Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical Study of the Effects of a Counterflow Jet on the Drag Reduction of a Blunt Body in a Hypersonic Flow

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A numerical investigation has been conducted for the drag reduction of a counterflow jet with a blunt body at Mach 6. The computational study was carried out by solving two-dimensional axisymmetric Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations. The Spalart–Allmaras one-equation turbulence model was used in this study. The jet flow of exit Mach number 2.86 interacts with the free stream and changes the single shock structure to a multiple shock structure. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of the stagnation pressure based on a parameter, the momentum parameter ratio (MPR), which can characterize the jet. The result shows that the flow field can be categorized as being in a long penetration mode (LPM) or short penetration mode (SPM) depending on the penetration length of the free-stream flow. In the LPM, under overexpanded jet conditions, the shock structure fluctuates continuously, so the flow field is unstable. On the other hand, in the SPM, the shock structure is nearly fixed, and the entire flow field is stable. For this reason, even if the penetration length of the flow field in the SPM is less than that in the LPM, the aerodynamic drag can be reduced by up to 40%. Therefore, it becomes clear that jet pressure conditions can significantly improve aerodynamic performance by reducing the drag applied to the blunt body.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson JD (2006) Hypersonic and high-temperature gas dynamics, 2nd edn. AIAA Education Series, Reston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Bodonoff SN, Vas LE (1959) Preliminary investigations of spiked bodies at hypersonic speeds. J Aerosp Sci 26:65–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Finley PJ (1966) The flow of a jet from a body opposing a supersonic free stream. J Fluid Mech 26:337–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lawrence D, Anthony M, Ellis J (1995) Experimental results on the feasibility of an aerospike for hypersonic missiles, vol 95. AIAA, Reno, p 737

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stephen AW, Timothy RM (1999) A base drag reduction experiment on the X-33 linear aerospike SR-71 experiment (LASRE) flight program, vol 99. AIAA, Reno, p 277

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gnemmi P, Srulijes J, Roussel K, Runne K (2001) Flow field around spike-tipped bodies for high attack angles at Mach 4.5. J Spacecr Rocket 40(5):622–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Feszty D, Badcock KJ, Richards BE (2004) Driving mechanisms of high-speed unsteady spiked body flows, Part 1: pulsation mode. AIAA J 42:95–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Panaras AG, Drikakis D (2009) High-speed unsteady flows and around spiked-blunt bodies. J Fluid Mech 632:69–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Perurena JB, Asma CO, Theunissen R (2009) Experimental investigation of liquid jet injection into Mach 6 hypersonic crossflow. Exp Fluids 46:403–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Aruna S, Anjalidevi SP (2012) Computational study on the influence of jet on reduction of drag over cone flare bodies in hypersonic turbulent flow. Procedia Eng 38:3635–3648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Benjamin M, Nelson HF, David WR (2001) Hypersonic drag and heat-transfer reduction using a forward-facing jet. J Aircraft 38(4):680–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shang JS, Hayes J, Wurtzler K, Strang W (2001) Jet-spike bifurcation in high speed flows. AIAA J 39(6):1159–1165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shang JS, Hayes J, Menart J (2002) Hypersonic flow over a blunt body with plasma injection. J Spacecr Rocket 39(3):367–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shang JS (2002) Plasma injection for hypersonic blunt-body drag reduction. AIAA J 40(6):1178–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chao YZ, Wen YJ (2012) A three-dimensional investigation on drag reduction of a supersonic spherical body with an opposing jet. J Aerosp Eng 228(2):163–177

    Google Scholar 

  16. Osuka T, Erdem E, Hasegawa N, Majima R, Tamba T, Yokota S, Sasoh A, Kontis K (2014) Laser energy deposition effectiveness on shock-wave boundary-layer interactions over cylinder-flare combinations. Phys Fluids 26(9):096103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chamberlain R, Dang A, McClure D (1999) Effect of exhaust chemistry on reaction jet control, vol 99. AIAA, Reno, p 0806

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ambrosio A, Wortman A (1962) Stagnation point shock detachment distance for flow around spheres and cylinders in air. J Aerosp Sci 29(7):875

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was conducted at the High-Speed Vehicle Research Center of KAIST with the support of the Defense Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA) and the Agency for Defense Development (ADD). This work was supported by the Advanced Research Center Program (NRF-2013R1A5A1073861) through the NRF Grant funded by the Korea Government (MSIP) contracted through Advanced Space Propulsion Research Center at Seoul National University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bok Jik Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoon, H., Lee, H.J., Lee, B.J. et al. Numerical Study of the Effects of a Counterflow Jet on the Drag Reduction of a Blunt Body in a Hypersonic Flow. Int. J. Aeronaut. Space Sci. 19, 828–835 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-018-0095-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-018-0095-2

Keywords

Navigation