Abstract
This paper proposes a guidance law which considers the constraints of seeker field-of-view (FOV) as well as the requirements on impact angle and time. The proposed guidance law is designed for a constant speed missile against a stationary target. The guidance law consists of two terms of acceleration commands. The first one is to achieve zero-miss distance and the desired impact angle, while the second is to meet the desired impact time. To consider the limits of FOV and lateral maneuver capability, a varying-gain approach is applied on the second term. Reduction of realizable impact times due to these limits is then analyzed by finding the longest course among the feasible ones. The performance of the proposed guidance law is demonstrated by numerical simulation for various engagement conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Xing M, Balakrishnan SN, Ohlmeyer EJ (2006) Guidance law design form missiles with reduced seeker field-of-view. In: Proceedings of the AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference, Keyston, Colorado, August 21–24. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-6085
Sang DK, Tahk MJ (2009) Guidance law switching logic considering the seeker’s field-of-view limits. J Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 223(8):1049–1058. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544100JAERO614
Park BG, Jeon BJ, Kim TH, Tahk MJ, Kim YH (2012) Composite guidance law for impact angle control of tactical missiles with passive seekers. In: Asia-Pacific international symposium on aerospace technology, Jeju, Korea, November 13–15
Ratnoo A (2016) Analysis of two-stage proportional navigation with heading constraints. J Guid Control Dyn 39(1):156–164. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001262
Kim TH, Park BG, Tahk MJ (2013) Bias-shaping method for biased proportional navigation with terminal-angle constraint. J Guid Control Dyn 36(6):1810–1816. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.59252
Tekin R, Erer KS (2015) Switched-gain guidance for impact angle control under physical constraints. J Guid Control Dyn 38(2):205–216. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000766
Erer KS, Tekin R, Özgören MK (2015) Look angle constraint impact angle control based on proportional navigation. In: AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference, AIAA SciTech Forum (AIAA 2015-0091). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2015-0091
Park BG, Kim TH, Tahk MJ (2013) Optimal impact angle control guidance law considering the seeker’s field-of-view limits. J Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 227(8):1347–1364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410012452367
Park BG, Kim TH, Tahk MJ (2016) Range-to-Go weighted optimal guidance with impact angle constraint and seeker’s look angle limits. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 52(3):1241–1256. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2016.150415
Wen Q, Xia Q, Weixia S (2015) A parameter design strategy for seeker’s field-of-view constraint in impact angle guidance. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 229(13):2389–2396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410015576237
Wang X, Zhang Y, Wu H (2016) Sliding mode control based impact angle control guidance considering the seekerxs field-of-view constraint. ISA Trans 61:49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2015.12.018
Tahk MJ, Shim SW, Hong SM, Lee CH, Choi HL Impact time control based on time-to-go prediction for sea-skimming anti-ship missiles. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst (submitted for publication)
Ryoo CK, Cho H, Tahk MJ (2005) Optimal guidance laws with terminal impact angle constraint. J Guid Control Dyn 28(4):724–732. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.8392
Dubins LE (1957) On curves of minimal length with a constraint on average curvature, and with prescribed initial and terminal positions and tangents. Am J Math 79(3):497–516. https://doi.org/10.2307/2372560
Acknowledgements
This work has been supported by Agency for Defense Development (ADD) and Defense Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA) under Grant 07-201-301-004.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shim, SW., Hong, SM., Moon, GH. et al. Impact Angle and Time Control Guidance Under Field-of-View Constraints and Maneuver Limits. JASS 19, 217–226 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-018-0004-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-018-0004-8