Key Summary Points
To determine the reliability and validity of the timed 360° turn test in people with Parkinson’s Disease (PwPD).
AbstractSection FindingsThe timed 360° turn test was found to have excellent intrarater, interrater, and test–retest reliability, and was correlated with functional mobility, functional and dynamic balance, motor symptoms, and severity and stage of the disease in Parkinson’s Disease (PD). The time taken to complete 360° turn was found to well discriminate PwPD from healthy people and fallers from non-fallers with PD.
AbstractSection MessageThe timed 360° turn test is a clinically available measurement tool for assessing turning ability and predicting both physical performance and PD-specific impairments in PD.
Abstract
Purpose
The objectives of this study were to examine (1) the intrarater, interrater, and test–retest reliability of the timed 360° turn test in people with Parkinson’s Disease (PwPD); (2) the minimum detectable change in the timed 360° turn test times; (3) the concurrent and discriminant validity of the timed 360° turn test; (4) the cut-off times which best discriminate PwPD from healthy people and fallers from non-fallers with Parkinson’s Disease (PD).
Methods
Fifty-four PwPD and 32 healthy people were included. The timed 360° turn test was administered along with Timed Up and Go Test, Berg Balance Scale, Four Square Step Test, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale, and Hoehn and Yahr Scale. In addition, PwPD were categorized into fallers and non-fallers based on fall history. Reliability analyses were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients in a subgroup of 38 PwPD.
Results
The timed 360° turn test had excellent intrarater, interrater, and test–retest reliability. It was strongly correlated with other outcome measures (p < 0.001). In both sides, significant differences in the timed 360° turn test times were found between PwPD and healthy people and between fallers and non-fallers with PD (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). The timed 360° turn test times of 3.76–3.89 s were found to best discriminate PwPD from healthy people, while 5.46–5.74 s were found to best discriminate fallers from non-fallers with PD. The minimum detectable change in the timed 360° turn test times were 1.98 s for dominant side and 1.48 s for non-dominant side in PwPD.
Conclusions
The timed 360° turn test is a reliable, valid, and clinically available tool for assessing turning ability in PwPD.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Meissner WG, Frasier M, Gasser T, Goetz CG, Lozano A et al (2011) Priorities in Parkinson’s disease research. Nat Rev Drug Discov 10:377–393
Kim SD, Allen NE, Canning CG, Fung VS (2013) Postural instability in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Epidemiology, pathophysiology and management. CNS Drugs 27:97–112
Allen NE, Schwarzel AK, Canning CG (2013) Recurrent falls in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review. Parkinson’s Dis 2013:906274
Idjadi JA, Aharonoff GB, Su H, Richmond J, Egol KA et al (2005) Hip fracture outcomes in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead, NJ) 34:341–346
Canning CG, Paul SS, Nieuwboer A (2014) Prevention of falls in Parkinson’s disease: a review of fall risk factors and the role of physical interventions. Neurodegener Dis Manag 4:203–221
Paul SS, Harvey L, Canning CG, Boufous S, Lord SR et al (2017) Fall-related hospitalization in people with Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Neurol 24:523–529
Spottke AE, Reuter M, Machat O, Bornschein B, von Campenhausen S et al (2005) Cost of illness and its predictors for Parkinson’s disease in Germany. Pharmacoeconomics 23:817–836
Jones CA, Martin WW, Wieler M, King-Jesso P, Voaklander DC (2012) Incidence and mortality of Parkinson’s disease in older Canadians. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 18:327–331
Glaister BC, Bernatz GC, Klute GK, Orendurff MS (2007) Video task analysis of turning during activities of daily living. Gait Posture 25:289–294
Crenna P, Carpinella I, Rabuffetti M, Calabrese E, Mazzoleni P et al (2007) The association between impaired turning and normal straight walking in Parkinson’s disease. Gait Posture 26:172–178
Stack E, Ashburn A (1999) Fall events described by people with Parkinson’s disease: implications for clinical interviewing and the research agenda. Physiother Res Int 4:190–200
Stack EL, Asburn AM, Jupp KE (1994) Strategies used by people with Parkinson’s disease who report difficulty turning. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 12:87–92
Hulbert S, Ashburn A, Robert L, Verheyden G (2015) A narrative review of turning deficits in people with Parkinson’s disease. Disabil Rehab 37:1382–1389
Morris ME, Huxham F, McGinley J, Dodd K, Iansek R (2001) The biomechanics and motor control of gait in Parkinson’s disease. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 16:459–470
Stack E, Ashburn A (2008) Dysfunctional turning in Parkinson’s disease. Disabil Rehab 30:1222–1229
Mellone S, Mancini M, King LA, Horak FB, Chiari L (2016) The quality of turning in Parkinson’s disease: a compensatory strategy to prevent postural instability? J Neuroeng Rehabil 13:39
Huxham F, Baker R, Morris ME, Iansek R (2008) Head and trunk rotation during walking turns in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 23:1391–1397
Visser JE, Voermans NC, Nijhuis LBO, van der Eijk M, Nijk R et al (2007) Quantification of trunk rotations during turning and walking in Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neurophysiol 118:1602–1606
Sofuwa O, Nieuwboer A, Desloovere K, Willems AM, Chavret F et al (2005) Quantitative gait analysis in Parkinson’s disease: comparison with a healthy control group. Arc Phys Med Rehabil 86:1007–1013
