electr Power Syst Res 103:105–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mei F, Mei J, Zheng JY et al (2013) Development and application of distributed multilayer on-line monitoring system for high voltage vacuum circuit breaker. J Electr Eng Technol 8(4):813–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Janssen A, Makareinis D, Solver CE (2014) International surveys on circuit-breaker reliability data for substation and system studies. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 29(2):808–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Forootani A, Afzalian AA, Ghohmshe AN (2016) Model-based fault analysis of a high-voltage circuit breaker operating mechanism. Turk J Electr Eng Comput Sci 25(3):2349–2362

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhu K, Mei F, Zheng J (2017) Adaptive fault diagnosis of HVCBs based on P-SVDD and P-KFCM. Neurocomputing 240:127–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu GQ, Gao Y, Yang L (2016) High-voltage circuit-breaker fault diagnosis based on mechanical vibration signals. Rev Tech Fac Ing Univ Zulia 30(4):387–394

    Google Scholar 

  7. Razi-Kazemi AA, Vakilian M, Niayesh K (2014) Circuit-breaker automated failure tracking based on coil current signature. IEEE Trans Power Delivery 29(1):283–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang Z, Liang LIANG, Li X (2015) Application of the Gray correlation model in fault diagnosis of high-voltage circuit breakers. Power Syst Technol 39(6):1731–1735

    Google Scholar 

  9. Van M, Kang H (2016) Bearing defect classification based on individual wavelet local fisher discriminant analysis with particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 12(1):124–135

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hwang DH, Youn YW, Sun JH et al (2015) Support vector machine based bearing fault diagnosis for induction motors using vibration signals. J Electr Eng Technol 10(4):1558–1565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Agrawal S, Giri VK (2017) Improved mechanical fault identification of an induction motor using Teager-Kaiser energy operator. J Electr Eng Technol 12(5):1955–1962

    Google Scholar 

  12. Su Z, Tang B, Liu Z et al (2015) Multi-fault diagnosis for rotating machinery based on orthogonal supervised linear local tangent space alignment and least square support vector machine. Neurocomputing 157:208–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jin X, Zhao M, Chow TWS et al (2014) Motor bearing fault diagnosis using trace ratio linear discriminant analysis. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 61(5):2441–2451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hinton GE, Salakhutdinov RR (2006) Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science 313(5786):504–507

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang WZ, Zhang SW (2017) A novel face recognition algorithm based on the deep convolution neural network and key points detection jointed local binary pattern methodology. J Electr Eng Technol 12(1):363–372

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Mohamed AR, Dahl GE, Hinton GE (2012) Acoustic modeling using deep belief networks. IEEE Trans Audio Speech Lang Process 20(1):14–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Basu S, Karki M, Ganguly S et al (2017) Learning sparse feature representations using probabilistic quadtrees and deep belief nets. Neural Process Lett 45(3):855–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tamilselvan P, Wang P (2013) Failure diagnosis using deep belief learning based health state classification. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 115:124–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. AlThobiani F, Ball A (2014) An approach to fault diagnosis of reciprocating compressor valves using Teager-Kaiser energy operator and deep belief networks. Expert Syst Appl 41(9):4113–4122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shao H, Jiang H, Zhang X et al (2015) Rolling bearing fault diagnosis using an optimization deep belief network. Meas Sci Technol 26:11

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hinton GE, Deng L, Yu D, Dahl GE, Mohamed A, Jaitly N (2012) Deep neural networks for acoustic modeling in speech recognition: the shared views of four research groups. IEEE Signal Process Mag 29:82–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2012) ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 25:1106–1114

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhuang FZ, Luo P, He Q et al (2015) Survey on transfer learning research. J Softw 26(1):26–39

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Shell J, Coupland S (2015) Fuzzy transfer learning: methodology and application. Inf Sci 293:59–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wei F, Zhang J, Chu Y et al (2014) FSFP: transfer learning from long texts to the short. Appl Math Inf Sci 8(4):2033–2040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hinton GE (2002) Training products of experts by minimizing contrastive divergence. Neural Comput 14(8):1771–1800

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Pan SJ, Yang Q (2010) A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Trans Data Eng 22(10):1345–1359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dai W, Yang Q, Xue GR et al (2007) Boosting for transfer learning. Icml 238(6):1855–1862

    Google Scholar 

  29. Li Q-M, Qian J-L, Huan Y-L et al (2004) Converse analysis dynamic characteristics of operating electromagnets in high voltage circuit breakers. Proc CSEE 24(6):127–131

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sun Y, Zhang W, Zhang Y (2015) Research on feature value extraction and fault recognition of coil current signal in high-voltage circuit breaker. High Volt Appar 51(9):134–139

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant no. 2015M571654).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Electrical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China

    Yi Pan, Huiyu Miao, Jianyong Zheng & Haoyuan Sha

  2. College of Energy and Electrical Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, China

    Fei Mei

  3. China Electric Power Research Institute (Nanjing), Nanjing, China

    Kedong Zhu

Authors
  1. Yi Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fei Mei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Huiyu Miao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jianyong Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kedong Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Haoyuan Sha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianyong Zheng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pan, Y., Mei, F., Miao, H. et al. An Approach for HVCB Mechanical Fault Diagnosis Based on a Deep Belief Network and a Transfer Learning Strategy. J. Electr. Eng. Technol. 14, 407–419 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-018-00048-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-018-00048-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation