Abstract
Categorizing an act as ‘violence’, ‘resistance’, ‘defense’ or ‘punishment’ depends on the context within which the act occurs. Concerned with the context of violence, this study adopts a pragmatic approach to focus on the techniques ISIS uses to project participants involved in the context of violence, in corpora representing the Arabic and English ISIS discourses in 2014 and 2015. FrameNet is employed to identify the typical participants in the violence contexts/frames. Results show that the projection of participants in violent events systematically varies according to the addressed society ISIS targets. ISIS depends on priming historical conflicts to urge hostile encounter against socio-linguistically and historically diverse enemies. Addressing the Arab world in which the Shia/Sunni conflict is central, ISIS wages the war mainly against Safawi armies. However, the ISIS English discourse basically activates the Crusader/Muslim war. Overall, four expandable designations are constantly used to label any ISIS enemy: ‘crusader’ for Christian enemies; ‘Murtadd’ for Sunni Muslim opponents; ‘Safawi’ for Shia adversaries and ‘Kuffar/disbelievers’ for religiously undefined groups.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbasi, A. (2007, May). Affect intensity analysis of dark web forums. In 2007 IEEE Intelligence and Security Informatics (pp. 282–288). IEEE.
Arosoaie, A. (2017). In the name of honour and freedom: The sacred as a justifying tool for ISIS’and secular violence. Culture and Religion, 18(3), 278–295.
Arts, T., Belinkov, Y., Habash, N., Kilgarriff, A., & Suchomel, V. (2014). arTenTen: Arabic corpus and word sketches. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 26(4), 357–371.
Atkins, S., Fillmore, C., & Johnson, C. (2003a). Lexicographic relevance: Selecting information from corpus evidence. International Journal of Lexicography, 16(3), 251–280.
Atkins, S., Rundell, M., & Sato, H. (2003b). The contribution of FrameNet to practical lexicography. International Journal of Lexicography, 16(3), 333–357.
Baker, P., & Vessey, R. (2018). A corpus-driven comparison of English and French Islamist extremist texts. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 23(3), 255–278.
Bakker, E., & Singleton, M. (2016). Foreign fighters in the Syria and Iraq conflict: Statistics and characteristics of a rapidly growing phenomenon. In Foreign Fighters under International Law and Beyond (pp. 9–25). The Hague: TMC Asser Press.
Bertoldi, A., & Chishman, R. (2011, August). Developing a frame-based lexicon for the Brazilian legal language: The case of the criminal_process frame. In International Workshop on AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems, pp. 256–270.
Colas, B. (2017). What does Dabiq do? ISIS hermeneutics and organizational fractures within Dabiq magazine. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 40(3), 173–190.
Colvin, S. (2009). Ulrike Meinhof and West German terrorism: Language, violence, and identity. Rochester, NY: Camden House.
De Marcken, C. G. (1990, June). Parsing the LOB corpus. In Proceedings of the 28th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 243–251). Association for Computational Linguistics.
Doosje, B., Moghaddam, F., Kruglanski, A., De Wolf, A., Mann, L., & Feddes, A. (2016). Terrorism, radicalization and de-radicalization. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 79–84.
Dutton, G. (2007). The psychology of genocide, massacres, and extreme violence: Why “normal” people come to commit atrocities. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Fillmore, C. (1975). An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. In Proceedings of the first annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 123–131.
Fillmore, C., & Baker, C. (2011). A frames approach to semantic analysis. In The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (pp. 313–340). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fillmore, C., Petruck, M., Ruppenhofer, J., & Wright, A. (2003). FrameNet in action: The case of attaching. International Journal of Lexicography, 16(3), 297–332.
Fisman, R., & Miguel, E. (2010). Economic gangsters: Corruption, violence, and the poverty of nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Galtung, J. (1990). Cultural violence. Journal of Peace Research, 27(3), 291–305.
Garver, N. (1968). What violence is. The Nation, 209(24), 819–822. Online.
Geen, R. G. (2001). Human aggression. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Ghajar-Khosravi, S., Kwantes, P., Derbentseva, N., & Huey, L. (2016). Quantifying salient concepts discussed in social media content: An analysis of Tweets posted by ISIS Fangirls. Journal of Terrorism Research, 7(2), 79–90.
Gildea, D., & Jurafsky, D. (2002). Automatic labeling of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics, 28(3), 245–288.
