Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Investigating Factors Influencing Deck Conditions of Concrete Bridge and Steel Bridge Using an Interpretable Machine Learning Framework

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Data Science for Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Good deck condition is critical for a bridge to transport vehicles across physical obstacles on the landscape. This study uses the National Bridge Inventory data provided by LTBP InfoBridge to assess the influence of weather, structure, and traffic factors on deck conditions of concrete and steel bridges in the ten states with the highest percentage of bridges with poor deck conditions. For this analysis, an interpretable machine learning framework takes advantage of the high prediction accuracy while maintaining interpretability. A model is built for each structure type producing results that reveal the impacts of the factors on deck conditions for both types of bridges. The effects of various factors on the deck conditions of steel and concrete bridges are analyzed by comparing the similarities and differences among these factors. The results show that the concrete cast-in-place is the only deck structure associated with good deck conditions for steel bridges, while multiple other structure types associate with good deck conditions for concrete bridges. For the wearing surface, the bituminous wearing surface is highly associated with poor deck conditions of steel bridges. The number of snow days is negatively associated with the deck condition of steel bridges, while the concrete bridge could maintain a good performance with extremely long snow days. The findings also confirmed that increasing the truck percentage could deteriorate the deck conditions faster.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ARTBA (2021) Bridge conditions report 2021

  • Assaad R, El-adaway IH (2020) Bridge infrastructure asset management system: comparative computational machine learning approach for evaluating and predicting deck deterioration conditions. J Infrastruct Syst 26:04020032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayrak H, Akgül F (2013) Effect of coefficients of regression model on performance prediction curves. Int J Eng Appl Sci 5:32–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavel BW (2012) Steel bridge design handbook: bridge deck design. Federal Highway Administration, Office of Bridge Technology

  • Chawla NV, Bowyer KW, Hall LO, Kegelmeyer WP (2002) SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J Artif Intell Res 16:321–357

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen T, He T, Benesty M et al (2015) Xgboost: extreme gradient boosting. R Package Version 04–2:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 20:273–297

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • FHWA (2017) National performance management measures; assessing pavement condition for the national highway performance program and bridge condition for the national highway performance program. Fed Reg 82:14438–14439

    Google Scholar 

  • FHWA (2020) National highway freight network. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight/infrastructure/nfn/index.htm. Accessed 8 May 2021

  • Freund Y, Schapire RE (1997) A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. J Comput Syst Sci 55:119–139

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ghonima O, Anderson JC, Schumacher T, Unnikrishnan A (2020) Performance of US concrete highway bridge decks characterized by random parameters binary logistic regression. ASCE-ASME J Risk Uncertain Eng Syst Part A Civ Eng 6:04019025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haghighat AK, Ravichandra-Mouli V, Chakraborty P et al (2020) Applications of deep learning in intelligent transportation systems. J Big Data Anal Transport 2:115–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan S, Elwakil E (2020) National bridge inventory data-based stochastic modeling for deck condition rating of prestressed concrete bridges. Pract Period Struct Des Constr 25:04020022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan S, Elwakil E (2021) Knowledge-driven stochastic reliable modeling for steel bridge deck condition rating prediction. J Struct Integr Maint 6:91–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Hema J, Guthrie WS, Fonseca FS (2004) Concrete bridge deck condition assessment and improvement strategies. Department of Transportation, Utah

  • Hu N, Burgueño R, Haider SW, Sun Y (2016) Framework for estimating bridge-deck chloride-induced degradation from local modeling to global asset assessment. J Bridg Eng 21:06016005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y-H (2010) Artificial neural network model of bridge deterioration. J Perform Constr Facil 24:597–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imani A, Saadati S, Gucunski N (2019) Comprehensive full-depth evaluation of concrete bridge decks based on GPR surveys and machine learning. In: SMAR 2019-fifth conference on smart monitoring, assessment and rehabilitation of civil structures, p 8

  • Jiang Y, KumareC S (1992) Simulation approach to prediction of highway structure conditions. Transp Res Rec 1347:11–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Y (2010) Application and comparison of regression and Markov chain methods in bridge condition prediction and system benefit optimization. J Transport Res Forum

  • Kahl S (2005) Box-beam concerns found under the bridge. C&T Res Rec 102:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim KH, Nam MS, Hwang HH, Ann KY (2020) Prediction of remaining life for bridge decks considering deterioration factors and propose of prioritization process for bridge deck maintenance. Sustainability 12:10625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavrenz SM, Saeed TU, Murillo-Hoyos J et al (2020) Can interdependency considerations enhance forecasts of bridge infrastructure condition? Evidence using a multivariate regression approach. Struct Infrastruct Eng 16:1177–1185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee I-K, Kim W-S, Kang H-T, Seo J-W (2015) Analysis and prediction of highway bridge deck slab deterioration. J Korea Inst Struct Maint Inspect 19:68–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Q, Song Z (2022) Ensemble-learning-based prediction of steel bridge deck defect condition. Appl Sci 12:5442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Zhang Y (2020) Bridge condition rating data modeling using deep learning algorithm. Struct Infrastruct Eng 16:1447–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lou P, Nassif H, Su D, Truban P (2016) Effect of overweight trucks on bridge deck deterioration based on weigh-in-motion data. Transp Res Rec 2592:86–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LTBP (2021) Data—LTBP InfoBridge. Ht*****tps://infobridge.fhwa.dot.gov/Data#!#OverviewTab. Accessed 30 Jul 2021

  • Lu P, Wang H, Tolliver D (2019) Prediction of bridge component ratings using ordinal logistic regression model. Math Probl Eng 2019:16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg S, Lee S-I (2017) A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. arXiv preprint arXiv:170507874

  • Madanat S, Ibrahim WHW (1995) Poisson regression models of infrastructure transition probabilities. J Transp Eng 121:267–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melhem HG, Cheng Y (2003) Prediction of remaining service life of bridge decks using machine learning. J Comput Civ Eng 17:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memmott J (2007) Highway bridges in the United States—an overview. vol 6

  • Mohammed Abdelkader E, Moselhi O, Marzouk M, Zayed T (2019) Condition prediction of concrete bridge decks using Markov chain Monte Carlo-based method. In: 7th CSCE international construction specialty conference jointly with construction research congress, pp 1–10

  • Morcous G (2006) Performance prediction of bridge deck systems using Markov chains. J Perform Constr Facil 20:146–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morcous G, Lounis Z, Mirza MS (2003) Identification of environmental categories for Markovian deterioration models of bridge decks. J Bridg Eng 8:353–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morcous G (2005) Modeling bridge deck deterioration by using decision tree algorithms. In: Transportation research board-6th international bridge engineering conference: reliability, security, and sustainability in bridge engineering, pp 509–516

  • Namy M, Charron J-P, Massicotte B (2015) Structural behavior of bridge decks with cast-in-place and precast concrete barriers: numerical modeling. J Bridg Eng 20:04015014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen TT, Dinh K (2019) Prediction of bridge deck condition rating based on artificial neural networks. J Sci Technol Civ Eng (STCE)-NUCE 13:15–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan N-F (2007) Forecasting bridge deck conditions using fuzzy regression analysis. J Chin Inst Eng 30:593–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafiq MI, Chryssanthopoulos MK, Sathananthan S (2015) Bridge condition modelling and prediction using dynamic Bayesian belief networks. Struct Infrastruct Eng 11:38–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds JC, Emanuel JH (1974) Thermal stresses and movements in bridges. J Struct Div 100:63–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter MA (1990) Timber bridges: design, construction, inspection, and maintenance. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Engineering Staff

  • Soto MG, Adeli H (2019) Semi-active vibration control of smart isolated highway bridge structures using replicator dynamics. Eng Struct 186:536–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travassos XL, Avila SL, Ida N (2020) Artificial neural networks and machine learning techniques applied to ground penetrating radar: a review. Appl Comput Inform 17:296–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varghese V, Chikaraishi M, Urata J (2020) Deep learning in transport studies: a meta-analysis on the prediction accuracy. J Big Data Anal Transp 2:199–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yavuz F, Attanayake U, Aktan H (2017) Economic impact analysis of bridge construction. Transp Res Rec 2630:95–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zulifqar A, Cabieses M, Mikhail A, Khan N (2014) Design of a bridge inspection system (BIS) to reduce time and cost. George Mason University, Farifax

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, 1111 RELLIS Parkway, Bryan, TX, 77807, USA

    Xiaoqiang Kong & Jason Ryan Wallis

  2. Zachry Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M University, 3136 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77843-3136, USA

    Zihao Li & Yunlong Zhang

Authors
  1. Xiaoqiang Kong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zihao Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jason Ryan Wallis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yunlong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yunlong Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kong, X., Li, Z., Wallis, J.R. et al. Investigating Factors Influencing Deck Conditions of Concrete Bridge and Steel Bridge Using an Interpretable Machine Learning Framework. Data Sci. Transp. 5, 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42421-023-00064-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42421-023-00064-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation