Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Requirements in performance measurement systems of construction projects from the lean production perspective

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Engineering Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Performance measurement (PM) generates useful data for process control, facilitates communication between different sectors, and helps to align efforts on the most important aspects of the business. Thus, PM plays a key role in the management of projects and organizations. PM is also important in the implementation of lean production principles and methods, such as reducing the share of nonvalue-adding activities, increasing process transparency, building continuous improvement into the process, and benchmarking. Moreover, the adoption of the lean production philosophy requires changes in PM. Despite its importance, limited studies have been conducted on the use of PM systems for assessing the impact of lean production programs in construction projects. In addition, studies on how lean companies (or projects) use performance measurement and to what extent the indicators adopted reflect the result of actions that have been undertaken are limited. This study proposes a set of requirements in PM systems of construction projects from the perspective of lean production and a taxonomy of performance metrics for lean production systems. Five empirical studies have been carried out on construction companies from South America involved in the implementation of lean production systems. The scope of this investigation is limited to the construction projects as production systems rather than PM at the level of construction organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ballard G (2001). Cycle time reduction in home building. In: Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. National University of Singapore, 1–10

  • Ballard G, Howell G (1998). Shielding production: Essential step in production control. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 124(1): 11–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth K B, Formoso C T (2008). Improvement of performance measurement systems using production management dashboards. In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. Manchester, 769–778

  • Beatham S, Anumba C, Thorpe T, Hedges I (2004). KPIs: A critical appraisal of their use in construction. Benchmarking, 11(1): 93–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellisario A, Pavlov A (2018). Performance management practices in lean manufacturing organizations: A systematic review of research evidence. Production Planning & Control, 29(5): 367–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardes M M S, Formoso C T (2002). Contributions to the evaluation of production planning and control systems in building companies. In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. Gramado, 1–11

  • Bhasin S (2008). Lean and performance measurement. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 19(5): 670–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois III L J (1981). On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review, 6(1): 29–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourne M, Mills J, Wilcox M, Neely A D, Platts K (2000). Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(7): 754–771

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa D B, Formoso C T (2004). A set of evaluation criteria for performance measurement systems in the construction industry. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 9(2): 91–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa D B, Formoso C T (2011). Key factors for the success of performance measurement systems for collaborative benchmarking between construction companies. Ambiente Construido, 11(3): 143–159 (in Portuguese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa D B, Formoso C T, Kagioglou M, Alarcon L F, Caldas C H (2006). Benchmarking initiatives in the construction industry: Lessons learned and improvement opportunities. Journal of Management Engineering, 22(4): 158–167

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vargas F B, Bataglin F S, Formoso C T (2018). Guidelines to develop a BIM model focused on construction planning and control. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction: Evolving Lean Construction Towards Mature Production Management Across Cultures and Frontiers. Chennai, 744–753

  • de Vargas F B, Formoso C T (2020). Method for location-based production planning and control supported by BIM. Ambiente Construido, 20(1): 129–151 (in Portuguese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Espana F, Tsao C C Y, Houser M (2012). Driving continuous improvement by developing and leveraging lean key performance indicators. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. San Diego, 1–10

  • Ewenstein B, Whyte J K (2007). Visual representations as ‘artefacts of knowing’. Building Research and Information, 35(1): 81–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazinga W R, Saffaro F A, Isatto E L, Kremer A (2016). Difficulties in work design in the construction sector. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. Boston, MA, 13–22

  • Fireman M C T, Formoso C T, Isatto E L (2013). Integrating production and quality control: Monitoring making-do and informal work packages. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 515–525

  • Formoso C T, Moura C B (2009). Evaluation of the impact of the Last Planner System on the performance of construction projects. In: Proceedings of of the 17th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. Taipei, 153–164

  • Formoso C T, Sommer L, Koskela L, Isatto E L (2017). The identification and analysis of making-do waste: Insights from two Brazilian construction sites. Ambiente Construido, 17(3): 183–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Frandson A G, Seppänen O, Tommelein I D (2015). Comparison between location based management and takt time planning. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. Perth, 3–12

  • Fullerton R R, Wempe W F (2009). Lean manufacturing, non-financial performance measures, and financial performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(3): 214–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Galsworth G (1997). Visual Systems: Harnessing the Power of the Visual Workplace. New York: American Management Association

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerwin D (2005). An agenda for research on the flexibility of manufacturing processes. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(12): 1171–1182

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall R W, Johnson H T, Turney P B B (1991). Measuring Up: Charting Pathways to Manufacturing Excellence. Illinois: Irwin Professional Pub

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E (2017). Safety-II in Practice: Developing the Resilience Potentials. Lodon: Taylor & Francis

