Skip to main content
Log in

State of Art: Vertical Handover Decision Schemes in Next-Generation Wireless Network

  • Review paper
  • Published:
Journal of Communications and Information Networks

Abstract

The state of art pertaining to vertical handover decisions in next-generation wireless networks provides a detailed overview of vertical handover studies. This paper classifies the research initiatives under the vertical handover decision mechanism for heterogeneous wireless networks. A fair comparison of traditional and recent techniques is drafted to obtain direction of the vertical handover decision. Several issues related to seamless support on mobility management techniques have been described in the literature. The next-generation wireless network promises to offer enhanced data services compared to other networks in mobile communication. Since all next generation network (NGN) is an IP-based network, challenges drive toward providing quality of service in the handover process. The necessity of handover process is a seamless connection. The handover operations that minimize or even target the elimination of delay in new network connection establishment are most welcomed. However, frequent disconnection and inefficient seamless handovers result in handover operation failures. Most of the existing methods on handover decisions are based on mobile-controlled handovers. Here, the decisions are in-corporate in the mobile devices. Several mobile-controlled handovers take a single parameter or two or more additional parameters as a combination to evaluate the policy decision. These approaches are carefully studied and classified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Ismail, R. Nordin. Vertical handover solutions over LTE-advanced wireless networks: an overview [J]. Wireless Personal Communications, 2014, 77(4): 3051–3079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. N. Nasser, A. Hasswa, H. Hassanein. Handoffs in fourth generation heterogeneous networks [J]. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2006, 44(10): 96–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Mohanty, I. F. Akyildiz. A cross-layer (layer 2 + 3) handoff management protocol for next-generation wireless systems [J]. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2006, 5(10): 1347–1360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Wang, H. Haas. Dynamic load balancing with handover in hybrid Li-Fi and Wi-Fi networks [J]. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2015, 33(22): 4671–4682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. B. J. Chang, J. F. Chen. Cross-layer-based adaptive vertical handoff with predictive RSS in heterogeneous wireless networks [J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2008, 57(6): 3679–3692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. X. Yan, N. Mani, Y. A. Sekercioglu. A traveling distance prediction based method to minimize unnecessary handovers from cellular networks to WLANs [J]. IEEE Communications Letters, 2008, 12(1): 14–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Hussain, S. A. Malik, S. Abrar, et al. Vertical handover necessity estimation based on a new dwell time prediction model for minimizing unnecessary handovers to a WLAN cell [J]. Wireless Personal Communications, 2013, 71(2): 1217–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. T. M. D. Ali, M. Saquib. Analytical framework for WLAN-cellular voice handover evaluation [J]. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2013, 12(3): 447–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. X. Yan, Y. A. Sekercioglu, S. Narayanan. A survey of vertical handover decision algorithms in Fourth Generation heterogeneous wireless networks [J]. Computer Networks, 2010, 54(11): 1848–1863.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. S. K. Lee, K. Sriram, K. Kim, et al. Vertical handoff decision algorithms for providing optimized performance in heterogeneous wireless networks [J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2009, 58(2): 865–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. M. Q. Al-Ghadi, I. M. Ababneh, W. E. Mardini. Performance study of SINR scheme for Vertical Handoff in wireless networks [J]. Information & Communication Systems, 2011: 137.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Ma, M. Ma. A QoS oriented vertical handoff scheme for WiMAX/WLAN overlay networks [J]. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 2012, 23(4): 598–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. D. W. Lee, G. T. Gil, D. H. Kim. A cost-based adaptive handover hysteresis scheme to minimize the handover failure rate in 3GPP LTE system [J]. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2010, 2010(1): 750173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. K. H. Hong, S. K. Lee, L. Y. Kim, et al. Cost-based vertical handover decision algorithm for WWAN/WLAN integrated networks [J]. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2009, 2009: 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. D. He, C. Chi, S. Chan, et al. A simple and robust vertical handoff algorithm for heterogeneous wireless mobile networks [J]. Wireless Personal Communications, 2011, 59(2): 361–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. R. M. Rodr´iguez-Dagnino, H. Takagi. Application of renewal theory to call handover counting and dynamic location management in cellular mobile networks [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 204(1): 1–13.