Abstract
Microalgal gasification produces synthesis gas (syngas), liquid products (e.g., tar), and solid carbon (e.g., char). However, at the current state, the viability of the process is yet to be established. One of the ways to achieve that is by understanding the fundamental of microalgal gasification. This could be done by optimizing the process conditions via modeling. Therefore, this study models the microalgal gasification process and further optimizes its process conditions. The modeling work was carried out using Aspen Plus V8.8 software, where thermodynamics equilibrium and kinetics approaches were used in the calculations of Chlorella vulgaris gasification. The study was done by modeling the gasifier in three stages: drying, pyrolysis, and gasification. The model was developed using proximate and ultimate analysis data of Chlorella vulgaris. The parameters were temperature (600–1000 °C), equivalence ratio (ER) 0.1–0.4, and mass flow rate of biomass (10–100 kg/h). The syngas yields of H2, CO, CO2, and CH4 were determined and the findings were compared with the literature and some deviations of the predicted syngas compositions were presented. It was found that consistent results of syngas composition and yield were obtained between the model and the experiments. The root mean square error (RMSE) values for the effect of temperature were 0.242, 0.294, 0.228, and 0.062 for H2, CO, CO2, and CH4, respectively. Meanwhile, for the effect of loading, the values were 0.083, 0.064, 0.362, and 0.479 for H2, CO, CO2, and CH4, respectively. The optimization of the gasification from sensitivity analysis results showed that the increment of temperature favored the H2 and CO production, and the increased in biomass loading favored H2 and CH4 production. Meanwhile, the increment of ER value resulted in increasing the CO2 yield. Based on the findings, a slight deviation in the simulation results was observed compared with the experimental work. This might be resulted from the limitation of the Aspen Plus V8.8 software where some parameters need to be set as a constant value, which in this study was the heating rate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdelouahed L, Authier O, Mauviel G, et al (2012) Detailed modeling of biomass gasification in dual fluidized bed reactors under Aspen Plus. Energy Fuel 26:3840–3855
Adeyemi I, Janajreh I (2015) Modeling of the entrained flow gasification: kinetics-based ASPEN. Plus Model 82:77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.073
Aspentech (2013) Getting started modeling processes with solids. Aspen Technology, Inc, Bedford
Begum S, Rasul MG, Akbar D, Ramzan N (2013) Performance analysis of an integrated fixed bed gasifier model for different biomass feedstocks. Energies 6:6508–6524. https://doi.org/10.3390/en6126508
Brennan L, Owende P (2010) Biofuels from microalgae-a review of technologies for production, processing, and extractions of biofuels and co-products. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14:557–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.009
Caputo AC, Palumbo M, Ã PMP, Scacchia F (2005) Economics of biomass energy utilization in combustion and gasification plants: effects of logistic variables. J Supercrit Fluids 28:35–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.04.009
Chakraborty S, Aggarwal V, Mukherjee D, Andras K (2012) Biomass to biofuel: a review on production technology. Asia-Pacific J Chem Eng 7:S254–S262. https://doi.org/10.1002/apj.1642
Cheng J, Huang R, Yu T, Li T, Zhou J, Cen K (2014) Bioresource Technology Biodiesel production from lipids in wet microalgae with microwave irradiation and bio-crude production from algal residue through hydrothermal liquefaction. Bioresour Technol 151:415–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.10.033
Doherty W, Reynolds A, Kennedy D (2013) Aspen Plus simulation of biomass gasification in a steam blown dual fluidised bed. In: Méndez-Vilas A (ed) Materials and processes for energy: communicating current research and technological developments. Formatex Research Centre, Madrid, p 212–220
Huang G, Chen F, Wei D, Zhang XW, Chen G (2010) Biodiesel production by microalgal biotechnology. Appl Energy 87:38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.06.016
Kaushal P, Tyagi R (2017) Advanced simulation of biomass gasification in a fluidized bed reactor using ASPEN PLUS. Renew Energy 101:629–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.09.011
Keche AJ, Prasad A, Gaddale R (2014) Simulation of biomass gasification in downdraft gasifier for different biomass fuels using ASPEN PLUS. Clean Techn Env Policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0804-x
McKendry P (2002) Energy production from biomass (part 2): conversion technologies. Bioresour Technol 83:47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00119-5
Mikulandrić R, Lončar D, Böhning D, Böhme R (2013) Biomass gasification process modelling approaches. In: Proceedings of the 13th European International Conference on Polygeneration Strategies, Vienna, Austria, p 1–13
Nikoo MB, Mahinpey N (2008) Simulation of biomass gasification in fluidized bed reactor using Aspen Plus. Biomass Bioenergy 32:1245–1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.02.020
Puig-arnavat M, Bruno JC, Coronas A (2010) Review and analysis of biomass gasification models. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14:2841–2851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.030
Raheem A, Azlina WAKGW, Tau YH, Danquah MK (2015a) Thermochemical conversion of microalgal biomass for biofuel production. Renew Sust Energ Rev 49:990–999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.186
Raheem A, Sivasangar S, Wan Azlina WAKG, Taufiq Yap YH, Danquah MK, Harun R (2015b) Thermogravimetric study of Chlorella vulgaris for syngas production. Algal Res 12:52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2015.08.003
Raheem A, WA WAKG, Taufiq Yap YH et al (2015c) Optimization of the microalgae Chlorella vulgaris for syngas production using central composite design. RSC Adv 5:71805–71815. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA10503J
Ramzan N, Ashraf A, Naveed S, Malik A (2011) Simulation of hybrid biomass gasification using Aspen plus : a comparative performance analysis for food , municipal solid and poultry waste. Biomass Bioenergy 35:3962–3969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.06.005
Sanchez-Silva L, López-González D, Garcia-Minguillan AM, Valvrde JL (2013) Pyrolysis, combustion and gasification characteristics of Nannochloropsis gaditana microalgae. Bioresour Technol 130:321–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.12.002
Spath P, Aden A, Eggeman T, et al (2005) Biomass to hydrogen production detailed design and economics utilizing the Battelle Columbus heated gasifier (NREL/TP-510-37408). National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO
Suwatthikul A, Limprachaya S, Kittisupakorn P, Mujtaba I (2017) Simulation of steam gasification in a fluidized bed reactor with energy self-sufficient condition. Energies 10:314. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10030314
Taqvi SA, Uddin F, Ld T et al (2015) Aspen Plus ® simulation of a coal gasification process ( geometric analysis ). Chem Eng Process Technol 6. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7048.1000264
Visconti A, Miccio M, Juchelkova D (2015) An aspen plus tool for simulation of lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis via equilibrium and ranking of the main process variables. Int J Math Model Methods Appl Sci 9:71–86
Yoshioka T, Hirata S, Matsumura Y, Sakanishi K (2010) Woody biomass resources and conversion in Japan : the current situation and projections to 2010 and 2050 $. 29:336–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.06.016
Funding
The study is funded by the Ministry of Higher of Education Malaysia under Fundamental Grant Research Scheme (Grant Number 5524736) and Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Atikah, M.S.N., Harun, R. Simulation and Optimization of Chlorella vulgaris Gasification Using Aspen Plus. Process Integr Optim Sustain 3, 349–357 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-019-0080-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-019-0080-7