Skip to main content
Log in

Case-based reasoning for selection of the best practices in low-carbon city development

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Engineering Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cities emit extensive carbon emissions, which are considered a major contributor to the severe issue of climate change. Various low-carbon development programs have been initiated at the city level worldwide to address this problem. These practices are invaluable in promoting the development of low-carbon cities. Therefore, an effective approach should be developed to help decision makers select the best practices from previous experience on the basis of the impact features of carbon emission and city context features. This study introduces a case-based reasoning methodology for a specific city to select the best practices as references for low-carbon city development. The proposed methodology consists of three main components, namely, case representation, case retrieval, and case adaption and retention. For city representation, this study selects city context features and the impact features of carbon emission to characterize and represent a city. The proposed methodology is demonstrated by applying it to the selection of the best practices for low-carbon development of Chengdu City in Sichuan Province, China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aamodt A, Plaza E (1994). Case-based reasoning: foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. AI Communications, 7(1): 39–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett F C (1932). Remembering: a Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaverstock J V, Smith R G, Taylor P J (1999). A roster of world cities. Cities, 16(6): 445–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlin Agenda Forum (2004). Designing the FUTURE: Agenda Draft Summary Adopted by the Berlin Agenda Forum. 2nd ed. Berlin: Berlin 21

  • Berry M J, Linoff G (1997). Data Mining Techniques: for Marketing, Sales, and Customer Support. New York: John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Bi J, Zhang R, Wang H, Liu M, Wu Y (2011). The benchmarks of carbon emissions and policy implications for China’s cities: case of Nanjing. Energy Policy, 39(9): 4785–4794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanco G, Gerlagh R, Suh S, Barrett J, de Coninck H C, Morejon C F D, Mathur R, Nakicenovic N, Ahenkorah A O, Pan J H, Pathak H, Rice J, Richels R, Smith S J, Stern D I, Toth F L, Zhou P (2014). Drivers, trends and mitigation. In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, Adler A, Baum I, Brunner S, Eickemeier P, Kriemann B, Savolainen J, Schlömer S, von Stechow C, Zwickel T, Minx J C, eds. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. IPCC Working Group III Contribution to AR5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Brännlund R, Lundgren T (2007). Swedish industry and Kyoto—an assessment of the effects of the European CO2 emission trading system. Energy Policy, 35(9): 4749–4762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • California Environmental Protection Agency (2006). Climate Action Team Report to Governor Schwarzenegger and the Legislature. Climate Action Team Report

  • Chan E H W, Choy L H T, Yung E H K (2013). Current research on low-carbon cities and institutional responses. Habitat International, 37: 1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Shen L Y, Shi Q, Hong J K, Ochoa J J (2019a). The effect of production structure on the total CO2 emissions intensity in the Chinese construction industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213: 1087–1095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Shi Q, Shen L, Huang Y, Wu Y (2019b). What makes the difference in construction carbon emissions between China and USA? Sustainable Cities and Society, 44: 604–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou J S (2009). Web-based CBR system applied to early cost budgeting for pavement maintenance project. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2): 2947–2960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Mántaras R L, McSherry D, Bridge D, Leake D, Smyth B, Craw S, Faltings B, Maher M L, Cox M T, Forbus K, Keane M, Aamodt A, Watson I (2005). Retrieval, reuse, revision and retention in case-based reasoning. Knowledge Engineering Review, 20(3): 215–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dourish P (2004). What we talk about when we talk about context. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8(1): 19–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economic Development Council of Small and Medium-sized Cities in China Society of Urban Economy (2010). Annual Report on Development of Small and Medium-sized Cities in China. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Sappagh S, Elmogy M, Riad A M (2015). A fuzzy-ontology-oriented case-based reasoning framework for semantic diabetes diagnosis. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 65(3): 179–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escriva-Bou A, Lund J R, Pulido-Velazquez M, Hui R, Medellín-Azuara J (2018). Developing a water-energy-GHG emissions modeling framework: insights from an application to California’s water system. Environmental Modelling & Software, 109: 54–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan J L, Yu H, Wei Y M (2015). Residential energy-related carbon emissions in urban and rural China during 1996–2012: from the perspective of five end-use activities. Energy and Building, 96: 201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenton P (2017). Sustainable mobility in the low carbon city: digging up the highway in Odense, Denmark. Sustainable Cities and Society, 29: 203–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich E, Trois C (2011). Quantification of greenhouse gas emissions from waste management processes for municipalities—a comparative review focusing on Africa. Waste Management, 31(7): 1585–1596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu B, Wu M, Che Y, Wang M, Huang Y, Bai Y (2015). The strategy of a low-carbon economy based on the STIRPAT and SD models. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35(4): 76–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomi K, Shimada K, Matsuoka Y (2010). A low-carbon scenario creation method for a local-scale economy and its application in Kyoto City. Energy Policy, 38(9): 4783–4796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greater London Authority (2007). Action Today to Protect Tomorrow. Report from the Former Mayor of London

  • Huggins R (2000). An index of competitiveness in the UK: local, regional and global analysis. In: Lloyd-Reason L, Wall S, eds. Dimensions of Competitiveness: Issues and Policies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 163–182

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (2013). Transition to Sustainable Buildings: Strategies and Opportunities to 2050. Paris: IEA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jebaraj S, Iniyan S (2006). A review of energy models. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 10(4): 281–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang P, Tovey N K (2009). Opportunities for low carbon sustainability in large commercial buildings in China. Energy Policy, 37(11): 4949–4958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones G J (2005). Challenges and opportunities of context-aware information access. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Ubiquitous Data Management, Tokyo, Japan, 53–60

  • Kedia S (2016). Approaches to low carbon development in China and India. Advances in Climate Change Research, 7(4): 213–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna N, Fridley D, Hong L (2014). China’s pilot low-carbon city initiative: a comparative assessment of national goals and local plans. Sustainable Cities and Society, 12: 110–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolodner J L (1983). Maintaining organization in a dynamic long-term memory. Cognitive Science, 7(4): 243–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolodner J L (1993). Case-Based Reasoning. San Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kolodner J L, Riesbeck C K (2014). Experience, Memory, and Reasoning. New York: Psychology Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Koo C, Hong T, Hyun C, Koo K (2010). A CBR-based hybrid model for predicting a construction duration and cost based on project characteristics in multi-family housing projects. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 37(5): 739–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann S (2012). Can rapid urbanization ever lead to low carbon cities? The case of Shanghai in comparison to Potsdamer Platz Berlin. Sustainable Cities and Society, 3: 1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Wang J, Yang X, Wang Y, Wu T (2018). A holistic overview of the progress of China’s low-carbon city pilots. Sustainable Cities and Society, 42: 289–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Chang S, Ma L, Liu P, Zhao L, Yao Q (2012). The development of low-carbon towns in china: concepts and practices. Energy, 47(1): 590–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilien G L, Kotler P, Moorthy K S (1995). Marketing Models. Englewood: Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin B Q, Liu J H (2010). Estimating coal production peak and trends of coal imports in China. Energy Policy, 38(1): 512–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin B, Liu H (2015). CO2 mitigation potential in China’s building construction industry: a comparison of energy performance. Building and Environment, 94: 239–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind A, Espegren K (2017). The use of energy system models for analysing the transition to low-carbon cities—the case of Oslo. Energy Strategy Reviews, 15: 44–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B, Tian C, Li Y, Song H, Ma Z (2018). Research on the effects of urbanization on carbon emissions efficiency of urban agglomerations in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197(Part 1): 1374–1381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu D R, Ke C K (2007). Knowledge support for problem-solving in a production process: a hybrid of knowledge discovery and case-based reasoning. Expert Systems with Applications, 33(1): 147–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu G, Yang Z, Chen B, Su M (2012). A dynamic low-carbon scenario analysis in case of Chongqing City. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 13(10): 1189–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Tao R, Tam C M (2013). Optimizing cost and CO2 emission for construction projects using particle swarm optimization. Habitat International, 37: 155–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu W, Qin B (2016). Low-carbon city initiatives in China: a review from the policy paradigm perspective. Cities, 51: 131–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo K (2014). China’s low-carbon city initiatives: the implementation gap and the limits of the target responsibility system. Habitat International, 42: 236–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlin J T, Ness I, Collins S T (1986). Book of World City Ranking. New York/London: Free Press/Collier Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Construction of the People’s Republic of China (2005). Code for Design of Civil Buildings. GB 50352 (in Chinese)

