Abstract
Supersonic parachutes are a critical element of planetary mission whose simple structure, light-weight characteristics together with high ratio of aerodynamic drag makes them the most suitable aerodynamic decelerators. The use of parachute in supersonic flow produces complex shock/shock and wake/shock interaction giving rise to dynamic pressure oscillations. The study of supersonic parachute is difficult, because parachute has very flexible structure which makes obtaining experimental pressure data difficult. In this study, a supersonic wind tunnel test using two rigid bodies is done. The wind tunnel test was done at Mach number 3 by varying the distance between the front and rear objects, and the distance of a bundle point which divides suspension lines and a riser. The analysis of Schlieren movies revealed shock wave oscillation which was repetitive and had large pressure variation. The pressure variation differed in each case of change in distance between the front and rear objects, and the change in distance between riser and the rear object. The causes of pressure oscillation are: interaction of wake caused by front object with the shock wave, fundamental harmonic vibration of suspension lines, interference between shock waves, and the boundary layer of suspension lines.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- \(d_\mathrm{{s}}\) :
-
Diameter of suspension lines and riser
- f :
-
Frequency
- l :
-
Length of suspension line
- L :
-
Distance between front and rear object
- \(L_\mathrm{{s}}\) :
-
Distance between the bundling point and the leading edge of rear object
- M :
-
Mach number
- n :
-
Mode number
- \(N_\mathrm{{s}}\) :
-
Number of suspension lines
- \(P_{0}\) :
-
Total pressure behind shock wave
- Re :
-
Reynolds number
- t :
-
Time
- T :
-
Tension
- \(\gamma \) :
-
Specific heat ratio
- \(\rho \) :
-
Linear density of suspension lines
- 1:
-
Before passing of shock wave
- 2:
-
After passing of shock wave
References
Sengupta A, Kelsch R, Roeder J, Wernet M, Witkowski A, Kandis M (2009) Supersonic performance of disk-gap-band parachutes constrained to a 0-degree trim angle. J Spacecr Rockets 46(6):285–302. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.41223
Karagiozis K, Kamakoti R, Cirak F, Pantano C (2011) A computational study of supersonic disk-gap-band parachutes using Large-Eddy simulation coupled to a structural membrane. J Fluids Struct 27(2):175–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2010.11.007
Cruz RJ, Lingard JS (2006) Aerodynamic decelerators for planetary exploration: past, present, and future. AIAA Paper 2006–6792: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-6792
Queen Eric M (2006) Mars science laboratory parachute simulation model. J Spacecr Rockets 43:374–377. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A11544b
Maru Y, Takayanagi H, Yamada K, Fujita K (2016) Wind tunnel testing of parachutes at transonic and supersonic speed’. In: The 47th annual symposium of the Japan society for aeronautical and space science, Tokyo, Japan, JSASS-2016-1004 (in Japanese)
Xue X, Koyama H, Nakamura Y, Wen C (2015) Effect of suspension line on flow field around a supersonic parachute. Aerosp Sci Technol 43:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2015.02.014
Sengupta A et al (2008) Results from the mars science laboratory parachute decelerator system supersonic qualification program. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Paper 1435-2008, March 2008. https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2008.4526284
Feszty D, Badcock JK, Richards EB (2004) Driving mechanisms of high-speed unsteady spiked body flows, part 1: pulsation mode. AIAA J 42(1):95–106. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.9034
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank ISAS, JAXA for providing us opportunities to use supersonic wind tunnel for conducting this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An earlier version of this paper was presented at APISAT 2017, Seoul, Korea, October 2017.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dahal, N., Fukiba, K., Mizuta, K. et al. Study of Pressure Oscillations in Supersonic Parachute. JASS 19, 24–31 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-018-0025-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-018-0025-3