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. E. A. Alyousfi, M. M. Alkhawlani. Optimization of vertical handover performance using elimination based MCDM algorithm [J]. Journal of Science & Technology, 2016, 21(1).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Z. Becvar, P. Mach, B. Simak. Improvement of handover prediction in mobile WiMAX by using two thresholds [J]. Computer Networks, 2011, 55(16): 3759–3773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. R. M. Abdullah, A. Abdullah, N. A. W. A. Hamid, et al. A network selection algorithm based on enhanced access router discovery in heterogeneous wireless networks [J]. Wireless Personal Communications, 2014, 77(3): 1733–1750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Y. Zhang, L. Chen, Z. Zheng. A utility-based optimal joint call admission control scheme with vertical handoff in heterogeneous wireless networks [J]. Journal of Computers, 2013, 8(12): 3152–3159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. M. N. Hindia, A. W. Reza, K. A. Noordin, et al. Enhanced seamless handover algorithm for WiMAX and LTE roaming [J]. Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2014, 14(4): 9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. S. Liang, Y. Zhang, B. Fan, et al. Multi-attribute vertical handover decision-making algorithm in a hybrid VLC-femto system [J]. IEEE Communications Letters, 2017, 21(7): 1521–1524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. T. Ali, M. Saquib. Analysis of an instantaneous packet loss based vertical handover algorithm for heterogeneous wireless networks [J]. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2014, 13(5): 992–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. C. L. Yang, J. X. Wang, H. Yu, et al. A velocity and transmission environment based handover algorithm for heterogeneous networks [J]. Applied Mechanics & Materials, 2014, 548-549: 1359–1362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. H. H. Choi. An optimal handover decision for throughput enhancement [J]. IEEE Communications Letters, 2010, 14(9): 851–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. P. Bellavista, A. Corradi, L. Foschini. Context-aware handoff middleware for transparent service continuity in wireless networks [J]. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 2007, 3(4): 439–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. M. Zekri, B. Jouaber, D. Zeghlache. Context aware vertical handover decision making in heterogeneous wireless Networks [C]//IEEE 35th Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN), Denver, 2010: 764–768.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. S. Lahde, M. Doering, L. Wolf. Dynamic transport layer handover for heterogeneous communication environments [J]. Computer Communications, 2007, 30(17): 3232–3238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. H. Alhazmi, N. Akkari. An overview of context-aware vertical handover schemes in heterogeneous networks [J]. International Journal of Computer Science & Engineering Survey, 2011, 2(4): 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. A. Sarma, S. Chakraborty, S. Nandi. Deciding handover points based on context-aware load balancing in a WiFi-WiMAX heterogeneous network environment [J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2016, 65(1): 348–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. O. Khattab, O. Alani. A survey on media independent handover (MIH) and IP multimedia subsystem (IMS) in heterogeneous wireless networks [J]. International Journal of Wireless Information Networks, 2013, 20(3): 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Y. Kim, S. Pack, C. G. Kang, et al. An enhanced information server for seamless vertical handover in IEEE 802.21 MIH networks [J]. Computer Networks, 2011, 55(1): 147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Y. K. Salih, O. H. See, S. Yussof. MIH: state of art and a proposed future direction in the heterogeneous wireless networks [J]. Journal of Applied Sciences, 2012, 12(13): 1318–1331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. M. Khan, K. Han. A Review of handover techniques in wireless Ad hoc networks based on IEEE 802.21 media independent handover standard [J]. IETE Technical Review, 2014, 31(5): 353–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. E. M. Malathy, M. Vijayalakshmi. Knapsack-TOPSIS technique for vertical handover in heterogeneous wireless network [J]. PloS One, 2015, 10(8): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. J. Zhou, C. Y. Zhu. Compensatory analysis and optimization for MADM for heterogeneous wireless network selection [J]. Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2016, 2016: 7539454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. A. Chinnappan, R. Balasubramanian. ComplexityCconsistency tradeoff in multi-attribute decision making for vertical handover in heterogeneous wireless networks [J]. IET Networks, 2016, 5(1): 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. E. S. Navarro, J. D. Morales, U. P. Rico. Evaluation of vertical handoff decision algorightms based on madm methods for heterogeneous wireless networks [J]. Journal of Applied Research and Technology, 2012, 10(4): 534–548.

