Abstract
In this commentary, we raise several points regarding Park and colleagues’ emotional well-being framework. First, we question whether the term emotional well-being is appropriate and whether a new framework is necessary, and we argue that the field may be better served through other efforts, such as clarifying the distinctions between different well-being constructs and providing guidance on best practices for measurement and intervention. In addition, we note that by placing well-being on the opposite end of the spectrum from despair and depression, Park and colleagues have overlooked the influences of stress, distress, and life challenges on shaping positive aspects of well-being, and vice versa. Furthermore, we challenge the conceptualization of well-being as encompassing how positive an individual feels generally and about life overall. In its current form, this definition of well-being is overly static and trait-like, whereas a process-oriented conceptualization would more closely align with how well-being unfolds in real-life contexts and would be more suitable for identifying mechanistic targets for intervention. Finally, we raise the concern that the process for developing this definition of well-being did not actively involve input from diverse communities that have historically been disserved and underrepresented in research, practice, and policy. The cultural differences in constituents of well-being as well as evidence demonstrating that key positive psychological constructs (e.g., positive affect, sense of control) are less health-protective in racial/ethnic minorities than in whites necessitate greater integration of perspectives from underrepresented communities to build a more inclusive and accurate understanding of well-being.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Assari, S. (2017). Race, sense of control over life, and short-term risk of mortality among older adults in the United States. Archives of Medical Science, 13(5), 1233–1240.
Boehm, J. K., & Kubzansky, L. D. (2012). The heart’s content: The association between positive psychological well-being and cardiovascular health. Psychological Bulletin, 138(4), 655–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027448
Charles, S. T. (2010). Strength and vulnerability integration (SAVI): A model of emotional well-being across adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1068–1091. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021232
Charles, S. T., Mogle, J., Urban, E. J., & Almeida, D. M. (2016). Daily events are important for age differences in mean and duration for negative affect but not positive affect. Psychology and Aging, 31(7), 661–671. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000118
Chi, K., Almeida, D. M., Charles, S. T., & Sin, N. L. (2021). Daily prosocial activities and well-being: Age moderation in two national studies. Psychology and Aging, 36(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000460
Craven, R. G., Ryan, R. M., Mooney, J., Vallerand, R. J., Dillon, A., Blacklock, F., & Magson, N. (2016). Toward a positive psychology of indigenous thriving and reciprocal research partnership model. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 47, 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.04.003
Diener, E. (2012). New findings and future directions for subjective well-being research. American Psychologist, 67(8), 590–597. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029541
Folkman, S. (1997). Positive psychological states and coping with severe stress. Social Science & Medicine, 45(8), 1207–1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00040-3
Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2000). Positive affect and the other side of coping. American Psychologist, 55(6), 647–654. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.6.647
Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Positive emotions broaden and build. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 1–53). Elsevier.
Fredrickson, B. L., Mancuso, R. A., Branigan, C., & Tugade, M. M. (2000). The undoing effect of positive emotions. Motivation and Emotion, 24(4), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010796329158
Hill, P. L., Sumner, R., & Burrow, A. L. (2014). Understanding the pathways to purpose: Examining personality and well-being correlates across adulthood. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(3), 227–234.
Hill, P. L., Klaiber, P., Burrow, A. L., DeLongis, A., & Sin, N. L. (2022). Purposefulness and daily life in a pandemic: Predicting daily affect and physical symptoms during the first weeks of the COVID-19 response. Psychology & Health, 37(8), 985–1001. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2021.1914838
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
Klaiber, P., Wen, J. H., DeLongis, A., & Sin, N. L. (2021). The ups and downs of daily life during COVID-19: Age differences in affect, stress, and positive events. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 76(2), e30–e37.
Lankarani, M. M., & Assari, S. (2017). Positive and negative affect more concurrent among Blacks than Whites. Behavioral Sciences, 7(3), 48.
Layous, K., Lee, H., Choi, I., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2013). Culture matters when designing a successful happiness-increasing activity: A comparison of the United States and South Korea. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(8), 1294–1303.
Mattis, J. S., Simpson, N. G., Powell, W., Anderson, R. E., Kimbro, L. R., & Mattis, J. H. (2016). Positive psychology in African Americans. In E. C. Chang, C. A. Downey, J. K. Hirsch, and N. J. Lin (Eds.), Positive psychology in racial and ethnic groups: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 83-107). American Psychological Association.
Miyamoto, Y., Yoo, J., & Wilken, B. (2019). Well-being and health: A cultural psychology of optimal human functioning. In D. Cohen and S. Kitayama, Handbook of cultural psychology, 2nd ed (pp. 319–342). The Guilford Press.
