Abstract
This paper sheds new light on the characteristics of urbanisation in China, which commenced as a comprehensive social–economic plan in 2014, from the perspective of ‘spatial urbanisation’ and ‘institutional urbanisation’. The paper argues that urbanisation in China comprises not merely ‘spatial urbanisation’, i.e., the concentration of population in certain areas as has been commonly observed in developed countries, but also ‘institutional urbanisation’ in which the institutional barrier has remained in situ to prevent migrants from becoming urban citizens and to suspend true urbanisation. To obtain clear picture of two kinds of urbanisation, the paper conducted the simulation analysis using input–output model. This econometric analysis indicates that ‘spatial urbanisation’ will boost the manufacturing sector, leading to economic growth, while ‘institutional urbanisation’ will cause a structural change towards a service-based economy, which could result in the so-called ‘middle-income trap’ being avoided. Nevertheless, the advancement of ‘institutional urbanisation’ is extremely costly rather than ‘spatial urbanisation’.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The term ‘middle-income trap’ was first defined in Gill and Kharas (2007). It means that a middle-income country cannot become a high-income country unless it can find other sources of growth as low-wage labour, the previous main source of development, disappears.
This ‘new human-centred style of urbanisation’ intends to remove the strong restrictions on movement into small and medium cities, but still emphasises the control of the number of migrants by the level of contribution to large cities. Friedman (2017) refers to it as ‘just-in-time (JIT) urbanisation’ in that China promotes economic growth efficiently by expelling uneducated worker from large cities and drawing the appropriate and required labour force there.
Figure 3 illustrates the linier relation but the non-linier relation could match better if the economy of agglomeration works.
It is represented as the so-called Environmental Kuznets Curb (inverted U shape). But it is still a debatable issue whether this hypothesis can be applied to the case of China.
97% of capital formation are created in cities. Therefore, 1086.9 billion yuan out of 1120.5 billion yuan in investment is increased by 1% urbanisation.
References
Chan KW (1994) Cities with invisible walls: reinterpreting urbanization in post-1949 China. Oxford University Press, Hong Kong
Chan KW (2009) The Chinese Hukou System at 50. Eurasian Geogr Econ 50(2):197–221
Chan KW, Wan G (2017) The size distribution and growth pattern of cities in China, 1982–2010: analysis and policy implications. J Asia Pac Econ 22(1):136–155
China Development Research Foundation (CDRF) (2013) China’s new urbanization strategy. Routledge, New York
Dan Q (2013) Research on the cost and sharing mechanism of civilianizing migrant workers (nong min gong shi min hua de cheng ben ji qi fen dan ji zhi yan jiu)’. China City Development Report—Shift of Population from Agriculture (City Blue Book), vol 6. Social Science Publisher, Beijing (in Chinese)
Duan R, Ang H (2009) A quantitative analysis of the relationship between urbanization and economic growth in China. Inq Econ Issues 3:26–30 (in Chinese)
Friedman E (2017) Just-in-time urbanization? Managing migration, citizenship, and schooling in the Chinese city. Crit Sociol. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920517695867
Gill I, Kharas H et al (2007) An East Asian renaissance: ideas for economic growth. World Bank, Washington, DC. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/6798
Glaeser E (2011) Triumph of the city. Macmillan, London
Guo B, Cheng G (2013) An empirical study on the relationship between urbanization level, trade liberalization and economic growth. J Int Trade 4:18–26 (in Chinese)
Kojima R (1987) Urbanization and urban problems in China. IDE occasional papers series 22. Institute of Developing Economies, Tokyo
Li Z (2004) China’s limited urbanization: under socialism and beyond. Nova Science, New York
Lu M, Wan G (2014) ‘Urbanization and urban systems in the People’s Republic of China: research findings and policy recommendations. J Econ Surv 28(4):671–685
Miller RE, Blair PD (2009) Input–output analysis: foundations and extensions, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York
National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) (2015) 2012 Input–output tables of China. China Statistics Press, Beijing
National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) (2016) China statistical yearbook 2016. China Statistics Press, Beijing
Okamoto N (2014a) Control of mega city in China—background and measurement (Chugoku Dai-Toshika no Yokusei—Haikei to Shudan). East Asia (TOA) 562:4–5 (in Japanese)
Okamoto N (2014b) Is repressing city size rational? City size distribution in China (Chugoku no Toshi System—Toshikibo wo Yokuseisuru Noha Gouritekika?). ERINA Rep 121:3–11 (in Japanese)
Okamoto N (2014c) The evaluation of new type urbanisation: can China pay the bill for urbanisation? (Shingata Toshika Seisaku No Hyoka—Chugoku Ha Toshika No Hiyo Wo Makanaerunoka?). East Asia (Toa) 569:32–53 (in Japanese)
Okamoto N (2017) What matters in the urbanization of China? New Asian Econ Rev 5(2):1–13
Tan Y, Xu H, Zhang X (2016) Sustainable urbanization in China: a comprehensive literature review. Cities 55:82–93
The Research Group of Development Research Center for State Council (DRC) (2011) Civilianizing the rural migrants (Nong min gong shi min hua: zhi du chuang xin yu ding ceng zheng ce she ji). China Development Publisher, Beijing (in Chinese)
Tsinghua University Research Group (2012) ‘Middle-income trap’ or ‘Transition trap’? (Joint research by the Social Development Research Center of the Kai Feng Development Research Institute at Tsinghua University and the Social Development Task Group of the Sociology Department at Tsinghua University) Kaifang Shidai (The Era of Opening Up), no. 3
UN-Habitat (2016) World cities report 2016: urbanization and development—emerging futures. UN-Habitat, Nairobi. http://unhabitat.org/books/world-cities-report/
Wallace J (2014) Cities and stability: urbanization, redistribution, and regime survival in China. University of Cambridge Press, New York
Wang W, Wei H, Zhang J (2014) New type urbanisation and unification of urban and rural area. China Workers Publication House, Beijing (in Chinese)
World Bank and Development Research Center of the State Council (2013) China 2030: building a modern, harmonious, and creative high-income society. World Bank, Washington, DC. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/12925
World Bank and Development Research Center of the State Council (2014) Urban China: toward efficient, inclusive and sustainable urbanization, conference edition. World Bank Report, Washington, DC. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/18865
Yao Y, Guo J (2010) A study on the causal relationship between urbanization and economic growth in China: based on panel data of east, middle and west, northeast China from 1978 to 2007. Hum Geogr 25(6):42–48 (in Chinese)
Yusuf S, Saich A (2008) China urbanizes: consequences, strategies, and policies. The World Bank, Washington, DC
Funding
This study was funded by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant number JP15K06261 and JP16K02002).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.
Informed consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Okamoto, N. Spatial and institutional urbanisation in China. Asia-Pac J Reg Sci 3, 863–886 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41685-019-00113-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41685-019-00113-y