Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of nanoclay and burnt limestone powder on fresh and hardened properties of self-compacting concrete

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Nanotechnology for Environmental Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The growing rate of cement production and construction waste due to rapid urbanization is producing environmental threat. Therefore, it is necessary to replace fully or partially with reinforcement material. Thus, in this research work, sulfate resistance cement (SRC) was replaced with different weight percentages of nanoclay (NC) (2, 4 and 6%) and burnt limestone powder (BLP) (50, 75 and 100 kg) to produce self-compacting concrete (SCC) for investigating the fresh and hardened properties. The local Iraqi natural Kaolin clay was calcinated at 700 °C for 2 h and milled for 40 h through ball milling to produce NC. Further, the limestone powder was burnt at 700 °C for 2 h and partially replaced with SRC. The ball milling successfully reduced clay to a particle size of < 75 nm sized for NC. Moreover, the inclusion of NC and BLP significantly affected the fresh properties of SCC. For hardened properties, the inclusion of both mixtures gradually increased hardened properties; however, the NC-incorporating SCC specimens have higher hardened properties than reference SCC (SCC0), whereas the lower weight percentages of BLP provided insignificant hardened properties. Additionally, as based on results, both mixture material (NC and BLP) can be utilized for producing SCC.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Okamura H, Ouchi M (1998) Self-compacting high-performance concrete. ProgStructEng Mater 1(4):378–383

    Google Scholar 

  2. Khayat KH, Feys D (2010) Design, production and placement of self-consolidating concrete. In: Proceedings of SCC2010, Montreal, Canada, September 26–29, 2010, vol 1. Springer

  3. Zerbino R, Giaccio G, Isaia GC (2011) Concrete incorporating rice-husk ash without processing. Constr Build Mater 25(1):371–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liew KM, Sojobi AO, Zhang LW (2017) Green concrete: Prospects and challenges. Constr Build Mater 156:1063–1095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Prusty JK, Patro SK, Basarkar S (2016) Concrete using agro-waste as fine aggregate for sustainable built environment—a review. Int J Sustain Built Environ 5(2):312–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rashad AM, Sadek DM (2016) An investigation on Portland cement replaced by high-volume GGBS pastes modified with micro-sized metakaolin subjected to elevated temperatures. Int J Sustain Built Environ

  7. Sojobi AO (2016) Evaluation of the performance of eco-friendly lightweight interlocking concrete paving units incorporating sawdust wastes and laterite. Cogent Eng 3(1):1255168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jin R, Chen Q (2013) An investigation of current status of ‘‘green” concrete in the construction industry. In: 49th ASC annual international conference proceedings

  9. Baikerikar A (2014) A review on green concrete. J EmergTechnolInnov Res 1(6):472–474

    Google Scholar 

  10. Imbabi MS, Carrigan C, McKenna S (2012) Trends and developments in green cement and concrete technology. Int J Sustain Built Environ 1(2):194–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hadzima-Nyarko M, Nyarko EK, Lu H et al (2020) Machine learning approaches for estimation of compressive strength of concrete. EurPhys J Plus 135:682. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00703-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Heikal M, Ibrahim NS (2016) Hydration, microstructure and phase composition of composite cements containing nano-clay. Constr Build Mater 112:19–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kabir S, Al-Shayeb A, Khan IM (2016) Recycled construction debris as concrete aggregate for sustainable construction materials. ProcediaEng 145:1518–1525

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mehta A, Siddique R (2016) An overview of geopolymers derived from industrial by-products. Constr Build Mater 127:183–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dash MK, Patro SK, Rath AK (2016) Sustainable use of industrial-waste as partial replacement of fine aggregate for preparation of concrete–A review. Int J Sustain Built Environ 5(2):484–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tayeh BA, Hadzima-Nyarko M, Zeyad AM, Al-Harazin SZ (2021) Properties and durability of concrete with olive waste ash as a partial cement replacement. AdvConcretConstr 11(1):59–71. https://doi.org/10.12989/acc.2021.11.1.059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Olar R (2011) Nanomaterials and nanotechnologies for civil engineering. BulInstitutuluiPoliteh din lasi Sect ConstrArhit 57(4):109

    Google Scholar 

  18. Birgisson B, Mukhopadhyay AK, Geary G, Khan M, Sobolev K (2012) Nanotechnology in concrete materials: a synopsis. Transp Res Circ 170:1

    Google Scholar 

  19. Said AM, Zeidan MS, Bassuoni MT, Tian Y (2012) Properties of concrete incorporating nano-silica. Constr Build Mater 36:838–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Siddique R, Mehta A (2014) Effect of carbon nanotubes on properties of cement mortars. Constr Build Mater 50:116–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Norhasri M, Sidek M, Hamidah MS, Fadzil AM, Abd Halim AG, Zaidi MR (2014) Fresh state behaviour of cement paste containing nano kaolin. Adv Mater Res 925:28–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Alobaidi YM, Hilal NN, Faraj RH (2020) An experimental investigation on the nano-fly ash preparation and its effects on the performance of self-compacting concrete at normal and elevated temperatures. Nanotechnology for Environmental Engineering, available online since November, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41204-020-00098-6.

  23. Nehdi ML (2014) Clay in cement-based materials: Critical overview of state-of-the-art. Constr Build Mater 51:372–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hamed N, El-Feky MS, Kohail M, Nasr E-SAR (2019) Effect of nano-clay de-agglomeration on mechanical properties of concrete. Constr Build Mater 205:245–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Norhasri MSM, Hamidah MS, Fadzil AM (2017) Applications of using nano material in concrete: a review. Constr Build Mater 133:91–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Morsy MS, Alsayed SH, Aqel M (2010) Effect of nano-clay on mechanical properties and microstructure of ordinary Portland cement mortar. Int J Civ Environ Eng IJCEE-IJENS 10(01):23–27

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mohamed AM (2016) Influence of nano materials on flexural behavior and compressive strength of concrete. HBRC J 12(2):212–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang WC (2017) Compressive strength and thermal conductivity of concrete with nanoclay under Various High-Temperatures. Constr Build Mater 147:305–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Brightson P, Baskar G, Gnanappa SB (2013) Strength and durability analysis of nano clay in concrete. Life Sci J 10:1172–1177

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kafi MA, Sadeghi-Nik A, Bahari A, Sadeghi-Nik A, Mirshafiei E (2016) Microstructural characterization and mechanical properties of cementitious mortar containing montmorillonite nanoparticles. J Mater CivEng 28(12):4016155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hakamy A, Shaikh FUA, Low IM (2015) Characteristics of nanoclay and calcinednanoclay-cement nanocomposites. Compos Part B Eng 78:174–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fan Y, Zhang S, Wang Q, Shah SP (2016) The effects of nano-calcined kaolinite clay on cement mortar exposed to acid deposits. Constr Build Mater 102:486–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Fan Y, Zhang S, Wang Q, Shah SP (2015) Effects of nano-kaolinite clay on the freeze–thaw resistance of concrete. CemConcr Compos 62:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hosseini P, Afshar A, Vafaei B, Booshehrian A, MolaeiRaisi E, Esrafili A (2017) Effects of nano-clay particles on the short-term properties of self-compacting concrete. Eur J Environ CivEng 21(2):127–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Aïtcin P-C (2007) Binders for durable and sustainable concrete. CRC Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Group S-CCEP (2005) The European guidelines for self-compacting concrete: Specification, production and use. International Bureau for Precast Concrete (BIBM)

  37. EFNARC (2005) Specification and guidelines for self-compacting concrete. European Federation for Specifications Construction Chemical & Concrete System. http://www.efnarc.org.

  38. B. S. EN (2002) 12390–3, Testing hardened concrete-Part 3: Compressive strength of test specimens. Br. Stand. Inst.

  39. ASTM C78/C78M-15a (2015) Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  40. ASTM C496/C496M-17 (2017) Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  41. ASTM C 642 (2006) Density, absorption, and voids in hardened concrete. American Society for Testing and Materials

  42. ASTM C597–09 (2009) Standard test method for pulse velocity through concrete. American Concrete Institute

  43. Kwalramani MA, Syed ZI (2018) Application of nanomaterials to enhance microstructure and mechanical properties of concrete. Int J IntegrEng 10(2):1

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kawashima S, Kim JH, Corr DJ, Shah SP (2012) Study of the mechanisms underlying the fresh-state response of cementitious materials modified with nanoclays. Construct Build Mater 36:749–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Shi C (2001) Studies on several factors affecting hydration and properties of lime-pozzolan cements. J Mater CivEng 13(6):441–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Mohd Faizal MJ, Hamidah MS, Muhd Norhasri MS (2014) Strength and chloride content of nanoclayed ultra-high performance concrete. In: Proceeding on structure, materials and construction engineering conference (CONS ENG’14), DAKAM, pp. 99–111

  47. Newman J, Choo BS (2003) Advanced concrete technology 2: concrete properties. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kawashima S, Kim JH, Corr DJ, Shah SP (2012) Study of the mechanisms underlying the fresh-state response of cementitious materials modified with nanoclays. Constr Build Mater 36:749–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Tregger NA, Pakula ME, Shah SP (2010) Influence of clays on the rheology of cement pastes. CemConcr Res 40(3):384–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Li Z (2011) Advanced concrete technology. Wiley

    Book  Google Scholar 

  51. Du S, Wu J, AlShareedah O, Shi X (2019) Nanotechnology in cement-based materials: a review of durability, modeling, and advanced characterization. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) 9(9):1213. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9091213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Heikal M, Ismail MN, Ibrahim NS (2015) Physico-mechanical, microstructure characteristics and fire resistance of cement pastes containing Al2O3 nano-particles. Constr Build Mater 91:232–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Benjeddou O, Soussi C, Jedidi M, Benali M (2017) Experimental and theoretical study of the effect of the particle size of limestone fillers on the rheology of self-compacting concrete. J Build Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2017.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Hosseini P, Hosseinpourpia R, Pajum A, Khodavirdi MM, Izadi H, Vaezi A (2014) Effect of nano-particles and aminosilane interaction on the performances of cement-based composites: an experimental study. Constr Build Mater 66:113–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Alrashedi B, Hassan M (2018) Effects of nano and micro size of clay particles on the compressive and tensile strength properties of selfconsolidating concrete. MATEC Web Conf 162:02030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Khan MNN, Jamil M, Karim MR, Zain MFM, Kaish A (2017) Filler effect of pozzolanic materials on the strength and microstructure development of mortar. KSCE J CivEng 21(1):274–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Heirman G, Vandewalle L (2003) The influence of fillers on the properties of self-compacting concrete in fresh and hardened state. In: 3rd International symposium on self-consolidating concrete, Reykjavik, Iceland, pp 606–608

  58. Klug Y, Holschemacher K (2003) Comparison of the hardened properties of self-compacting and normal vibrated concrete. In: 3rd International symposium on self- compacting concrete, Reykjavik, Iceland, pp 596–605

  59. Mehta PK, Monteiro PJM (2017) Concrete microstructure, properties and materials

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nahla Hilal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alani, N.Y., Al-Jumaily, I.A. & Hilal, N. Effect of nanoclay and burnt limestone powder on fresh and hardened properties of self-compacting concrete. Nanotechnol. Environ. Eng. 6, 20 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41204-021-00114-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41204-021-00114-3

Keywords

Navigation