Abstract
An experimental muon source is planned for the China Spallation Neutron Source. A simplified beamline with a limited number of magnets is achieved using a FODO lattice for implementation in a future preliminary stage. The yield of the muon delivered to the experimental sample is slightly larger than 105 μ+/s within the FWHM beam spot (~ Ø30 mm) from a thick muon target. In addition, the beam polarization is 92% and the contamination that is mainly formed by positrons is approximately a fraction of 1%.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
F. Foroughi, E. Morenzoni, T. Prokscha et al., Upgrading the PSI muon facility. Hyperfine Interact. 138(1–4), 483–488 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020830830050
R. Abela, F. Foroughi, D. Renker, Muon beams at PSI. Z. Phys. C Part. Fields 56(1), S240–S242 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426803
T. Prokscha, E. Morenzoni, K. Deiters et al., The new μE4 beam at PSI: a hybrid-type large acceptance channel for the generation of a high intensity surface-muon beam. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 595(2), 317–331 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2008.07.081
G.M. Marshall, Muon beams and facilities at TRIUMF. Z. Phys. C Part. Fields 56(1), S226–S231 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426801
J.L. Beveridge, J. Doornbos, D.M. Garner, Muon facilities at TRIUMF. Hyperfine Interact. 32(1–4), 907–912 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02395002
A.D. Hillier, D.J. Adams, P.J. Baker et al., Developments at the ISIS muon source and the concomitant benefit to the user community. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 551, 012067 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/551/1/012067
T. Matsuzaki, K. Ishida, K. Nagamine et al., The RIKEN-RAL pulsed muon facility. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 465, 365–383 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00694-5
Y. Miyake, K. Shimomura, N. Kawamura et al., J-PARC muon facility, MUSE. Phys. Proc. 30, 46–49 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2012.04.037
P. Strasser, A. Koda, et al. Status of the new surface muon beamline at J-PARC MUSE, in Proceeding of 14th International Conference on Muon Spin Rotation, Relaxation and Resonance (μSR2017) (2018), p. 011061. https://doi.org/10.7566/jpscp.21.011061
R. Kadono, Y. Miyake, MUSE, the goddess of muons, and her future. Rep. Prog. Phys. 75(2), 026302 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/75/2/026302
H.S. Chen, X.L. Wang, China’s first pulsed neutron source. Nat. Mater. 15(7), 689–691 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4655
H.T. Jing, C. Meng, J.Y. Tang et al., Production target and muon collection studies for an experimental muon source at CSNS. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 684(684), 109–116 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2012.05.045
K. Nagamine, Pulsed μSR facility at the KEK Booster. Hyperfine Interact. 8(4–6), 787–795 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01037563
A. Ferrari, P. R. Sala, A. Fasso, et al. FLUKA: A Multi-Particle Transport Code. Technical report, CERN-2005-10 (2005). https://doi.org/10.2172/877507
PSI Graphic Transport Framework, by U. Rohrer based on a CERN-SLAC-FERMILAB version by K.L. Brown et al
T. J. Roberts, D. M. Kaplan, G4beamline simulation program for matter-dominated beam lines, in 2007 IEEE Particle Accelerator Conference (PAC). https://doi.org/10.1109/pac.2007.4440461
S.Y. Lee, Accelerator Physics, 3rd edn. (M. World Scientific, Singapore, 2011). https://doi.org/10.1142/8335
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank all colleagues in the EMuS collaborations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11575217, 11527811).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, LP., Mu, QL., Jing, HT. et al. A possible scheme for the surface muon beamline at CSNS. NUCL SCI TECH 30, 169 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-019-0684-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-019-0684-1