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E, Woods D D, Leveson N (2006). Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmström J, Ketokivi M, Hameri A P (2009). Bridging practice and theory: A design science approach. Decision Sciences, 40(1): 65–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins A (2009). Thinking about process safety indicators. Safety Science, 47(4): 460–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell G, Ballard G (1997). Implementing lean construction: Improving downstream performance. In: Alarcon L, ed. Lean Construction. Rotterdam: A. A. Balkema, 111–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagioglou M, Cooper R, Aouad G (2001). Performance management in construction: A conceptual framework. Construction Management and Economics, 19(1): 85–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan R S, Norton D P (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1): 71–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson C, Ahlström P (1996). Assessing changes towards lean production. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(2): 24–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennerley M, Neely A D (2003). Measuring performance in a changing business environment. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(2): 213–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskela L (1992). Application of the New Production Philosophy to Construction (vol. 72). Stanford University

  • Koskela L (2000). An Exploration towards a Production Theory and Its Application to Construction. Finland: VTT Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskela L (2004). Making do—The eight category of waste. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. Denmark

  • Koskela L, Howell G (2002). The underlying theory of project management is obsolate. In: Proceedings of the PMI Research Conference. Seattle, WA, 293–302

  • Lantelme E, Formoso C T (2000). Improving performance through measurement: The application of lean production and organisational learning principles. In: Proceedigs of the 8th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. Brigthon: University of Sussex, 10

    Google Scholar 

  • Love P E D, Holt G D (2000). Construction business performance measurement: The SPM alternative. Business Process Management Journal, 6(5): 408–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Manoochehri G (1999). Overcoming obstacles to developing effective performance measures. Work Study, 48(6): 223–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskell B H (1991). Performance Measurement for World Class Manufacturing: A Model for American Companies. Portland, OR: Productivity Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Neely A D (1999). The performance measurement revolution: Why now and what next? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(2): 205–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Neely A D, Richards H, Mills J, Platts K, Bourne M (1997). Designing performance measures: A structured approach. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17(11): 1131–1152

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohno T (1988). Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production. Portland, OR: Productivity Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton J R (2013). Task Diminishment: Construction Value Loss due to Sub-Optimal Task Execution. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Terre Haute: Indiana State University

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlov A, Bourne M (2011). Explaining the effects of performance measurement on performance: An organizational routines perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(1): 101–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson H S, Anumba C J, Carrillo P M, Al-Ghassani A M (2005). Business performance measurement practices in construction engineering organisations. Measuring Business Excellence, 9(1): 13–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Rother M, Shook J (1999). Learning to See: Value Stream Mapping to Create Value and Eliminate Muda. Cambridge: Lean Enterprise Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks R, Seppänen O, Priven V, Savosnick J (2017). Construction flow index: A metric of production flow quality in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 35(1–2): 45–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Safayeni F, Purdy L (1991). A behavioral case study of Just-in-Time implementation. Journal of Operations Management, 10(2): 213–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez A M, Pérez M P (2004). The use of lean indicators for operations management in services. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 5(5/6): 465–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarhan S, Fox A (2013). Performance measurement in the UK construction industry and its role in supporting the application oflean construction concepts. Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, 13(1): 23–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Saurin T A, Formoso C T, Cambraia F B (2008). An analysis of construction safety best practices from a cognitive systems engineering perspective. Safety Science, 46(8): 1169–1183

    Google Scholar 

  • Saurin T A, Formoso C T, Reck R, Beck da Silva Etges B M, Ribeiro J L D (2015). Findings from the analysis of incident-reporting systems of construction companies. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(9): 05015007

    Google Scholar 

  • Seppänen O, Ballard G, Pesonen S (2010). The combination of Last Planner System and location-based management system. Lean Construction Journal, 43–54

  • Shook J (2008). Managing to Learn: Using the A3 Management Process to Solve Problems, Gain Agreement, Mentor and Lead. Lean Enterprise Institute

  • Spear S J, Bowen H K (1999). Decoding the DNA of the Toyota production system. Harvard Business Review, 77: 96–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Tezel B A, Koskela L J, Tzortzopoulos P (2010). Visual management in construction: Study report on Brazilian cases. SCRI Research Report, 36

  • Valente C, Brandalise F, Pivatto M, Formoso C T (2017). Guidelines for devising and assessing visual management systems in construction sites. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. Heraklion: 703–710

  • van Aken J E (2004). Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: The quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. Journal of Management Studies, 41(2): 219–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Viana D D (2015). Integrated production planning and control model for engineer-to-order prefabricated building systems. Porto Alegre: Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

    Google Scholar 

  • Waggoner D B, Neely A D, Kennerley M P (1999). The forces that shape organisational performance measurement systems: An interdisciplinary review. International Journal of Production Economics, 60: 53–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Womack J P, Jones D T (2003). Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster

    Google Scholar 

  • Womack J P, Jones D T, Ross D (1990). The Machine that Changed the World. New York, NY: Rawson Associates

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Building Innovation Research Unit (NORIE), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 90040-060, Brazil

    Karina B. Barth & Carlos T. Formoso

Authors
  1. Karina B. Barth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carlos T. Formoso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karina B. Barth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barth, K.B., Formoso, C.T. Requirements in performance measurement systems of construction projects from the lean production perspective. Front. Eng. Manag. 8, 442–455 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-020-0108-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-020-0108-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation