Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation on the Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Capacity of Extracts from Crataegus azarolus L.: Effect of Growing Location of an Important Tunisian Medicinal Plant

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Chemistry Africa Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For the first time, the current study was designed to evaluate growing location on the chemical composition as well as the DPPH capacity of Crataegus azarolus L. (var. aronia (Willd.) Batt.) methanolic aqueous extracts. It was found that Crataegus azarolus L. collected from Neber (Governorate of Kef) had the highest total phenolic, flavonoids, condensed and hydrolysable tannin contents while the same genus growing in Jdidi (Governorate of Zaghouan) were characterized by the highest content of sugar (15.27 mg Gluc g−1 DW). Moreover, the plants contents’ in P, K, and Na was investigated. Accordingly, the genus origins have shown to highly affect their content in the former minerals. In vitro, antioxidant activity was also determined using DPPH radical and expressed as concentration of each extract in order to inhibit 50% of DPPH radicals. The obtained values ranged from 55.22 to 138.66 μg mL−1. From a nutritional and antioxidant point of view, Crataegus azarolus L. (var. aronia (Willd.) Batt.) can be considered as a valuable variety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

mg GAE.g−1 DW:

mg of gallic acid equivalent per 1 g of dry weight

mg QE.g−1 DW:

mg of quercetin equivalent per 1 g of dry weight

mg CE. g−1 DW:

mg catechin equivalents per g of dry weight

mg EAE.g−1 DW:

mg ellagic acid equivalents per g of dry weight

mg GlucE.g−1 DW:

mg of glucose equivalent per 1 g of dry weight

DW:

Dry weight

References

  1. Khiari S, Boussaid M, Messaoud C (2015) Biochem Syst Ecol 59:264–270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chang WT, Dao J, Shao ZH (2005) Am J Chin Med 33:1–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang B, Liu P (2012) J Sci Food Agric 92:1578–1590

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bahri-Sahloul R, Ammar S, Grec S, Harzallah-Skhiri F (2009) J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 84:23–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Belkhir M, Rebai O, Dhaouadi K, Sioud B, Amri M, Fattouch S (2013) Int J Food Prop 16:1380–1393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chu C, Lee M, Liao C, Lin W, Yin Y, Tseng T (2003) J Agric Food Chem. 51:7583–7588

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kao E, Wang C, Lin W, Yin Y, Wang C, Tseng T (2005) J Agric Food Chem 53:430–436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fan C, Yan J, Qian Y, Wo X, Gao L (2006) J Pharmacol Sci 100:51–58

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Daniele C, Mazzanti G, Pittler MH, Ernst E (2006) Drug Saf 29:523–535

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maie N, Behrens A, Knicker H, Kogel-Knabner I (2003) Soil Biol Biochem 35:577–589

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Singleton VL, Rossi JA (1965) Am J Enol Viticult 16:144–158

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rigane G, Ben Salem R, Sayadi S, Bouaziz M (2011) J Food Sci 76:965–973

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Saada M, Fallehh H, Jalleli I, Snoussi M, Ksouri R (2014) S Afr J Bot 94:114–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Albouchi A, Ghhrir R, El Aouni MH (1997) Ann For Sci 54:155–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nagata T, Ishida H, Shinohara H, Nishikawa S, Kasahara S, Wakano Y, Daigen S, Troullos ES (1994) J Clin Periodontol 21:217–221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pinta M, Bourdon B, Rousselet F (1980) Masson et Arston (Eds), Paris, 478p.

  17. Laurent L (1991) Tec& Doc(Ed), Paris, 987p.

  18. Bahorum T, Trotin F, Pommery J, Vasseur J, Pinkas M (1994) Planta Med 60:323–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cui N, Nakamura K, Tian S, Kayahara H, Tian Y (2006) Bio Biotech Biochem 70:2948–2956

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Svedström U, Vuorela H, Kostiainen R, Tuominen J, Kokkonen J, Rauha J, Laakso I, Hiltunen R (2002) Phytochem 60:821–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Svedström U, Vuorela H, Kostiainen R, Huovinen K, Laakso I, Hiltunen R (2002) J Chromatog A 968:51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rosa M, Prado C, Podazza G, Hilal M, Interdonato R et al (2009) Plant Signal Behav 4:388–393

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Edwards JE, Brown PN, Talent N, Dickinson TA, Shipley PR (2012) Phytochem 79:5–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Soetan KO, Olaiya CO, Oyewole OE (2010) Afr J Fd Sci 4:200–222

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Agarwal A, Khanna P, Baidya DK, Arora MK (2011) J Endocrinol Metab 1:57–63

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Tunisian Ministry of Agriculture and the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research for financial support and are grateful to Professor Mohamed Rigane for useful discussions about the English.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ghayth Rigane.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yahyaoui, A., Arfaoui, M.O., Rigane, G. et al. Investigation on the Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Capacity of Extracts from Crataegus azarolus L.: Effect of Growing Location of an Important Tunisian Medicinal Plant. Chemistry Africa 2, 361–365 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42250-019-00054-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42250-019-00054-1

Keywords

Navigation