Abstract
Bullying, both traditional and cyber, has been associated with several negative outcomes for students, but when bystanders (such as peers or adults) intervene, bullying will often decrease or stop. Teachers are especially important adult bystanders because they are more likely than parents to witness or hear about bullying, especially bullying that occurs in the school setting, but previous research has shown that teachers often do not intervene. Applying the Bystander Intervention Model (notice the event, interpret as an emergency, accept responsibility, know what to do, and act) to bullying in schools may help us understand why teachers may or may not intervene. Via self-report, this study examined associations among affective empathy, perceived bullying seriousness, and each step of the Bystander Intervention Model in Bullying for both traditional bullying and cyber bullying among 150 elementary-high school teachers. Results indicate a positive association between affective empathy and engagement in each step of the Bystander Intervention Model for traditional bullying. Additionally, affective empathy was positively and significantly related to two of the steps (notice the event and take responsibility) for cyber bullying. There was also a positive association between perceived bullying seriousness for two steps of the model (notice the event and interpret as an emergency) for traditional bullying. Implications for teacher involvement in bullying prevention and intervention are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atlas, R. S., & Pepler, D. J. (1998). Observations of bullying in the classroom. The Journal of Educational Research, 92, 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220679809597580.
Batsche, G. M. (2002). Bullying. In G. G. Bear, K. M. Minke, & A. Thomas (Eds.), Children’s needs: II. Development, problems, and alternatives (pp. 171–180). National Association of School Psychologists: Bethesda.
Bauman, S., & Del Rio, A. (2006). Preservice teachers’ responses to bullying scenarios: comparing physical, verbal, and relational bullying. Journal of Education & Psychology, 98, 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.219.
Black, H., & Phillips, S. (1982). An intervention program for the development of empathy in student teachers. The Journal of Psychology, 112, 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1982.9915373.
Boulton, M. J., Hardcastle, K., Down, J., Fowles, J., & Simmonds, J. A. (2014). A comparison of preservice teachers’ responses to cyber versus traditional bullying scenarios similarities and differences and implications for practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 65, 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113511496.
Caravita, S., Di Blasio, P., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Unique and interactive effects of affective empathy and social status on involvement in bullying. Social Development, 18, 140–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00465.x.
Chen, L. M., Cheng, W., & Ho, H. C. (2013). Perceived severity of school bullying in elementary schools based on participants’ roles. Educational Psychologist, 35, 484–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.860220.
Darley, J. M., & Latané, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 377–383. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025589.
Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85–101.
Dedousis-Wallace, A., Shute, R., Varlow, M., Murrihy, R., & Kidman, T. (2013). Predictors of teacher intervention in indirect bullying at school and outcome of a professional development presentation for teachers. Educational Psychologist, 34, 862–875. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.785385.
Dempsey, A. G., Sulkowski, M. L., Dempsey, J., & Storch, E. A. (2011). Has cyber technology produced a new group of peer aggressors? Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14, 297–302. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0108.
Dinkes, R., Kemp, J., Baum, K., & Snyder, T. D. (2009). National Center for Education Statistics: Indicators of school crime and safety. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov
Dooley, J. J., Pyżalski, J., & Cross, D. (2009). Cyberbullying versus face-to-face bullying. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 217, 182–188. https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.182.
Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., Schroeder, D. A., & Penner, L. A. (2006). The social psychology of prosocial behavior. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315085241.
Ellis, A. A., & Shute, R. (2007). Teacher responses to bullying in relation to moral orientation and seriousness of bullying. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 649–663. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709906x163405.
Fekkes, M., Pijpers, F. I., & Verloove-Vanhorick, S. P. (2004). Bullying: Who does what, when and where? Involvement of children, teachers and parents in bullying behavior. Health education research, 20(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyg100.
Fischer, P., Krueger, J. I., Greitemeyer, T., Vogrincic, C., Kastenmüller, A., Frey, D., & Kainbacher, M. (2011). The bystander-effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and nondangerous emergencies. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 517–537. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023304.
Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoè, G. (2007). Does affective empathy predict adolescents’ bullying and defending behavior? Aggressive Behavior, 33, 467–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20204.
Giumetti, G. W., & Kowalski, R. M. (2016). Cyberbullying matters: examining the incremental impact of cyberbullying on outcomes over and above traditional bullying in North America. In Cyberbullying across the globe (pp. 117–130). Cham: Springer.
Gradinger, P., Strohmeier, D., & Spiel, C. (2009). Traditional bullying and cyberbullying. The Journal of Psychology, 217, 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.205.
Greitemeyer, T., Fischer, P., Kastenmüller, A., & Frey, D. (2006). Civil courage and helping behavior: differences and similarities. European Psychologist, 11, 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.11.2.90.
Hektner, J. M., & Swenson, C. A. (2012). Links from teacher beliefs to peer victimization and bystander intervention: tests of mediating processes. Journal of Early Adolescence, 32, 516–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431611402502.
Hertz, M. F., & David-Ferdon, C. (2011). Online aggression: a reflection of in-person victimization or a unique phenomenon? The Journal of Adolescent Health, 48, 119–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.11.255.
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2012). Cyberbullying: neither an epidemic nor a rarity. The European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 539–543.
Hymel, S., & Swearer, S. M. (2015). Four decades of research on school bullying: an introduction. The American Psychologist, 70, 293–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038928.
Jenkins, L., Fredrick, S. S., & Nickerson, A. (2018). The assessment of bystander intervention in bullying: examining measurement invariance across gender. Journal of School Psychology, 69, 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.05.008.
Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2013). Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 53, S13–S20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.09.018.
Kowalski, R. M., Morgan, C. A., & Limber, S. P. (2012). Traditional bullying as a potential warning sign of cyberbullying. School Psychology International, 33, 505–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034312445244.
Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1968). Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026570.
Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? New York: Appleton-Century-Croft.
Law, D. M., Shapka, J. D., Hymel, S., Olson, B. F., & Waterhouse, T. (2012). The changing face of bullying: an empirical comparison between traditional and internet bullying and victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.004.
Li, Q. (2007). New bottle but old wine: a research of cyberbullying in schools. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1777–1791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.10.005.
Li, Q. (2009). Cyberbullying in schools: an examination of preservice teachers’ perception. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 34, 375–390. https://doi.org/10.21432/T2DK5G.
Loewenstein, G., & Small, D. A. (2007). The scarecrow and the tin man: the vicissitudes of human sympathy and caring. Review of General Psychology, 11, 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.11.2.112.
Machackova, H., Dedkova, L., & Mezulanikova, K. (2015). Brief report: the bystander effect in cyberbullying incidents. Journal of Adolescence, 43, 96–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.05.010.
Machackova, H., Dedkova, L., Sevcikova, A., & Cerna, A. (2016). Empathic responses by cyberbystanders: the importance of proximity. Journal of Youth Studies, 6, 793–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2015.1112882.
Migliaccio, T. (2014). Teacher engagement with bullying: managing an identity within a school. Sociological Spectrum, 35, 84–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.2014.978430.
Mishna, F., Cook, C., Gadalla, T., Daciuk, J., & Solomon, S. (2010). Cyber bullying behaviors among middle and high school students. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 80, 362–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01040.x.
Modecki, K. L., Minchin, J., Harbaugh, A. G., Guerra, N. G., & Runions, K. C. (2014). Bullying prevalence across contexts: a meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 55, 602–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.06.007.
Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simons-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among US youth: prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. Jama, 285, 2094–2100.
Newman, J. B., Frey, K. S., & Jones, D. C. (2010). Factors influencing teacher interventions in bullying situations. Handbook of Youth Prevention Science. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203866412.ch11.
Nickerson, A. B., Mele, D., & Princiotta, D. (2008). Attachment and affective empathy as predictors of roles as defenders or outsiders in bullying interactions. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 687–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2008.06.002.
Nickerson, A. B., Aloe, A. M., Livingston, J. A., & Feeley, T. H. (2014). Measurement of the bystander intervention model for bullying and sexual harassment. Journal of Adolescence, 37, 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.03.003.
Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: what we know and what we can do. New York: Blackwell.
Patchin, W. J., & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: a preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4, 148–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204006286288.
Piaget, J. (1962). The stages of the intellectual development of the child. Bulletin of the Menninger clinic, 26(3), 120.
Pölyhönen, V., Juvonen, J., & Salmivalli, C. (2010). What does it take to stand up for the victim of bullying? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56, 142–163.
Pulos, S., Elison, J., & Lennon, R. (2004). The hierarchical structure of the interpersonal reactivity index. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 32, 355–359. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2004.32.4.355.
Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: a review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007.
Swearer, S., & Espelage, D. (2011). A social-ecological framework of bullying among youth in North American schools. New York: Routledge.
VanZoeren, S., Weisz, N., & A. (2018). Teachers’ perceived likelihood of intervening in bullying situations: individual characteristics and institutional environments. Journal of School Violence, 17, 258–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2017.1315307.
Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Huitsing, G., Sainio, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2014). The role of teachers in bullying: the relation between antibullying attitudes, efficacy, and efforts to reduce bullying. Journal of Education & Psychology, 106, 1135–1143. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036110.
Waasdorp, T. E., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2015). The overlap between cyberbullying and traditional bullying. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 56, 483–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.12.002.
Yoon, J. S. (2004). Predicting teacher interventions in bullying situations. Education and Treatment of Children, 27, 37–46.
Yoon, J., & Bauman, S. (2014). Teachers: a critical but overlooked component of bullying prevention and intervention. Theory Into Practice, 53, 308–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2014.947226.
Yoon, J., & Kerber, K. (2003). Bullying: elementary teachers’ attitudes and intervention strategies. Research in Education, 69, 27–35. https://doi.org/10.7227/rie.69.3.
Yoon, J., Bauman, S., Choi, T., & Hutchinson, A. S. (2011). How South Korean teachers handle an incident of school bullying. School Psychology International, 32(3), 312–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034311402311.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eldridge, M.A., Jenkins, L.N. The Bystander Intervention Model: Teacher Intervention in Traditional and Cyber Bullying. Int Journal of Bullying Prevention 2, 253–263 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-019-00033-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-019-00033-7