Abstract
This paper introduces some improved ratio methods of imputation using higher-order moment of an auxiliary variable while imputing missing values. It is well-known fact that the optimal ratio estimators attain the MSE of regression estimator, but while using Searls-type transformation this may not always happen. The performance of the proposed imputation methods is investigated relative to the methods proposed by Bhushan et al. (Commun Stat Simul Comput, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2018.1500595), Mohamed et al. (Commun Stat Simul Comput, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2016.1208235) and Bhushan and Pandey (J Stat Manag Syst 19(6):755–769, 2016, Commun Stat Theory Methods 47(11):2576–2589, 2018). A comparative study has been carried out, and it has been shown that the proposed methods perform better in comparison with methods proposed by Bhushan et al. (2018), Mohamed et al. (2017) and Bhushan and Pandey (2016, 2018). The theoretical findings are supported by numerical study on two real populations and a simulation study using hypothetical population.
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
References
Ahmed MS, Al-Titi O, Al-Rawi Z, Abu-Dayyeh W (2006) Estimation of a population mean using different imputation methods. Stat Transit 7(6):1247–1264
Bhushan S, Pandey AP (2016) Optimal imputation of missing data for estimation of population mean. J Stat Manag Syst 19(6):755–769
Bhushan S, Pandey AP (2018) Optimality of ratio type estimation methods for population mean in presence missing data. Commun Stat Theory Methods 47(11):2576–2589
Bhushan S, Pandey AP, Pandey A (2018) On optimality of imputation methods for estimation of population mean using higher order moment of an auxiliary variable. Commun Stat Simul Comput. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2018.1500595
Bhushan S, Pandey AP (2020) Optimal imputation of missing data using multi auxiliary information. Comput Stat. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-020-01016-9
Bouza CN (2008) Estimation of the population mean with missing observations using product type estimators. Rev Investig Oper 29(3):207–223
Diana G, Perri PF (2010) Improved estimators of the population mean for missing data. Commun Stat Theory Methods 39:3245–3251
Herrera BCN, Al-Omari AI (2011) Ranked set estimation with imputation of the missing observations: the median estimator. Rev Investig Oper 32(1):30–37
Heitjan DF, Basu S (1996) Distinguishing ‘missing at random’ and ‘missing completely at random’. Am Stat 50:207–213
Heitjan DF, Little RJA (1991) Multiple imputations for the fatal accident reporting system. J R Stat Soc C 40(1):13–29
Kalton G, Kasprzyk D, Santos R (1981) Issues of nonresponse and imputation in the survey of income and program participation. In: Krewski D, Platek R, Rao JNK (eds) Current topics in survey sampling. Academic Press, New York, pp 455–480
Kalton G, Kasprzyk D (1982) Imputing for missing survey responses. In: Proceedings of the section on survey research method. American Statistical Association, pp 22–31
Khalid M, Singh GN (2020) Some imputation methods to deal with the issue of missing data problems due to random non-response in two-occasion successive sampling. Commun Stat Simul Comput. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2020.1828920
Little RJA, Rubin DB (1987) Statistical analysis with missing data. Willey, New York
Little RJA, Rubin DB (1989) Analysis of social science data with missing values. Sociol Methods Res 18:292–326
Lee H, Rancourt E, Sarndal CE (1994) Experiments with variance estimation from survey data with imputed values. J Off Stat 10:231–243
Lee H, Rancourt E, Särndal CE (1995) Variance estimation in the presence of imputed data for the generalized estimation system. In: Proceedings of the American Statistical Association (social survey research methods section), pp 384–389
Landerman LR, Land KC, Pieper CF (1997) An empirical evaluation of the predictive mean matching method for imputing missing values. Sociol Methods Res 26:3–33
Murthy MN (1977) Sampling: theory and methods. Statistical Publishing Society, Calcutta
Mohamed C, Sedory SA, Singh S (2017) Imputation using higher order moments of an auxiliary variable. Commun Stat Simul Comput. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2016.1208235
Rubin RB (1976) Inference and missing data. Biometrika 63(3):581–592
Reddy VN (1978) A study on the use of prior knowledge on certain population parameters in estimation. Sankhya C 40:29–37
Rueda M, Gonzalez S (2004) Missing data and auxiliary information in surveys. Computat Stat 19:551–567
Rueda M, Gonzalez S, Arcos A (2005) Indirect methods of imputation of missing data based on available units. Appl Math Comput 164:249–261
Searls DT (1964) The utilization of a known coefficient of variation in the estimation procedure. J Am Stat Assoc 59:1225–1226
Singh S, Horn S (1998) An alternative estimator in multi-character surveys. Metrika 48:99–107
Singh S, Horn S (2000) Compromised imputation in survey sampling. Metrika 51:267–276
Singh S, Deo B (2003) Imputation by power transformation. Stat Pap 44:555–579
Singh S (2003) Advanced sampling theory with applications: how Michael selected Amy, vol 12. Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn
Singh S (2009) A new method of imputation in survey sampling, statistics. J Theor Appl Stat 43(5):499–511
Singh S, Valdes SR (2009) Optimal method of imputation in survey sampling. Appl Math Sci 3(35):1727–1737
Singh GN, Khalid M, Kim JM (2019) Some imputation methods to deal with the problems of missing data in two-occasion successive sampling. Commun Stat Simul Comput. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2018.1563153
Toutenburg H, Srivastava VK (1998) Estimation of ratio of population means in survey sampling when some observations are missing. Metrika 48:177–187
Toutenburg H, Srivastava VK (2008) Amputation versus imputation of missing values through ratio method in sample surveys. Stat Pap 49:237–247
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the honorable reviewers and editor for their constructive and insightful comments which led to a significant improvement in the present manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1
An outline of derivation of Theorem 1. The bias of \(T_{rat1}\)
we can write it in the term of \(t_{rat1}\), is given by
Taking expectation on both sides
The MSE \(T_{rat1}\) is given by
which can be expressed as
For optimum value of \(\psi _{1}\) differentiating the \(MSE\left( T_{rat1}\right)\) with respect to \(\psi _{1}\) and equating to zero, we get
substituting the optimum value of \(\psi _{1}\) in \(MSE\left( T_{rat1}\right)\), we get the minimum MSE
The derivations for other estimators \(T_{rat2}\) and \(T_{rat3}\) can be done on similar lines. In general, we have
The optimum values of scalars involved are tabulated below for ready reference:
where \(\omega _{1}=\omega _{3}=\omega _{5}=\dfrac{C_y(\rho (\lambda _{04}-1)-\lambda _{12}\lambda _{03})}{C_x(\lambda _{04}-1-\lambda _{03}^2)}\) and \(\omega _{2}=\omega _{4}=\omega _{6}=\dfrac{C_y(\lambda _{12}-\rho _{yx}\lambda _{03})}{(\lambda _{04}-1-\lambda _{03}^2)}\) are used as optimizing value of the constant in this study, which are the optimum values of these scalars when \(\psi _{i}=1\) is set in the respective estimators.
Appendix 2
N\(<-\) 2000 | |
X\(<-\) rep(0,N); | |
Y\(<-\) rep(0,N); | |
x1\(<-\)rgamma(N,0.085,1.2) | |
y1\(<-\)rgamma(N,0.109,2.0) | |
X\(<-\) 2.4+x1 | |
SX\(<-\) sqrt(var(x1)) | |
SY\(<-\) sqrt(var(y1)) | |
rho\(<-\) 0.6 | |
\(Y<- 2.8+(sqrt(1-rho^2)*y1)+(rho*(SY/SX)*x1)\) | |
set.seed(123456789) | |
\(N<- 2000\) | |
\(X<- rep(0,N);\) | |
\(Y<- rep(0,N);\) | |
\(x1<-rgamma(N,0.085,1.2)\) | |
\(y1<-rgamma(N,0.109,2.0)\) | |
\(X<- 2.4+x1\) | |
\(SX<- sqrt(var(x1))\) | |
\(SY<- sqrt(var(y1))\) | |
\(rho<- 0.6\) | |
\(Y<- 2.8+(sqrt(1-rho^2)*y1)+(rho*(SY/SX)*x1)\) | |
\(df = data.frame(X, Y)\) | |
\(X1<- df\)X | |
X2\(<-\) dfY | |
\(Sxy<-cov(X1,X2);Sxy\) | |
\(Vx<-var(X1);Vx\) | |
\(Vy<-var(X2);Vy\) | |
\(Sx<-sd(X1);Sx\) | |
\(Sy<-sd(X2);Sy\) | |
\(ro<-cor(X1, X2);ro\) | |
\(R<-(Ybr/Xbr);R\) | |
\(beta<-Sxy/Vx;beta\) | |
\(n<-200\) | |
\(r<-160\) | |
\(fn<-(1/n-1/N)\) | |
\(fr<-(1/r-1/N);\) | |
\(frn<-(1/r-1/n);\) | |
\(Ybr<-mean(X2);Ybr\) | |
\(Xbr<-mean(X1);Xbr\) | |
\(Cy<-Sy/Ybr;Cy\) | |
\(Cx<-Sx/Xbr;Cx\) | |
\(Beta<-(ro*(Cy/Cx));Beta\) | |
\(mu11<-sum((X2-Ybr)*(X1-Xbr))/(N-1)\) | |
\(mu12<-sum((X2-Ybr)*((X1-Xbr)^2))/(N-1)\) | |
\(mu02<-sum((X1-Xbr)^2)/(N-1)\) | |
\(mu20<-sum((X2-Ybr)^2)/(N-1)\) | |
\(mu03<-sum((X1-Xbr)^3)/(N-1)\) | |
\(mu04<-sum((X1-Xbr)^4)/(N-1)\) | |
\(lambda12<-((mu12)/((sqrt(mu20))*mu02));lambda12\) | |
\(lambda03<-((mu03)/((mu02)^(3/2)));lambda03\) |
\(lambda04<-((mu04)/(mu02^2));lambda04\) | |
\(beta1<-((Sxy*(lambda04-1))-(Sy*Sx*lambda12*lambda03))/(Vx*(lambda04-1-(lambda03^2)));beta1\) | |
\(beta2<-((Sy*Sx*lambda12)-(Sxy*lambda03))/((Sx^3)*(lambda04-1-(lambda03^2)));beta2\) | |
Strategy1 | |
\(A1<-1/(1+(fr*(Cy^2))-(fn*(ro^2)*(Cy^2)));\) | |
\(B1<-(ro*Sy)/(Sx*(1+(fr*(Cy^2))-(fn*(ro^2)*(Cy^2))));\) | |
\(C1=(1+(fr*Cy^2)+(2*(Beta^2)*fn*Cx^2)+((Beta*fn)*((Cx^2)-(4*ro*Cy*Cx))));\) | |
\(D1=(1+(((Beta^2)/2)*fn*Cx^2)+(((Beta/2)*fn)*((Cx^2)-(2*ro*Cy*Cx))));D1\) | |
\(alpha1=(D1/C1);\) | |
\(d1<-(Cy*((ro*(lambda04-1))-(lambda12*lambda03)))/(Cx*(lambda04-1-(lambda03^2)))\) | |
\(d2<-(Cy*(lambda12-(ro*lambda03)))/(lambda04-1-(lambda03^2));\) | |
\(K1<-(1+(2*(d1^2)*fn*Cx^2)+(2*(d2^2)*fn*(lambda04-1))+(d1*fn*((Cx^2)-(4*ro*Cy*Cx)))\) | |
\(+(d2*fn*((lambda04-1)-(4*Cy*lambda12)))+(4*d1*d2*fn*Cx*lambda03));K1 K2<-(1+(((d1^2)/2)*fn*Cx^2)+(((d2^2)/2)*fn*(lambda04-1))+((d1/2)*fn*((Cx^2)-(2*ro*Cy*Cx)))+((d2/2)*fn*((lambda04-1)-(2*Cy*lambda12)))+(d1*d2*fn*Cx*lambda03));K1\) | |
\(M1<-(fr*Vy);M1\) | |
\(M2<-((fr*Vy)+(fn*(((R^2)*Vx)-(2*R*Sxy))));M2\) | |
\(M3<-((fr*Vy)-(fn*Vy*(ro^2)));M3\) | |
\(M4<-((Ybr^2*M3)/((Ybr^2)+M3));M4\) | |
\(M5<-((fr*Vy)-((fn*Vy)*((ro^2)+(((lambda12-(ro*lambda03))^2)/(lambda04-1-(lambda03^2))))));M5\) | |
\(M6<-((Ybr^2*M5)/((Ybr^2)+M5));M6\) | |
\(M7<-((Ybr^2)*(1-((D1^2)/C1)));M7\) | |
\(M8<-((Ybr^2)*(1-((K1^2)/K1)));M8\) | |
\(P1<-100\) | |
\(P2<-(M1/M2)*100;P2\) | |
\(P3<-(M1/M3)*100;P3\) | |
\(P4<-(M1/M4)*100;P4\) | |
\(P5<-(M1/M5)*100;P5\) | |
\(P6<-(M1/M6)*100;P6\) | |
\(P7<-(M1/M7)*100;P7\) | |
\(P8<-(M1/M8)*100;P8\) | |
\(g1<-((Ybr^2)/((Ybr^2)+(fr*Vy)-((fn*Vy)*((ro^2)+(((lambda12-(ro*lambda03))^2)/(lambda04-1-(lambda03^2)))))));g1\) | |
\(g2<-(g1*Sy*((ro*(lambda04-1))-(lambda12*lambda03)))/(Sx*(lambda04-1-(lambda03^2)));g2\) | |
\(g3<-(g1*Sy*(lambda12-(ro*lambda03)))/(Vx*(lambda04-1-(lambda03^2)));g3\) | |
Strategy2 | |
\(A2<-1/(1+(fr*(Cy^2))-(fr*(ro^2)*(Cy^2)));A2\) | |
\(B2<-(ro*Sy)/(Sx*(1+(fr*(Cy^2))-(fr*(ro^2)*(Cy^2))));B2\) | |
\(C2=(1+(fr*Cy^2)+(2*(Beta^2)*fr*Cx^2)+((Beta*fr)*((Cx^2)-(4*ro*Cy*Cx))));C2\) | |
\(D2=(1+(((Beta^2)/2)*fr*Cx^2)+(((Beta/2)*fr)*((Cx^2)-(2*ro*Cy*Cx))));D2\) | |
\(alpha2=(D2/C2);alpha2\) | |
\(M21<-(fr*Vy);M21\) | |
\(M22<-((fr*Vy)+(fr*(((R^2)*Vx)-(2*R*Sxy))));M22\) | |
\(M23<-((fr*Vy)-(fr*Vy*(ro^2)));M23\) | |
\(M24<-((Ybr^2*M23)/((Ybr^2)+M23));M24\) | |
\(M25<-((fr*Vy)-((fr*Vy)*((ro^2)+(((lambda12-(ro*lambda03))^2)/(lambda04-1-(lambda03^2))))));M25\) | |
\(M26<-((Ybr^2*M25)/((Ybr^2)+M25));M26\) | |
\(P21<-100\) | |
\(P22<-(M21/M22)*100;P22\) | |
\(P23<-(M21/M23)*100;P23\) | |
\(P24<-(M21/M24)*100;P24\) | |
\(P25<-(M21/M25)*100;P25\) | |
\(P26<-(M21/M26)*100;P26\) |
\(g4<-((Ybr^2)/((Ybr^2)+(fr*Vy)-((fr*Vy)*((ro^2)+(((lambda12-(ro*lambda03))^2)/(lambda04-1-(lambda03^2)))))));g4\) | |
\(g5<-(g4*Sy*((ro*(lambda04-1))-(lambda12*lambda03)))/(Sx*(lambda04-1-(lambda03^2)));g5\) | |
\(g6<-(g4*Sy*(lambda12-(ro*lambda03)))/(Vx*(lambda04-1-(lambda03^2)));g6\) | |
Strategy3 | |
\(A3<-1/(1+(fr*(Cy^2))-(frn*(ro^2)*(Cy^2)));A3\) | |
\(B3<-(ro*Sy)/(Sx*(1+(fr*(Cy^2))-(frn*(ro^2)*(Cy^2))));B3\) | |
\(C3=(1+(fr*Cy^2)+(2*(Beta^2)*frn*Cx^2)+((Beta*frn)*((Cx^2)-(4*ro*Cy*Cx))));C3\) | |
\(D3=(1+(((Beta^2)/2)*frn*Cx^2)+(((Beta/2)*frn)*((Cx^2)-(2*ro*Cy*Cx))));D3\) | |
\(alpha3=(D3/C3);alpha3\) | |
\(M31<-(fr*Vy);M31\) | |
\(M32<-((fn*Vy)+(frn*(Vy+((R^2)*Vx)-(2*R*Sxy))));M32\) | |
\(M33<-((fn*Vy)+(frn*Vy*(1-(ro^2))));M33\) | |
\(M34<-((Ybr^2*M33)/((Ybr^2)+M33));M34\) | |
\(M35<-((fn*Vy)+((frn*Vy)*(1-(ro^2)-(((lambda12-(ro*lambda03))^2)/(lambda04-1-(lambda03^2))))));M35\) | |
\(M36<-((Ybr^2*M35)/((Ybr^2)+M35));M36\) | |
\(P31<-100\) | |
\(P32<-(M31/M32)*100;P32\) | |
\(P33<-(M31/M33)*100;P33\) | |
\(P34<-(M31/M34)*100;P34\) | |
\(P35<-(M31/M35)*100;P35\) | |
\(P36<-(M31/M36)*100;P36\) | |
\(g7<-((Ybr^2)/((Ybr^2)+(fr*Vy)-((frn*Vy)*((ro^2)+(((lambda12-(ro*lambda03))^2)/(lambda04-1-(lambda03^2)))))));g7\) | |
\(g8<-(g7*Sy*((ro*(lambda04-1))-(lambda12*lambda03)))/(Sx*(lambda04-1-(lambda03^2)));g8\) | |
\(g9<-(g7*Sy*(lambda12-(ro*lambda03)))/(Vx*(lambda04-1-(lambda03^2)));g9\) | |
\(n<- 200\) | |
\(ll<- 200\) | |
\(r<- 160\) | |
\(S<-rep(0,n)\) | |
\(XX<- rep(0,r);\) | |
\(YY<- rep(0,r);\) | |
\(Xn<- rep(0,n);\) | |
\(Yn<- rep(0,n);\) | |
\(ZX<-rep(0,ll);\) | |
\(M11<- rep(0,ll);\) | |
\(M12<- rep(0,ll);\) | |
\(M13<- rep(0,ll);\) | |
\(M14<- rep(0,ll);\) | |
\(M15<- rep(0,ll);\) | |
\(M16<-rep(0,ll);\) | |
\(M17<-rep(0,ll);\) | |
\(M21<- rep(0,ll);\) | |
\(M22<- rep(0,ll);\) | |
\(M23<- rep(0,ll);\) | |
\(M24<- rep(0,ll);\) | |
\(M25<- rep(0,ll);\) | |
\(M26<-rep(0,ll);\) | |
\(M27<-rep(0,ll);\) | |
\(M31<- rep(0,ll);\) | |
\(M32<- rep(0,ll);\) | |
\(M33<- rep(0,ll);\) |
\(M34<- rep(0,ll);\) | |
\(M35<- rep(0,ll);\) | |
\(M36<-rep(0,ll);\) | |
\(M37<-rep(0,ll);\) | |
\(ZXM<-rep(0,n);\) | |
\(ZYM<- rep(0,n);\) | |
\(xyr<-0\) | |
\(S<-matrix(data=0, nrow=ll, ncol=n, byrow=\)”T”) | |
\(S11<-matrix(data=0, nrow=ll, ncol=n, byrow=\)”T”) | |
\(S12<-matrix(data=0, nrow=ll, ncol=n, byrow=\)”T”) | |
\(S13<-matrix(data=0, nrow=ll, ncol=n, byrow=\)”T”) | |
\(S14<-matrix(data=0, nrow=ll, ncol=n, byrow=\)”T”) | |
\(S15<-matrix(data=0, nrow=ll, ncol=n, byrow=\)”T”) | |
\(S16<-matrix(data=0, nrow=ll, ncol=n, byrow=\)”T”) | |
\(S17<-matrix(data=0, nrow=ll, ncol=n, byrow=\)”T”) | |
\(S21<-matrix(data=0, nrow=ll, ncol=n, byrow=\)”T”) | |
\(S22<-matrix(data=0, nrow=ll, ncol=n, byrow=\)”T”) | |
\(S23<-matrix(data=0, nrow=ll, ncol=n, byrow=\)”T”) | |
\(S24<-matrix(data=0, nrow=ll, ncol=n, byrow=\)”T”) | |
\(S25<-matrix(data=0, nrow=ll, ncol=n, byrow=\)”T”) | |
\(S26<-matrix(data=0, nrow=ll, ncol=n, byrow=\)”T”) | |
\(S27<-matrix(data=0, nrow=ll, ncol=n, byrow=\)”T”) | |
\(S31<-matrix(data=0, nrow=ll, ncol=n, byrow=\)”T”) | |
\(S32<-matrix(data=0, nrow=ll, ncol=n, byrow=\)”T”) | |
\(S33<-matrix(data=0, nrow=ll, ncol=n, byrow=\)”T”) | |
\(S34<-matrix(data=0, nrow=ll, ncol=n, byrow=\)”T”) | |
\(S35<-matrix(data=0, nrow=ll, ncol=n, byrow=\)”T”) | |
\(S36<-matrix(data=0, nrow=ll, ncol=n, byrow=\)”T”) | |
\(S37<-matrix(data=0, nrow=ll, ncol=n, byrow=\)”T”) | |
\(ZY<-rep(0,ll);\) | |
\(W<- seq(1:N)\) | |
for (it in 1:n) | |
\(D<-sample(W, n, replace = FALSE, prob = NULL)\) | |
for (kk in 1:n) | |
Tn\(<-\) D[kk] | |
Xn[kk]\(<-\) X1[Tn] | |
Yn[kk]\(<-\) X2[Tn] | |
for (j in 1:ll) | |
T\(<-\)sample(D, r, replace = FALSE, prob = NULL) | |
for (k in 1:r) | |
T1\(<-\) T[k] | |
XX[k]\(<-\) X1[T1] | |
YY[k]\(<-\) X2[T1] | |
XX | |
YY | |
ZX[j]\(<-\)mean(XX); | |
ZY[j]\(<-\)mean(YY) | |
yr\(<-\)mean(YY); | |
\(M11[j]<-((yr-mean(X2))^2);\) | |
\(yrat1<-mean(YY)*mean(X1)/mean(Xn);\) |
\(M12[j]<-((yrat1-mean(X2))^2);\) | |
\(yreg1<-mean(YY)+beta*(mean(X1)-mean(Xn));\) | |
\(M13[j]<-((yreg1-mean(X2))^2)\) | |
\(treg1<-(A1*mean(YY))+(B1*(mean(X1)-mean(Xn)));\) | |
