Abstract
Balancing time and cost has long been a primary focus of construction project management. In this context, achieving optimal balancing time and cost objectives is crucial. The multi-verse optimizer (MVO) has emerged as a promising stochastic optimization algorithm in this field, as it efficiently explores and exploits the search space. This study proposes the MVO model as a new tool to address time–cost optimization problems (TCOPs). To evaluate MVO's performance, three benchmark test problems were used, each comprising 18 activities. The findings suggest that MVO outperforms other stochastic optimization techniques in terms of effectiveness when applied to small-scale TCOPs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The corresponding author can provide the data, model, or code that underlie the findings of study upon request, subject to reasonable conditions.
References
Abdel-Raheem, M., & Khalafallah, A. (2011). Using electimize to solve the time-cost-tradeoff problem in construction engineering. Computing in Civil Engineering Proceedings, 250(257), 2011.
Afshar, A., et al. (2009). Nondominated archiving multicolony ant algorithm in time–cost trade-off optimization. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(7), 668–674.
Albayrak, G. (2020). Novel hybrid method in time–cost trade-off for resource-constrained construction projects. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 44(4), 1295–1307.
Aminbakhsh, S., & Sonmez, R. (2016). Discrete particle swarm optimization method for the large-scale discrete time–cost trade-off problem. Expert Systems with Applications, 51, 177–185.
Aminbakhsh, S., & Sonmez, R. (2017). Pareto front particle swarm optimizer for discrete time-cost trade-off problem. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 31(1), 04016040.
Ashuri, B., & Tavakolan, M. (2015). Shuffled frog-leaping model for solving time-cost-resource optimization problems in construction project planning. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 29(1), 04014026.
Bettemir, Ö. H., & Talat Birgönül, M. (2017). Network analysis algorithm for the solution of discrete time-cost trade-off problem. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering., 21(4), 1047–1058.
Boussaïd, I., Lepagnot, J., & Siarry, P. (2013). A survey on optimization metaheuristics. Information Sciences, 237, 82–117.
Chen, P.-H., & Weng, H. (2009). A two-phase GA model for resource-constrained project scheduling. Automation in Construction, 18(4), 485–498.
Eirgash, M. A., Toğan, V., & Dede, T. (2019). A multi-objective decision making model based on TLBO for the time-cost trade-off problems. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 71(2), 139–151.
Elbeltagi, E., Hegazy, T., & Grierson, D. (2005). Comparison among five evolutionary-based optimization algorithms. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 19(1), 43–53.
Elbeltagi, E., Hegazy, T., & Grierson, D. (2007). A modified shuffled frog-leaping optimization algorithm: Applications to project management. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 3(1), 53–60.
Eshtehardian, E., Afshar, A., & Abbasnia, R. (2008). Time–cost optimization: Using GA and fuzzy sets theory for uncertainties in cost. Construction Management and Economics, 26(7), 679–691.
Feng, C.-W., Liu, L., & Burns, S. A. (1997). Using genetic algorithms to solve construction time-cost trade-off problems. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 11(3), 184–189.
Hegazy, T. (1999). Optimization of construction time-cost trade-off analysis using genetic algorithms. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 26(6), 685–697.
Kalhor, E., et al. (2011). Stochastic time–cost optimization using non-dominated archiving ant colony approach. Automation in Construction, 20(8), 1193–1203.
Kaveh, A. (2014). Advances in metaheuristic algorithms for optimal design of structures. Springer.
Kaveh, A., et al. (2015). CBO and CSS algorithms for resource allocation and time-cost trade-off. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 59(3), 361–371.
Kaveh, A., & Ilchi Ghazaan, M. (2020). A new VPS-based algorithm for multi-objective optimization problems. Engineering with Computers, 36, 1029–1040.
Kaveh, A., & Laknejadi, K. (2011). A novel hybrid charge system search and particle swarm optimization method for multi-objective optimization. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(12), 15475–15488.
Kaveh, A., & Laknejadi, K. (2013). A hybrid evolutionary graph-based multi-objective algorithm for layout optimization of truss structures. Acta Mechanica, 224(2), 343–364.
Kaveh, A., & Mahdavi, V. R. (2019). Multi-objective colliding bodies optimization algorithm for design of trusses. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 6(1), 49–59.
Mirjalili, S., Mirjalili, S. M., & Hatamlou, A. (2016). Multi-verse optimizer: A nature-inspired algorithm for global optimization. Neural Computing and Applications, 27(2), 495–513.
Naseri, H., & Ghasbeh, M. A. E. (2018). Time-cost trade off to compensate delay of project using genetic algorithm and linear programming. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 9(6), 285–290.
Ng, S. T., & Zhang, Y. (2008). Optimizing construction time and cost using ant colony optimization approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(9), 721–728.
Pham, V. H. S., & Nguyen, V. N. (2023). Cement transport vehicle routing with a hybrid sine cosine optimization algorithm. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2023, 2728039.
Son, P. V. H., & Khoi, T. T. (2020). Development of Africa Wild Dog Optimization Algorithm for optimize freight coordination for decreasing greenhouse gases. InICSCEA 2019 (pp. 881–889). Springer.
Son, P. V. H., & Nguyen Dang, N. T. (2023). Solving large-scale discrete time–cost trade-off problem using hybrid multi-verse optimizer model. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 1987.
Sonmez, R., & Bettemir, Ö. H. (2012). A hybrid genetic algorithm for the discrete time–cost trade-off problem. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(13), 11428–11434.
Toğan, V., & Eirgash, M. A. (2019). Time-cost trade-off optimization of construction projects using teaching learning based optimization. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 23(1), 10–20.
Yang, I.-T. (2007). Using elitist particle swarm optimization to facilitate bicriterion time-cost trade-off analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(7), 498–505.
Zhang, H., & Xing, F. (2010). Fuzzy-multi-objective particle swarm optimization for time–cost–quality tradeoff in construction. Automation in Construction, 19(8), 1067–1075.
Zhang, Y., & Thomas Ng, S. (2012). An ant colony system based decision support system for construction time-cost optimization. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 18(4), 580–589.
Zheng, D. X., Ng, S. T., & Kumaraswamy, M. M. (2005). Applying Pareto ranking and niche formation to genetic algorithm-based multiobjective time–cost optimization. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(1), 81–91.
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our gratitude to Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT), VNU-HCM, for their provision of time and resources in support of this study.
Funding
No specific funding was received for this research from any public, commercial, or not-for-profit sector grant agencies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors collectively composed the main manuscript, generated all figures and tables, and thoroughly reviewed the revisions prior to submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Son, P.V.H., Nguyen Dang, N.T. Optimizing time and cost simultaneously in projects with multi-verse optimizer. Asian J Civ Eng 24, 2443–2449 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00652-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00652-y