Skip to main content
Log in

Projection-based 3D bioprinting for hydrogel scaffold manufacturing

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Bio-Design and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Liu N, Ye X, Yao B et al (2021) Advances in 3D bioprinting technology for cardiac tissue engineering and regeneration. Bioact Mater 6(5):1388–1401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.10.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee A, Hudson AR, Shiwarski DJ et al (2019) 3D bioprinting of collagen to rebuild components of the human heart. Science 365(6452):482–487. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav9051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Matai I, Kaur G, Seyedsalehi A et al (2020) Progress in 3D bioprinting technology for tissue/organ regenerative engineering. Biomaterials 226:119536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou J, Tian Z, Tian Q et al (2021) 3D bioprinting of a biomimetic meniscal scaffold for application in tissue engineering. Bioact Mater 6(6):1711–1726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.11.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sun Y, Yu K, Nie J et al (2020) Modeling the printability of photocuring and strength adjustable hydrogel bioink during projection based 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication 13(3):035032. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aba413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar H, Sakthivel K, Mohamed MGA et al (2020) Designing gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA)-based bioinks for visible light stereolithographic 3D biofabrication. Macromol Biosci 21(1):e2000317. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.202000317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fiedor P, Ortyl J (2020) A new approach to micromachining: high-precision and innovative additive manufacturing solutions based on photopolymerization technology. Materials 13(2951):2951. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13132951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huh JT, Moon YW, Park J et al (2021) Combinations of photoinitiator and UV absorber for cell-based digital light processing (DLP) bioprinting. Biofabrication 13(3):034103. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/abfd7a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yu K, Zhang XJ, Sun Y et al (2022) Printability during projection-based 3D bioprinting. Bioact Mater 11:254–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.09.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. U1909218, 81827804 and T2121004).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YH conceived the study; YS and KY contributed to methodology and investigation; YS helped in writing original draft; all the authors contributed to writing and editing; YH contributed to funding acquisition; QG provided resources; YH supervised the study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong He.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study does not contain any work related to human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, Y., Yu, K., Gao, Q. et al. Projection-based 3D bioprinting for hydrogel scaffold manufacturing. Bio-des. Manuf. 5, 633–639 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-022-00189-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-022-00189-0

Navigation