Abstract
Construction projects need to be effectively managed to prevent conflicts and problems between the constructor, users, and the environment, and this requires considering the principles of eco-friendliness, especially for housing projects. This study was, therefore, conducted to set priorities to improve the performance of housing construction project management using the green building principle initiated in 2013 as a benchmark for the Greenship assessment for new buildings by the Green Building Council of Indonesia. The Importance Performance Analysis was applied to measure the level of user interest and satisfaction on the performance of constructors in constructing housing projects. The results showed technical factors of construction management are dominant in evaluating constructor’s performance. The users expect their houses to be constructed on time according to planned and agreed schedules. Moreover, the factors associated with green building-based performance include reusable and recyclable building materials (mean score of satisfaction level = 3.682 and interest level = 3.882), availability of facilities for people with disabilities (mean score of satisfaction level = 3.420 and interest level = 3.874), eco-friendly materials and construction (mean score of satisfaction level = 3.634 and interest level = 3.840), friendly design and materials for people with disabilities, infants, seniors, and pregnant women (mean score of satisfaction level = 3.704 and interest level = 3.832), and the use of solar energy (mean score of satisfaction level = 3.688 and interest level = 3.825). This, therefore, means the green building is considered important by the users during the construction and implementation processes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Source: Sedayu 2016)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abualrejal, H., Udin, Z.M., & Mohtar, S. (2017). Green building toward construction sustainability: energy efficiency with material and design aspects. Journal of Technology and Operations Management, Special Issue (May) 2017, 100–109. Retrieved : https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/jtom/article/view/9498
Agrawal, A., & Halder, S. (2020). Identifying factors affecting construction labour productivity in India and measures to improve productivity. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 21, 569–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-019-00212-3.
Ahn, Y. H., Jung, C. W., Suh, M., & Jeon, M. H. (2016). Integrated construction process for green building. Procedia Engineering, 145(2016), 670–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.065.
Anggraeni, L.K. (2017). Kajian penerapan ergonomi dalam perancangan bangunan sekolah dasar, studi kasus SDN Bubutan IV Surabaya. Journal Desain Interior, 2(1):43–53. https://doi.org/10.12962/j12345678.v2i1.2378
Ayun, S. Q., & Rachmaniyah, N. (2017). Aplikasi konsep Islami nuansa Turki Utsmaniyah pada interior madrasah Mambaul Hasan Al-Misbah Paiton Probolinggo. Journal Sains dan Seni ITS, 6(2), 378–383. https://doi.org/10.12962/j23373520.v6i2.27404.
Badawy, M. (2020). A hybrid approach for a cost estimate of residential buildings in Egypt at the early stage. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 21, 763–774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-020-00237-z.
Chandra, M. S., Nandapala, K., Weerasinghe, K. A. B., Priyadarshana, G., Liyanarathne, B. L. S. W., & Halwatura, R. U. (2020). An engineering approach towards the traditional beliefs in house construction. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 21, 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-019-00215-0.
Green Building Council of Indonesia (GBCI). (2013). Greenship Rating Tools. Divisi Rating dan Teknologi : Green Building Council of Indonesia. Retrieved : www.gbcindonesia.org
Hambali, H. (2016). Pembangunan gedung sekolah dan ruang kelas baru di Kabupaten Seluma pasca pemekaran. Manajer Pendidikan, 10(1), 20–28. Retrieved : https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/index.php/manajerpendidikan/article/view/1229
Haron, N. A., Devi, P., Hassim, S., Alias, S. A. H., Tahir, M. M., & Harun, A. N. (2017). Project management practice and its effects on project success in Malaysian construction industry. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 291, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/291/1/012008.
Hwang, B. G., Zhu, L., Wang, Y., & Cheong, X. (2017). Green building construction projects in Singapore: Cost premiums and cost performance. Project Management Journal, 48(4), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697281704800406.
Hwang, B. G., Shan, M., & Phuah, S. L. (2018). Safety in green building construction projects in Singapore: Performance, critical Issues, and improvement solutions. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 22(2), 447–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-1961-3.
Khan, J. S., Zakaria, R., Shamsudin, S. M., Abidin, N. I. A., Sahamir, S. R., Abbas, D. N., et al. (2019). Evolution to emergence of green buildings: A review. Administrative Sciences, 9(6), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9010006.