Schaafsma JD, Balash Y, Gurevich T, Bartels AL, Hausdorff JM et al (2003) Characterization of freezing of gait subtypes and the response of each to levodopa in Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Neurol 10:391–398
Podsiadlo D, Richardson S (1991) The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 39:142–148
Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee SL, Williams JI, Gayton D (1989) Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument. Physiother Can 41:304–311
Gill TM, Williams CS, Tinetti ME (1995) Assessing risk for the onset of functional dependence among older adults: the role of physical performance. J Am Geriatr Soc 43:603–609
Schenkman M, Cutson TM, Kuchibhatla M, Chandler J, Pieper C (1997) Reliability of impairment and physical performance measures for persons with Parkinson’s disease. Phys Ther 77:19–27
Shiu CH, Ng SS, Kwong PW, Liu TW, Tam EW et al (2016) Timed 360° turn test for assessing people with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 97:536–544
Lexell JE, Downham DY (2005) How to assess the reliability of measurement in rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 84:719–723
Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ (1992) Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. A clinicopathological study of 100 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 55:181–184
Hoehn MM, Yahr MD (1967) Parkinsonism: onset, progression, and mortality. Neurology 17:427–442
Mathias S, Nayak US, Isaacs B (1986) Balance in elderly patients: the” get-up and go” test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 67:387–389
Huang SL, Hsieh CL, Wu RM, Tai CH, Lin CH et al (2011) Minimal detectable change of the timed “up & go” test and the dynamic gait index in people with Parkinson disease. Phys Ther 91:114–121
Verheyden G, Kampshoff CS, Burnett ME, Cashell J, Martinelli L et al (2014) Psychometric properties of 3 functional mobility tests for people with Parkinson disease. Phys Ther 94:230–239
Schlenstedt C, Brombacher S, Hartwigsen G, Weisser B, Möller B et al (2015) Comparing the Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale with the Mini-BESTest and Berg Balance Scale to assess postural control in patients with Parkinson disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 96:218–225
Dite W, Temple VA (2002) A clinical test of stepping and change of direction to identify multiple falling older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83:1566–1571
Duncan RP, Earhart GM (2013) Four square step test performance in people with Parkinson disease. J Neurol Phys Ther 37:2–8
Movement Disorder Society Task Force on Rating Scales for Parkinson’s Disease (2003) The Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS): status and recommendations. Mov Disord 18:738–750
Finlayson ML, Peterson EW, Cho CC (2006) Risk factors for falling among people aged 45 to 90 years with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87:1274–1279
Portney LG, Watkins MP (2009) Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice, 3rd edn. Pearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Domholdt E (2005) Rehabilitation research: principles and applications, 3rd edn. Elsevier Saunders, St Louis
Fan J, Upadhye S, Worster A (2006) Understanding receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. CJEM 8:19–20
Altman DG, Bland JM (1994) Diagnostic tests 2: predictive values. BMJ 309:102
Revicki D, Hays RD, Cella D, Sloan J (2007) Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcome. J Clin Epidemiol 61:102–109
Kloos AD, Fritz NE, Kostyk SK, Young GS, Kegelmeyer DA (2014) Clinimetric properties of the Tinetti Mobility Test, Four Square Step Test, Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale, and spatiotemporal gait measures in individuals with Huntington’s disease. Gait Posture 40:647–651
Goldberg A, Schepens S (2011) Measurement error and minimum detectable change in 4-meter gait speed in older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res 23:406–412
Son M, Youm C, Cheon S, Kim J, Lee M et al (2017) Evaluation of the turning characteristics according to the severity of Parkinson disease during the timed up and go test. Aging Clin Exp Res 29:1191–1199
Cheng FY, Yang YR, Wang CJ, Wu YR, Cheng SJ et al (2014) Factors influencing turning and its relationship with falls in individuals with Parkinson’s disease. PLoS ONE 9:e93572
Schenkman M, Ellis T, Christiansen C, Barón AE, Tickle-Degnen L et al (2011) Profile of functional limitations and task performance among people with early-and middle-stage Parkinson disease. Phys Ther 91:1339–1354
Jessop RT, Horowicz C, Dibble LE (2006) Motor learning and Parkinson disease: refinement of movement velocity and endpoint excursion in a limits of stability balance task. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 20:459–467
Yang YR, Lee YY, Cheng SJ, Lin PY, Wang RY (2008) Relationships between gait and dynamic balance in early Parkinson’s disease. Gait Posture 27:611–615
Snijders AH, Haaxma CA, Hagen YJ, Munneke M, Bloem BR (2012) Freezer or non-freezer: clinical assessment of freezing of gait. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 18:149–154
Kumar R, Indrayan A (2011) Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve for medical researchers. Indian Pediatr 48:277–287
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Research Committee (Gazi University Clinical Research Ethics Committee, Ethical number: 441 at date 2018-06-11) and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Soke, F., Guclu-Gunduz, A., Ozkan, T. et al. Reliability and validity of the timed 360° turn test in people with Parkinson’s disease. Eur Geriatr Med 11, 417–426 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-019-00285-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-019-00285-y