Skip to main content
Log in

Methods to Assess the Value of New Technologies: the Case of Consumer Sentiment Towards Digital Wallet Technology

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Data-Enabled Discovery and Applications

Abstract

New technologies and scientific findings are typically announced in peer-reviewed scholarly journals which seldom assess the economic or social consequences of the technology, even though this may be important in motivating funding for future extensions and commercial applications of the research. This paper describes new methodologies that have become available with the advent of social network data and computationally intensive statistical methods to ascertain the value of new technologies. It provides an example application of two methodologies to answer basic questions in a specific industry, regarding the dynamic processes governing IP protection, innovation law, market structure and evolution, and rates or entry and exit. It also proposes a third affective technology for revealing true consumer sentiment and discusses risks and controls of collecting such affective data, which is commercially important in areas such as film and television review, food and beverage consumption, and in general arenas that display strong non-verbal or emotive characteristics, which would be likely subjects for data acquisition. Our application collected 449,145 Twitter postings on consumer perceptions of digital wallet payment systems and collected all available information on patents in the US Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO) databases on digital wallet technologies. Automated lexical analysis was programmed and applied to individual tweets to extract consumer sentiment concerning specific technologies in the USPTO database, and assessed using customized econometric methods. The application of methodologies in this topic area can provide guidance for using newly available datasets to assess the potential economic value and consumer acceptance of new technologies arising out of the laboratory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Y. Anwar, Scientists map brain’s thesaurus to help decode inner thoughts (2016), http://news.berkeley.edu/2016/04/27/brain-thesaurus/. 27 Apr 2016

  2. L. Berchicci, Towards an open R&D system: internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance. Res Policy 42(1), 117–127 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. W. Boucsein, Electrodermal activity (Plenum Pub Corp, New York, 1992)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Cincera, R. Veugelers, Differences in the rates of return to R&D for European and US young leading R&D firms. Res Policy 43(8), 1413–1421 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. X. Ding, B. Liu, P. S. Yu, A holistic lexicon-based approach to opinion mining. Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM (2008)

  6. U. Doraszelski, J. Jaumandreu, R&D and productivity: estimating endogenous productivity. Rev. Econ. Stud. rdt011, (2013)

  7. C. Féré, The pathology of emotions: physiological and clinical studies. (1920)

  8. D.C. Fowles, in Psychophysiology, ed. by M. G. H. Coles, E. Donchin, S. W. Porges. The eccrine system and electrodermal activity (Guilford Press, New York, 1986), pp. 51–96

    Google Scholar 

  9. D.C.Fowles, M.J. Christie, R. Edelberg, W.W. Grings, D.T. Lykken, P.H. Venables, Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements. Psychophysiology 18(3), 232–239 (1981)

  10. B.H. Hall, F. Lotti, J. Mairesse, Evidence on the impact of R&D and ICT investment on innovation and productivity in Italian firms. Econ Innov New Technol 22(3), 300–328 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D. Hinchcliffe, The state of Web 2.0. Web Serv. J. Retrieved 2006-08-06 (2006)

  12. C. M. Lewis, Y. Tan, Debt-equity choices, R&D investment and market timing. J. Financ. Econ. (2016)

  13. B. Liu, Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies 5(1), 1–167 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. W.M. Marston, The lie detector test (Richard R. Smith, New York, 1938)

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Mendonca, Brave old world: accounting for ‘high-tech’ knowledge in ‘low-tech’ industries. Res Policy 38(3), 470–482 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. R. Ortega-Argiles, L. Potters, M. Vivarelli, R&D and productivity: testing sectoral peculiarities using micro data. Empir Econ 41(3), 817–839 (2011). doi:10.1007/s00181-010-0406-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. C.J. Patrick, W.G. Iacono, Validity of the control question polygraph test: the problem of sampling bias. J Appl Psychol 76(2), 229–238 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. C.H. Wang, Y.H. Lu, C.W. Huang, J.Y. Lee, R&D, productivity, and market value: an empirical study from high-technology firms. Omega 41(1), 143–155 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. W. Wundt, Principles of physiological psychology, Translated by Edward Bradford Titchener (1904) (1902), http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Wundt/Physio/

  20. Y. Yamamoto, Measurement and analysis of skin electrical impedance. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl 185, 34–38 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  21. V.A. Zeithaml, L.L. Berry, A. Parasuraman, The behavioral consequences of service quality. J Mark 60, 31–46 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. M. Edwin. Entry, Gibrat's law, innovation, and the growth of firms. The American economic review. 1023–1051 (1962)

  23. I. William G., D. T. Lykken. The validity of the lie detector: Two surveys of scientific opinion. J Appl Psychol 82.3 426 (1997)

  24. F. Don C., R. Roberts, K.E. Nagel. The influence of introversion/extraversion on the skin conductance response to stress and stimulus intensity. J Res Pers 11.2 (1977): 129–146

  25. Edelberg, Muller, 1977; The status of the electrodermal recovery measure. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society For Psychophysiological Research, Philadelphia (1977)

  26. T. Graham, F. Schaefer, W. Boucsein. Effects of stimulus intensity, risetime, and duration on autonomic and behavioral responding: Implications for the differentiation of orienting, startle, and defense responses. Psychophysiology 36.4 453–463 (1999)

  27. G. José A. Sympathetic skin response. J Clin Neurophysiol 11.5 519–524 (1994)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Christopher Westland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Westland, J.C. Methods to Assess the Value of New Technologies: the Case of Consumer Sentiment Towards Digital Wallet Technology. Data-Enabled Discov. Appl. 1, 2 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41688-017-0003-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41688-017-0003-0

Keywords

Navigation