Mroczek, D. K., Stawski, R. S., Turiano, N. A., Chan, W., Almeida, D. M., Neupert, S. D., & Spiro, A. (2015). Emotional reactivity and mortality: Longitudinal findings from the VA Normative Aging Study. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 70(3), 398–406.
Nahum-Shani, I., Hekler, E. B., & Spruijt-Metz, D. (2015). Building health behavior models to guide the development of just-in-time adaptive interventions: A pragmatic framework. Health Psychology, 34(S), 1209–1219.
Ong, A. D., & Allaire, J. C. (2005). Cardiovascular intraindividual variability in later life: The influence of social connectedness and positive emotions. Psychology and Aging, 20(3), 476–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.20.3.476
Park, C. L., Kubzansky, L., Chafouleas, S., Davidson, R., Keltner, D., Parsafar, P., Conwell, Y., Martin, M., Hamner, J., & Wang, K. H. (2022). Emotional well-being: What it is and why it matters. Affective Science. (in press)
Pressman, S. D., & Cohen, S. (2005). Does positive affect influence health? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 925–971. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.925
Pressman, S. D., Jenkins, B. N., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2019). Positive affect and health: What do we know and where next should we go? Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 627–650. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102955
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166.
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081.
Sastry, J., & Ross, C. E. (1998). Asian ethnicity and the sense of personal control. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 101–120.
Schick, M. R., Kirk-Provencher, K. T., Goldstein, S. C., Nalven, T., & Spillane, N. S. (2021). A framework for the adaptation of positive psychological interventions to North American Indigenous populations. Prevention Science, 22(7), 913–922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-021-01282-z
Scott, S. B., Sliwinski, M. J., Zawadzki, M., Stawski, R. S., Kim, J., Marcusson-Clavertz, D., Lanza, S. T., Conroy, D. E., Buxton, O., Almeida, D. M., & Smyth, J. M. (2020). A coordinated analysis of variance in affect in daily life. Assessment, 27(8), 1683–1698. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118799460
Shin, L. J., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2017). Increasing well-being in independent and interdependent cultures. Scientific Advances in Positive Psychology, 11–36.
Sin, N. L. (2016). The protective role of positive well-being in cardiovascular disease: Review of current evidence, mechanisms, and clinical implications. Current Cardiology Reports, 18(11), 1–10.
Sin, N. L., & Almeida, D. M. (2018). Daily positive experiences and health: Biobehavioral pathways and resilience to daily stress. In C. D. Ryff & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of integrative health science. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190676384.013.10
Sin, N. L., Graham-Engeland, J. E., Ong, A. D., & Almeida, D. M. (2015). Affective reactivity to daily stressors is associated with elevated inflammation. Health Psychology, 34(12), 1154–1165. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000240
Sin, N. L., Ong, A. D., Stawski, R. S., & Almeida, D. M. (2017). Daily positive events and diurnal cortisol rhythms: Examination of between-person differences and within-person variation. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 83, 91–100.
Sin, N. L., Klaiber, P., Wen, J. H., & DeLongis, A. (2021). Helping amid the pandemic: Daily affective and social implications of COVID-19-related prosocial activities. The Gerontologist, 61(1), 59–70.
Uchida, Y., & Kitayama, S. (2009). Happiness and unhappiness in east and west: Themes and variations. Emotion, 9(4), 441–456.
Walsh, L. C., Boehm, J. K., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2018). Does happiness promote career success? Revisiting the evidence. Journal of Career Assessment, 26(2), 199–219.
Yoo, J., & Miyamoto, Y. (2018). Cultural fit of emotions and health implications: A psychosocial resources model. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12(2), e12372. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12372
Zautra, A. J., Affleck, G. G., Tennen, H., Reich, J. W., & Davis, M. C. (2005). Dynamic approaches to emotions and stress in everyday life: Bolger and Zuckerman reloaded with positive as well as negative affects. Journal of Personality, 73(6), 1511–1538.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
This work was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (430-2019-0608 to NLS) and the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research (SCH-2020-0590 to NLS).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Data and/or Code Availability
Not applicable.
Authors’ Contributions
Both authors made conceptual contributions and developed the ideas for this paper. NLS took a primary role in the initial drafting of the manuscript. Both authors revised the manuscript for intellectual content.
Informed Consent
Not applicable.
Additional information
Handling editor: Wendy Berry Mendes
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sin, N.L., Ong, L.Q. Considerations for Advancing the Conceptualization of Well-being. Affec Sci 4, 45–48 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-022-00149-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-022-00149-y