Abstract
Real-world decision-making challenges tend to evolve into more intricate scenarios over time. In this context, the Fermatean fuzzy set emerges as an efficient and convenient framework, adept at illustrating the uncertainties inherent in multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems. To address decision-making challenges intertwined with uncertainties, the fundamental objective of this study is to develop a Fermatean fuzzy MCDM tool. This tool aims to expand users’ scope to articulate their opinions and viewpoints. As a preliminary step, the study begins by elucidating the computation of the degree of proximity between the optimal alternative and its counterparts. This article presents the concept, representation, and pertinent characteristics of the Spearman rank correlation coefficient (CC) within the context of Fermatean fuzzy sets. Subsequent to this, a multi-criteria decision-making technique, fortified by incorporating Fermatean fuzzy operators (FFOs), is formulated based on the proposed Spearman rank CC. Ultimately, we demonstrate the significance and efficacy of the introduced approach by showcasing its application in a real-world context, specifically within the domain of supplier selection decision-making. The results revealed that the primary advantage of the provided decision rule lies in its potential to effectively reduce production costs and streamline complexity within the context of supplier selection problems, both in theory and practical application. We demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method in delivering reliable outcomes through a comprehensive analysis of FFOs and a comparative assessment against established techniques. A concrete case study is employed to firmly establish the stability and credibility of FFOs when combined with the Spearman rank CC. Additionally, this study carefully conducts a comprehensive comparative evaluation, comparing the previously developed methods with the newly proposed approach. This reinforces the robustness and authenticity of the FFO-based methodology and highlights its unique and practical nature.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
No data were used to support this study.
References
Aczel AD, Sounderpandian J (1999) Complete business statistics. Irwin/McGraw Hill, Boston
Akram M, Shahzadi G, Alcantud JCR (2022) Multi-attribute decision-making with q-rung picture fuzzy information. Granul Comput 7:197–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-021-00260-8
Ali A, Rashid T (2019) Hesitant fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications. Int J Intell Syst 34(8):1953–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22131
Alipour M, Hafezi R, Rani P, Hafezi M, Mardani A (2021) A new Pythagorean fuzzy-based decision-making method through entropy measure for fuel cell and hydrogen components supplier selection. Energy 234:121208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121208
Asim A, Nasar R, Rashid T (2019) Correlation coefficient of intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy sets based on informational energy and their applications to clustering analysis. Soft Comput 23:10393–10406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3591-1
Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20(1):87–96
Atanassov KT (2012) On intuitionistic fuzzy sets theory. Springer
Beg I, Rashid T (2014) Multi-criteria trapezoidal valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision making with Choquet integral based TOPSIS. Opsearch 51:8–129
Bonizzoni P, Vedova GD, Dondi R, Jiang T (2008) Correlation clustering and consensus clustering. Lect Notes Comput Sci 3827:226–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/11602613-24
Bustince H, Burillo P (1995) Correlation of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 74(2):237–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(94)00343-6
Broumi S, Smarandache F (2013) Correlation coefficient of interval neutrosophic set. Appl Mech Mater 436:511–7
Chen SM, Phuong BD (2017) Fuzzy time series forecasting based on optimal partitions of intervals and optimal weighting vectors. Knowl Based Syst 118:204–16
Chen SM, Niou SJ (2011) Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on fuzzy preference relations. Expert Syst Appl 38(4):3865–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.09.047
Chen SJ, Chen SM (2001) A new method to measure the similarity between fuzzy numbers. In: 10th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems.(Cat. No. 01CH37297) (Vol. 3, pp. 1123-1126). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZ.2001.1008852
Chen SM, Randyanto Y (2013) A novel similarity measure between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its applications. Int J Pattern Recognit Artif 27(07):1350021
Chen SM, Randyanto Y, Cheng SH (2016) Fuzzy queries processing based on intuitionistic fuzzy social relational networks. Inf Sci 327:110–24
Chen SM, Wang NY (2010) Fuzzy forecasting based on fuzzy-trend logical relationship groups. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 40(5):1343–58. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCB.2009.2038358
Chen SM, Ko YK, Chang YC, Pan JS (2009) Weighted fuzzy interpolative reasoning based on weighted increment transformation and weighted ratio transformation techniques. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 17(6):1412–27. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2009.2032651