\(M14[j]<-((treg1-mean(X2))^2);\) | |
\(ynew_ch1<-(mean(YY)+(beta1*(mean(X1)-mean(Xn)))+(beta2*(var(X1)-var(Xn))))\); \(M15[j]<-((ynew_ch1-mean(X2))^2);\) | |
\(T11<-((g1*mean(YY))+g2*(mean(X1)-mean(Xn))+g3*(var(X1)-var(Xn)));\) | |
\(M16[j]<-((T11-mean(X2))^2)\) | |
\(Tr1<-(alpha1*mean(YY)*((mean(X1)/mean(Xn))^Beta));\) | |
\(M17[j]<-((Tr1-mean(X2))^2);\) | |
\(yr<-mean(YY)\); | |
\(M21[j]<-((yr-mean(X2))^2);\) | |
\(yrat2<-mean(YY)*mean(X1)/mean(XX)\); | |
\(M22[j]<-((yrat2-mean(X2))^2);\) | |
\(yreg2<-mean(YY)+beta*(mean(X1)-mean(XX))\); | |
\(M23[j]<-((yreg2-mean(X2))^2);\) | |
\(treg2<-(A2*mean(YY))+(B2*(mean(X1)-mean(XX)))\); | |
\(M24[j]<-((treg2-mean(X2))^2);\) | |
\(ynew_ch2<-(mean(YY)+(beta1*(mean(X1)-mean(XX)))+(beta2*(var(X1)-var(XX))));\) | |
\(M25[j]<-((ynew_ch2-mean(X2))^2);\) | |
\(T21<-((g4*mean(YY))+g5*(mean(X1)-mean(XX))+g6*(var(X1)-var(XX)));\) | |
\(M26[j]<-((T21-mean(X2))^2)\) | |
\(Tr2<-(alpha2*mean(YY)*((mean(X1)/mean(XX))^Beta));\) | |
\(M27[j]<-((Tr2-mean(X2))^2);\) | |
\(yr<-mean(YY);\) | |
\(M31[j]<-((yr-mean(X2))^2)\); | |
\(yrat3<-mean(YY)*mean(Xn)/mean(XX)\); | |
\(M32[j]<-((yrat3-mean(X2))^2);\) | |
\(yreg3<-mean(YY)+beta*(mean(Xn)-mean(XX));\) | |
\(M33[j]<-((yreg3-mean(X2))^2);\) | |
\(treg3<-(A3*mean(YY))+(B3*(mean(Xn)-mean(XX)));\) | |
\(M34[j]<-((treg3-mean(X2))^2);\) | |
\(ynew_ch3<-(mean(YY)+(beta1*(mean(Xn)-mean(XX)))+(beta2*(var(Xn)-var(XX))))\); \(M35[j]<-((ynew_ch3-mean(X2))^2);\) | |
\(T31<-((g7*mean(YY))+g8*(mean(Xn)-mean(XX))+g9*(var(Xn)-var(XX)));\) | |
\(M36[j]<-((T31-mean(X2))^2)\) | |
\(Tr3<-(alpha3*mean(YY)*((mean(Xn)/mean(XX))^Beta));\) | |
\(M37[j]<-((Tr3-mean(X2))^2);\) | |
S[it,]\(<-\) ZX | |
S11[it,]\(<-\)M11 | |
S12[it,]\(<-\)M12 | |
S13[it,]\(<-\)M13 | |
S14[it,]\(<-\)M14 | |
S15[it,]\(<-\)M15 | |
S16[it,]\(<-\)M16 | |
S17[it,]\(<-\)M17 | |
S21[it,]\(<-\)M21 | |
S22[it,]\(<-\)M22 | |
S23[it,]\(<-\)M23 | |
S24[it,]\(<-\)M24 | |
S25[it,]\(<-\)M25 |
S26[it,]\(<-\)M26 | |
S27[it,]\(<-\)M27 | |
S31[it,]\(<-\)M31 | |
S32[it,]\(<-\)M32 | |
S33[it,]\(<-\)M33 | |
