Skip to main content
Log in

Behaviour of Two-Tiered Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Walls

  • Original Article
  • Published:
INAE Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The literature studies and current design methodologies of reinforced soil wall show increases in tensile stresses in reinforcement with increase in height of wall. This results in decrease of spacing between reinforcement and ultimately increases in cost of construction. Alternatively, the reinforced soil wall can be constructed in tiered fashion to improve aesthetic and reduce cost of construction. This paper focuses on the performance of two-tiered-reinforced soil-retaining walls with different offset lengths. A numerical model of geosynthetic-reinforced soil-retaining wall with a concrete-block facing reported in literature is simulated using commercial finite element software ANSYS. The backfill soil is modelled using the Drucker–Prager plasticity model. The concrete facing is simulated as elastic material and reinforcement with non-linear material properties. The results obtained from numerical model are validated with those from physical model studies reported in literature. Using validated model parameters, two-tiered-reinforced soil walls with different offset lengths are simulated. Four models of 0 offset, 1.2-m offset, 2.0-m offset and 3.0-m offset are developed to study the effects of tiered wall. The offset lengths are determined as intermediate offset distance and large setback distance as per FHWA (2010). The walls are studied for horizontal displacement of facing, strain developed in backfill soil and in reinforcement layers. The maximum horizontal displacements of reinforced soil wall decrease with increase in offset length of tiered wall. By considering the strain variation in soil, two deformation zones—shear deformation zone near the facing and compaction zone below the upper tier facing—are identified. The strains in compaction zone of lower tier increase with increase in offset length. The reinforcement strains in top reinforcement layer of lower tier decrease with increase in offset length.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AASHTO (1998) Standard specifications for highway bridges. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • ANSYS v 14.5 (2012) ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg

  • Bathurst RJ, Hatami K (2006) Parametric analysis of reinforced soil walls with different height and reinforcement stiffness. Geosynthetics, ISBN 9059660447, pp 1343–1346

  • Bhattacharjee A, Krishna AM (2012) Development of numerical model of wrap faced walls subjected to seismic excitation. Geosynth Int 19(5):354–369. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.12.00022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharjee A, Krishna AM (2015) Strain behaviour of backfill soil in rigid faced reinforced soil walls subjected to seismic excitation. Int J Geosynth Ground Improv. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-015-0016-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Biglin O (2009) Failure mechanisms governing reinforcement length of geogrid reinforced soil walls. Eng Struct 31:1967–1975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BS 8006 (2010) Code of practice for strengthened/reinforced soils and other fills. Publication no. BS8006-1-2010, British Standards Publication

  • Damians IP, Bathurst RJ, Josa A, Lloret A (2015) Numerical analysis of an instrumented steel-reinforced soil wall. Int J Geomech ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0000394

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich M, Mirmoradi SH (2013) Evaluation of the effects of facing stiffness and toe resistance on the behavior of GRS walls. Geotext Geomembr 40(2013):28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FHWA (2010) Mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes design and construction guidelines. Vol. 1, 2. Publication No. FHWA-NHI-10-024, US Department of Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)

  • FHWA (2010) Mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes design and construction guidelines. Vol. 1, 2. Publication No. FHWA-NHI-10-024, US Department of Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)

  • Guler E, Hamderi M, Demirkan MM (2007) Numerical analysis of reinforced soil-retaining wall structures with cohesive and granular backfills. Geosynth Int 14(6):330–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatami K, Bathurst RJ (2005) Development and verification of a numerical model for the analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced soil segmental walls under working stress conditions. Can Geotech J 42(4):1066–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatami K, Bathurst RJ (2006) Numerical model for reinforced soil segmental walls under surcharge loading. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132(6):673–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho SK, Rowe RK (1996) Effect of wall geometry on the behavior of reinforced soil walls. Geotext Geomembr 14(10):521–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpurapu R, Bathurst RJ (1995) Behaviour of geosynthetic reinforced soil retaining walls using the finite element method. Comput Geotechn 17:279–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koener RM, Soong T (2000) Geosynthetic reinforced segmental retaining walls. Geotext Geomembr 19:359–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koerner RM, Koerner GR (2013) A database, statistics and recommendations regarding 171 failed geosynthetic reinforced mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls. Geotext Geomembr 40:20–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KVZZ, Wu JTH (2004) A synthesis of case histories on GRS bridge-supporting structures with flexible facing. Geotext Geomembr 22:181–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leshchinsky D, Han J (2004) Geosynthetic reinforced multitiered walls. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130(12):1225–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling HI, Leshchinsky D (2003) Finite element parameter studies of the behavior of segmental block reinforced soil retaining walls. Geosynth Int 10(3):77–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling HI, Cardany CP, Sun L-X, Hashimoto H (2000) Finite element study of a geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining wall with concrete-block facing. Geosynth Int 7(3):163–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H (2011a) Long-term lateral displacement of geosynthetic-reinforced soil segmental retaining walls. Geotext Geomembr 32:18–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Ling HI (2012) Seismic response of reinforced soil retaining walls and strain-softening of backfill soil. Int J Geomech ASCE 12(4):351–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Yang G, Ling HI (2014) Seismic response of multi-tiered reinforced soil retaining walls. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 61–62(2014):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed SBA, Yang KH, Hung WY (2014) Finite element analyses of two-tier geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls: comparison involving centrifuge tests and limit equilibrium results. Comput Geotechn 61(2014):67–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NCMA (1997) Design manual for segmental retaining walls. In: Collin J (ed) 2nd Edition, National Concrete Masonry Association, Herndon

  • NCMA (1998) Segmental retaining walls seismic design manual. In: Bathurst RJ (ed) National Concrete Masonry Association, First Edition, Herndon

  • Rowe RK, Ho SK (1997) Continuous panel reinforced soil walls on rigid foundations. J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng 123(10):912–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe RK, Skinner GD (2001) Numerical analysis of geosynthetic reinforced retaining wall constructed on a layered soil foundation. Geotext Geomembr 19:387–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shinde AL, Mandal JN (2007) Behaviour of reinforced soil retaining wall with limited fill zone. Geotech Geol Eng 25:657–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner GD, Rowe RK (2005) Design and behavior of a geosynthetic reinforced retaining wall and bridge abutment on a yielding foundation. Geotext Geomembr 23(3):234–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatsuoka F, Tataeyama M, Mohri Y, Matsushima K (2007) Remedial treatment of soil structures using geosynthetic-reinforcing technology. Geotext Geomembr 25(4–5):204–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FHWA (2001). Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes Design and Construction Guidelines. Publication No. FHWA-NHI-00-043, US Department of Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)

  • Liu H (2011) Comparing seismic responses of single and multi-tiered geosynthetic reinforced soil walls. Geo-Frontiers Congress 2011, Dallas

  • Yang G, Zhang B, Lv P, Zhou Q (2009) Behaviour of geogrid reinforced soil retaining wall with concrete-rigid facing. Geotext Geomembr 27:350–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang KHJ, Zornberg G, Liu CN, Lin HD (2012) Stress distribution and development within geosynthetic-reinforced soil slopes. Geosynth Int 19(1):62–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo C, Jung H-Y (2004) Measured behaviour of geosynthetic-reinforced segmental retaining wall in a tiered configuration. Geotext Geomembr 22:359–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo C, Kim S (2008) Performance of two-tier geosynthetic reinforced segmental retaining wall under a surcharge load: full scale load test and 3D finite element analysis. Geotext Geomembr 26:460–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arup Bhattacharjee.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhattacharjee, A., Amin, M.U. Behaviour of Two-Tiered Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Walls. INAE Lett 4, 91–100 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41403-019-00069-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41403-019-00069-7

Keywords

Navigation