Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Well-Intentioned Fantasy? A Comment on “Proposals for a Democracy of the Future” by Bruno Frey

  • Comment
  • Published:
Homo Oeconomicus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We argue that Frey’s proposals are utopian and impractical, focusing on four key issues: the complexity of decision-making; politicians’ and technocrats’ importance in decision making processes; reconciling the geography of political rights in a globalising world; and recognizing how power frames political discourse and outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Lea Raible and Leah Trueblood, ‘The Swiss system of referendums and the impossibility of direct democracy’: https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2017/04/04/lea-raible-and-leah-trueblood-the-swiss-system-of-referendums-and-the-impossibility-of-direct-democracy/ (Accessed 13 April 2017).

References

  • Achen, C. H., & Bartels, L. M. (2016). Democracy for realists: why elections do not produce responsive governments. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Criddle, B. (2015). Variable diversity: MPs and candidates. In P. Cowley & D. Kavanagh (Eds.), The British general election of 2015 (pp. 336–363). Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A. (1967). The city in the future of democracy. American Political Science Review, 61, 953–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daley, D. (2016). Ratf**cked: the true story behind the secret plan to steal America’s democracy. New York: Liveright Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G., & Tilley, J. (2017). The new politics of class: the political exclusion of the British working class. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Everett, T. J., & Everett, B. M. (2015). Justice and Gini coefficients. Philosophy, Politics & Economics, 14, 187–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, S., Johnston, R. J., & Manley, D. (2016). If immigrants could vote in the UK: a thought experiment with data from the 2015 general election. The Political Quarterly, 87, 500–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gest, J. (2016). The new minority: white working class politics in an age of immigration and inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodhart, D. (2017). The road to somewhere: the populist revolt and the future of politics. London: C. Hurst and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1978). Law, legislation and liberty: volume III, the political order of a free people. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking: fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key, V. O., Jr. (1966). The responsible electorate. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lamprinakou, C., Morucci, M., Campbell, R., & van Heerde-Hudson, J. (2017). All change in the House? The profile of candidates and MPs in the 2015 British general election. Parliamentary Affairs, 70, 207–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGann, A. J., Smith, C. A., Latner, M., & Keena, A. (2016). Gerrymandering in America: the House of Representatives, the Supreme Court and the future of popular sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Qvortrup, O. (2005). A comparative study of referendums: government by the people. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipman, T. (2016). All out war: Brexit and the sinking of Britain’s political class. London: William Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing, G. (2016). The Precariat: the new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston, D. (2007). The political brain. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. (1961). The rise of the meritocracy, 1870–2033. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ron Johnston.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fox, S., Johnston, R. Well-Intentioned Fantasy? A Comment on “Proposals for a Democracy of the Future” by Bruno Frey. Homo Oecon 34, 229–235 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41412-017-0048-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41412-017-0048-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation