Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of barley genotypes for resistance against covered smut disease

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Indian Phytopathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) is one of the important cereal crops with a share of 7 per cent of the global cereals production. It ranks fourth after the major cereals wheat, rice, maize and has a special significance in Indian agriculture. Covered smut caused by (Ustilago hordei) (Pers.) Lagerheim is one of the biotic stresses limiting its production and productivity. It can cause quantitative and qualitative losses to the barley crop. Out of the total 83 genotypes screened for two consecutive years, 5 cultivars (HBL 113, HBL 391, HBL 316, DWRUB 92 and DWRUB 123) and 41 germplasm lines were highly resistant whereas two germplasm lines (BL 1656 and BL 1562) exhibited resistant reaction against Ustilago hordei. Rest of the genotypes were moderately susceptible to susceptible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Anonymous (2018-19) Package of practices for Rabi Crops. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, p 19

  • Atheya SC (1974) Barley varietal resistance to covered smut (Ustilago hordei) in Uttar Pardesh. Indian J Mycol PI Pathol 4:82

    Google Scholar 

  • Beniwal MS, Mehta SK (2007) Identification of resistant sources against covered smut in barley. Crop Res 33:218–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Yephet Y, Henis Y, Dinoor A (1975) Phytopathology 65:563–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal TS, Rossnagel BG, Scoles GJ (2006) Inheritance of resistance to covered smut in Barley. Can J Plant Sci 86:829–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal TS, Rossnagel BG, Scoles GJ (2008) Validation of molecular markers for covered smut resistance and marker-assisted introgression of loose andcovered smut resistance into hulless barley. Mol Breed 21:37–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henry CE, Gaines V, Bullock B, Schaefer RW (1987) Genetics of Ustilago hordei: fungicide ressiatnt mutants. Bot Gaz 148:25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leroux P, Berthier G (1988) Resistance to carboxin and fenfuram in Ustilago nuda (Jens.) Rostr, the causal agent of barely looses smut. Crop Prot 7:16–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz N, Klause S, Muller KJ, Spiess H (2006) Screening of winter barley varieties (Hordeum vulgare) for resisatnce against loose smut (Ustilago nuda) and covered smut (Ustilago hordei) in Germany. Czech J Genet Plant Breed 42:20–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey DP, Rathee VK, Sethi GS (2000) Screening of germplasm for multiple disease resistance. Crop Res 20:549–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma VK, Kaur A, Cheema BS, Rani R, Kaur J, Mohan C (2017) Development of inoculation method for resistance evaluation against covered smut of barley. Agric R J 54:369–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma RPS, Kharub AS, Kumar D, Sarkar B, Selvakumar R, Singh R, Malik R, Kumar R, Sharma I (2011) Fifty years of coordinated barley research in India. Directorate of Wheat Research, Karnal-132001. Research Bulletin No. 27: 46

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amrinder Kaur.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, J., Kaur, A. & Sharma, V.K. Evaluation of barley genotypes for resistance against covered smut disease. Indian Phytopathology 73, 359–360 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42360-020-00231-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42360-020-00231-0

Keywords

Navigation