  • Mi Z, Guan D, Liu Z, Liu J, Viguié V, Fromer N, Wang Y (2019). Cities: the core of climate change mitigation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207: 582–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China (2013). China Urban Construction Statistical Yearbook 2012. Beijing: China Planning Press (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Northam R M (1979). Urban Geography. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Oku K, Nakajima S, Miyazaki J, Uemura S (2006). Context-aware SVM for context-dependent information recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Mobile Data Management, Nara, Japan: IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal S K, Shiu S C (2004). Foundations of Soft Case-Based Reasoning (Vol. 8). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pathak M, Shukla P R (2016). Co-benefits of low carbon passenger transport actions in Indian cities: case study of Ahmedabad. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 44(9): 303–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phdungsilp A (2010). Integrated energy and carbon modeling with a decision support system: policy scenarios for low-carbon city development in Bangkok. Energy Policy, 38(9): 4808–4817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reffold E, Leighton F, Choudhury F, Rayner P S (2008). Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Water Supply and Demand Management Options. Science Report SC070010

  • Riesbeck C K, Schank R C (1989). Inside Case-Based Reasoning. Hillsdale: L. Erlbaum Associates Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli D A, Vastag G (1998). Urban economic growth in the 21st century: assessing the international competitiveness of metropolitan areas. In: Bilsborrow R E, ed. Migration, Urbanization and Development:New Directions and Issues. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 469–514

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saraiva R, Perkusich M, Silva L, Almeida H, Siebra C, Perkusich A (2016). Early diagnosis of gastrointestinal cancer by using case-based and rule-based reasoning. Expert Systems with Applications, 61: 192–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savageau D, Boyer R (1993). Places Rated Almanac: Your Guide to Finding the Best Places to Live in America. New York: Prentice Hall Travel

    Google Scholar 

  • Seto K C, Dhakal S, Bigio A, Blanco H, Delgado G C, Dewar D, Huang L, Inaba A, Kansal A, Lwasa S, McMahon J, Müller D B, Murakami J, Nagendra H, Ramaswami A (2014). Human settlements, infrastructure and spatial planning. In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, Adler A, Baum I, Brunner S, Eickemeier P, Kriemann B, Savolainen J, Schlömer S, von Stechow C, Zwickel T, Minx J C, eds. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 923–1000

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilit B N, Theimer M M (1994). Disseminating active map information to mobile hosts. IEEE Network, 8(5): 22–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen L Y, Ochoa J J, Zhang X, Yi P (2013). Experience mining for decision making on implementing sustainable urbanization—an innovative approach. Automation in Construction, 29: 40–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen L, Yan H, Fan H, Wu Y, Zhang Y (2017a). An integrated system of text mining technique and case-based reasoning (TM-CBR) for supporting green building design. Building and Environment, 124: 388–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen L, Yan H, Zhang X, Shuai C (2017b). Experience mining based innovative method for promoting urban sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 156: 707–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi X, Li X (2018). Research on three-stage dynamic relationship between carbon emission and urbanization rate in different city groups. Ecological Indicators, 91: 195–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefanidis K, Pitoura E, Vassiliadis P (2008). A context-aware preference database system. International Journal of Pervasive Computing and Communications, 3(4): 439–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su M, Li R, Lu W, Chen C, Chen B, Yang Z (2013). Evaluation of a low-carbon city: method and application. Entropy, 15(4): 1171–1185

