Skip to main content
Log in

Fermatean fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making based on Spearman rank correlation coefficient

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Granular Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Real-world decision-making challenges tend to evolve into more intricate scenarios over time. In this context, the Fermatean fuzzy set emerges as an efficient and convenient framework, adept at illustrating the uncertainties inherent in multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems. To address decision-making challenges intertwined with uncertainties, the fundamental objective of this study is to develop a Fermatean fuzzy MCDM tool. This tool aims to expand users’ scope to articulate their opinions and viewpoints. As a preliminary step, the study begins by elucidating the computation of the degree of proximity between the optimal alternative and its counterparts. This article presents the concept, representation, and pertinent characteristics of the Spearman rank correlation coefficient (CC) within the context of Fermatean fuzzy sets. Subsequent to this, a multi-criteria decision-making technique, fortified by incorporating Fermatean fuzzy operators (FFOs), is formulated based on the proposed Spearman rank CC. Ultimately, we demonstrate the significance and efficacy of the introduced approach by showcasing its application in a real-world context, specifically within the domain of supplier selection decision-making. The results revealed that the primary advantage of the provided decision rule lies in its potential to effectively reduce production costs and streamline complexity within the context of supplier selection problems, both in theory and practical application. We demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method in delivering reliable outcomes through a comprehensive analysis of FFOs and a comparative assessment against established techniques. A concrete case study is employed to firmly establish the stability and credibility of FFOs when combined with the Spearman rank CC. Additionally, this study carefully conducts a comprehensive comparative evaluation, comparing the previously developed methods with the newly proposed approach. This reinforces the robustness and authenticity of the FFO-based methodology and highlights its unique and practical nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No data were used to support this study.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to the editor and reviewers for their comments and suggestions to improve the quality of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MA: conceptulization, methodolgy, data curation, writing—original draft. TR: investigation, supervision. AA: writing—review and editing, validation, supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Amman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Funding

No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amman, M., Rashid, T. & Ali, A. Fermatean fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making based on Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Granul. Comput. 8, 2005–2019 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-023-00421-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-023-00421-x

Keywords

Navigation