Skip to main content
Log in

Pressure fluctuation characteristics in the pressurization unit of a multiphase pump

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Hydrodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The tip clearance induces the tip leakage vortex (TLV), which has a great impact on the pressure fluctuation characteristics of the multiphase pump. To investigate the effect of the tip clearance on the pressure fluctuations, based on the Reynolds time-averaged Navier-Stokes equation and the shear stress transfer (SST) k - ω turbulence model, the three-dimensional turbulent flow in the pump is numerically simulated for different tip clearances in the water and gas-liquid two-phase cases by using the ANSYS CFX software and the results are verified with experimental data. It is shown the greater pressure fluctuation intensity corresponds with the TLV both in the water and gas-liquid two-phase cases. In the meantime, the location of the maximum pressure fluctuation intensity is related to the tip clearance size. In addition, for different tip clearances, the pressure fluctuation intensity with the rotor and stator interaction (RSI) is relatively larger. The difference is that when Rtc = 1.5 mm , the pressure fluctuation intensity near the impeller middle point is also relatively larger. On the whole, the pressure fluctuation intensity in the gas-liquid two-phase case is larger than that in the water case. Furthermore, the gas causes the frequency of the high-amplitude pressure fluctuation in the impeller and the diffuser to be shifted from 7 fn (fn denotes impeller rotational frequency) and 3 fn to the low-frequency region, respectively. The pressure fluctuations at the blade-passing frequency (BPF) and the multiple BPFs gradually disappear. Meanwhile, the amplitude at the dominant frequency in the gas-liquid two-phase case is at least one order of magnitude smaller than that in the water case, and the peak-to-peak value of the pressure fluctuation is also much smaller.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kim J., Lee, H., Yoon J. et al. Multi objective optimization of a multiphase pump for offshore plants [C]. Proceedings of the ASME 2014 4th Joint Us-European Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting, Chicago, IL, USA, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hu H., Li X. Gu B. Hydraulic Optimization of multiphase pump based on cfd and genetic algorithm [J]. International Journal of Grid Distribution Computing, 2015, 8: 161–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim J., Lee H., Kim J. et al. Improvement of hydrodynamic performance of a multiphase pump using design of experiment techniques [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2015, 137(8): 081301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu M., Cao S., Cao S. Numerical analysis for interphase forces of gas-liquid flow in a multiphase pump [J]. Engineering Computations, 2018, 35(6): 2386–2402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang W., Yu Z., Zahid M. et al. Study of the gas distribution in a multiphase rotodynamic pump based on interphase force analysis [J]. Energies, 2018, 11(5): 1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang Y., Zhang J., Zhu H. et al. 3D blade hydraulic design method of the rotodynamic multiphase pump impeller and performance research [J]. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2014, 6: 803972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shi Y., Zhu H., Yin B. et al. Numerical investigation of two-phase flow characteristics in multiphase pump with split vane impellers [J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2019, 33(4): 1651–1661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Suh J., Kim J., Choi Y. et al. A study on numerical optimization and performance verification of multiphase pump for offshore plant [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part A Journal of Power and Energy, 2017, 231(5): 382–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Suh J., Kim J., Choi Y. et al. Development of numerical Eulerian-Eulerian models for simulating multiphase pumps [J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2018, 162: 588–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang J., Tan L. Energy performance and pressure fluctuation of a multiphase pump with different gas volume fractions [J]. Energies, 2018, 11(5): 1216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang D., Shi W., van Esch B. P. M. (Bart) et al}. Numerical and experimental investigation of tip leakage vortex trajectory and dynamics in an axial flow pump [J]. Computers and Fluids, 2015, 112: 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xu Y., Cao S., Sano T. et al. Experimental investigation on transient pressure characteristics in a helico-axial multiphase pump [J]. Energies, 2019, 12(3):461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shi G., Liu Z., Xiao Y. et al. Effect of the inlet gas void fraction on the tip leakage vortex in a multiphase pump [J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 150: 46–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shi G., Liu Z., Xiao Y. et al. Tip leakage vortex trajectory and dynamics in a multiphase pump at off-design condition [J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 150: 703–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang W., Yu Z., Li Y. et al. Numerical analysis of pressure fluctuation in a multiphase rotodynamic pump with air-water two-phase flow [J]. Oil and Gas Science and Technology, 2019, 74: 18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang J., Fan H., Zhang W. et al. Energy performance and flow characteristics of a multiphase pump with different tip clearance sizes [J]. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 11(1): 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Feng J., Luo X., Guo P. et al. Influence of tip clearance on pressure fluctuations in an axial flow pump [J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2016, 30(4): 1603–1610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shen S., Qian Z., Ji B. et al. Numerical investigation of tip flow dynamics and main flow characteristics with varying tip clearance widths for an axial-flow pump [J], Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 2019, 233: 476–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu Y., Tan L., Hao Y. et al. Energy performance and flow patterns of a mixed-flow pump with different tip clearance sizes [J]. Energies, 2017, 10(2): 191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hao Y., Tan L., Liu Y. et al. Energy performance and radial force of a mixed-flow pump with symmetrical and unsymmetrical tip clearances [J]. Energies, 2017, 10(1): 57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang W., Yu Z., Zhu B. Numerical study of pressure fluctuation in a gas- liquid two-phase mixed-flow pump [J]. Energies, 2017, 10(5): 634.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang L., Lu J., Liao W. et al. Numerical simulation of the tip leakage vortex characteristics in a semi-open centrifugal pump [J]. Applied Sciences, 2019, 9(23): 5244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ayad A., Farid A. M., El-Azm A. Effect of semi-open impeller side clearance on the centrifugal pump performance using CFD [J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2015, 47: 247–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zheng L., Chen X., Zhang W. et al. Investigation on characteristics of pressure fluctuation in a centrifugal pump with clearance flow [J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2020, 34: 3657–3666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Huan Y. Y., Liu Y. Y., Li X. J. et al. Experimental and numerical investigations of cavitation evolution in a high-speed centrifugal pump with inducer [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2021, 33(1): 140–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Han C. Z., Xu S., Cheng H. Y. et al. LES method of the tip clearance vortex cavitation in a propelling pump with special emphasis on the cavitation-vortex interaction [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2020, 32(6): 1212–1216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jung J., Joo W. Effect of tip clearance, winglets, and shroud height on the tip leakage in axial flow fans [J]. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2018, 93: 195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Syed N., Shafiq R., Malik M. et al. Effect of tip clearance and rotor-stator axial gap on the efficiency of a multistage compressor [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 99: 988–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Taghavi-Zenouz R., Eslami S. Numerical simulation of unsteady tip clearance flow in an isolated axial compressor rotor blades row [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2012, 226(1): 82–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Central Leading Place Scientific and Technological Development Funds for Surface Project (Grant No. 2021ZYD0038), the Open Research Fund Program of State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University (Grant No. sklhse-2021-E-03) and the Key Scientific Research Fund of Xihua University (Grant No. Z1510417).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guang-tai Shi.

Additional information

Projects supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFB0905200)

Biography

Guang-tai Shi (1985-), Male, Ph. D., Associate Professor

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shi, Gt., Liu, Zk., Xiao, Yx. et al. Pressure fluctuation characteristics in the pressurization unit of a multiphase pump. J Hydrodyn 33, 1230–1241 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-022-0108-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-022-0108-2

Key words

Navigation