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tan S, Yang J, Yan J, Lee C, Hashim H, Chen B (2017). A holistic low carbon city indicator framework for sustainable development. Applied Energy, 185: 1919–1930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian Y, Xiong S, Ma X, Ji J (2018). Structural path decomposition of carbon emission: a study of China’s manufacturing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 193: 563–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2010). World Urbanization Prospects: the 2009 Revision. New York: United Nations

    Google Scholar 

  • Valcarce D, Parapar J, Barreiro Á (2018). Finding and analysing good neighbourhoods to improve collaborative filtering. Knowledge-Based Systems, 159: 193–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Hong G, Cui C Q, Yu H, Murty T (2019). Comprehensive analysis on China’s National Climate Change Assessment Reports: action and emphasis. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 6(1): 52–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Deng J, Gao J, Zhang P (2017). A hybrid user similarity model for collaborative filtering. Information Sciences, 418–419: 102–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Huang G H, Cai Y P, Dong C, Sun H G (2014). The identification of optimal CO2 emissions-trading strategies based on an inexact two-stage chance constrained programming approach. International Journal of Green Energy, 11(3): 302–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Yin F, Zhang Y, Zhang X (2012). An empirical research on the influencing factors of regional CO2 emissions: evidence from Beijing City, China. Applied Energy, 100: 277–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams B (2007). Statement on Climate Change at the UN Commission on Sustainable Development 15th Session. New York, USA

  • Wu M C, Lo Y F, Hsu S H (2008). A fuzzy CBR technique for generating product ideas. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1): 530–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu X, Peng B, Lin B (2017). A dynamic life cycle carbon emission assessment on green and non-green buildings in China. Energy and Building, 149: 272–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao H, Wei Q, Wang H (2014). Marginal abatement cost and carbon reduction potential outlook of key energy efficiency technologies in China’s building sector to 2030. Energy Policy, 69: 92–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie R, Fang J, Liu C (2017). The effects of transportation infrastructure on urban carbon emissions. Applied Energy, 196: 199–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang C J, Chen J L (2011). Accelerating preliminary eco-innovation design for products that integrates case-based reasoning and TRIZ method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(9–10): 998–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Wang X C, Zhou Z Y (2018). Development path of Chinese low-carbon cities based on index evaluation. Advances in Climate Change Research, 9(2): 144–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang L, Li Y (2013). Low-carbon city in China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 9: 62–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao C, Feng K, Hubacek K (2015). Driving forces of CO2 emissions in the G20 countries: an index decomposition analysis from 1971 to 2010. Ecological Informatics, 26: 93–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh A G, Shi X (2001). Case-based reasoning (CBR) in development control. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 3(3): 238–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu L (2014). Low carbon eco-city: new approach for Chinese urbanization. Habitat International, 44: 102–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Dai G (2018). Research on traffic decision making method based on image analysis case based reasoning. Optik, 158: 908–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M S Y (2016). Low-Carbon Indicator System—Sino: Evaluating Low-Carbon City Development Level in China. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Westphalia: University of Duisburg-Essen

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Zhang J, Yang Z, Li S (2011). Regional differences in the factors that influence China’s energy-related carbon emissions, and potential mitigation strategies. Energy Policy, 39(12): 7712–7718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z X (2010). China in the transition to a low-carbon economy. Energy Policy, 38(11): 6638–6653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou G, Singh J, Wu J, Sinha R, Laurenti R, Frostell B (2015). Evaluating low-carbon city initiatives from the DPSIR framework perspective. Habitat International, 50: 289–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoundi Z (2017). CO2 emissions, renewable energy and the environmental Kuznets curve, a panel cointegration approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72: 1067–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongqin Fan.

Additional information

This research was partially supported by the research project B-Q61R, which was funded by the General Research Fund of the Research Grant Council, Hong Kong SAR.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, Z., Fan, H. & Shen, L. Case-based reasoning for selection of the best practices in low-carbon city development. Front. Eng. Manag. 6, 416–432 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-019-0036-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-019-0036-1

Keywords

Navigation