Khodadadzadeh, T. (2016). Green building project management: Obstacles and solutions for sustainable development. Journal of Project Management, 1(2016), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.jpm.2017.1.003.
Kim, J. J., Goodwin, C. W., & Kim, S. (2017). Communication turns green construction planning into reality. Journal of Green Building, 12(1), 168–186. https://doi.org/10.3992/1552-6100.12.1.168.
Kinneging, T., Graaf, R. D., Siebelink, S., & Dijck, T. V. (2020). The documentation of design decisions in engineering projects: A study in infrastructure development. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 8(1), 44–64. https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm080103.
Kiswati, S., & Chasanah, U. (2019). Analisis konsultan manajemen konstruksi terhadap penerapan manajemen waktu pada pembangunan rumah sakit di Jawa Tengah. NeoTeknika: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi, 5(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.37760/neoteknika.v5i1.1367
Kusumawardani, R.P., Suryasari, N., & Antariksa, A. (2016). Komponen pada elemen fasade masjid Agung Jami' Malang Periode 1910, 1940, dan 2016. Jurnal Mahasiswa Jurusan Arsitektur, 4(4), 1–7. Retrieved : https://arsitektur.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/jma/article/view/290
Ogbeifun, E. (2018). Performance management as a tool for performance improvement in the management of built facilities. Journal of Construction Project Management and Innovation, 8(2), 1852–1871. Persistent Link : https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-13434974f4
Oguntona, O. A., Akinradewo, O. I., Ramorwalo, D. L., Aigbavboa, C. O., & Thwala, W. D. (2019). Benefits and drivers of implementing green building projects In South Africa. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1378(032038), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1378/3/032038.
Rahi, K. (2019). Project resilience: a conceptual framework. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 7(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm070104.
Ryan, T. P. (2013). Sample size determination and power. New Jersey: Wiley.
Sedayu, A. (2016). Evaluasi kinerja green building pondok pesantren. Prosiding Temu Ilmiah IPLBI 2016, ITN Malang, Indonesia, 11–18. Retrieved : https://temuilmiah.iplbi.or.id/evaluasi-kinerja-green-building-pondok-pesantren/
Sedayu, A. (2017). Project evaluation based on sharia construction management and green building principles. IPTEKS Journal of proceeding series, ITS Surabaya, Indonesia, 556–567. https://doi.org/10.12962/j23546026.y2017i6.3304
Sedayu, A., & Mangkoedihardjo, S. (2019). Housing project performance evaluation with review sharia construction management. Current World Environment, 14(2), 239–244. https://doi.org/10.12944/CWE.14.2.08
Sim, Y. L., & Putuhena, F. J. (2015). Green building technology initiatives to achieve construction quality and environmental sustainability in the construction industry in Malaysia. Management of Environmental Quality, 26(2), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-08-2013-0093.
Simpeh, E.K., & Smallwood, J.J. (2018). Analysis of the benefits of green building in South Africa. Journal of Construction Project Management and Innovation, 8(2), 1829–1851. Persistent Link : https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-134344c1c5
Smit, A.M., & du Toit, F. (2015). Investigating the financial benefits of green buildings. Environmental Economics, 6(3), 61–71. Retrieved : https://businessperspectives.org/images/pdf/applications/publishing/templates/article/assets/6804/ee_2015_03_Smit.pdf
Sugiyono, S. (2009). Statistika untuk penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sun, C.Y., Chen, Y.G., Wang, R.J., Lo, S.C., Yau, J.T., & Wu, Y.W. (2019). Construction cost of green building certified residence: A case study in Taiwan. Sustainability, Vol.11, No.2195. DOI : 10.3390/su11082195
Tsegaye, M. (2019). Efficient procedure to scheduling construction projects at the planning phase. Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management, 2019(7), 60–80. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjreecm-2019-0004.
Yudha, A.E.P, & Setiyowati, E. (2016). Mualaf center design as an implementation of psychological and economical effect for mualaf in Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Architecture, 4(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.18860/jia.v4i1.3466
Zian, O.B., Fam, S.F., Liang, C., Wahjono, S.I., & YingYing, T., (2019). A critical research of green building assessment systems in Malaysia context. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(12S2), 778–785. 10.35940/ijitee.L1134.10812S219
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sedayu, A., Setiono, A.R., Subaqin, A. et al. Improving the performance of construction project using green building principles. Asian J Civ Eng 21, 1443–1452 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-020-00289-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-020-00289-1