S34[it,]\(<-\)M34 | |
S35[it,]\(<-\)M35 | |
S36[it,]\(<-\)M36 | |
S37[it,]\(<-\)M37 | |
Strategy1 | |
MSE1\(<-\)(sum(S11))/(n*ll);MSE1 | |
MSE2\(<-\)(sum(S12))/(n*ll);MSE2 | |
MSE3\(<-\)(sum(S13))/(n*ll);MSE3 | |
MSE4\(<-\)(sum(S14))/(n*ll);MSE4 | |
MSE5\(<-\)(sum(S15))/(n*ll);MSE5 | |
MSE6\(<-\)(sum(S16))/(n*ll);MSE6 | |
MSE7\(<-\)(sum(S17))/(n*ll);MSE7 | |
PRE1\(<-\)100 | |
PRE2\(<-\)(MSE1/MSE2)*100;PRE2 | |
PRE3\(<-\)(MSE1/MSE3)*100;PRE3 | |
PRE4\(<-\)(MSE1/MSE4)*100;PRE4 | |
PRE5\(<-\)(MSE1/MSE5)*100;PRE5 | |
PRE6\(<-\)(MSE1/MSE6)*100;PRE6 | |
PRE7\(<-\)(MSE1/MSE7)*100;PRE7 | |
Strategy2 | |
MSE21\(<-\)(sum(S21))/(n*ll);MSE21 | |
MSE22\(<-\)(sum(S22))/(n*ll);MSE22 | |
MSE23\(<-\)(sum(S23))/(n*ll);MSE23 | |
MSE24\(<-\)(sum(S24))/(n*ll);MSE24 | |
MSE25\(<-\)(sum(S25))/(n*ll);MSE25 | |
MSE26\(<-\)(sum(S26))/(n*ll);MSE26 | |
MSE27\(<-\)(sum(S27))/(n*ll);MSE27 | |
PRE21\(<-\)100 | |
PRE22\(<-\)(MSE21/MSE22)*100;PRE22 | |
PRE23\(<-\)(MSE21/MSE23)*100;PRE23 | |
PRE24\(<-\)(MSE21/MSE24)*100;PRE24 | |
PRE25\(<-\)(MSE21/MSE25)*100;PRE25 | |
PRE26\(<-\)(MSE21/MSE26)*100;PRE26 | |
PRE27\(<-\)(MSE21/MSE27)*100;PRE27 | |
Strategy3 | |
MSE31\(<-\)(sum(S31))/(n*ll);MSE31 | |
MSE32\(<-\)(sum(S32))/(n*ll);MSE32 | |
MSE33\(<-\)(sum(S33))/(n*ll);MSE33 | |
MSE34\(<-\)(sum(S34))/(n*ll);MSE34 | |
MSE35\(<-\)(sum(S35))/(n*ll);MSE35 | |
MSE36\(<-\)(sum(S36))/(n*ll);MSE36 | |
MSE37\(<-\)(sum(S37))/(n*ll);MSE37 | |
PRE31\(<-\)100 | |
PRE32\(<-\)(MSE31/MSE32)*100;PRE32 | |
PRE33\(<-\)(MSE31/MSE33)*100;PRE33 | |
PRE34\(<-\)(MSE31/MSE34)*100;PRE34 | |
PRE35\(<-\)(MSE31/MSE35)*100;PRE35 | |
PRE36\(<-\)(MSE31/MSE36)*100;PRE36 | |
PRE37\(<-\)(MSE31/MSE37)*100;PRE37 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bhushan, S., Pandey, A.P. Optimality of Ratio-Type Imputation Methods for Estimation of Population Mean Using Higher Order Moment of an Auxiliary Variable. J Stat Theory Pract 15, 48 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42519-021-00187-y
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42519-021-00187-y