Skip to main content
Log in

Optimizing time and cost simultaneously in projects with multi-verse optimizer

  • Research
  • Published:
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Balancing time and cost has long been a primary focus of construction project management. In this context, achieving optimal balancing time and cost objectives is crucial. The multi-verse optimizer (MVO) has emerged as a promising stochastic optimization algorithm in this field, as it efficiently explores and exploits the search space. This study proposes the MVO model as a new tool to address time–cost optimization problems (TCOPs). To evaluate MVO's performance, three benchmark test problems were used, each comprising 18 activities. The findings suggest that MVO outperforms other stochastic optimization techniques in terms of effectiveness when applied to small-scale TCOPs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The corresponding author can provide the data, model, or code that underlie the findings of study upon request, subject to reasonable conditions.

References

  • Abdel-Raheem, M., & Khalafallah, A. (2011). Using electimize to solve the time-cost-tradeoff problem in construction engineering. Computing in Civil Engineering Proceedings, 250(257), 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Afshar, A., et al. (2009). Nondominated archiving multicolony ant algorithm in time–cost trade-off optimization. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(7), 668–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albayrak, G. (2020). Novel hybrid method in time–cost trade-off for resource-constrained construction projects. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 44(4), 1295–1307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aminbakhsh, S., & Sonmez, R. (2016). Discrete particle swarm optimization method for the large-scale discrete time–cost trade-off problem. Expert Systems with Applications, 51, 177–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aminbakhsh, S., & Sonmez, R. (2017). Pareto front particle swarm optimizer for discrete time-cost trade-off problem. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 31(1), 04016040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashuri, B., & Tavakolan, M. (2015). Shuffled frog-leaping model for solving time-cost-resource optimization problems in construction project planning. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 29(1), 04014026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettemir, Ö. H., & Talat Birgönül, M. (2017). Network analysis algorithm for the solution of discrete time-cost trade-off problem. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering., 21(4), 1047–1058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boussaïd, I., Lepagnot, J., & Siarry, P. (2013). A survey on optimization metaheuristics. Information Sciences, 237, 82–117.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, P.-H., & Weng, H. (2009). A two-phase GA model for resource-constrained project scheduling. Automation in Construction, 18(4), 485–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eirgash, M. A., Toğan, V., & Dede, T. (2019). A multi-objective decision making model based on TLBO for the time-cost trade-off problems. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 71(2), 139–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbeltagi, E., Hegazy, T., & Grierson, D. (2005). Comparison among five evolutionary-based optimization algorithms. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 19(1), 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbeltagi, E., Hegazy, T., & Grierson, D. (2007). A modified shuffled frog-leaping optimization algorithm: Applications to project management. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 3(1), 53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eshtehardian, E., Afshar, A., & Abbasnia, R. (2008). Time–cost optimization: Using GA and fuzzy sets theory for uncertainties in cost. Construction Management and Economics, 26(7), 679–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, C.-W., Liu, L., & Burns, S. A. (1997). Using genetic algorithms to solve construction time-cost trade-off problems. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 11(3), 184–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegazy, T. (1999). Optimization of construction time-cost trade-off analysis using genetic algorithms. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 26(6), 685–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalhor, E., et al. (2011). Stochastic time–cost optimization using non-dominated archiving ant colony approach. Automation in Construction, 20(8), 1193–1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A. (2014). Advances in metaheuristic algorithms for optimal design of structures. Springer.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., et al. (2015). CBO and CSS algorithms for resource allocation and time-cost trade-off. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 59(3), 361–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., & Ilchi Ghazaan, M. (2020). A new VPS-based algorithm for multi-objective optimization problems. Engineering with Computers, 36, 1029–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., & Laknejadi, K. (2011). A novel hybrid charge system search and particle swarm optimization method for multi-objective optimization. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(12), 15475–15488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., & Laknejadi, K. (2013). A hybrid evolutionary graph-based multi-objective algorithm for layout optimization of truss structures. Acta Mechanica, 224(2), 343–364.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., & Mahdavi, V. R. (2019). Multi-objective colliding bodies optimization algorithm for design of trusses. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 6(1), 49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirjalili, S., Mirjalili, S. M., & Hatamlou, A. (2016). Multi-verse optimizer: A nature-inspired algorithm for global optimization. Neural Computing and Applications, 27(2), 495–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naseri, H., & Ghasbeh, M. A. E. (2018). Time-cost trade off to compensate delay of project using genetic algorithm and linear programming. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 9(6), 285–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, S. T., & Zhang, Y. (2008). Optimizing construction time and cost using ant colony optimization approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(9), 721–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pham, V. H. S., & Nguyen, V. N. (2023). Cement transport vehicle routing with a hybrid sine cosine optimization algorithm. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2023, 2728039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Son, P. V. H., & Khoi, T. T. (2020). Development of Africa Wild Dog Optimization Algorithm for optimize freight coordination for decreasing greenhouse gases. InICSCEA 2019 (pp. 881–889). Springer.

  • Son, P. V. H., & Nguyen Dang, N. T. (2023). Solving large-scale discrete time–cost trade-off problem using hybrid multi-verse optimizer model. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonmez, R., & Bettemir, Ö. H. (2012). A hybrid genetic algorithm for the discrete time–cost trade-off problem. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(13), 11428–11434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toğan, V., & Eirgash, M. A. (2019). Time-cost trade-off optimization of construction projects using teaching learning based optimization. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 23(1), 10–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, I.-T. (2007). Using elitist particle swarm optimization to facilitate bicriterion time-cost trade-off analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(7), 498–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H., & Xing, F. (2010). Fuzzy-multi-objective particle swarm optimization for time–cost–quality tradeoff in construction. Automation in Construction, 19(8), 1067–1075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., & Thomas Ng, S. (2012). An ant colony system based decision support system for construction time-cost optimization. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 18(4), 580–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, D. X., Ng, S. T., & Kumaraswamy, M. M. (2005). Applying Pareto ranking and niche formation to genetic algorithm-based multiobjective time–cost optimization. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(1), 81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT), VNU-HCM, for their provision of time and resources in support of this study.

Funding

No specific funding was received for this research from any public, commercial, or not-for-profit sector grant agencies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The authors collectively composed the main manuscript, generated all figures and tables, and thoroughly reviewed the revisions prior to submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nghiep Trinh Nguyen Dang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Son, P.V.H., Nguyen Dang, N.T. Optimizing time and cost simultaneously in projects with multi-verse optimizer. Asian J Civ Eng 24, 2443–2449 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00652-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00652-y

Keywords

Navigation