Cheng Y, Zhao F, Zhang Q, Wang G (2021) A survey on granular computing and its uncertainty measure from the perspective of rough set theory. Granul Comput 6:3–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-019-00204-3
Dikbaş F (2018) A new two-dimensional rank correlation coefficient. Water Resour Manag 32(5):1539–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1886-0
Ejegwa PA (2021) Generalized triparametric correlation coefficient for Pythagorean fuzzy sets with application to MCDM problems. Granul comput 6(3):557–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-020-00215-5
Faizi S, Sałabun W, Rashid T, Zafar S, Wątróbski J (2020) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets in multi-criteria group decision making problems using the characteristic objects method. Symmetry 12(9):1382
Faizi S, Svitenko H, Rashid T, Zafar S, Sałabun W (2023) Some operations and properties of the cubic intuitionistic set with application in multi-criteria decision-making. Mathematics 11(5):1190
Feng F, Zhang C, Akram M, Zhang J (2023) Multiple attribute decision making based on probabilistic generalized orthopair fuzzy sets. Granul Comput 8(4):863–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-022-00358-7
Garg H (2016a) A novel accuracy function under interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy environment for solving multicriteria decision making problem. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 31(1):529–40
Garg H (2016b) A novel correlation coefficients between Pythagorean fuzzy sets and its applications to decision-making processes. Int J Intell Syst 12:1234–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21827
Garg H (2017) Novel intuitionistic fuzzy decision making method based on an improved operation laws and its application. Eng Appl Artif Intell 60:164–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2017.02.008
Gerstenkorn T, Mańko J (1991) Correlation of intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 44(1):39–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(91)90031-K
Gou X, Xu Z, Ren P (2016) The properties of continuous Pythagorean fuzzy information. Int J Intell Syst 31(5):401–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21788
Gul M, Lo HW, Yucesan M (2021) Fermatean fuzzy TOPSIS-based approach for occupational risk assessment in manufacturing. Complex Intell Syst 7:2635–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-021-00417-7
Hajiaghaei-Keshteli M, Cenk Z, Erdebilli B, Özdemir YS, Gholian-Jouybari F (2023) Pythagorean fuzzy TOPSIS method for green supplier selection in the food industry. Expert Syst Appl 224:120036
Hanafy IM, Salama AA, Mahfouz K (2012) Correlation of neutrosophic data. Int Refereed J Eng Sci 1(2):39–43
Hong DH (2006) Fuzzy measures for a correlation coefficient of fuzzy numbers under TW (the weakest t-norm)-based fuzzy arithmetic operations. Inf Sci 176(2):150–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2004.11.005
Hong DH (1998) A note on correlation of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 95(1):113–7
Hung WL, Wu JW (2002) Correlation of intuitionistic fuzzy sets by centroid method. Inf Sci 144(1–4):219–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-0255(02)00181-0
Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Methods for multiple attribute decision making. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications a state-of-the-art survey. Lect Notes Econ Math Syst 2:58–191
Kumar K, Chen SM (2021) Multiattribute decision making based on the improved intuitionistic fuzzy Einstein weighted averaging operator of intuitionistic fuzzy values. Inf Sci 568:369–83
Kumar K, Chen SM (2022) Group decision making based on advanced intuitionistic fuzzy weighted Heronian mean aggregation operator of intuitionistic fuzzy values. Inf Sci 601:306–22
Kraljic P (1983) Purchasing must become supply chain management. Harv Bus Rev 2:109–117
Kriegel HP, Kroger P, Schubert E, Zimek A (2008) A General framework for increasing the robustness of PCA-based correlation clustering algorithms. Lect Notes Comput Sci 5069:418–435
Liu P, Chen SM, Wang Y (2020) Multiattribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy partitioned Maclaurin symmetric mean operators. Info Sci 512:830–54
Mafakheri F, Dai L, Slezak D, Nasiri F (2007) Project delivery system selection under uncertainty: Multicriteria multilevel decision aid model. J Manag Eng 23(4):200–6
Mu Z, Zeng S, Liu Q (2018) Some interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Zhenyuan aggregation operators and their application to multi-attribute decision making. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowlege-Based Syst 04:633–53
Myers JL, Well AD, Lorch RF (2010) Introduction to multiple regression. Res Des Stat Anal 52:528–547
Noor Q, Rashid T, Beg I (2023) Multi-attribute group decision-making based on probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy Maclaurin symmetric mean operators. Granul Comput 8(3):633–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-022-00346-x
Opricovic S (2009) A Compromise solution in water resources planning. Water Resour Manag 23:1549–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9340-y
Parasuraman A (1980) Vendor segmentation: an additional level of market segmentation. Ind Mark Manag 9(1):59–62
Park DG, Kwun YC, Park JH, Park IY (2009) Correlation coefficient of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application to multiple attribute group decision making problems. Math Comput Model 50(9–10):1279–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2009.06.010
Peng X, Yuan H (2016) Fundamental properties of Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators. Fundam Inform 147(4):415–46. https://doi.org/10.3233/FI-2016-1415
Peng X, Yang Y (2015) Some results for Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 30(11):1133–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21738
Pramanik S, Roy R, Roy TK, Smarandache F (2017) Multi criteria decision making using correlation coefficient under rough neutrosophic environment. Infinite Study
Rashid T, Ali A, Chu Y-M (2021) Hybrid BW-EDAS MCDM methodology for optimal industrial robot selection. PLoS ONE 16(2):e0246738. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246738
Reformat MZ, Yager RR (2014) Suggesting recommendations using Pythagorean fuzzy sets illustrated using Netflix movie data. In International conference on information processing and management of uncertainty in knowledge-based systems (pp 546-556). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08795-5-56
Ren P, Xu Z, Gou X (2016) Pythagorean fuzzy TODIM approach to multi-criteria decision making. Appl Soft Comput 42:246–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.12.020
Rezaei A, Aghsami A, Rabbani M (2021) Supplier selection and order allocation model with disruption and environmental risks in centralized supply chain. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 12:1036–1072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-021-01164-1
Senapati T, Yager RR (2020) Fermatean fuzzy sets. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 11:663–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01377-0
Senapati T, Yager RR (2019) Fermatean fuzzy weighted averaging/geometric operators and its application in multi-criteria decision-making methods. Eng Appl Artif Intell 85:112–21
Sharaf IM (2020) Supplier selection using a flexible interval-valued fuzzy VIKOR. Granul Comput 5:485–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-019-00169-3
Singh A, Kumar S (2021) Picture fuzzy Choquet integral-based VIKOR for multicriteria group decision-making problems. Granul Comput 6:587–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-020-00218-2
Sun H, Zhang B, Ni W (2022) A hybrid model based on SEM and fuzzy TOPSIS for supplier selection. Mathematics. 10(19):3505. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10193505
Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (2010) The Spearman rank correlation coefficient between intuitionistic fuzzy sets. In 2010 5th IEEE international conference intelligent systems (pp. 276-280). IEEE
Verma R, Mittal A (2023) Multiple attribute group decision-making based on novel probabilistic ordered weighted cosine similarity operators with Pythagorean fuzzy information. Granul Comput 8(1):111–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-022-00318-1
Wang G, Li X (1999) Correlation and information energy of interval-valued fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets Syst 103(1):169–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00303-5
Wei GW, Wang HJ, Lin R (2011) Application of correlation coefficient to interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making with incomplete weight. Knowl Inf Syst 26:337–349
Yager RR (2013) Pythagorean fuzzy subsets. In: 2013 joint IFSA world congress and NAFIPS annual meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS) (pp 57-61). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IFSA-NAFIPS.2013.6608375
Yager RR, Alajlan N (2017) Approximate reasoning with generalized orthopair fuzzy sets. Inf Fusion 38:65–73
Ye J (2010) Multi-criteria fuzzy decision-making method using entropy weights-based correlation coefficients of interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Appl Math Model 34:3864–3870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2010.03.025
Ye J (2010) Fuzzy decision-making method based on the weighted correlation coefficient under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Eur J Oper Res 205(1):202–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.01.019
Ye J (2013) Another form of correlation coefficient between single valued neutrosophic sets and its multiple attribute decision-making method. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 1(1):8–12
Ye J (2017) Correlation coefficient between dynamic single valued neutrosophic multisets and its multiple attribute decision-making method. Information 8(2):41
Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf control 8(3):338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
Zhang X, Xu Z (2014) Extension of TOPSIS to multiple criteria decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 12:1061–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21676
Zou XY, Chen SM, Fan KY (2020) Multiple attribute decision making using improved intuitionistic fuzzy weighted geometric operators of intuitionistic fuzzy values. Inf Sci 535:242–53
Acknowledgements
We are thankful to the editor and reviewers for their comments and suggestions to improve the quality of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MA: conceptulization, methodolgy, data curation, writing—original draft. TR: investigation, supervision. AA: writing—review and editing, validation, supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Funding
No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Amman, M., Rashid, T. & Ali, A. Fermatean fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making based on Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Granul. Comput. 8, 2005–2019 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-023-00421-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-023-00421-x