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69–119.
Haykel, B. (2016). ISIS and al-Qaeda—What are they thinking? Understanding the adversary. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 668(1), 71–81.
Herbst, P., & Herbst, R. (2003). Talking terrorism: A dictionary of the loaded language of political violence. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Ingram, H. J. (2017). Learning from ISIS’s virtual propaganda war for Western Muslims: A comparison of Inspire and Dabiq. In M. Conway, L. Jarvis, & O. Lehane (Eds.), Terrorists’ use of the Internet: Assessment and response (pp. 136–170). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Khan, A., & Estrada, M. A. R. (2016). The effects of terrorism on economic performance: The case of Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS). Quality & Quantity, 50(4), 1645–1661.
Laqueur, W., & Wall, C. (2018). The future of terrorism: ISIS, Al-Qaeda, and the Alt-Right. New York: Thomas Dunne Books.
Lowe, W. (2015). http://yoshikoder.sourceforge.net/ykconverter/index.html.
Macnair, L., & Frank, R. (2018). The mediums and the messages: Exploring the language of Islamic State media through sentiment analysis. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 11, 438–457.
Mahood, S., & Rane, H. (2017). Islamist narratives in ISIS recruitment propaganda. The Journal of International Communication, 23(1), 15–35.
McCauley, C., & Moskalenko, S. (2017). Understanding political radicalization: The two-pyramids model. American Psychologist, 72(3), 205.
Motz, A. (2016). The psychology of female violence: Crimes against the body. London: Routledge.
Nimmer, L. (2011). De-contextualization in the terrorism discourse: A social constructionist view. KVÜÕA Toimetised, 14, 223–240.
Novenario, C. M. I. (2016). Differentiating Al Qaeda and the Islamic State through strategies publicized in Jihadist magazines. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 39(11), 953–967.
O’Donnell, M. (2008, April). The UAM CorpusTool: Software for corpus annotation and exploration. In Proceedings of the XXVI Congreso de AESLA (pp. 3–5). Almeria Spain.
Pennebaker, J. (2011). Using computer analyses to identify language style and aggressive intent: The secret life of function words. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, 4(2), 92–102.
Perelberg, R. (2005). Psychoanalytic understanding of violence and suicide. London: Psychology Press.
Ruppenhofer, J., Ellsworth, M., Petruck, M. R., Johnson, C. R., & Scheffczyk, J. (2016). FrameNet II: Extended theory and practice. Berkeley: Online Library.
Schmidt, B., & Schröder, I. (2001). Anthropology of violence and conflict. London: Psychology Press.
Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2016). Strangers, trust, and religion: On the vulnerability of being alive. Human Studies, 39(2), 167–187.
Steindal, M. (2016). ISIS totalitarian ideology and discourse: An analysis of the Dabiq Magazine discourse. Master’s thesis, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås.
Stephan, M. (2015). Civil resistance vs ISIS. Journal of Resistance Studies, 1(2), 127–150.
Turner, C. (2013). Islam without Allah?: The rise of religious externalism in Safavid Iran. Routledge.
Volavka, J. (2008). Neurobiology of violence. New York: American Psychiatric Pub.
Welch, T. (2018). Theology, heroism, justice, and fear: An analysis of ISIS propaganda magazines Dabiq and Rumiyah. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, 11(3), 186–198.
Welss, M., & Hassan, H. (2016). ISIS inside the Army of Terror. New York: Regan Arts.
Wignell, P., O’Halloran, K. L., Tan, S., Lange, R., & Chai, K. (2018). Image and text relations in ISIS materials and the new relations established through recontextualisation in online media. Discourse & Communication, 12, 535–559.
Wignell, P., Tan, S., O’Halloran, K. L., & Lange, R. (2017). A mixed methods empirical examination of changes in emphasis and style in the extremist magazines Dabiq and Rumiyah. Perspectives on Terrorism, 11(2), 2–20.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their useful comments on the earlier draft of this article. I would also like to thank Miss Megan E. Wagy and Dr Tyler J. True, Northern Arizona University, for the esthetic work they did by proofreading this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abdelzaher, E.M. The Systematic Adaptation of Violence Contexts in the ISIS Discourse: A Contrastive Corpus-Based Study. Corpus Pragmatics 3, 173–203 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-019-00055-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-019-00055-y