    Google Scholar 

  39. G. Tamea, M. Biagi, S. Member, et al. Soft multi-criteria decision algorithm for vertical handover in heterogeneous networks [J]. IEEE Communications Letters, 2011, 15(11): 1215–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. I. Chamodrakas, D. Martakos. A utility-based fuzzy TOPSIS method for energy efficient network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks [J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2012, 12(7): 1929–1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. M. Kumru, P. Y. Kumru. A fuzzy ANP model for the selection of 3D coordinate-measuring machine [J]. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2015, 26(5): 999–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. R. Trestian, O. Ormond, G. M. Muntean. Performance evaluation of MADM-based methods for network selection in a multimedia wireless environment [J]. Wireless Networks, 2015, 21(5): 1745–1763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. R. Trestian, O. Ormond, G. M. Muntean. Enhanced power-friendly access network selection strategy for multimedia delivery over heterogeneous wireless networks [J]. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, 2014, 60(1): 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. J. Márquez-Barja, C. T. Calafate, J. C. Cano, et al. An overview of vertical handover techniques: Algorithms, protocols and tools [J]. Computer Communications, 2011, 34(8): 985–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. M. Elhoseny, A. Tharwat, A. Farouk, et al. K-coverage model based on genetic algorithm to extend wsn lifetime [J]. IEEE Sensors Letters, 2017, 1(4): 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. X. Yuan, M. Elhoseny, H. K. El-Minir, et al. A genetic algorithmbased, dynamic clustering method towards improved WSN longevity [J]. Journal of Network and Systems Management, 2017, 25(1): 21–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. M. A. Ben-Mubarak, B. M. Ali, N. K. Noordin, et al, Fuzzy logic based self-adaptive handover algorithm for mobileWiMAX [J]. Wireless Personal Communications, 2013, 71(2): 1421–1442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. V. Kantubukta, S. Maheshwari, S. Mahapatra, et al. Energy and quality of service aware FUZZY-technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution based vertical handover decision algorithm for heterogeneous wireless networks [J]. IET Networks, 2013, 2(3): 103–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. M. Zekri, B. Jouaber, D. Zeghlache. A review on mobility management and vertical handover solutions over heterogeneous wireless networks [J]. Computer Communications, 2012, 35(17): 2055–2068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. A. G. Mahira, M. S. Subhedar. Handover decision in wireless heterogeneous networks based on feedforward artificial neural network [M]//Computational Intelligence in Data Mining. Springer, Singapore, 2017: 663–669.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  51. A. S. Sadiq, K. A. Bakar. A fuzzy logic approach for reducing handover latency in wireless networks [J]. Network Protocols and Algorithms, 2011, 2(4): 61–87.

    Google Scholar 

  52. C. A. Sgora, A. Gizelis, D. D. Vergados. Network selection in a WiMAXCWiFi environment [J]. Pervasive and Mobile computing, 2011, 7(5): 584–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. M. Sharma, R. K. Khola. Fuzzy logic based handover decision system [J]. International journal of Ad hoc, Sensor & Ubiquitous Computing, 2012, 3(4): 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. M. Elhoseny, X. Yuan, Z. Yu, et al. Balancing energy consumption in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks using genetic algorithm [J]. IEEE Communications Letters, 2015, 19(12): 2194–2197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. M. Malathy.

Additional information

E. M. Malathy [corresponding author] is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Information Technology, SSN college of Engineering Kalavakkam, Tamil Nadu, India. She received her B.S. degree in Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering from the Government College of Technology, Coimbatore, India. She received her M.E. degree in System Engineering and Operation Research from College of Engineering, Guindy, Anna University. She is now pursuing her Ph.D. degree at College of Engineering, Guindy, Anna University. Her current research work is on optimization of handover decisions in next generation wireless networks. Her research interests include mobile computing, operation research, Modeling & Simulation, Multi-objective Optimization, etc. (Email: malathyem@ssn.edu.in)

Vijayalakshmi Muthuswamy is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Information Science and Technology, Anna University, Chennai. She received her M.E. and Ph.D. degrees from Anna University. She has published 50 articles in journals and conferences. Her research interests include computer networks, mobile cloud, cloud computing. (Email: vijim@ annauniv.edu)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malathy, E.M., Muthuswamy, V. State of Art: Vertical Handover Decision Schemes in Next-Generation Wireless Network. J. Commun. Inf. Netw. 3, 43–52 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41650-018-0009-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41650-018-0009-2

Keywords

Navigation